Journal of Other Forum Analysis (Volume II, Issue 2)

[Hap Shaughnessy]

[hide]

Spoiler:  (click to show)(click to hide)

If you read this you are gay, LMAO

[/hide]

Edit: Can't hide posts anymore?

[benji]

Well again, one of the problems I have with socialism is like you said- it's basically capitalism without capitalists. Most people are beholden to growthism and the idea that we need to produce just to produce, so I don't think you're going to get a lot of socialist fantasy that is significantly different from stories of a capitalistic status quo. I also did agree that leftist needs to get better at storytelling and plain language, and allow ourselves to be imaginative rather than sticking within circles that espouse theory as jargon. I actually did start briefly making a personal kind of world-building document for myself about what I would imagine a "post capitalist" society to be, both to have some sort of idea to pitch to people and work towards tangibly in the real world, and as a vehicle to read and learn more about alternative ways and philosophies of living. In many ways, it is like a lot of children's cartoons for the 80s in that it is primarily communal. My basic ideas were as follows:

You don't have a menial job to go to at a certain time anymore, working for a boss, although you are expected to reasonably pitch in towards the maintenance of the utilities and resources you want to access within your community. Ex. You take from a public garden then you better make sure you're putting back what you took for the next person who comes along somehow, either through time spent cultivating it or providing resources for its maintenance. Libraries of the commons would also be a more fundamental public service where you can have access to the tools and items you may need without having to necessarily go and buy them; people donate usable but unwanted "things" (cookware, furniture, lawn equipment, clothing, etc.) and you rent this like you would a book at a library, and bring it back when you're done. Art and culture would still be valuable pursuits too, and indeed, freer expressions of self and culture would be encouraged: city and park demonstrations, more volunteer upkeep of buildings, more public paintings and graffiti, street music, etc. People should be encouraged to be creative and have fun with others. Housing would be more mixed; closer quarters where most amenities (bars and restaurants, clubs, pharmacies, grocery stores, etc.) are within walking or biking distance. And so long as a spot or joint is free and fits your living needs, you can claim it as your home so long as you promise to abide by whatever community and/or local ordinances exist there. Political organization would be expressed through a consensus based form of representation. Everyone is encouraged to participate in local meetings to address grievances, and goals and demands are reached through discussion and consensus and delivered to a higher presiding body by a representative who is voted on by the chosen body. This representative would ideally not always be the same person to temper the inclination of power-tripping. Also, we're fucking off of fossil fuels permanently and our public transporation is robust and strong. Solarpunk reality baby.

I didn't write much more than that, but that was my starting idea for a little fantasy world. You wake up, get yourself together, and essentially go about your day however you choose without the threat of coercive labor forcing you to do shit you don't really want to do. You wanna hang at the local bar with your friends, take a trip into the wilderness, etc. then go for it. Be merry. If you wish to use a public service in society, get groceries and supplies, or anything else, it is simply mandated that you maintain and use it responsibly and return it back for the rest of the community to use too. It's not too horrible, is it?

I think part of the reason I thought this wasn't the "take a carrot, leave a carrot" post is because I knew there were two posts where she had a very similar fantasy utopia. This is the other one:

My ideal society imagines a world that pushes true self-actualization of the individual and participation within a community to take care of a sustainable world.

You're not toiling in retail, in a warehouse, or a cubicle for 35-40 years to enrich some fucking asshole who makes thousands of times what you do for far less work. You do the minimum that you need to do under the understanding that you are contributing meaningful work to society, and then you are not only free but encouraged to pursue your interests and talents through free and cheap access to education, workshops, and grassroots organizations and groups, knowing that the more human beings we allow to pursue and develop their strengths, the likelier we increase our discovery of new breakthroughs in our lives, whether socially or technologically.

Your amenities and shops are not miles and miles away necessitating an expensive-ass car that needs expensive-ass gas or for you to stop every so often to charge it up again. If you're far out or taking a long trip, then you've got robust public options to get to where you need to go.

You've got family, friends, and neighbors who actually give a damn about you for you, who see about you, and who make sure you're alright. Indeed, your first option before going to buy something should be asking if your friend or neighbor can help you out, and they likely will knowing you'll return the favor. "Cup of sugar politics" as I call it.

The streets and parks are actually alive with art (real fucking art, not this AI trash), music, dancing, food and other cultural footnotes. Kids are drawing with chalk. Folks are skating up and down the road. Some musicians have met up to jam. People are hanging out talking about their lives and dating healthily.

You don't worry about crime really all that much. Not only are people's needs largely being met, but we have communal ways and deterrents to prevent assholes from taking advantage without having to sic jack-booted racists on them.

I want to live in a country whose politics focus less on property and consumption and more on people and socializing. I want a country where I can easily find friends, or someone to talk to, or a cool boyfriend. I want to be able to walk down to the park and see a festival going on and be obliged to join in. I want to sit on the porch during the evening and chat it up with my neighbors.

I want to have a fucking life on a planet whose ecosystems aren't dying to fill the holes in our hearts and spirits with video games and phones.

It's like her rant recently about how everyone else is unimaginative and cruel.

I probably should have just hunted for this in the Great Moments thread.

[Hap Shaughnessy]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/september-10-2025-charlie-kirk-assassinated-at-utah-valley-university-do-not-post-videos-of-incident-up-suspect-in-custody.1294083/page-260#post-145150773

Absolutely. I just point and laugh. If they're not gonna shift their hearts then I may as well get enjoyment out of their discomfort.

[benji]

Edit: Can't hide posts anymore?

It got broken and since nobody ever used it I didn't bother to fix it. I probably should and see if there is a better plugin than the janky one I used before.

[DavidCroquet]

But the things I'm thinking of beyond decolonization are just ways we rethink what is important in society, what is good for society, and healthy ways we can achieve these goals. There's this thread from an Ojibwe tribe member about how their culture interacts with disability, for example. For one, there is no word in the Anishinaabemowin language for "disabled" because there is no need to make the differentiation, because anyone regardless of physical ability can meet the social obligations that the Ojibwe people find important in their community, things such as making sure your local neighbors have what they need and are okay, being available to help for familial and communal events and duties, etc. Capitalist society has to make the distinction because we fundamentally do not place importance on the very existence of disabled people, because they are considered less capable workers than abled people. Capitalism merely accomodates them to various degrees after the fact of building hostile infrastructure and practices, but the fundamental issues remain.

First off, this feels like something worth fact checking, but secondly, if you don't have a word for "disabled" it would also mean you don't have a concept of "accessibility". I wouldn't be surprised at all if the level communal participation of disabled people in that tribe would be considered completely unacceptable when you apply it to a first world country.

“”The honorable and first tribes of this land see no disability…They instead address the individual directly in the Anishinaabemowin language. Translated from the original, tribal members have unique titles such as ‘Jimmy no-legs’ and ‘that fucked up little one’. Capitalism robs societies of such sophisticated social touchstones.”

[Hap Shaughnessy]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/the-gaza-family-torn-apart-by-idf-snipers-from-chicago-and-munich.1293096/#post-144921504

Is this guy back in Chicago? His home address and everything should be made public. I am not going to be shocked when a lot of these jewnazis are hunted down.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/guardian-ex-idf-chief-confirms-gaza-casualties-over-200-000.1296984/#post-145107351

Zionazi fucks

[Potato]

Well again, one of the problems I have with socialism is like you said- it's basically capitalism without capitalists. Most people are beholden to growthism and the idea that we need to produce just to produce, so I don't think you're going to get a lot of socialist fantasy that is significantly different from stories of a capitalistic status quo. I also did agree that leftist needs to get better at storytelling and plain language, and allow ourselves to be imaginative rather than sticking within circles that espouse theory as jargon. I actually did start briefly making a personal kind of world-building document for myself about what I would imagine a "post capitalist" society to be, both to have some sort of idea to pitch to people and work towards tangibly in the real world, and as a vehicle to read and learn more about alternative ways and philosophies of living. In many ways, it is like a lot of children's cartoons for the 80s in that it is primarily communal. My basic ideas were as follows:

