12-08-2024, 05:08 PM
I will say if the study happened as presented, it kind of sounds flawed, like yes obviously if you give someone leading literature they're going to have it rolling around in their head for at least as long as they're a captive audience
maybe that's the point, it just feels weird
if you force someone to read a paper that presents a strong argument that people named Sam have a tendency to be evil and sadistic, and then have them read a story about two anonymous people and ask which of them is more likely to be named Sam, obviously they're going to take what they just read into account
maybe that's the point, it just feels weird
if you force someone to read a paper that presents a strong argument that people named Sam have a tendency to be evil and sadistic, and then have them read a story about two anonymous people and ask which of them is more likely to be named Sam, obviously they're going to take what they just read into account
3 users liked this post: