12-20-2025, 06:31 AM
The Good
![[Image: 61336679.jpg]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1655884909i/61336679.jpg)
![[Image: 204593674.jpg]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1705350188i/204593674.jpg)
The Okay
![[Image: 65214162.jpg]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1687142454i/65214162.jpg)
![[Image: 207567968.jpg]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1707158560i/207567968.jpg)
The Meh
![[Image: 131124860.jpg]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1681444483i/131124860.jpg)
![[Image: 150778691.jpg]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1685992409i/150778691.jpg)
![[Image: 173404019.jpg]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1686580489i/173404019.jpg)
I want to take issue with Schreier for quoting magazines and websites while not only not naming the source but not citing it in his end notes. The book's also more like an extended Wikipedia entry that rarely does any reporting versus what looks like, from the end notes, him just using stuff people already wrote. He jams all the sexual harassment stuff into a single chapter and suggests it was just one guy who couldn't take a hint that they eventually fired. He's also not a very compelling writer though you can tell he thinks he is.
![[Image: 61336679.jpg]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1655884909i/61336679.jpg)
![[Image: 204593674.jpg]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1705350188i/204593674.jpg)
The Okay
![[Image: 65214162.jpg]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1687142454i/65214162.jpg)
![[Image: 207567968.jpg]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1707158560i/207567968.jpg)
The Meh
![[Image: 131124860.jpg]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1681444483i/131124860.jpg)
![[Image: 150778691.jpg]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1685992409i/150778691.jpg)
![[Image: 173404019.jpg]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1686580489i/173404019.jpg)
I want to take issue with Schreier for quoting magazines and websites while not only not naming the source but not citing it in his end notes. The book's also more like an extended Wikipedia entry that rarely does any reporting versus what looks like, from the end notes, him just using stuff people already wrote. He jams all the sexual harassment stuff into a single chapter and suggests it was just one guy who couldn't take a hint that they eventually fired. He's also not a very compelling writer though you can tell he thinks he is.