Eat any good books lately?

[benji]

I don't really have too many complaints about this. For someone not familiar with the history (and it's all of them, staring with 1789) these mostly four or five page summaries of each election are probably more than they want to know. Minimal factual errors which is somewhat rare. My main comment about this is the part where he talks about how "no longer" can candidates become nominees without winning primaries and facing the people, the party bosses have been rendered irrelevant, etc. It's just amusing because of what recently happened this year since he uses strong language that was so quickly proven wrong. Though I don't want to seem like I foresaw it either, it was just amusing to be reading so shortly after it occurred.