Philosophical Productive Discussion

[Eric Cartman]

Well, while I think the law is probably best evaluated in the content-neutral paradigm, one of the burdens on the gov't is they have to show that their law is narrowly tailored to fit the issue. Relevant to that is defining "social media." I think that's an extremely difficult task, especially since I have a hard time believing they're including Youtube in that restriction. Can you imagine telling your 15-year-old she's not old enough yet to watch makeup tutorials on Youtube? So if Youtube doesn't count, as I'm assuming it wouldn't, I don't know how you meaningfully differentiate it from basically any other social media website up to the standard of review the court would implement.

YouTube is just too big and useful to do much of anything about - its as fundamental to the useful part of the internet as wikipedia tbh.