Journal of Other Forum Analysis (Volume II, Issue 1)

[Propagandhim]

Yall dont know the dialectical materialism.  The theory.  Yall don't put in the work.    It's fundamental to understand the world through its material conditions and inherent contradictions in order to lead to change.....but, i ain't leading you to that understanding.  Real leftists have been here the whole time, organizing - where the fuck have you been?  The real ones have been doin' the work at 242 Oak Tree Drive near the...you know what?  Fuck yall.  Find it yourself...if you have the object permanence to use Google Maps.

[benji]

if you have the object permanence to use Google Maps.

The doxxing tool?

[benji]

THIS GOOGLE?!?

[HaughtyFrank]

Why don't you just tell them?  Why do they have to go looking for it.  Is it an easter egg hunt?

The answer is organizing and end capitalism. Order unclear.

[benji]

I'm sure it's difficult modering something like YouTube but you need to do better.

You allow so many channels that are filled with constant hate speech to just continue existing, whether it's people like SmashJT and The Qartering with their bigotry and hate campaigns or a "gaming" channel like Geeks + Gamers that just the other day were talking about how "lesbos" were ruining The Last of Us.

Hate speech and bigotry are not "opinions."

[benji]

Mutual aid alert for another ResetERA.com member (thank you Melody Shreds for boosting awareness)


Also Shreds girlfriend needs help too:


And while you're there whoever this is but it's not as urgent:

[simiansmarts]

Mutual aid alert for another ResetERA.com member (thank you Melody Shreds for boosting awareness)


Also Shreds girlfriend needs help too:


And while you're there whoever this is but it's not as urgent:

and coincidentally they're all disabled trans women in their 30s. 
 
no more anime and videogames until we figure out what the hell is going on 

[benji]

Never before on ResetERA.com has Nepenthe posted "dialectical materialism" or even "dialectic" but she did post this on the same page as someone else posting it:

Not going to get too embroiled in the weeds of the higher concepts of degrowth and whatnot beyond criticizing capitalism, greed, and overconsumption as "human nature." This is a thought-terminating cliche that doesn't necessarily have any anthropological or genetic backing to it. If it did, politicians would be quoting the science saying as such.

Capitalism and neoliberalism are not inevitable states of being; the former is only a few hundred years old out of our 100,000 year lifespan as a species, and neoliberalism far younger. They're just arbitrary sociopolitical constructs.

A far more likelier explanation for the permanence of capitalism is a simple one of environmental effects- tie the act of selling your labor to your ability to not die and socially ascend, and thus you inherently train humans to think that capitalism is somehow an objective, biological reality. Hell, you are absolutely guaranteeing that the most sociopathic assholes rise to the top.

And it's not like this doesn't carry over to other social mores. We already know that crime is linked to poverty, that you effectively incentivize humans to break the law to meet their needs and wants when they are outcast from the systems that would allow them to do so otherwise through legal means. This is why racists are on one when they call poor Black and Brown people lazy- they're attributing an environmental outcome to a presumed biological deficiency.

Why is this easy to understand but capitalist realism is just casually accepted?

Which is to say, I don't believe in capitalist realism so much as I believe in entropic decay. Which is to say in more down to earth terms that if we want to better ourselves and our society, there is a huge cost in energy. We have to work really really really hard at it, because otherwise we will decay faster than we will learn or grow.

You're not telling me much that I don't believe. Getting the ball rolling on change for issues like "climate change" or "world hunger" or whatever is hard because you are fundamentally dealing with a problem that is large, looming, and scary, which causes paralysis. Further causes of paralysis are the fact that we are burdened by capitalism into succumbing further to it versus the shit we actually want to do. Everyone is tired. But that's irrelevant to the fact that anyone who cares about these problems has to start somewhere regardless. But you're not doing anyone, or yourself, any favors in overcoming the psychological hurdles inherent to inaction if you chalk up the state of things to "human nature." If that's the case then there is no need for you to actually fight for anything because our current society is an objective, scientific inevitability that cannot change at all. Instead, I argue that anyone who cares needs to wholeheartedly believe that all the bullshit we deal with are arbitrary political constructs held in place by gentlemen's agreements, that we can work towards the society that the vulnerable deserve.

The thing is, "We're mutable and tend to revert to the lowest common demonitor" is nonetheless an identifiable problem, or perhaps state of things, that can be discussed and worked with. Because then the question becomes "Well, how do we engender or build environments that incentivize humans towards more active behaviors more aligned with our ideals?" and we can go from there. But just "human nature is a shit show" shuts down discussion. If humans are doomed by their biological nature to be a shitshow, then there's no solution to large-scale problems you can impart to create change that doesn't fundamentally violate ethical boundaries in the first place. You may see the language as just a shorthand, but I see this kind of negative framing as a death knell to any sort of desire for improvement. And the negativity can compound since terminally-online liberals have a tendency towards nihilism and anxiousness which just makes the paralysis worse.

