I can't believe it but modern politics has got me to reconsider monarchism and I think it's winning out as the best overall political ideology for me.
Look at California. People are waving foreign flags while they burn cars and it's being okayed as "freedom of speech". Republics and Democracies are highly limited and do not consider human nature. For example, the Union - if they had a lick of sense - would have banned the Confederate Flag, and frankly, any flag that flies in America besides the stars and stripes. To do otherwise is to uplift other nations. Now, almost one and a half century after the effects of the Civil War, people hang Israel flags, and Palestine flags, and this flag, and that flag, every where a fucking flag flag, which naturally goes against the call of the nation that all Americans must hold fealty to America and America alone and drop their foreign ties.
But nope. Democrats are unable to contend with the fact they lost the election. Trump won partly due to his illegal immigration stance and the Democrats are in La La Land unable to accept it.
All this data and zero compromise. Democrats say they're the party of data, but if so why won't they relent?
Because Democracy and Republicans are about power. It's not about what's best for the nation. It's about the procurement of power against all else. if that wasn't the case things would get done.
Instead, we just go back and forth every 4 or 8 years in some political game of musical chairs. Every few years, things change in democracy. It's a constant back and forth. And if you were doing good you can't continue because....reasons. What if there were a third Obama term? You couldn't find out because democracy decided for you. Democracy is unstable. It also relies on placing hope in people that were not bred for power, but pursue it. It naturally raises up the vulture and the crow, who seek power at all costs even against the ruin of their own country.
Versus monarchism. Long reign so it's more stable, things happen quicker because less red tape, kings and queens are bred from a sense of duty to not only their family and class, but their people, as leaders. Humans naturally seek hierarchy and those above us. Just as humans have a natural tendency to seek God, we seek our betters in the flesh. Politicians are snakes and not our betters.
CS Lewis said this:
"Where men are forbidden to honour a king they honour millionaires, athletes, or film-stars instead: even famous prostitutes or gangsters. For spiritual nature, like bodily nature, will be served; deny it food and it will gobble poison."
And he's correct. Without an example of a monarchy or royalty society descends into no shape or reason because there's no good example to be made much less to follow. So boys admire people like Andrew Tate or Trump instead. Look at Prince William. He's someone that conjures respect. Who is a better example to our people? Riff raff or actual royalty?
Right now almost half of American children cannot read. We are graduating kids that cannot write much less read.
Yet our politicians don't give a shit and it's business as usual.
Nothing gets done and politics are in constant deadlock as they feast on our tax dollars.
It's time to consider that the Founding Fathers were wrong and the Loyalists were correct. America showed promise but the cracks have truly revealed themselves. At the end of the day, humans are animals and animals just want to be happy and led into the pen like a sheep barked at by a sheep dog. People want direction. People want an easy life for their families. People want community. Freedom gets in the way of all of these things and basing a society off of freedom alone was rather foolish in light of our human frailties. Social cohesion, stability, and leadership produce a better human society.
Fuck voting in a Constitutional Republic. Utterly pointless except at the local level.
Look at California. People are waving foreign flags while they burn cars and it's being okayed as "freedom of speech". Republics and Democracies are highly limited and do not consider human nature. For example, the Union - if they had a lick of sense - would have banned the Confederate Flag, and frankly, any flag that flies in America besides the stars and stripes. To do otherwise is to uplift other nations. Now, almost one and a half century after the effects of the Civil War, people hang Israel flags, and Palestine flags, and this flag, and that flag, every where a fucking flag flag, which naturally goes against the call of the nation that all Americans must hold fealty to America and America alone and drop their foreign ties.
But nope. Democrats are unable to contend with the fact they lost the election. Trump won partly due to his illegal immigration stance and the Democrats are in La La Land unable to accept it.
All this data and zero compromise. Democrats say they're the party of data, but if so why won't they relent?
Because Democracy and Republicans are about power. It's not about what's best for the nation. It's about the procurement of power against all else. if that wasn't the case things would get done.
Instead, we just go back and forth every 4 or 8 years in some political game of musical chairs. Every few years, things change in democracy. It's a constant back and forth. And if you were doing good you can't continue because....reasons. What if there were a third Obama term? You couldn't find out because democracy decided for you. Democracy is unstable. It also relies on placing hope in people that were not bred for power, but pursue it. It naturally raises up the vulture and the crow, who seek power at all costs even against the ruin of their own country.
Versus monarchism. Long reign so it's more stable, things happen quicker because less red tape, kings and queens are bred from a sense of duty to not only their family and class, but their people, as leaders. Humans naturally seek hierarchy and those above us. Just as humans have a natural tendency to seek God, we seek our betters in the flesh. Politicians are snakes and not our betters.
CS Lewis said this:
"Where men are forbidden to honour a king they honour millionaires, athletes, or film-stars instead: even famous prostitutes or gangsters. For spiritual nature, like bodily nature, will be served; deny it food and it will gobble poison."
And he's correct. Without an example of a monarchy or royalty society descends into no shape or reason because there's no good example to be made much less to follow. So boys admire people like Andrew Tate or Trump instead. Look at Prince William. He's someone that conjures respect. Who is a better example to our people? Riff raff or actual royalty?
Right now almost half of American children cannot read. We are graduating kids that cannot write much less read.
Yet our politicians don't give a shit and it's business as usual.
Nothing gets done and politics are in constant deadlock as they feast on our tax dollars.
It's time to consider that the Founding Fathers were wrong and the Loyalists were correct. America showed promise but the cracks have truly revealed themselves. At the end of the day, humans are animals and animals just want to be happy and led into the pen like a sheep barked at by a sheep dog. People want direction. People want an easy life for their families. People want community. Freedom gets in the way of all of these things and basing a society off of freedom alone was rather foolish in light of our human frailties. Social cohesion, stability, and leadership produce a better human society.
Fuck voting in a Constitutional Republic. Utterly pointless except at the local level.
1 user liked this post: