Journal of Other Forum Analysis

[benji]

Regardless, my doubts mostly lie in trying to apply content-based speech restriction case law to the Florida law, which I think is probably better analyzed as content-neutral.

But this would actually be an even harder case to make because you'd have to argue the state has a compelling interest in controlling private property and somehow in the name of content that's legal.

I can tell you right now that one of the justices is going to ask if that means the state can tell you what you can watch on your own television or books you can read on your own Kindle.

Spoiler:  (click to show)(click to hide)

Or what bread you can put in YOUR OWN DAMN TOASTER!