05-10-2025, 12:05 AM
(05-09-2025, 10:57 PM)Potato wrote:(05-09-2025, 10:17 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote:
That thread is amazing.
The way the guy comes in waving his dick around about historic Indian third genders and then smoke bombs when she calls him out for using evidence that doesn't even remotely supports his hypothesis.
Then the other guy sinks the boot in by preempting his next three tweets about Pacific Islander third gender people etc.
Online "discourse" summarised in a few short tweets...
It's fascinating because it feels like they start arguing out of pure instinct and not because they even comprehend the original claim. Saying that trans women have always been at the forefront for women rights is an objectively crazy thing to say and would need some crazy evidence. But they don't even understand that, they just see that JK disagrees with that so now they need to fight her about it. And then after probably a desperate Google search for trans suffragettes they make a complete non sequitur argument about some cultures having a third gender thousands of years ago, ignoring that by nature a third gender can hardly fight for women's rights, as it's a third gender, not a woman.
It's all so dumb



11 users liked this post: