You could be right, but I think that you're again drifting into content-based analysis. Your "what I can watch on my TV" analogy is again appealing to content, and you're also an adult. Social networks can be argued to be a forum rather than content. Maybe it's content, but I'd say that's up in the air.
Honestly, social media is such a unique beast, unlike anything the world has ever seen before--even the real-life analog it's attempting to imitate (a town square or whatever)--so it's hard to say what arguments will win out. Especially when the harm it causes to kids is so extremely well established. But then again, so is the harm of sugar. Maybe you're right that it will be treated as content-based speech, and maybe you're right that a content-neutral approach is even more difficult to win, although I don't think so.
Honestly, social media is such a unique beast, unlike anything the world has ever seen before--even the real-life analog it's attempting to imitate (a town square or whatever)--so it's hard to say what arguments will win out. Especially when the harm it causes to kids is so extremely well established. But then again, so is the harm of sugar. Maybe you're right that it will be treated as content-based speech, and maybe you're right that a content-neutral approach is even more difficult to win, although I don't think so.
2 users liked this post: