(06-07-2025, 08:54 PM)Averon wrote: Nepenthe just days ago argued that her making fun of small dicked, bald-headed losers is fine. She believed so strongly in that she should be able to make fun of a person's physical traits that she used an alt--or used her friend by proxy--to attack ERA and its users and even B-Dumbs himself. Now she's in that Brazilian jokes thread saying bigoted speech is deserving of prison time.
Does she now think she should get prison time for making fun of people's physical differences? Of course, she will argue that "it's not the same" but what's the difference between someone making fun of a minority due to skin color and someone like her making fun of someone because of their physical condition. Both are a person's born, immutable trait. Well, it won't happen to her, you see.
Because it didn't. So it won't.
Questions? Learn the theory.
13 users liked this post: Chudder Barbarity, Chumbawumbafan69, JoeBoy101, Tucker's Law, Greatness Gone, benji, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Keetongu, Propagandhim, BIONIC, Taco Bell Tower, Averon, Gameboy Nostalgia
(06-07-2025, 10:06 PM)Propagandhim wrote: They all constantly say that people gotta get their hands dirty, that rough measures are required. But they always mean other people getting their hands dirty, not them. They never do it themselves. But Neppy will only go as far as publicly fantasizing about what she'll do to suppressive class traitors if she had superpowers.
They don't even have the courage to articulate what they mean.
Get rough!
by doing what?
By getting serious, that's what!
What does that mean?
More than voting, that's for sure!
Ok, such as?
Uh...placing a moderator banner on Xbox OTs to inform about the potential to possibly boycott South of Midnight (no wait, you have to buy that one) Halo (actually, the collection is too good of a deal to miss!) Xbox Hardware (well, that's sort of being phased out as is) an additional month of game pass ultimate! Of course!
06-07-2025, 10:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-07-2025, 10:39 PM by Boredfrom.)
https://www.resetera.com/threads/do-you-agree-with-hank-hill-about-grilling.1210632/#post-141095628
Quote:Hank was a propane salesman of course would say some outlandish shit to make a buck. Capitalism is a bitch. Charcoal all the way. If I wanted to cook on gas I'd use my stove.
I never saw someone misreading Hank Hill that bad.
12 users liked this post: JoeBoy101, Tucker's Law, benji, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, MJBarret, Keetongu, Hap Shaughnessy, Gameboy Nostalgia, mormapope, Averon, Uncle, Taco Bell Tower
it takes zero media literacy to understand that hank absolutely loves propane as a fuel
it's like his personal wholesome autistic obsession
11 users liked this post: Tucker's Law, NekoFever, benji, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, MJBarret, Keetongu, Averon, Gameboy Nostalgia, Taco Bell Tower, mormapope, Boredfrom
If she hates the society she lives in so much, she should just go move to Brazilohwait….
If free speech exemptions were actually doing nothing and people were willy nilly being disappeared for saying "stuff the government doesn't like", 80% of Era and 50% of Twitter would be posting from jail.
Ironically, if I were to post this on Era I would be banned immediately.
(06-07-2025, 11:53 PM)DavidCroquet wrote: If free speech exemptions were actually doing nothing and people were willy nilly being disappeared for saying "stuff the government doesn't like", 80% of Era and 50% of Twitter would be posting from jail.
Ironically, if I were to post this on Era I would be banned immediately.
Yeah what is Nepenthe even talking about. I can only think of the very recent cases of those Palestine protesters which A) caused huge outcries and B) only worked to some degree because the people weren't citizens so they can be threatened with deportation
https://www.resetera.com/threads/tinder-testing-new-height-preference-feature-following-drop-in-paid-users.1203921/page-4#post-140773587
Quote: User Banned (2 Weeks): Sexist Commentary
Saganator wrote:I imagine women being attracted to taller men is pretty primal (wanting to feel safe and protected), much like how men are attracted to big boobs and wide hips (child bearing). In modern society those traits aren't as important, but that shit is hard wired. The dynamics have shifted, women can be much more selective than previous generations, men not in the top 10% or so just have to take what they can get.
06-08-2025, 12:04 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-08-2025, 12:04 AM by Hap Shaughnessy.)
(06-08-2025, 12:04 AM)Hap Shaughnessy wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/trump-says-he-is-very-disappointed-in-elon-musk-and-suggests-he-has-trump-derangement-syndrome.1208508/page-18#post-141017298
Quote: User Banned (2 Weeks): Ableist Rhetoric
silva1991 wrote:this is hilarious
I lost the count on how many alts he has.
Resetera Free speech laws in action. Getting banned for a screenshot that makes fun of the guy who has a "retard finder" account
"These laws where we put comedians in jail for 8 years are great, sorry we have standards here, ya dumb yanks!" says someone from one of the very exclusive list of countries who deliberately elected someone more retarded than Trump.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/brazilian-comedian-sentenced-to-jail-for-racist-homophobic-jokes.1211220/page-3#post-141140664
talkingood wrote:Honest question, this is not a rhetorical move or something—would you say that Brazil is more or less racist since enacting these laws? If it is more racist, why do you suppose the law has not been successful at changing Brazilian people's attitudes? If it is less racist, do you feel that this law has been responsible for this, or is it something else? This poster registered in 2017 with >1000 posts is about to be banned as a troll in junior phase.
Also, this poster in the same thread is pretty interesting:
Core wrote:Brasilian lawyer here, my granduation thesis was on the crime of racism (later interpreted as homophobia as well) and the second phase of my bar exam was on constitutional Law , and I would like to say: criticism, harsh takes, exposés and other "mere disagreements" are not covered by hate speech.
The "comedian" in particular is a right wing lunatic who not only surfed the fascist wave in this country, he and his buddies are repeat offenders on this type of stuff, one time or another this would happen, I'm actually glad to see the law being used, because condemnations as these are rare, I remember that when I was doing my graduation thesis I had a single case of something like this happening and it was a dude who literally published a book with anti-semitic connotations, it was unheard of at the time for racism against black people, let alone homophobia being tried as this.
No right is absolute, especially when it infringes on other rights, for a society to work limits need to be estabilished, if you allow someone to constantly berate, harass and humiliate those whose "crimes" are just existing.
Free speech is supposed to defend you against government action, not give you card blanche to go around disseminating hateful ideologies, In Brasilian law we value (or at least we should this country is very flawed and by no means beautiful, those who are in the trenches know it) Dignity over some vain notion of freedom, after all you can't have dignity without freedom but you can totally be free to do some unsavory and harmful things, or even worse you can be coerced into awful acts and have that be masked as "freedom".
If anyone wants to know details about either the case or Brasilian law, I am here and will try to answer on the best of my ability.
Otherwise I have to say good riddance, by profession I am not "Impartial" I take sides, and I'm certainly not on the side of this piece of shit, also he can exchange jail time for like community service and other things, it's called a "Right-restricting sentence" rather than going to jail, it usually happens if your crime has no violence or threat to life and is inferior to four years.
Wasn't this guy sentenced to 8 years? I'm supposed to believe you're a lawyer?
His very next post quotes a damn Final Fantasy Tactics meme image.
Core wrote:If the penalty of a crime is just a fine, then it only exists for the lower classes.
Leave Nep alone. She's out there shoring up communities, bridging gaps, beavering away.
06-08-2025, 01:16 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-08-2025, 01:17 AM by Propagandhim.)
Quote:Free speech is supposed to defend you against government action, not give you card blanche to go around disseminating hateful ideologies .
https://veja.abril.com.br/coluna/veja-gente/as-falas-absurdas-de-leo-lins-que-o-levaram-a-prisao/
(images because they included some script to prevent copy and paste)
Quote:Brasilian lawyer here, my granduation thesis was on the crime of racism (later interpreted as homophobia as well) and the second phase of my bar exam was on constitutional Law , and I would like to say: criticism, harsh takes, exposés and other "mere disagreements" are not covered by hate speech.
The "comedian" in particular is a right wing lunatic who not only surfed the fascist wave in this country, he and his buddies are repeat offenders on this type of stuff, one time or another this would happen, I'm actually glad to see the law being used, because condemnations as these are rare, I remember that when I was doing my graduation thesis I had a single case of something like this happening and it was a dude who literally published a book with anti-semitic connotations, it was unheard of at the time for racism against black people, let alone homophobia being tried as this.
To be clear, the "lunatic" is the comedian doing edgy jokes and not the guy that studied law in a professional capacity and still wants to put someone in prison for nearly a decade for.... this.
"go out eating gay without a condom" is a fat4all post
14 users liked this post: Chudder Barbarity, Chumbawumbafan69, Keetongu, mormapope, StandingOvation, NekoFever, benji, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Boredfrom, BIONIC, Uncle, Taco Bell Tower, Propagandhim, Gameboy Nostalgia
Royalan more upset by this guy than the kids who literally killed an old man
06-08-2025, 01:26 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-08-2025, 01:27 AM by Propagandhim.)
https://www.resetera.com/threads/brazilian-comedian-sentenced-to-jail-for-racist-homophobic-jokes.1211220/page-3 wrote:No right is absolute, especially when it infringes on other rights...
Ya don't say?
Quote:....for a society to work limits need to be estabilished, if you allow someone to constantly berate, harass and humiliate those whose "crimes" are just existing.
"just existing" like demanding to have access to women's prisons, battered shelters, sororities, or in their combat sports league - just existing without infringing on anyone else's rights.
Except the Jews
- Resetera
Yeah, women's right is quickly demeaned and cast aside as "transphobia" the second it inconvenience the Trans movement.
"Lesbians want a place to hang up and meet up? Fuck you, TERF, for excluding us translesbians. Lesbians not wanting ladycock is some bigoted TERFy bullshit."
"Women prisoners not having to share space with a male rapist that decided they were suddenly trans, like, 5 minutes ago? Only transphobes would have a problem with that."
06-08-2025, 01:38 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-08-2025, 03:16 AM by Propagandhim.)
never wrote:
I think a lot of our obsession with free speech comes from our indoctrination of the American story and not because there is some greater truth or reason for it.
Nepenthe wrote:That's really all it is, coupled with a dose of Red Scare shit.
Let me tell you how aggravating it is every time there's a story of some racist piece of shit denigrating another human being, and your so-called allies start running defense for them in terms of whether they should suffer consequences because "it's his right to say it!!!"
Literally enraging.
Speech is the only peaceful mechanism for correcting error and challenging power. It's all people have to hold power accountable in a free country that allows self-governance. It protects minority viewpoints from suppression -- and without a peaceful outlet for dissent, there's only violence and authoritarianism. It's "literally enraging" that the state grants you this right for yourself? You want that taken away? You privileged, take-everything-for-granted fucking retard.
Funkelpop said: wrote:Well all this does is charge people up to ramp up the sexist/racist/homophobic jokes. Nepenthe wrote:No it doesn't, actually.
People's bigotry is their own responsibility.
You are not ever forced to be an asshole.
It's your responsibility to control how you react to things. You aren't forced to have your life fall apart everytime some idiot says something mean to you. We all have to live in a country that throws free speech out the window and have the government throw you in prison for words because Nepenthe can't figure out how to control how she reacts to what people say to her?
14 users liked this post: Chudder Barbarity, JoeBoy101, Keetongu, Tucker's Law, killamajig, Potato, Averon, Hap Shaughnessy, benji, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, MJBarret, Taco Bell Tower, imsotired, DavidCroquet
06-08-2025, 01:48 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-08-2025, 01:49 AM by Propagandhim.)
Nepenthe wrote:I don't think it's inherently contradictory to fight for prison abolition and revolution of a justice system while also not giving a shit when bigots get incarcerated under the current system. Empathy is limited.
13 users liked this post: Chudder Barbarity, JoeBoy101, Keetongu, Tucker's Law, Straight Edge, Averon, Hap Shaughnessy, benji, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, DavidCroquet, MJBarret, Taco Bell Tower, HaughtyFrank
06-08-2025, 01:50 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-08-2025, 02:00 AM by Propagandhim.)
