I've got about 45 minutes left but overall a fascinating discussion about the possibility of a lost civilization that was uprooted at the end of the Ice Age and its survivors spread across the globe to influence other cultures.
Hancock is argueing that archaeologists are sort of 'gate keeping' by dismissing work and findings that support this theory which don't fit the existing narrative.
While Dibble argues that Hancock is peddling a fantasy as there is no direct evidence to support it. They have also said some things in the media about each other that is not so nice.
They each have about 100 PowerPoint slides to back up their arguments.
Thankfully Joe Rogan is giving these people a platform to talk out their differences and share their views in a respectable way.
After seeing this I will definitely look up Hancocks Netflix series. Some of the mythical stuff lining up in cultures across the globe who never interacted is really interesting.
As is Dibbles extensive work on the domestication of crops.
Hancock is argueing that archaeologists are sort of 'gate keeping' by dismissing work and findings that support this theory which don't fit the existing narrative.
While Dibble argues that Hancock is peddling a fantasy as there is no direct evidence to support it. They have also said some things in the media about each other that is not so nice.
They each have about 100 PowerPoint slides to back up their arguments.
Thankfully Joe Rogan is giving these people a platform to talk out their differences and share their views in a respectable way.
After seeing this I will definitely look up Hancocks Netflix series. Some of the mythical stuff lining up in cultures across the globe who never interacted is really interesting.
As is Dibbles extensive work on the domestication of crops.