Journal of Other Forum Analysis

[benji]

And it won't be surprising if he even got into office as a Democrat, signalling himself as a "kind moderate" or socially-left fisical-libertarian.

About a hundred years late for one of the latter.

Doesn't matter what political spectrum he claims to align himself with, no matter what acts of good he has done, he's a ticking scandal timebomb. He buys influence, has a messiah complex, and has a massive cult.

                       projection?
 

inequality and hyerarchization of society didn't start with capitalism and the end of capitalism won't bring and end to it.

Inequality and hyerarchization started with the agricultural revolution +10000 years ago, an really consolidated during the Bronze Age.

Then what's capitalism? She said capitalism was hierarchy. This isn't "inequality and hyerarchization" it's civilization. Agriculture stopped people from wandering all over and put them in one place. She's already said she wants an apocalypse to destroy civilization so Black people can start from scratch so it's not surprising she wants "degrowth" back to nomadism.

Thiese societies have been considered the first communist utopias amongst some authors, the most famous of which was Maria Gimbutas, but lately this interpretation have been falling out of favor. Although nothing is settled in archeology and things are still up for debate, we can consider those civilizations transitional ones.

Only societies were we find true redistribution of wealth is in hunter-gatherer societies, and even i those we can find example of dual models, in which they would switch from a hierarchical to a non-hierarchical form of society depending on food scarcity, weather patterns etc.

So the thing is, how do we evolve towards a more fair societal model in a post agriculture revolution, post-capitalism, globalized world? Noone has the answer to that, and much less economic models from 150y ago.

1. Those interpretations are falling out of favor because there's no proof for any of it. Gimbutas work was based on her interpreting ancient things to mean things she wanted them to mean.
2. You're the one talking about economic models from millennia ago. You think we're going to debunk trade soon?

I'm a proponent of the de-growth movement, but I have zero faith that it will be implemented in the way it should be implemented. Yeah, we will reach the limit of growth, but it's going to.be a rude awakening for all involved, specially and unfortunately for those in developing countries.

So post-capitalism, end of growth world, how it will look like? It will be the end of globalization, much more local economies, local energy sources, end of waste as well and probably less inequality, but not an end of inequality and things can also end up being much worse, all depending in how we handled the transition.

Why? Why do you think we're near or ever will know when we're near the limits? Why do you think an "end of growth world" would be the "end of waste" and "inequality"? Why do you think it's the "transition" that needs to be handled and not your demand for a static state in which NOTHING EVER GETS BETTER OR CHANGES? Why would anyone want this?

We have some good theories, yes, goverments in the world should come out and say let's start by growing a bit less every year, going from growth to no-growth to de-growth

You said things should be more democratic and one of your earlier rants was about how we need to abolish capitalism so governments can focus on what "people really want" but can't be done because they poll poorly the Jews influence them not to. Now you're saying governments should just tell people they need to get increasingly poorer and shutting the fuck up is free?

Capitalism is shit and we fast approaching the end of it thank god

Any day now, Marx had a dream about it so it must be true.

The jerk didn't he even cite his sources properly like this:

https://www.resetera.com/threads/prime-video-will-have-ads-starting-jan-29-2-99-mo-for-ad-free.799182/?post=116828295#post-116828295

This is a joke. The annual Prime sub should cover video and the kindle unlimited stuff. These subscription services are getting to be so expensive that no one is going to stick around for long. I already dropped Disney+ because of its recent price hike. All thats left is Amazon, Netflix, and Apple.

That's what's been said about literally every price hike. When they went from $89 to $119 everyone said it was over because they had gone above the arbitrary $99 price and everyone's brains would break and realize it was worthless. Clearly we're realizing the limits to growth in subscription prices and what we need is a transition managed by the state (aka cops) to first stop the price from growing and then slowly lower the price while adding more features and perks. If we don't have the cops do this and stop the "hyerarchization" of the price it's going to be terrible and we're all going to die. The science has proven it.