Alright. Only so much Nepenthe I can take. Done for today. Sorry, fellas.
It's just so funny and fascinating to peer into the fishbowl of this living ecosystem that one huge asshole controls the temperature of, who spurts out all these blatantly idiotic, contradictory and hypocritical views, and has managed to create a space where the only ones who can challenge them have been banned, and the remaining ones won't do it. And then she dictates to everyone about why the freedom to speak is "literally enraging". She'd pay her entire salary to be an admin of this forum.
15 users liked this post: Chudder Barbarity, JoeBoy101, Keetongu, Tucker's Law, killamajig, Potato, Greatness Gone, Averon, benji, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, HaughtyFrank, DavidCroquet, MJBarret, D3RANG3D, Taco Bell Tower
(06-07-2025, 06:00 PM)DavidCroquet wrote: (06-07-2025, 05:21 PM)killamajig wrote: I know who Jeff reminds me of...
Zippy the Pinhead
Spoiler: (click to show)(click to hide)
He just needs that little ribbon on top of his hair to tie it all together. I have no context on Zippy but he is giving based IMO.
I AM HAVING FUN
(06-07-2025, 08:37 PM)Gameboy Nostalgia wrote: Y'all over here getting mad at Blueballs when y'all need to look at y'allself a little more. Blueballs is acting like y'alls conscience in his posts and y'all should reflect more on y'alls lives.
Y'all need to stop worrying about Jeff, Nep, and the rest of them and pay attention to what's more important.
Spoiler: (click to show)(click to hide) CUM
Ok, GameReba Nostalgia.
(06-07-2025, 09:48 PM)Gameboy Nostalgia wrote: Elon should've been less autistic, wore a suit to meetings, and shut the fuck up when the big boys were talking. 
But y'all do know this is nothing more than a farce created by the GOP to make the Dems focus more on the ELON and TRUMP feud and not the new spending bill.
All according to plan.

Editors note: Plan is white for keikaku
(06-07-2025, 09:55 PM)Gameboy Nostalgia wrote: No kink at pride. Thanks 
What we need is a shame parade.
1. You can't have a "right to dignity" this is merely a loophole for the state to violate rights, not protection of an actual right.
2. If America is so bad why do they never mention the superior places? Name me just one, one time, please. No white countries.
3. If free speech protections are so bad why do they never celebrate them being ignored? In that thread they're actually complaining about bigots being punished for protesting Israel. Sorry, you said you wanted bigots punished by the state. "They're not bigots!" That's not up to you, you said you wanted the state to do this. Never did you say "the state should do this but consult me first in every case!"
4. This case isn't Lula's doing (presumably) but he's continuing Bolsonaro's tradition: https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2023/5/5/a-brazilian-ministry-of-truth-is-in-the-making so let's not pretend this is just some lone "right-wing" bigot losing his free speech in Brazil.
5. It's not about the bigots right to say bigoted things, this is like saying we shouldn't bother with trials, demands for evidence and other parts of due process because it's protecting the murderers right to murder.
6. No, it absolutely is a contradiction to say you're a progressive, police and prison abolitionist but want the state to imprison everyone in society so that nobody can speak against the state.
7. And it's absolutely fucking telling that your argument that this isn't a contradiction because you want people who say things you don't like to face "consequences" like prison. Like, duh. That's what every reactionary says.
8. You don't get better societies with more violence.
9. "Words are violence so we should get to do actual violence" says people who should just get therapy.
06-08-2025, 03:45 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-08-2025, 03:46 AM by benji.)
(06-07-2025, 09:55 PM)Uncle wrote: ![[Image: LxJdpux.jpeg]](https://i.imgur.com/LxJdpux.jpeg) What if I see some lesbian TERFs at Pride talking about Harry Potter? What if I see some anti-trans gays misgendering someone? What if somebody at Pride is saying that non-binary is an incoherent concept nobody is duty bound to respect?
|