Journal of Other Forum Analysis

[Daffy Duck]

1691478960[/url]']
Their thread about masculinity is interesting. Masculinity is kindness, empathy and understanding apparently.

Did you guys see that video of the robot that dropped the grenade on those russian ex-prison rapists?

We need Reconstruction for men. The world doesn't work on Easy Mode for men anymore so they need structures in place to help them navigate an equitable world. ]

Check out this meaningless drivel. What does reconstruction for men look like? Giving men money?

Yes, I’m reading it now and it’s making my blood boil a little with the responses. Almost like vilifying people all the time ultimately doesn’t quite work out, like I’m sorry but what do you expect when you tell a whole group of people that they’re shit stains on humanity?

https://www.resetera.com/threads/washington-post-opinion-men-are-lost-here%E2%80%99s-a-map-out-of-the-wilderness.750814/

This article was stupid, I hated it so much.

Any attempt at defining desirable masculine traits is inherently regressive, which is why it is the realm of the regressive right.
The author's attempt at defining traits: Protector, Provider and Procreator were so bad and laughable, and offensive in their own right.
Look being proud of being a woman is a backlash because of centures of opression and control against women, and understanding their voices and their power is something that still needs to be recognized and fought for every day.
I read that article few weeks ago and it was so infuriating that I was fuming about it just about the entire day.

My position is that asking the question is inherently regressive and not only does it NOT need to be answered, asking it is contributing to the problem. Tear down the sexist society we live in and allow everyone to be the good person they can be. Masculine/Femine traits is tainting the question.

Yeah, this Hilbert person is a fucking cunt.