Kulturkampf

[benji]

Those are both pretty obvious active aggression: you're attacking the person who says the ideology or the person who wishes to trade with others. In both cases you're justifying the protectionism as "defense" in order to attack them to stop them from acting in a way they want that doesn't infringe on you except for your pre-ordained conclusion that it creates externalities against you.

You're basically arguing for hate speech crackdowns or invasions of Brazil to protect the Amazon here. Self-defense only happens upon the aggression against you, an ideology and trade with others isn't aggression against you unless you're planning on heading down the path of progressives where others not doing as you command is violence against you.