05-21-2024, 07:48 PM
(05-21-2024, 02:44 PM)Uncle wrote:(05-21-2024, 12:06 AM)Potato wrote: I'm with Scarlett on this one.
I'm not
personally I didn't even think it sounded like her
in the future when we want to use AI voices for things we can't have this chilling factor at all times that if something sounds slightly too close to an existing person, better watch out or you'll get sued, just for the mere casual appearance of sounding like them
it would be so easy to find a scarjo impersonator to train from and that should be perfectly legal, I don't know if openai trained on her without consent or just managed to find a similar sounding voice, but I could see them removing it not as admission of guilt but just to avoid yet another legal battle
there isn't a single voice you can make that someone on earth wouldn't be able to say "hey, that sounds kind of like me, I should sue and get rich"
The difference is intention I guess. The fact they approached her more than once and basically gave her an ultimatum kind of suggests they did it on purpose...that's considering it went down like Johansson said it did though.
I don't know, maybe she's full of it, but I generally don't care for tech bro cocks and their "move fast and break things" philosophy. It's led to too many poor outcomes that were promised to be improvements.

2 users liked this post: