(3 hours ago)Let's Cyber wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/how-do-you-view-obama%E2%80%99s-presidency-in-a-post-trump-world.1517011/
Quote:If Joe Leiberman wasn't a snake Quote:If Joe Leiberman wasn't a snake and didn't tank the public option in the ACA bill, I think Obama's legacy would be stronger.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America%27s_Healthy_Future_Act#Comparisons_with_other_bills wrote:On September 29, the Finance Committee rejected two amendments to add a public plan to Baucus' proposal. Senator Jay Rockefeller's amendment was rejected 15 to 8, with five Democrats (Baucus, Kent Conrad, Blanche Lincoln, Tom Carper, Bill Nelson) and all Republicans voting no. Senator Chuck Schumer's amendment was defeated 13 to 10, with three Democrats (Baucus, Conrad, Lincoln) and all Republicans voting no.[35] They also forget that the ACA as it was passed in the House by only four votes too. There were eight Democrats who were going to vote against it over abortion until they won concessions. Something Ben Nelson also won in the Senate over the same topic.
They always have trouble understanding that members of Congress aren't elected to blindly serve the Party or the President. No matter how much Trump also desires that to be the case.
2 hours ago
(This post was last modified: 2 hours ago by benji.)
Quote:I do blame him for not forcing an up or down vote on Garland. Even if Bidens term showed that he'd have been a terrible pick, it was clear in 2016 that the it was a real issue and voters didn't care enough to believe people when they said abortion was on the ballot.
I know he was playing games because he wanted to let Hillary pick the actual person, but calling the Republicans bluff and making them actually do a vote on it would have at least made it register in voters minds.
Quote:And he held on to that until the end of his 2nd term, when he did not try to force the issue of his Supreme Court pick being treated normally. That shit should've went
to court, immediately, and been expedited and decided before his term was up. Even if SCOTUS had ruled again him and let that seat be stolen - which is NOT a given; SCOTUS then is not SCOTUS now - their ruling might possibly have set a precedent that would have prevented Trump and McConnell from seating another justice with days left in Trump's term.
Why do they think the President can force the Senate to do things? Especially one controlled by the opposition party?
edit:
Quote:He arguably could have made a recess appointment with the argument that the Senate had ceded its responsibility to advise and consent on the appointment by refusing to bring it up for a vote, and there were definitely people advocating for it at the time, but it's unclear how that would have resolved itself.
Quote:Wouldn't the recess appointment issue likely have been see by the Supreme Court? If so, we know how that would have ended.
Quote:Yeah, I think most likely it would have been slapped down. That said, in 2016 the court was 4-4 between conservative and liberal justices, so in the unlikely event that the justices were deadlocked I'm not quite sure what would have happened.
They already had decided this 9-0 two years earlier: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NLRB_v._Noel_Canning
2 hours ago
(This post was last modified: 1 hour ago by Jansen.)
https://www.resetera.com/threads/i-made-the-mistake-of-peaking-at-some-gaming-discourse-on-social-media-jesus-fucking-christ-its-about-mixtape.1515259/page-8#post-154851724
IMCaprica, post: 154851724, member: 58901 wrote:Just had someone on Bluesky tell me who I am and totally rewrite my lived experiences as fake because some complaints I had about the game were recurring complaints they had seen from a bunch of people online. What am I supposed to say to that?
I'm a pretty thorough complainer about Mixtape, but I've never even considered going up to someone who loves this game to tell them they're lying and their reasons for feeling how they feel aren't real. Absolute madness going on with this game.
I'm just happy anyone enjoys anything anymore. But I'm not going to pretend that I think this mixtape is even remotely realistic and relatable as an American who has been on this earth for nearly 4 decades. This mixtape isn't a 1999 teenage mixtape. It's a 40-something music buff's nostalgic streaming playlist. There are no radio songs. She can name drop "This Is How We Do It" but she couldn't add "The Crossroads"? "Waterfalls"? The game literally takes place the moment Ricky Martin was exploding and Santana was having a massive resurgence. It just doesn't work…for me.
 another welcoming bonfire they have there on Blue sky
https://www.resetera.com/threads/the-girlbossification-of-ai-reese-witherspoon-mel-robbins-and-sheryl-sandberg-are-telling-women-to-use-chatgpt-or-get-left-behind.1516483/page-2#post-154836247
Φοῖνιξ wrote:I have to admit I used AI to make a Mother's Day card yesterday.
...they were all out at the store and I had to make it fast. I wrote the text at least... Lobster Roll wrote:I wonder how people got out of this jam prior to AI. Φοῖνιξ wrote:TBH I'm not a proponent of using AI for stuff that should be...human. But in my case I'm not an artist. I don't usually make a card. So it's either buy a design somebody else made that was pumped out in a factory, with a message someone else wrote, or create a design like I did which is customized to my family and doesn't look like any card that exists, with a message I wrote.
But either way in this specific situation, most people are just buying something they didn't create. Lobster Roll wrote:However you want to justify it. Nepenthe wrote:You know you can get or cut out some blank cards and write and draw on your own, right? Like you are physically capable of putting a pen to some paper.
This isn't hard. Φοῖνιξ wrote:Yeah, a card I wrote would suck. I draw stick figures. It would be worse than what was actually made, which had our pets and our kid in a realistic pose with a funny message I wrote. My kid made her a card by hand.
Are we actually on the "AI is bad for everything" train? It isn't. It's fine to use for things you otherwise could not do. Like I said, I never make cards by hand. I wouldn't use this as a replacement for something I was already doing. What I created was more personal than some Hallmark crap off the rack. Nepenthe wrote:Φοῖνιξ wrote:Yeah, a card I wrote would suck. But it would actually be a product of your labor. Not only would it be more meaningful in that regard, but you would actually be in a position to develop a new skill.
Ultimately though, instead of buying a card made in a factory (aka, created by humans), you instead pilfered a free card commission from a robot, and since the robot cannot actually claim authorship, you convinced yourself into thinking you actually made something. You didn't.
Φοῖνιξ wrote:My kid made her a card by hand. So your kid put in more effort than you did. Wild.
Φοῖνιξ wrote:It's fine to use for things you otherwise could not do. But you are physically capable of making a card by hand. You just didn't want to go through the effort for whatever reason.
Φοῖνιξ wrote:Are we actually on the "AI is bad for everything" train? For the arts? Abso-fucking-lutely.
Φοῖνιξ wrote:What I created was more personal than some Hallmark crap off the rack. The most personal thing you could have done is sat down and do it yourself, to actually be vulnerable and communicate who you are through the medium of drawing to your loved one.
Instead you said "fuck that, I'm not good enough." If the majority of the artists working said "I'm not good enough" as a reason to not draw something, they would've never became artists at all. It's a skill you have to develop, but a lack of development on one's art doesn't mean that the art lacks value. Human art is inherently beautiful and I'm not sure why AI proponents can't see that. Aw yeah, drag this motherfucker, girlboss.
Spoiler: (click to show)(click to hide) Nepenthe wrote:instead of buying a card made in a factory (aka, created by humans), you instead pilfered a free card commission from a robot
Obligatory feminism:
Quote:This should be a sign to stop using Gen AI, if you needed any more common sense beaten in.
Reese Witherspoon
Mel Robbins
Sheryl Sandberg
Just ethically, set aside whatever shit you think you know about Gen AI... is that the team you wanna be on? RMS?
https://youtu.be/g9fwe_NEerE?si=neLO5Zg90l4VkgWs
Quote:I have no idea who any of these three are.
And will remain that way, thanks.
Quote:Republican Lite™ women love AI for some reason.
Quote:Not only are they shilling for gen ai but giving men in positions of authority the preemptive pass for being less likely to get crumb fucked up with the carpet lint by gen ai replacements and being more receptive to it (gee... wonder why).
But when your ex husband's hand is moving your already compromised mouth more I guess that's legally tight
Quote:Looking at the resumes of the three of them, I suppose they are experts in what it feels like to be left behind.
Quote:I have no idea who Sheryl Sandberg is.
Quote:Former Meta COO
Lmao of course
Quote:Yeaaah that's fine, I'll take whatever those folks think is "left behind". They're not exactly role model material.
Quote:Man, who.
Only old white ladies probably have any idea who those three are and old white ladies are probably the ones fucking with ai the most without even knowing it.
They're too far gone already anyways 👋👋
(1 hour ago)Hap Shaughnessy wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/hasan-piker-is-the-democrats%E2%80%99-new-man-on-the-trail-whether-they-like-it-or-not.1517113/#post-154852771
ClickyCal' wrote:At this point I would take President Hasan heavily over many of the leading 2028 candidates. That's weird, I previously got the impression that Clicky was against Presidents who would throw people into camps.
Clicky is in for a rude awakening when Hasan starts backing whoever the Dem's choose. Do not put faith in a streamer.
(10 hours ago)nachobro wrote: i checked out the game on gamepass since people wont shut up about it
its bad and im kinda convinced its made by ai
worse. a nepo baby.
40 minutes ago
(This post was last modified: 38 minutes ago by Let's Cyber.)
(59 minutes ago)benji wrote: That's weird, I previously got the impression that Clicky was against Presidents who would throw people into camps I'm curious if Clicky would push back on the idea that Hasan is a Maoist in favor of reeducation camps or not.
The Dog Shocker does hide his powerlevel quite a bit, I really do think a good chunk of his viewers think he's just a SocDem.
(3 hours ago)Let's Cyber wrote: This thread will get extremely stupid in a hurry
https://www.resetera.com/threads/how-do-you-view-obama%E2%80%99s-presidency-in-a-post-trump-world.1517011/
Obama wasn't the second coming of Chairman Mao, 2/10 would not president again. Also something something drones strikes.

Quote:He's a war criminal that faced 0 consequences for his crimes, I don't care about trying to wash away bad shit he did nor do I care to pretend he isn't a war criminal because he did some good things and was less of a giant fucking asshole than other USA presidents are.
 Quote:If Joe Leiberman wasn't a snake
Excuse me, the preferred ERA term is jewish Zionist rat
That thread exceeded my low expectations and confirms to me that Reee is full of coward hacks who spend all day trying to out virtue each other. They love Trump being in office as that adds to their endless victim status and want of things never improving.
If the USA was ever invaded these are the traitors who would be offering their dry stinky mouths and dirty asses to the invading forces or trading info for a new Nintendo game.
28 minutes ago
(This post was last modified: 24 minutes ago by Gameboy Nostalgia.)
Hasan isn't a Maoist, he's a larper plant of the Democrats to funnel enraged "SocDem" liberals who claim they are leftists to the polls like the good little sheep they are.
21 minutes ago
(This post was last modified: 20 minutes ago by DavidCroquet.)
Vertigo wrote: If the USA was ever invaded these are the traitors who would be offering their dry stinky mouths and dirty asses to the invading forces or trading info for a new Nintendo game. Ironically, this means they are America’s most effective deterrent against foreign invasion.
19 minutes ago
(This post was last modified: 11 minutes ago by HaughtyFrank.)
(Today, 01:09 AM)Boredfrom wrote: Being honest
I apologize for making you self-conscious, it's ok to say it
https://www.resetera.com/threads/motorslice-recoups-its-development-costs-within-hours-of-launch.1513966/page-3#post-154745128
Quote: User banned (1 month): Dismissing concerns of sexual harassment over multiple posts
DSDreamer wrote:XoXoXenogears wrote:Literally all they were saying is that the praise something gets isn't a just argument for its ethicality. Other people are though, jrx posted "What's present in this game isn't a kink, it's verging on sexual assault to my mind. If I did those things to another person, I'd probably be in jail."
(15 minutes ago)Hap Shaughnessy wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/motorslice-recoups-its-development-costs-within-hours-of-launch.1513966/page-3#post-154745128
Quote: User banned (1 month): Dismissing concerns of sexual harassment over multiple posts
DSDreamer wrote:XoXoXenogears wrote:Literally all they were saying is that the praise something gets isn't a just argument for its ethicality. Other people are though, jrx posted "What's present in this game isn't a kink, it's verging on sexual assault to my mind. If I did those things to another person, I'd probably be in jail."
https://www.resetera.com/threads/forza-horizon-6-unencrypted-files-accidentally-got-leaked-via-a-steam-update-game-has-already-been-cracked-release-is-in-9-days-early-access-in-5.1516081/page-5#post-154843048
Quote: User Banned (2 Weeks): Conspiracy Theorizing; Attempted Thread Derail
Something Creative wrote:Afrikan wrote:How does this happen?
Disgruntled employee who knows they are going to be let go soon anyway?
Or an employee who is forced to do a job they usually don't do, because of layoffs? (Edit- I mean an accident because not fully knowing the procedure)
Or just a mistake/incompetence? burgerdog wrote:Did a reviewer leak the game, then? Could it be someone upset with Microsoft's role in the Gaza genocide?
https://www.resetera.com/threads/the-bds-movement-calls-for-a-boycott-of-xbox-and-microsoft-gaming-products-over-its-parent-companys-complicity-in-the-genocide-in-gaza.1155057/
|