Journal of Other Forum Analysis

[Polident]

Rolling Stone published her Ray Fisher hit piece (Which even I believed for a while until Fisher came with the receipts). And her "Jason Momoa dressed up as Johnny Depp to attack poor Amber Heard" piece.

If Collider and other sources are calling out their framing of DaCosta's moving and writers are questioning the "Feelings and Lessons" script, then it's at least a bit fishy.

Collider is not a good source. Taking Collider's word over Variety Is nuts. But I also didn't know that about the author.

This is absolutely right and makes the MCU maniacs look hilariously retarded. Industry mags like Hollywood Reporter, Deadline, and Variety are leagues ahead of online sites such as Collider.

Wanted to fact check the writer in question. Gets kinda dark.

https://www.npr.org/2023/03/21/1164360143/rolling-stone-fbi-raid-journalist-james-gordon-meek

As the story noted, Siegel's sources told her "federal agents allegedly found classified information on Meek's laptop during their raid." Siegel reported that Meek left his job at ABC after the raid; a publishing contract with Simon & Schuster evaporated.

As edited by Rolling Stone Editor-in-Chief Noah Shachtman, however, the article omitted a key fact that Siegel initially intended to include: Siegel had learned from her sources that Meek had been raided as part of a federal investigation into images of child sex abuse, something not publicly revealed until last month.

Why did Rolling Stone suggest Meek was targeted for his coverage of national security, rather than something unrelated to his journalism?

Neither Siegel nor Shachtman would comment for this story.

…yeah. And amirox was arrested for editing old posts.

In a more serious example of her erroneous reporting, turns out she’s also behind the claim the Snyder Cut campaign was influenced by Russian bots. Even the Oscars pushed back against it. Totally clears the director. Thank you!