03-21-2025, 06:31 PM
I guess I'm just questioning the scenario where there is a war that is actually worth having in the first place where having or not having nukes is going to be the deciding factor, because its kind of assumed a war that goes nuclear means even the 'winners' are left kinda irreversibly fucked if they don't have their space colonies shit ready to go.
Any kind of war where victory is more than "We died last tho" is going to rely on things like quality of training and equipment of ground troops, quality of training and equipment of ancillary forces (sea, air, etc), logisitics and supply chains and quality of the various types of intel (sigint, humint, etc).
Any kind of war where victory is more than "We died last tho" is going to rely on things like quality of training and equipment of ground troops, quality of training and equipment of ancillary forces (sea, air, etc), logisitics and supply chains and quality of the various types of intel (sigint, humint, etc).