You don't have a menial job to go to at a certain time anymore, working for a boss, although you are expected to reasonably pitch in towards the maintenance of the utilities and resources you want to access within your community. Ex. You take from a public garden then you better make sure you're putting back what you took for the next person who comes along somehow, either through time spent cultivating it or providing resources for its maintenance. Libraries of the commons would also be a more fundamental public service where you can have access to the tools and items you may need without having to necessarily go and buy them; people donate usable but unwanted "things" (cookware, furniture, lawn equipment, clothing, etc.) and you rent this like you would a book at a library, and bring it back when you're done. Art and culture would still be valuable pursuits too, and indeed, freer expressions of self and culture would be encouraged: city and park demonstrations, more volunteer upkeep of buildings, more public paintings and graffiti, street music, etc. People should be encouraged to be creative and have fun with others. Housing would be more mixed; closer quarters where most amenities (bars and restaurants, clubs, pharmacies, grocery stores, etc.) are within walking or biking distance. And so long as a spot or joint is free and fits your living needs, you can claim it as your home so long as you promise to abide by whatever community and/or local ordinances exist there. Political organization would be expressed through a consensus based form of representation. Everyone is encouraged to participate in local meetings to address grievances, and goals and demands are reached through discussion and consensus and delivered to a higher presiding body by a representative who is voted on by the chosen body. This representative would ideally not always be the same person to temper the inclination of power-tripping. Also, we're fucking off of fossil fuels permanently and our public transporation is robust and strong. Solarpunk reality baby.

I didn't write much more than that, but that was my starting idea for a little fantasy world. You wake up, get yourself together, and essentially go about your day however you choose without the threat of coercive labor forcing you to do shit you don't really want to do. You wanna hang at the local bar with your friends, take a trip into the wilderness, etc. then go for it. Be merry. If you wish to use a public service in society, get groceries and supplies, or anything else, it is simply mandated that you maintain and use it responsibly and return it back for the rest of the community to use too. It's not too horrible, is it?

I think part of the reason I thought this wasn't the "take a carrot, leave a carrot" post is because I knew there were two posts where she had a very similar fantasy utopia. This is the other one:

My ideal society imagines a world that pushes true self-actualization of the individual and participation within a community to take care of a sustainable world.

You're not toiling in retail, in a warehouse, or a cubicle for 35-40 years to enrich some fucking asshole who makes thousands of times what you do for far less work. You do the minimum that you need to do under the understanding that you are contributing meaningful work to society, and then you are not only free but encouraged to pursue your interests and talents through free and cheap access to education, workshops, and grassroots organizations and groups, knowing that the more human beings we allow to pursue and develop their strengths, the likelier we increase our discovery of new breakthroughs in our lives, whether socially or technologically.

Your amenities and shops are not miles and miles away necessitating an expensive-ass car that needs expensive-ass gas or for you to stop every so often to charge it up again. If you're far out or taking a long trip, then you've got robust public options to get to where you need to go.

You've got family, friends, and neighbors who actually give a damn about you for you, who see about you, and who make sure you're alright. Indeed, your first option before going to buy something should be asking if your friend or neighbor can help you out, and they likely will knowing you'll return the favor. "Cup of sugar politics" as I call it.

The streets and parks are actually alive with art (real fucking art, not this AI trash), music, dancing, food and other cultural footnotes. Kids are drawing with chalk. Folks are skating up and down the road. Some musicians have met up to jam. People are hanging out talking about their lives and dating healthily.

You don't worry about crime really all that much. Not only are people's needs largely being met, but we have communal ways and deterrents to prevent assholes from taking advantage without having to sic jack-booted racists on them.

I want to live in a country whose politics focus less on property and consumption and more on people and socializing. I want a country where I can easily find friends, or someone to talk to, or a cool boyfriend. I want to be able to walk down to the park and see a festival going on and be obliged to join in. I want to sit on the porch during the evening and chat it up with my neighbors.

I want to have a fucking life on a planet whose ecosystems aren't dying to fill the holes in our hearts and spirits with video games and phones.

It's like her rant recently about how everyone else is unimaginative and cruel.

I probably should have just hunted for this in the Great Moments thread.

Just pure unhinged delusion. 

She can't manage a video game forum without being a turbocunt. How's she gonna fill holes in hearts and spirits by having conversations with neighbours on the porch? What's she doing to talk about? How many people she reported and sent to the gulags this week?

[Potato]

First off, this feels like something worth fact checking, but secondly, if you don't have a word for "disabled" it would also mean you don't have a concept of "accessibility". I wouldn't be surprised at all if the level communal participation of disabled people in that tribe would be considered completely unacceptable when you apply it to a first world country.

“”The honorable and first tribes of this land see no disability…They instead address the individual directly in the Anishinaabemowin language. Translated from the original, tribal members have unique titles such as ‘Jimmy no-legs’ and ‘that fucked up little one’. Capitalism robs societies of such sophisticated social touchstones.”

Tribal ways of dealing with disability usually involved leaving the poor little fucker to die on the side of a mountain in the freezing cold.

[BananaBlast]

So you know how the loonies were ripping apart those who said "Cold-blooded assassination is wrong" in the charlie kirk thread? How some even got bans for denouncing murder?

I feel sorry for his children but I enjoyed watching the video of him getting shot in the neck.

i don't care about what happened to him either, but yeah, watching the video made my heart race in what I would describe as a not good way. it was horrific.

you can think whatever you want about the dude, but enjoying a video of someone getting murdered is not okay.

OK or not, I found it amusing. Had a nice little chuckle.

... jesus christ. this forum makes me sick to my stomach sometimes.

Edgelord behavior.

Perhaps I am desensitized to violence because I live in a country of people like him.

I don't give a shit the dude is dead, not at all. But enjoying watching it happen is fucking wild and you need to speak to someone about it.

You need help.

Same here. If you take pleasure in murder you need help. Violence is not the answer

You do you edgy the edge mcedgerton

What in the bipolar is this? Suddenly the bloodthrist is a problem for them? The difference between "i'm celebrating the murder of this guy" and "i enjoyed watching the video of him getting shot" is pretty damn minimal.

[Rendle]

I wish I could assassinate a far-right political figure too but in Australia there's no-one even worth killing, you guys don't even know how lucky you are

Pauline could do with a bullet.

My friend used to work as a waitress at an RSL where Pauline did a stop on speaking tour once, she said that she used to hate Pauline but after listening to her speak for an hour or so she just felt sorry for her.

[Polident]

Running theme of posts shared here is these guys saying “I’m so heckin empathetic” before talking about wanting to fight a 1 and 3-year-old. It’s been well established they don’t know what empathy is in concept or definition. But it’s weird how they invoke it as a sort of “no homo” for their psychotic babble.

[Uncle]

I probably should have just hunted for this in the Great Moments thread.

I don't think it's there, but put it there so it can be found later alongside HaughtyFrank coining it   

edit: oh the great work has been completed 

[HaughtyFrank]

I probably should have just hunted for this in the Great Moments thread.

I don't think it's there, but put it there so it can be found later alongside HaughtyFrank coining it   

edit: oh the great work has been completed 

I was sitting here, wondering if it was me but I didn't really want to say anything without being sure 

[Propagandhim]

I mean, profit at any stage is inherently exploitative to me. You're pocketing the surplus value of a service that was produced by the workers; simple as. There is not a single time in my life that I recall spending money for the services of the business owner; he's not cooking my food, servicing my health, showing me products, shipping stuff to me, or anything of note that is relevant to my living situation. If anything, it's his myopic decisions that are resulting in inefficiencies whenever I have a problem with a business, because he isn't actually on the ground doing the true labor and doesn't know what's going on. The people who actually keep society afloat have always seen the least financial compensation. It is at that point that it should be considered a feature, not a bug.

It's just the quintessential childlike understanding and entitlement here.  Every single thing Nepenthe uses and takes for granted exists because somewhere along the line a business owner or investor took on financial risk to provide capital and coordinate resources to give workers who didn't take that risk the ability to work in jobs to make those services possible and earn a wage.  Where are those workers going to have equipment, facilities, and operations to labor in if someone doesn't take on financial risk because "profit is inherently exploitative"?  The government? So who funds the government other than taxpayers, and how is that different from pooling resources under private ownership except with far less efficiency and innovation because of no incentive to compete?  This is something a 12 year old should be able to understand..  We've seen this play out dozens of times and it always ends up with the same result.  There is no utopia, get skills and make your life less miserable instead of trying to drag everyone else down, Larping dumbass.

[Propagandhim]

oh my god i found it, the post where they were going to kill the Middle Eastern guy with capoeira

She gives the middle eastern restaurateur the whitest name possible    

Nepenthe has been such an immense source of joy for me over the years.

[PogiJones]

Take a carrot, leave a carrot was a lie this whole time?!

[PogiJones]

At least we still have hookup knife

[Propagandhim]

holy shit

But this is, again, not the case. There is no finite creation of value. There might be a finite supply of, say, physical currency, but that's not the same thing. Becoming wealthy on the basis of investing deprives no one of anything. You say "if I accept it as true", but I don't, because it's not.

Yeah, there's a finite supply of physical currency that can exist at any given time in an economic system, and a shrinking amount of capital on Earth in general (hi global warming, can't wait for you to hit), which are both literally necessary to perpetuate value in a practical sense. No one can say their start up or investment is worth "infinite" value. It can only be worth x amount of value, x being a measurable amount. X amount can fluctuate up or down based on fickle, even stupid-ass shit, and thus it is theoretically infinite, but in a practical sense physical currency and capital, and subsequently the value that is derived from those things, have like, actual ceilings. Everyone on Earth cannot be rich just by mathematical design, even if we don't get into the fact that the hoarding of wealth and the attainment of a billion dollars' worth of value is, like, a conscious choice that these people do. They don't just fall into it; you have to aggressively pursue that shit no matter the actual human cost of your decisions.

It is also a fucking useless choice. Because value has practical limits, so is the marginal utility of any dollar you have access to also limited. The more of it you have, the less any individual dollar even matters to your well being. The moment your needs and wants can all be comfortably met, what the fuck are you even doing hoarding several thousands of times more for? Why is that worth congratulating? What is the point?

This is all just a glorified dick waving contest that has no actual fucking benefit to society at large. If every billionaire just disappeared simultaneously right now, hell, the planet might actually be somewhat better off.

    

Okay I'm done trying to find it for real.

Well, Africa is not really decolonized. A lot of the continent's practices are rooted in European capitalism, and it's now being targeted by China for roughly the same ends. The same issues are going to be apparent in Central and South America and Asia too, for example. Capitalism is the global status quo; there is currently no country that is operating completely divorced from it no matter how much conservatives wanna bitch about Venezuela lol. As a result, there is no country I can point to for a hard example of anything I'm visualizing.

You can tell she's just parroting Marxist talking points from one or two books she's read without any critical thinking.  The world economy is not a fixed pie, if you had one braincell and looked at the historical trajectory of global poverty over the years you'd be able to see.   The money supply is not the same as wealth and real output can grow and has grown - anyone can see how many can become better off all at once.   Over a long period of time there are obvious widespread gains in living standards for all people that have occurred simultaneously, even if the distribution of money is unequal.  Money stays unequal, but wealth (goods, services, skills, assets) goes up.  If she cares about Africa so much, how come she hasn't seen the sustained growth they've experienced.  Most of the entire sub-saharan conomy used to be a subsistence economy and now they have tech hubs that manufacture transistors and other high-skill formal work, and consumption rose along with increasing wealth even as populations grew...wealth has gone up, obviously more people become better off even if inequality is still there.  How is 0-profit Marxism going to grow wealth for developing countries?  No coordinated investment or innovation is going to keep these places fucking poor because they'll have no place with global trade and those living standards gains will go away, you evil imbecile.  Why is she so intent on believing Africa cannot compete in the global system, despite the evidence showing they are growing and have a place there?  It's racist and insulting.   Her beliefs are so easily debunked, that she's either willfully lying to gain some kind of advantage or impossibly stupid, and I can't imagine the latter.

Increasing the social hostility to capitalism will inevitably widen the environment for exploration, prompting more people with various inclinations and talents to seek out working and philosophical solutions. When you can finally imagine that there is an alternative, that there is another door that can open, you have an avenue of learning and exploration. There's plenty of literature and educational resources for example about Indigenous and African modes of thinking and living not only in harmony in the planet

But the things I'm thinking of beyond decolonization are just ways we rethink what is important in society, what is good for society, and healthy ways we can achieve these goals. There's this thread from an Ojibwe tribe member about how their culture interacts with disability, for example.

We're talking about MACRO-LEVEL economics.  She sees Africans as an entirely different species that are just not compatible with the rest of the world's "mode" of thinking.

[Boredfrom]

Well, the good news is that current events have finally pushed me to delete my social media accounts, so that's a plus in my life.

[BIONIC]

At least we still have hookup knife

I came up with that

[HaughtyFrank]

Take a carrot, leave a carrot was a lie this whole time?!

Let's call it... an "emotional truth" ™. 

When someone takes a carrot from a communal garden and leaves the "resources" for a new one it helps you fuck all when you came there to harvest a carrot.

[Propagandhim]

"Africa has experienced developmental growth in AI, fintech, cloud/data centers, agritech, healthcare, logistics, cybersecurity, software engineering, and data science and other high-growth, high-skilled industries.  GDP growth has steadily gone up year after year and specialized job creation and product development with it.  We never thought it was possible that these subhumans could participate in the global economy like this...."   





"...that's enough. We must decolonize Africa"

[HaughtyFrank]

Resetera themselves can't resist the internet sleuthing

https://www.resetera.com/threads/september-10-2025-charlie-kirk-assassinated-at-utah-valley-university-do-not-post-videos-of-incident-up-suspect-in-custody.1294083/post-145159623

There's a right wing substack claiming to have found the roommate's online presence. I don't know if talking about this stuff is allowed or not, but I hid it from public view. Delete if it breaks rules please.

In December 2024, Twiggs changed his preferred display name on Steam from Lance to "Luna." A search of Reddit for usernames connected to his Steam username history revealed a match: user "lancelott3," with the display name "flux." Biographical details on the Reddit account line up with Twiggs.

That account was highly active on the r/4tran subreddit.

Around the same time, he responded to a now-deleted post lamenting about the re-election win of Donald Trump and what it means for transgender people.

"Trump winning has motivated me to finally fix my life," the 4tran post read. "I won't let the idiot cisfags who want me to be miserable win. I'll be independent, fit, happy, and trans and they can't stop me."

Twiggs responded: "Honestly same, i realized after a bit of dooming that even if i was overall hiding from the local public now, my life socially wouldn't really change, which was more depressing than any election lol. So, working on that as my new year's resolution."

"Cisfags?" No trans person would ever use those words!!!!"

[DavidCroquet]

Conservatives don't like facts, because most of the shit they believe in is fake, made-up bullshit. So they have to create their own "alternative facts", make up their own reality. They're batshit insane.

He's a groyper, a Fuentes acolyte! At the very least a 764'er. Facist just means "anyone I don't like" to these people. He has a trans girlfriend...well you know all those people are closeted chasers; sounds about white!

CNN - Crap, Not News
MSNBC - Manufactured Shit, Now Bloviating Crap
WSJ - Won't Supply Journalism

[simiansmarts]

"Africa has experienced developmental growth in AI, fintech, cloud/data centers, agritech, healthcare, logistics, cybersecurity, software engineering, and data science and other high-growth, high-skilled industries.  GDP growth has steadily gone up year after year and specialized job creation and product development with it.  We never thought it was possible that these subhumans could participate in the global economy like this...."   





"...that's enough. We must decolonize Africa"

please dont ever post that picture of nep ever again, i had a visceral reaction of disgust upon seeing that 

[Propagandhim]

"Africa has experienced developmental growth in AI, fintech, cloud/data centers, agritech, healthcare, logistics, cybersecurity, software engineering, and data science and other high-growth, high-skilled industries.  GDP growth has steadily gone up year after year and specialized job creation and product development with it.  We never thought it was possible that these subhumans could participate in the global economy like this...."   





"...that's enough. We must decolonize Africa"

please dont ever post that picture of nep ever again, i had a visceral reaction of disgust upon seeing that 

There's glorious things you can do nowadays.

[Rendle]

That processing just used the same amount of electricity you'd need to keep a baby on a ventilator breathing for 10 minutes.

[HaughtyFrank]

The same people who had no problem understanding 4D-chess connections of how they guy could be a groyper and why groypers would want to kill Charlie Kirk are now suddenly utterly confused about why it would be relevant if the shooter had a trans lover

The whole roommate was trans angle....if it could be proven to be a motive....

Are they saying to have empathy and compassion for someone different than you makes you wanna shoot someone? I'm trying to understand the logic.....and I know thats a complete waste of time.

Because there is a mountain of history of mass shootings, shootings where trans ppl were not a motive.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/september-10-2025-charlie-kirk-assassinated-at-utah-valley-university-do-not-post-videos-of-incident-up-suspect-in-custody.1294083/post-145160328

What is there not to understand? If he had a trans lover it makes it likely he'd shoot Charlie Kirk for his anti-trans rhetoric.

I can't quite tell if they're really this dumb or if they're all pretending and no one dares to say it

[Shecky Fragbaum]

Of course she hates Mayonnaise.

Spoiler:  (click to show)(click to hide)

Not all condiments, just the white ones

[nachobro]

Being fair, I think Nintendo is genuinely being both greedy and cheap this generation.

70 fucking dollars for galaxy games