Quote:![[Image: new-black-cat-skin-model-comparison-v0-1...4c03eee013]](https://preview.redd.it/new-black-cat-skin-model-comparison-v0-1mxdpjzk2y3h1.jpg?width=477&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ad1c431ed0b4cd26945ebf8d5b1e7c4c03eee013)
caught this earlier and i again must state my complete and total disdain for marvel rivals and how it treats women
https://www.reddit.com/r/marvelrivals/comments/1tqgrd3/new_black_cat_skin_model_comparison/
they're just making female characters have varying breast and ass sizes between skins and some of them are getting to absurd
https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-women-criticise-sexualised-character-designs-ot3-make-her-look-more-corpulent-more-stuffed-where-the-eyes-cant-escape.275780/post-155547904
Absurd? Have you seen Kim Kardashian?
Is rape more or less particularly heinous than genocide?
(Yesterday, 01:03 AM)benji wrote: (Yesterday, 12:42 AM)BananaBlast wrote: Character is a rapist towards real life celebrity figures (that they hate) = "wowie, I guess that's Baki for you, teehee " Yup. Not to mention that like, rape is a particularly heinous act. It's not "just" violence, rape is unique in just how particularly bad it is. Guys who reduce it to a joke or simple shock value, or act like it's on the same level as something like murder are totally missing the point, either out of ignorance or, unfortunately, often very willingly.
I’m gonna say this and it’s gonna sound ironic but hear me out. At least after you’re murdered you aren’t suffering anymore. I mean yea you’re dead and that sucks don’t get me wrong. But yea I’d probably rate murder as slightly less heinous than rape. Kind of like the logic that the death penalty lets people escape the far shittier option of life in prison with no parole and the suffering that can entail.
but I thought Reset is the place for polite discussion with lots of developers, and not for drive-by posting and personal attack.
(05-28-2026, 08:40 PM)benji wrote: (05-28-2026, 08:25 PM)Hap Shaughnessy wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/%E2%80%98both-parties-kind-of-get-it-wrong%E2%80%99-the-young-men-who-may-swing-the-midterms.1532593/page-2#post-155535313
Nepenthe wrote:When you live in a system where your value as a person is directly proportional to your ability to bring in income But it's not? This is just your own projection? 
Nepenthe wrote:At the end of the day, everyone deserves a dignified way of life regardless. What is this even supposed to mean? 
Leftist philosophy so often boils down to, "I want what they have but I don't want to work for it."
Yesterday, 02:16 AM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 02:23 AM by BananaBlast.)
(Yesterday, 01:17 AM)HaughtyFrank wrote: Quote:![[Image: new-black-cat-skin-model-comparison-v0-1...4c03eee013]](https://preview.redd.it/new-black-cat-skin-model-comparison-v0-1mxdpjzk2y3h1.jpg?width=477&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ad1c431ed0b4cd26945ebf8d5b1e7c4c03eee013)
caught this earlier and i again must state my complete and total disdain for marvel rivals and how it treats women
https://www.reddit.com/r/marvelrivals/comments/1tqgrd3/new_black_cat_skin_model_comparison/
they're just making female characters have varying breast and ass sizes between skins and some of them are getting to absurd
https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-women-criticise-sexualised-character-designs-ot3-make-her-look-more-corpulent-more-stuffed-where-the-eyes-cant-escape.275780/post-155547904 Ironically I had that same exact reddit link tabbed to the side  Losers crying about a skin for black cat having a bigger ass, oh no the horror!
(Yesterday, 01:17 AM)HaughtyFrank wrote: Absurd? Have you seen Kim Kardashian? Nope, they'll never acknowledge real life women with huge badonks, especially not the BBL demons. They have to keep reinforcing their cognitive dissonance to ensure the hivemind doesn't immediately fall apart.
(Yesterday, 01:19 AM)Lonewulfeus wrote: (Yesterday, 01:03 AM)benji wrote: (Yesterday, 12:42 AM)BananaBlast wrote: Character is a rapist towards real life celebrity figures (that they hate) = "wowie, I guess that's Baki for you, teehee " Yup. Not to mention that like, rape is a particularly heinous act. It's not "just" violence, rape is unique in just how particularly bad it is. Guys who reduce it to a joke or simple shock value, or act like it's on the same level as something like murder are totally missing the point, either out of ignorance or, unfortunately, often very willingly.
I’m gonna say this and it’s gonna sound ironic but hear me out. At least after you’re murdered you aren’t suffering anymore. I mean yea you’re dead and that sucks don’t get me wrong. But yea I’d probably rate murder as slightly less heinous than rape. Kind of like the logic that the death penalty lets people escape the far shittier option of life in prison with no parole and the suffering that can entail.
I have no idea how I ended up on this video about canaries earlier but I freaked the fuck out when I saw this dude was advocating for rape
(Yesterday, 01:17 AM)HaughtyFrank wrote: Quote:![[Image: new-black-cat-skin-model-comparison-v0-1...4c03eee013]](https://preview.redd.it/new-black-cat-skin-model-comparison-v0-1mxdpjzk2y3h1.jpg?width=477&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ad1c431ed0b4cd26945ebf8d5b1e7c4c03eee013)
caught this earlier and i again must state my complete and total disdain for marvel rivals and how it treats women
https://www.reddit.com/r/marvelrivals/comments/1tqgrd3/new_black_cat_skin_model_comparison/
they're just making female characters have varying breast and ass sizes between skins and some of them are getting to absurd
https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-women-criticise-sexualised-character-designs-ot3-make-her-look-more-corpulent-more-stuffed-where-the-eyes-cant-escape.275780/post-155547904
Absurd? Have you seen Kim Kardashian?
No wonder they're angry
User banned (Two weeks): Boys rhetorical club
Yesterday, 05:04 AM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 12:26 PM by BIONIC.)
B-Dubs, post: 155521651, member: 143 wrote:Guys, I'm going to be real: just attack the argument and not the poster. It's not that hard. Who cares if they post in a gacha thread? Or if their name/avatar is from a specific gacha game? That doesn't make their argument wrong. Keep in mind, I am not saying their argument was right, just that what people were doing did literally nothing to disprove what they were saying. Instead of actually having a discussion, actually going "You're wrong because...," people went straight for the personal attacks. This thread did not need to turn out the way it did, we shouldn't have needed to do anything, but because people, for some reason, couldn't have an actual conversation, we had to step in, lock it, and toss a bunch of people.
Just have the conversation next time. It's an internet forum, presumably we're all here to talk about stuff, so talk about stuff instead of just insulting each other. This isn't a big ask.
Sure thing, boss.
——
Xadra, post: 155523538, member: 49057 wrote:Where is the proper channel to inquire about a warning?
Thanks
GrayMage, post: 155524057, member: 114710 wrote:Submit a Ticket
Xadra, post: 155525095, member: 49057 wrote:Thanks, i wasn't sure if I was doing it right.
The thing is, I already submitted a ticket and they rejected it and closed but no word. 😭
Idk maybe they are busy, but I was being polite, feels it's not the right way to treat the community.
If we cannot learn what we did wrong, it's not easy to be better. Feels one sided.
——
Lobster Roll, post: 155526286, member: 60178 wrote:I didn't realize that users in that thread were stalking OP out and then pointing each other to this thread like "get a load of this". I have this thread set to an alert so I automatically get notified when new posts are made and figured others had the same thing in place. But yeah, I can't believe somebody thought it was a good idea to encourage others to follow OP around like that.
This two-faced cunt
——
Aero, post: 155509453, member: 15661 wrote:also wrt the common refrain of “if you want the site to be less depressing, make more fun threads!” why would i even risk making a thread (never mind putting effort into it, i imagine that first post took a while to research/write) when there’s a chance i might get eviscerated by the angry mob
Minthara, post: 155546302, member: 421 wrote:I know it's been a few thread pages but I just wanted to say here that you will very much not be eviscerated by a mob for making fun threads. I can tell you from first hand experience as someone who pretty much does nothing but make very strongly opinionated threads that are sometimes controversial, the "worst thing" that often happens is everyone just ignores your thread, which is just the way the internet is.
And if someone does come into a thread and either attack you or troll, which has happened in some threads I've made, if you or others use the report function the trash IS firmly taken out. It may not happen instantly, because the mod team is unpaid, has lives and also needs to discuss the angle they want to take, but they do action in cases where people have clearly crossed the line and pretty much always have whenever I've made a report.
The truly hardest part of making a thread on this forum is when people are purposefully trying to get it closed, but that doesn't happen to fun threads here, mostly threads that are clearly ruffling some feathers or are getting brigaded by a subset of people.
As long as the OP "puts in the work" on their thread by posting in it and not abandoning it after the OP, engaging with people responding to them, using thread marks (if needed) and keeping the thread up to date (if applicable), the moderation team always does their best to step in and ensure bullshit doesn't happen.
It's when an OP posts something and then ghosts or was clearly trolling that threads like I describe often result in a shit storm. The key to posting a thread is to remember (especially if it's a serious thread) is that the OP is responsible for framing the thread, and framing the thread (title, OP, supporting media) is everything and often determines the post quality for the rest of the thread.
But fun threads? You are more than fine.
——
AngelsOfDelusion, post: 155551786, member: 241783 wrote:That is correct. I was actually preparing to answer some questions in that thread and then I saw those and decided that it was not worth the effort. Didn't come back yesterday because I NEED TO BREATHE.
The things is. I used this name during the period when the story of said characters appeared. I chose it because it means any Google search would not be able to locate my real life identity. Its OPSEC in this increasingly dangerous internet.
This is true. I tried engaging the first few posters. Went to sleep because there is time difference (yes, I live on the other side of the world).
Then I woke up to a shit storm.
It was clear by that point there is a significant number of posters in the thread who are not willing to engage in the "article that I did research on" and instead prefer to talk about the ZZZ incident that should be the topic of another thread, or drive by post that are just variations of "AI bad" that has nothing to do with the article itself. It was just not worth it. I have a job and life. The article probably took me 3 hours to properly find all the sources alone. If further reply would just bring more of hate, what is the point?
I am glad I have anti-depressant with me when I saw the replies.
12 users liked this post: Green Jupiter, BananaBlast, killamajig, MJBarret, kaleidoscopium, Let's Cyber, benji, Cheers, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, HaughtyFrank, Hap Shaughnessy, Taco Bell Tower
Yesterday, 05:11 AM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 05:13 AM by simiansmarts.)
https://www.resetera.com/threads/trump%E2%80%99s-approval-plunges-among-his-white-working-class-base.1533175/#post-155553079
AceDomino wrote:If you're part of the working class and you support Trump, honestly, you should just go and hang yourself. I'm being serious. I respect an honest enemy more than a traitor. I may not have any sympathy for the oligarchs and plutocrats but at least I can acknowledge they're looking out for their own interests like I look out for mine, those just happen to be diametrically opposed.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/the-misinformation-regarding-mihoyos-ai-usage-is-insane.1531216/page-4#post-155495317
Quote: User Banned (2 weeks): Hostility to other users in multiple recent threads, history of similar behavior
Adulfzen wrote:going to bat for gacha slop to defend gen ai usage, is peak pathethic behavior, I'm impressed
https://www.resetera.com/threads/star-fox-announced-releasing-june-25-switch-2.1512472/page-52#post-154740955
Quote: User Banned (Permanently): Misogynistic Rhetoric; History of the Same
SPRidley wrote:mael wrote:At least there's room for the multiplayer to solve that a bit.
It's baffling that the cancelled Star Fox 2 is much better in that regard.
For Kat, it's the only female character so that magnifies the issue tenfold.
Otherwise I kinda like what they did with her design, it's unappealing as hell but I like that they went in that direction.
Star Wolf is majestic, the redesigns are just perfect.
Pigma is the absolute highlight, I couldn't imagine a better design for that character. Im not a huge fan, Katts personality was basically Faye Valentine, they could have gone more that way. She also doesnt look neither like a cat, nor an engineer like some people are trying to sell, because and engineer wouldnt have used Homer's make up shot gun in whore mode. And from the dialogue they had showed, it seems that her old personality is also out the window, at least i hope she still flirts with Falco, because that dynamic between both was fun.
She is not playable in multiplayer btw, only star fox and star wolf are, so if they are not hidding unlockable surprises for multi...
I do like a lot the star wolf redesigns, they do look like they should, even andrew, that looks like a super pro, once he opens his mouth and animtes, its still a nepo baby and now, but has like im too cool and rich for this shit face facade now.
Rum&coke ' wrote:If they really wanted to introduce Star Fox to a new generation I think a better decision would've been to have made a complete reboot that brings the female characters from 2 and Krystal into the mix from the start. Going back to it only being dudes is a disappointment when the series has branched out already. It's also 2026 video games are not just for boys, give the girls some furry characters to see themselves in!
What's the plan if this game sells well? We know they won't remake Adventures, are we just going to get a Star Fox 2 that has Krystal or are they planning on retconning Krystal entirely?
The discourse on Zero is pedantry. The people arguing know what people mean when they say Zero is a rehash they just want to argue for the sake of it. "errm ackchually..." Yep, that would have been great. May and Fiyu also have the best female designs of the series.
In some positive news, during the direct, the only mention of more star fox games was only adventure, assalut and command werent even mentioned, they may have something cooking with adventures (would love not for a remake, but a reimagining of that game)
Yesterday, 06:53 AM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 09:39 AM by Orange Juice Box.)
(05-28-2026, 06:33 PM)Hap Shaughnessy wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/the-art-pub-show-off-your-work-help-each-other-out.3018/page-57#post-155477449
EchizenKurage wrote:A few old paintings of mine too
[/spoiler]

I kind of like this one, Bob.
So Nepenthe has debates with her dog? Is it telling her what to do?
![[Image: David_Berkowitz_Arrested_August_10_1977_..._Argus.jpg]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1a/David_Berkowitz_Arrested_August_10_1977_Mount_Vernon_Argus.jpg)
"I suppose you make a good point that licking your balls is will never be appreciated in our lifetimes without organizing. I will bring this up at the next mutual aid community gathering/HOA meeting"
And leave her alone. She's simply ascertained that "dialectical," is the best word to use. Even when talking about raising a dog.
My dog says Nepenthe is a famous cunt
(05-28-2026, 10:56 PM)Greatness Gone wrote: It almost feels like Planetsmasher somehow got more retarded over the past few days. Almost every post from him is worse than usual.
 I've never seen him talk about playing Destiny before but the cunt is suddenly all over the numerous threads in the past few days about Bungie offering his boring as fuck opinion about everything. Dude just tries to dominate threads with his negativity.
(Yesterday, 07:48 AM)HardcoreRetro wrote: Wait, it was seed!?
I watched that video without the sound on and now my canary is dead. 
zeovgm wrote:You know what would be cool?
If instead of calling him an ugly fuck, the official Democrat Twitter quote tweeted Miller and defended trans people.
Feel free to end that tweet by calling him an ugly fuck, which is a factual statement, but this is performative nonsense if Dems aren't actually fighting back and defending the people who he is attacking.
koopathecasual wrote:I mean, quote tweeting Miller would also literally be performative as well. Actual change is not going to happen on Twitter dot com.
zeovgm wrote:Not if they're using the opportunity to stand up for human rights.
They obviously then need to back that up with further actions but it's a major step up from the ignoring of trans people that the party has been doing and certainly more impactful than "lol ur ugly."
https://www.resetera.com/threads/democrats-official-twitter-account-to-steven-miller-“shut-up-you-ugly-fuck”.1532596/page-5#post-155555251
They really haven’t figured out why they lost in 2024  , Plenty more examples in that thread
12 users liked this post: yetanotheraccountholyf, Let's Cyber, Vertigo, Hap Shaughnessy, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Cheers, BananaBlast, Taco Bell Tower, killamajig, MJBarret, DavidCroquet, HaughtyFrank
went to look at mina the hollower steam discussions
always like seeing a bunch of normal topics, one or two replies, but then out of nowhere...
I'd give my rapeseed to Neppy if you know what I mean
Spoiler: (click to show)(click to hide) To plant in the community garden of course. Take a rape, leave a rape
Yesterday, 10:59 AM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 11:00 AM by HaughtyFrank.)
(Yesterday, 10:33 AM)kaleidoscopium wrote: zeovgm wrote:You know what would be cool?
If instead of calling him an ugly fuck, the official Democrat Twitter quote tweeted Miller and defended trans people.
Feel free to end that tweet by calling him an ugly fuck, which is a factual statement, but this is performative nonsense if Dems aren't actually fighting back and defending the people who he is attacking.
koopathecasual wrote:I mean, quote tweeting Miller would also literally be performative as well. Actual change is not going to happen on Twitter dot com.
zeovgm wrote:Not if they're using the opportunity to stand up for human rights.
They obviously then need to back that up with further actions but it's a major step up from the ignoring of trans people that the party has been doing and certainly more impactful than "lol ur ugly."
https://www.resetera.com/threads/democrats-official-twitter-account-to-steven-miller-“shut-up-you-ugly-fuck”.1532596/page-5#post-155555251
They really haven’t figured out why they lost in 2024 , Plenty more examples in that thread
Zeo? The guy who spends all days tweeting "you're an ugly fuck" at chuds on twitter is scolds Democrats for being performative by tweeting "you're an ugly fuck?"
19 users liked this post: yetanotheraccountholyf, Let's Cyber, DavidCroquet, Vertigo, Chudder Barbarity, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Alpacx, Cheers, Jonsey, Averon, BananaBlast, Taco Bell Tower, simiansmarts, BIONIC, Orange Juice Box, killamajig, MJBarret, Lonewulfeus, kaleidoscopium
(Yesterday, 10:59 AM)HaughtyFrank wrote: (Yesterday, 10:33 AM)kaleidoscopium wrote: zeovgm wrote:You know what would be cool?
If instead of calling him an ugly fuck, the official Democrat Twitter quote tweeted Miller and defended trans people.
Feel free to end that tweet by calling him an ugly fuck, which is a factual statement, but this is performative nonsense if Dems aren't actually fighting back and defending the people who he is attacking.
koopathecasual wrote:I mean, quote tweeting Miller would also literally be performative as well. Actual change is not going to happen on Twitter dot com.
zeovgm wrote:Not if they're using the opportunity to stand up for human rights.
They obviously then need to back that up with further actions but it's a major step up from the ignoring of trans people that the party has been doing and certainly more impactful than "lol ur ugly."
https://www.resetera.com/threads/democrats-official-twitter-account-to-steven-miller-“shut-up-you-ugly-fuck”.1532596/page-5#post-155555251
They really haven’t figured out why they lost in 2024 , Plenty more examples in that thread
Zeo? The guy who spends all days tweeting "you're an ugly fuck" at chuds on twitter is scolds Democrats for tweeting "you're an ugly fuck?"
Zeo does it right, he says “trans rights are human rights, you ugly fascist fuck”
14 users liked this post: yetanotheraccountholyf, Let's Cyber, Vertigo, Chudder Barbarity, Greatness Gone, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Cheers, Averon, BananaBlast, Taco Bell Tower, simiansmarts, Orange Juice Box, MJBarret, HaughtyFrank
(Yesterday, 10:33 AM)kaleidoscopium wrote: zeovgm wrote:You know what would be cool?
If instead of calling him an ugly fuck, the official Democrat Twitter quote tweeted Miller and defended trans people.
Feel free to end that tweet by calling him an ugly fuck, which is a factual statement, but this is performative nonsense if Dems aren't actually fighting back and defending the people who he is attacking.
koopathecasual wrote:I mean, quote tweeting Miller would also literally be performative as well. Actual change is not going to happen on Twitter dot com.
zeovgm wrote:Not if they're using the opportunity to stand up for human rights.
They obviously then need to back that up with further actions but it's a major step up from the ignoring of trans people that the party has been doing and certainly more impactful than "lol ur ugly."
https://www.resetera.com/threads/democrats-official-twitter-account-to-steven-miller-“shut-up-you-ugly-fuck”.1532596/page-5#post-155555251
They really haven’t figured out why they lost in 2024 , Plenty more examples in that thread
I also doubt the other side won because fucking Stephen Miller.
Yesterday, 12:48 PM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 01:35 PM by BIONIC.)
mentok15, post: 155544577, member: 36517 wrote:I think a lot of people just want to be aggressive/bully others and are looking for any "morally correct" reason to do so. The reason why (AI in this case) isn't the main concern, it's just an excuse for the behaviour some want to engage in.
It's an internet issue overall but seems more pronounced here.
Yahsper, post: 155555887, member: 24852 wrote:We've gone over this before in this topic and I keep coming back to it. The reason why may not be the main concern, but the fact is there's a subsection of Era who has decided that AI is the Big Bad of Everything and when AI is mentioned, you are allowed to bully. Even in this very thread, whenever someone brings up that fact, we get some people coming up with replies in the likes of "the community has decided we hate AI" or "that's how we do things here". Which is not only quite the self-fulfilling prophecy when people with even a moderate stance on AI get driven out or told they need to shut up, it's also hypocritical as fuck when people are hiding behind arguments like ecological impact and job loss but at the same time when topics come up about destructive industries like industrial agriculture or Temu/AliExpress the reaction ranges from open defiance against changing behavior to laissez-faire.
Personally I find this hypocritical behavior not entirely out of line with how Era as a broad group mainly rallies around anti-USA politics. You'll get a 30 page thread on Trump's muslim travel ban and then scroll further and see a thread championing China, who is actively putting Muslims in labor and reeducation camps. In the US-Iran war, you'll have people openly cheer for Iran because if Iran wins, Trump loses, conveniently ignoring that Iran does everything Trump does time two.
I'm not saying this to downplay AI or Trump, it is to illustrate that instead of having even halfway decent discussions on how to navigate an increasingly complicated world where it's always ever more challenging to live a moral, ethical life while doing no harm while still trying to actually live your life, provide and care for your loved ones and generally just managing to survive, Era has evolved in a place where being progressive is reduced to being a fashion statement, and if you're not saying whatever is 'in vogue' right now, you're out. And if you're out, you're obviously trash and allowed to be bullied.
Nameless Hero, post: 155556985, member: 4464 wrote:I guess my question would be, what people actually want here. Obviously over the line posts should be moderated. But mods can't force people to like a terrible thread.
All they can do is lock the thread when it becomes clear it's turning into a dogpille but me being the 432 person to disagree and say the thread is bad cannot be grounds for moderation. Again unless my post crosses a line.
You can appeal to users to not do that sure, and you can lament people ignoring that appeal but really there's not much more to it.
Yahsper, post: 155557456, member: 24852 wrote:Just shaking your head and clicking away is somehow inconceivable? Why do you need to be the 432th person to disagree. If you have nothing to add, just shut up. It's ironic that bots are banned (rightfully so) but users posting bot-quality posts would not be grounds for moderation.
Like, I understand that from a mod perspective, it's just unfeasible to put in that sort of time. But in abstract terms, yes, people should be discouraged from doing so.
AngelsOfDelusion, post: 155558119, member: 241783 wrote:Regarding your point on "progressive is reduced to being a fashion statement", coincidentally, the famous transgender YouTuber Natalie Wynn recently caused a shitstorm on the "online left" after she did interviews with a few podcasts, in which she criticized the online left for caring more about purity than actually enacting changes. (Not exactly quote but this is the idea.)
[
While I disagree with Ms Wynn regarding policy position such as that on Palestine, I can respect she has came to a different conclusion based on her education and experience. Such nuance, of course, is not popular online and you can easily find response videos from "the left" in which commentators who used to be friendly towards Ms Wynn are suddenly very hostile because she said something that is considered "wrong".
When presented with a choice between "left wing", "liberal", "progressive" community; and "right wing", "conservative", "reactive" community, an argument I used to heard a lot about why we should choose the left instead of the right is the following:
Liberals are diverse vs Conservatives are homogeneous
Liberals are inclusive vs Conservatives are exclusive
Liberals care about facts vs Conservatives care about rhetoric
Liberals use concrete arguments vs Conservatives use arguments that fit their world views
etc, etc....
Yet, when you look at the now closed thread, have we seen inclusivity? diverse opinion? concrete arguments?
Instead, the thread look like it could have came straight from Gamergate.
I am old enough to remember what happened with Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn, when they have to defend against accusations that are complete bollocks. This incident really shattered some of my naive imagination of the "liberals".
You dun fucked up now. Contra is excommunicado motherfucker
AngelsOfDelusion, post: 155558557, member: 241783 wrote:Oh, and one more thing.
I am forever grateful for the support from the Hoyo community on Era.
After the incident, I have received multiple DMs from different members asking if I am okay, and that they understand my point, and that it is not worth it to try to discuss gachas in the main board. I will stick to their advice for now.
It’s so heartwarming when the pedo community support and uplift each other
PenisSmasher wrote:Honestly this really can't be overstated, I think. Having a mode to play in where it feels like you're making progress and not just being slammed up against online players who DO NOT CARE how inexperienced you are is a huge boon for new players.
Like, yeah, the low-level WT battles are so easy they borderline feel like jokes for anyone who knows how to do a QCF. But that's a lot more bearable than online matchmaking for someone who doesn't even know the fundamentals yet, and Training Mode isn't really a good substitute.
I’d pay good money to watch PSmasher play online ranked in Street Fighter and lose his shit
|