Journal of Other Forum Analysis (Volume II, Issue 2)

[BIONIC]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/hockey-canada-2018-junior-team-trial-all-5-players-found-not-guilty-of-sexual-assault.1252710/page-2#post-143100261

That was the first thing I thought when I read the judgement: "she judged with what she had". And that made her side with the status quo.
Imma be honnest, when I came into this thread, I was afraid to voice that.
I'm always afraid of saying my opinion on Era of fear of getting banned.

So the irony here is that your initial post was 100x more likely to get you banned whatever else you hesitated to post. I know this because you've already been reported for "Just saying: the judge is a woman as well..." which is frankly an extremely poor thing to say in a thread like this without making sure ydu are fully articulating your thoughts. That can be read the same as "a woman judged then not guilty of SA so it has to be okay", right? Fortunately you replied to a person who responded negatively before we huddled over the flagged post or it would've been pretty easy to ban on that read.

Don't take this as a call out to discourage you from posting, I'm trying to save yourself and others from needless pain in the future when you had no ill intentions. Too many people get reported then banned for short drive bys in sensitive threads like this, then explain what they really meant in a ban appeal ticket after the fact, when it was avoidable if they put the fleshed-out thoughts from the tickets on the forum instead.