Journal of Other Forum Analysis

[kaleidoscopium]

Sorry, but no. You're dancing around the fact that you think there's a possibility that all nine people are lying about the abuse. You're just not saying that exact phrase. You're also showing a complete misunderstanding of how investigative journalism works but implying that we need to know the names of the sources for them to be valid.

And if you don't want people replying to you, then you shouldn't be trying to correct people with, "Now hold on, we shouldn't be calling him an abuser" in a thread that shows us he is, in fact, an abuser.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/rolling-stone-jonathan-majors%E2%80%99-%E2%80%98extreme-abuse%E2%80%99-allegedly-goes-back-nearly-a-decade.736824/page-3#post-108299793


Surely this post won't come back to bite him in the ass for not waiting to condemn someone, right?