(Yesterday, 06:14 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote:
See, this is why I can't take the "regulate the media" argument serious because how many articles have been written about Sophie Cunningham in recent weeks? How much pressure has been put on her, not just online but in real life? And yet it's understood that this is fair coverage
Factually incorrect:
10 hours ago
(This post was last modified: 10 hours ago by Potato.)
(Yesterday, 04:36 PM)Ethan wrote: (Yesterday, 04:01 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote:
I think true crime-brained wine moms transcend the political spectrum, actually.
If they have the time and money to do this they're likely upper middle class progressives.
(11 hours ago)Alpacx wrote: (Yesterday, 06:14 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote:
See, this is why I can't take the "regulate the media" argument serious because how many articles have been written about Sophie Cunningham in recent weeks? How much pressure has been put on her, not just online but in real life? And yet it's understood that this is fair coverage
Factually incorrect:
What a cunt
Not providing a counter argument and locking replies is a great way to convince people
(11 hours ago)Alpacx wrote: (Yesterday, 06:14 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote:
See, this is why I can't take the "regulate the media" argument serious because how many articles have been written about Sophie Cunningham in recent weeks? How much pressure has been put on her, not just online but in real life? And yet it's understood that this is fair coverage
Factually incorrect:
Was she really booed though? Rachel literally shows a one second clip and we barely hear anything except for the commentator saying "hearing the boos".
Anyway, in the full video, Rachel goes on and suggests watching the Last Week Tonight "fantastic" segment about trans women in sports, summarizing it with "cis men don't actually have an across the board advantage over cis women in sports".
Rachel is a bit like Canada's own Taylor Lorenz, with a little Alejandra Caraballo thrown in. Although herself a cis woman, she feels concern as a tall woman because, and I quote, "people like Cunningham and myself are also among those who might be disproportionaly targeted by these anti-trans laws. These laws force rigid expressions of femininity on women".
9 hours ago
(This post was last modified: 9 hours ago by Ethan.)
(9 hours ago)Potato wrote: "Cis men don't actually have an across the board advantage over cis women in sports."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.news.com.au/sport/sports-life/uproar-as-allboys-netball-team-beats-girls-to-win-state-title/news-story/819d1d0101345dad1aee9ea814102456%3famp
Cool.
Well akshually, in skeet shooting and ultra-marathon passed the 278th kilometres, cis men and women are pretty much on equal ground.
See, not across the board!
the whole point of sport is that even if groups are mostly equal on average, standout examples will rise above all the rest and inscribe their names in the history books
you look at the high end of the spectrum of athletic achievement, and they're all men
like I've said before, I look forward to one day seeing that all records are held by "women," rather than women
high jump, long jump, longest drive, fastest pitch, most home runs...bring it on, prove that men also make better women than women
8 hours ago
(This post was last modified: 8 hours ago by HaughtyFrank.)
(9 hours ago)Potato wrote: "Cis men don't actually have an across the board advantage over cis women in sports."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.news.com.au/sport/sports-life/uproar-as-allboys-netball-team-beats-girls-to-win-state-title/news-story/819d1d0101345dad1aee9ea814102456%3famp
Cool.
Read an interesting article recently
Quote:The phrase “throw like a girl” is a crude stereotype, but, like many stereotypes, it contains more than a grain of truth. In fact, the sex difference in overhand throwing is one of the largest behavioral sex differences ever measured.
Psychologists typically express group differences in standard deviations. Among young children, boys outperform girls in throwing distance and velocity by about 1.5 standard deviations. The gap widens across childhood and adolescence. By late adolescence and adulthood, estimates are generally around two standard deviations or greater. Thomas and French’s classic meta-analysis remains a useful starting point for examining this sex difference.
A difference of two standard deviations is roughly the same magnitude as the familiar adult sex difference in height. It means that the average man throws as well as or better than about 98 percent of women.
The raw numbers make the point just as clearly. In one study of young adults, men threw a tennis ball at an average velocity of 29.4 meters per second, compared with 18.6 meters per second for women. In other words, the women averaged about 63 percent of the men’s throwing velocity. At elite levels, the sex difference remains large. In modern track and field competition, men throw the javelin about 30 percent farther than women despite using a heavier javelin. The sex difference in javelin performance is therefore substantially larger than the familiar male advantages in running and jumping events.
These are group averages, not rules about individuals. The distributions overlap, some girls and women throw extremely well, and training matters. Nonetheless, the sex difference is large, appears well before puberty, and generally increases with age.
https://www.realityslaststand.com/p/throwing-like-a-girl-is-biology-allowed?r=17uk7&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email&triedRedirect=true
The longer article is about how despite those differences, differences that remain even in completely different cultures, from Americans to Germans to Aboriginals, you'll have researchers arguing that this has nothing to do with biology and is solely related to culture. The idea that a difference between genders can be explained through biology, not just culture, seems almost dirty
(9 hours ago)Ethan wrote: (9 hours ago)Potato wrote: "Cis men don't actually have an across the board advantage over cis women in sports."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.news.com.au/sport/sports-life/uproar-as-allboys-netball-team-beats-girls-to-win-state-title/news-story/819d1d0101345dad1aee9ea814102456%3famp
Cool.
Well akshually, in skeet shooting and ultra-marathon passed the 278th kilometres, cis men and women are pretty much on equal ground.
See, not across the board!
Their favorite is figure skating back in the olden days when it was apparently about skating figures into the ice instead of jumps and spins and shit.
6 hours ago
(This post was last modified: 6 hours ago by Potato.)
They fired the guy who exposed Jason Arday
(Yesterday, 02:30 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote: You know what's more annoying than the DSA's policies? Them not even knowing how to defend themselves against the most obvious counter arguments (10 hours ago)HaughtyFrank wrote: Not providing a counter argument and locking replies is a great way to convince people It's not their job to educate you.
(6 hours ago)Potato wrote: They fired the guy who exposed Jason Arday
Not fired yet but I think his goose is cooked
5 hours ago
(This post was last modified: 5 hours ago by HaughtyFrank.)
The weird thing is the university was well aware of his race stuff, that's after all why he lost his position at Cambridge, but now when he called out plagiarism he crossed a line?
5 hours ago
(This post was last modified: 5 hours ago by Potato.)
It's funny...if you are going to criticise a guy for saying that in a meritocracy without affirmative action very few black people would hold positions of power, then you also have to criticise the DEI theory that says very few black people can hold positions of power if we keep it a meritocracy and don't implement affirmative action.
(5 hours ago)HaughtyFrank wrote: but now when he called out plagiarism he crossed a line? Way to downplay murder.
14 minutes ago
(This post was last modified: 11 minutes ago by benji.)
(5 hours ago)Potato wrote: It's funny...if you are going to criticise a guy for saying that in a meritocracy without affirmative action very few black people would hold positions of power, then you also have to criticise the DEI theory that says very few black people can hold positions of power if we keep it a meritocracy and don't implement affirmative action. I think it's funny that the argument of these people is that these are irredeemably white supremacist institutions that plan and organize at all times to advance white supremacy yet we can also trust them to better the world with DEI policies rather than deliberately advance people like Arday to promote white supremacy when he inevitably fails. And also rope in the "anti-racists" to not only defend people like Arday but the policies and the institutions themselves. Look at how they move in lockstep to defend white supremacist incredibly wealthy elite institutions like Harvard and Cambridge (or the corporations or cops celebrating DEI) and insist we should trust them in every way.
|