From a (far-right) New York Times story:
1. Cats are human-caused?
2. Buildings and cats (and probably oil pits?) are massively more abundant than wind power. Does wind power even cover 0.01% of land? What would be the rate if wind power was as abundant as buildings?
Quote:Wind energy is responsible for less than 0.01 percent of human-caused bird fatalities, per federal data, significantly less than buildings, cats or oil pits.
1. Cats are human-caused?
2. Buildings and cats (and probably oil pits?) are massively more abundant than wind power. Does wind power even cover 0.01% of land? What would be the rate if wind power was as abundant as buildings?