(04-10-2026, 04:37 PM)Himu wrote: Bring back three strikes, broken window laws, and the war on drugs.
These never went away.
(04-10-2026, 04:37 PM)Himu wrote: I can admit that I was wrong on ending the drug war. It puts undesirables in their place and hard on crime laws makes those unable to behave in society to die in prison the way they should. It's good for the black community because the more riff raff are in jail the less they're able to procreate.
This is another perfect example of your typical illogical and irrational thinking and almost random solution chasing. The war on drugs caused the Black criminality problem you're focused on. You see the result of a bunch of things becoming inherently treated as violent criminality, see a whole swath of the culture pushed into violent criminality without any sort of conscious choice on their part, then lament the fact that a large part of the culture has taken up criminality as their culture and so decide that the answer is a need for even greater criminality. It would make more sense if your lament was that there's some Black people who don't wind up as criminals.
And you're so focused on Black criminality that you don't see the white criminality or Hispanic criminality that stems from the "solution" you're demanding more of even as it has never, in a century, achieved any of its goals except expansion of the state and the removal of responsibility that state violence represents.
If the War on Drugs was ended then responsibility would return with it, you don't see it because you don't see how criminalization requires dispute resolution to take the form of further criminal activity. If the premises of the War on Drugs were correct then surely we should see greater criminality in the now decriminalized dispensary market. But we don't, it remains in the criminalized supplier market. It's pretty simple logic, if I can sue you or call the police when you wrong me I don't have to have people murder you and form a gang to protect my criminal operation from similar.
You don't want this, you
want the Black population to be forced into greater criminal dispute resolution. You solve your cognitive dissonance by assuming the state is perfect and can achieve its stated goals, so you see the carnage of the state in your community and determine the answer is the state simply didn't do enough. Despite a century and trillions spent on it. You ignore the cost to everyone and the massive effort put into it by telling yourself "if only the state knew." You invent an enemy that's undermining the state's perfect efforts even as the enforcement has never waivered, even as the criminalization has never stopped increasing, even as the "Obama judiciary" releasing people is because the system cannot keep up with the enforcement levels demanded, even as the costs have spiraled to untold of levels. No, no, the answer must be that nothing is being done or it's being sabotaged, why else wouldn't the solution be working?
You actually know this, you just can't accept it, and we know you know this because you immediately move past the liberal judges and the supposed ending of the war on drugs to start focusing on the
real problem and the
real solution...
(04-10-2026, 04:37 PM)Himu wrote: I'm starting to support eugenics at this point and the ghetto blacks need their dna severed from the rest of us to save the black community in earnest.
The great part is that this is the same misunderstanding of how genetics actually works that the original eugenicists and their fellow racists had. In truth, it's even more dire than simply believing in scientific racism because there's no science involved. Which we can see by simply focusing on how you believe you can remove a trait from the population without ever identifying what causes the trait. Assume for the sake of ease that this is a single code because otherwise it's essentially impossible to locate in DNA even for extreme traits, if it's recessive you can't eliminate it from the population by sterilizing or exterminating those who demonstrate it in adulthood.
Ironically, this is why the Nazis form of eugenics was
technically more correct than the more "progressive" forms. You really have to eliminate the entire population, you can't pick and choose traits. The irony comes from the fact that the Nazis didn't practice it, as best evidenced by the non-Aryans they picked for so many leadership positions. Yep, I'm saying the worst aspect of the Nazis was their hypocrisy.
2 users liked this post:
