Journal of Other Forum Analysis

[Cheers]

Actually their Luddite thing is really funny considering they claim to be socialists. Similar to the anti-social thing we talked about yesterday. They basically think the entire economy and all of society should come to a screeching halt and bow down to a handful of people at all times.

This is basically the opposite of every socialist thinker. You've all seen the meme about "I was going to be a poet" "DIG THE FUCKING HOLE" but that wasn't the only point of central planning. The entire point was to achieve peak industrialization, to end scarcity with infinite abundance from all of society turning into one giant factory. In the countries trying to skip steps like Soviets, China, etc. there was no "but I want to draw furry art the old way" they'd definitely be like "fuck you, we're mass generating all furry art from now on."

These were regimes who weren't even concerned with things like maintaining supply of firewood for everyone. Nah, we need that wood to meet our targets for industrial steel smelting plants that don't work properly. Yeah, they're definitely going to be concerned about you wanting to not lose your jobs to automation.

"But that's why we need unions!" Which is also centralized and nationalized. Your local isn't allowed to strike, strikes are treason against the state now. There's no more collective bargaining because there's not supposed to be any class to bargain against, you're getting what you deserve. 

"But I shouldn't have to emotionally labor." Sorry, bruh, not only should you have to but he who emotionally labors the most will set the standards all others need to match:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stakhanovite_movement
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Udarnik
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chollima_Movement

They don't even know what they advocate for. How about crunch?

was a common Soviet work practice of frantic and overtime work at the end of a planning period in order to fulfill the planned production target. The practice usually gave rise to products of poor quality at the end of a planning cycle.[2]

The cycle of shturmovshchina, associated with the tradition of monthly targets (on which bonuses and managers' positions depend), is described as follows. Due to the planned economy,[3] required materials and tools were not always available on time, and the work slowed as a result, or workers might have been reassigned to do something else, with the expectation that the job would be done when the materials arrive. However, when the end of a month neared, management was placed under pressure, substitute materials and improvised tools were used, and the workers were expected to produce the expected product in time.

At least you'd be freed from the exhausting never ending chase of numbers for some executive:

As applied in practice, "wrecking" and "sabotage" referred to any action which negatively affected the economy, including failing to meet unrealistic economic targets, allegedly causing poor morale among subordinates (e.g. by complaining about conditions of work), lack of effort, or other incompetence. Thus, it referred to economic or industrial sabotage in the very broadest sense. The definition of sabotage was interpreted dialectically and indirectly, so any form of non-compliance with Party directives could have been considered a 'sabotage'.

"Take a carrot, leave a carrot?" Sorry, no, you have a carrot quota to meet, back to work, comrade.

No Chud, you need to read more literature. 


Allow me to tell you about my specific brand of communist stupid: degrowth. Yes we will live in huts as the Africans do (we will never specify which African country). 
Oh wait


Well what about Lagos


Shit ummm see that’s why colonialism is bad. Can’t even find huts on google images.