Journal of Other Forum Analysis

[Potato]

Anyway the whole comparison with what's just as bad or worse kinda sucks and doesnt seem sincere, especially from people who use things like "but its based on a real woman" or "but his wife drew designs". Just be honest and say you like what they're doing.

I like how when their takes are so bad and easy to counter that people just use the same obvious points to counter them, they think people repeatedly undermining their takes somehow strengthens their takes.

"Ugh, not this 'video evidence from space' and 'you can book a flight going around the world' argument again. Just admit you get off on the idea of a round Earth."

They do this with everything, their favorite "debunking" is laughing and rolling their eyes never realizing nobody's ever taken down the counterargument. It's hilarious when compared to how often they spam thought terminating cliches and all use the same exact language. (LOUDER FOR THOSE IN THE BACK!)

I think the best example remains the "I identify as an attack helicopter" because it so clearly enrages them since they have no answer to it. To where they viciously went after that trans woman for writing a story about it in an honest way. And they think it's dismissing the argument by yelling "ONE JOKE" without ever identifying what the joke is even about.

I think you're giving them way too much credit by assuming they even read the attack helicopter story. 

Someone on Twatter told them they should be offended and they were duly offended.