Optimism, imagination, and positive framing are necessary for fighting for a world that doesn't exist, and it doesn't mean you delve into naivete or underestimation of the work at hand either. Positivity doesn't have to become toxic. It means you just psychologically prime yourself to be more apt for doing the work than not, no more or less. To me, human nature isn't a shitshow. For all of the bullshit and horror in the world I fundamentally believe in a baseline good for most people on the planet. We don't live in a perpetual Purge; I don't fear getting my head bashed in when I go to the store or whatever, and I don't live in a well-off area or anything either. If nothing else, I tend to see respect, peace, laughter, and acts of kindness when I take a second to just look around myself when I'm in a public space. Instead, it's our environments and political systems that are a shitshow. Fix those, and human nature follows. At the end of the day humans are animals, specifically social ones, and we already know as a basic fact that animals thrive in environments where their needs are met and they're socially and mentally enriched. So just fix the goshdarned environments. I'm not saying it's easy. I'm saying that is the solution.

 

Earlier in the thread she posted this as a STAFF COMMUNICATION:

Official Staff Communication
Bringing up the locked thread regarding how pet ownership could essentially pay for world hunger is quite amusing.

Had most of the posters bothered to read that OP, as well as the thread creator's multiple clarifications, it would've been easy to glean that the Oxfam article never actually mentioned pet ownership's impact or lack thereof on world hunger. That was a comparison specifically brought up by the OP as a way to illustrate the monetary scale of the problem in relatable terms. It was not a call to action for mass pet release or euthanasia, nor was it a negative judgement on part of pet owners, in the same way that telling a McDonald's employee that they have to work 1000 hours a day to earn Elon Musk's wealth or whatever is not an indictment on McDonald's employees' work ethic. Sometimes, just sometimes, you make comparisons just to illustrate concepts.

It was pet owners who got up in their feelings because of a bad read. And I get the read- we've become hip to the fact that corporate and political entities will frame large scale sociopolitical issues in terms of individualistic action in order to temper mass calls for legislative action. "Get a job." "Reduce your carbon footprint." "Just follow the law." etc. I want to assume in good faith that that is what happened, because a lot of people felt personally attacked and insisted on rerouting blame to billionaires.

However, facts don't care about your feelings. It was a complete misread on part of pet owners and, ironically, was illustrative of part of Booshka's point that liberals in the Global North are not prepared for the idea of confronting any personal sacrifices that may need to happen in order to live in the equitable world they call for. It's easy to call for systemic change because that's up to the bigwigs, and it's also largely true, but it belies the fact that systemic change means you will not be guaranteed the same quality of life you have now. And if you can't handle that, you're not really for saving the world. It's all talking the talk but not walking the walk. And even then, neither the OP or Booshka said that people should not be allowed to own pets. They clarified multiple times in the previous thread.

Now you're dragging this dumb shit from a locked thread into this one because some of you now have a personal grudge against Booshka for something they never said because you couldn't be bothered to read the OP.

Knock it off, or risk a ban.

edit: She doesn't appear to have ever used "materialism" before now either, though I know she's incorrectly claimed to be a materialist in the past so that's close enough. Here's a random post from a few weeks ago:

The Post WW2 world Order, with all it's flaws and hypocrisies, was better than what existed before it.

It being over is not going to be an improvement.

This reads like typical white supremacist liberal drivel.

Zionist genocide and ethnic cleansing emerged immediately after the WW2 international system. It was a product of it, not an abberation.

Must be nice living in a white liberal bubble where you can be shielded from the machinations of EuroAmerican brutality. Have some shame.

People really think horrors like genocide are errors of individual bad actors instead of the inevitable outcomes from the dominance of a system built and maintained at gunpoint by a culture spearheaded by religiously-delusional genocidal colonizers, a culture that has pretty much done fuck all in the present to amputate itself from and make meaningful compensation for that past because it's economically inconvenient and makes white people feel really really sad.

The inability to think in macro, within a historical context, and without any reckoning of just how evil Western Europe and America are as conscious state actors is fascinating at this point.

Like I wanna live in that world for a moment just to see how cozy it is.

Here's some other random BASIC THEORY, followed by her again using the COVID vaccine supply as a reason for why a single global state that controls the supply of everything on Earth is necessary (even though she has no clue she's saying this):

Automation is not going to result in a significant displacement because having huge swathes of an educated population either suddenly routed into shitty jobs they didn't ask for or, even worse, supported financially by the government (which means no meaningful UBI is coming either; our politicians are not going to side with us in that matter), means that capitalists will find it harder to exert authority.

Capitalists want us as dependent upon them for our needs as possible so that the hierarchy is maintained. All that automation is going to do is allow it so that more can be produced by the workers than they would be able to produce otherwise. So it will drive wages even further down, and longer hours will follow from desperate people trying to make ends meet.

A world where tens or hundreds of millions of people suddenly cannot work, or realize they can live meaningful lives without the monotony of modern jobs, is a world closer to capitalists getting guillotine'd, and that is the last thing they want.

So you think capitalists will suddenly turn off the progress machine?
Suddenly the thousands of developers focusing on AI will stop because they lose their funding or something?

Maybe but it seems to me that that train has left the station.

No. The point is not that automation will not happen. The point is that automation will be utilized by capitalists in such a way as to magically keep you working for 8-12 hours a day for a meager wage regardless of the fact that we already live in a world where work hours could have been pared down significantly without sacrifice to quality of life (although I would argue the Global North needs to cut the fuck back anyway, but different rant for a different day).

The endgame of capitalism is not to replace work and have it so that we all have free time to pursue meaning and human connection. These people are not our friends. Capitalists do not give a shit about our well-being, and there's no bright light at the end of the tunnel where technology is going to magically solve all of our problems. Their endgame is to continually control workers under worse and worse conditions to sustain the ideal of perpetual growth.

I would actually predict that technological advancement would be forcibly stifled by billionaires and the government if it ever became a meaningful threat to the current social order than our bosses going "Oh well, I can't do anything about the Inevitability of Human Progress™; let me pay you a living wage for only the work you actually need to do while the robots handle the rest of it." Shit is not about to happen.

Passive technological advancement where we magically arrive at a utopia without having to lift a finger and fight for it is not in the cards.

I don't think anyone has the power to slow progress, not capitalists, not the government, not religious leaders. Each of those forces that have tried to resist progress in the past have tried, failed, and died. Even gigantic and powerful corporations.

Now I do not think technology is some miracle that will save us all, to the contrary, it gives even more power to those that would seek to control it and as such will require ever more stringent controls, but contending that anyone has the ability to "turn off progress" seems inaccurate at best to me.

Again, no one is talking about turning off all invention. We're talking about how inventions are funded, distributed, marketed, and used. For example, if we ever discovered immortality, do you think it will be easily available and affordable for the poorest among us? No. It will be strictly reserved for politicians and billionaires to the detriment of the rest of us. The covid vaccines are another example; marvels of immunological science that were ultimately hoarded by the wealthiest nations. I myself had to dump several vials during the worst of the pandemic under the full knowledge that people in the Global South were dying for no reason.

Subsequently, if some kid in a basement made a robot that could be easily produced and could literally do all known labor with no drawbacks, first of all, who is going to fund such a thing? Second of all, why wouldn't capitalists immediately run campaigns against this thing as the beginnings of Skynet and turn popular sentiment against it and stunt the ability to mass produce it? Or, who's saying that these robots would actually be produced to help humanity? They would more than likely be war and police machines first and foremost.

Our technological development is not a straight line dictated by the mere appearance of a new discovery. It is ultimately guided by the arbiters of society who wish to continue being at the top of the hierarchy. The idea that billionaires and politicians will not have to be dragged kicking and screaming into a better future, assuming a better future even awaits us, because "automation" and "progress" is ludicrous.

where and when has capitalism "succeeded" for all the individuals who have been forced to exists under its implementation?

Funny thing is, most pro-capitalist folks won't even argue that capitalism is "succeeding" for most people because you can just fucking look at the state of the world and tell that that's a flagrant lie. They instead relent that "well, it's the best we can do!"

I don't know if COVID vaccines are the best example of hoarding resources --- there's been 13 billion COVID vaccine doses given globally and the US is committed to donating 1 billion exclusively to developing countries.

... Wut? The UN declared in March of this year that the lack of vaccine equity in the developing world has been bad enough to actually widen the wealth gap in these countries, and that we are no where close to meeting our declared distribution targets despite the fact that the pandemic is on the decline. But this lack of urgency was fatal when Delta was in play. Brazil and India in particular got fucking ravaged while us in the United States were fighting to get people to just come in for their appointments and subsequently having to throw vials away.

Like, what happened is actually capitalism in action. People outside of North America and Europe were left to die through no fault of their own because vaccine distribution wasn't prioritized by need, it was prioritized by wealth and color. Promises to donate don't fucking matter to the family members left behind.

Covid is literally gonna be the blue print for climate change.

I can't wait to watch otherwise "caring" liberals rationalize why millions have to die as they become climate refugees as a result of our fuckery.

[Kyon1988]

An 80+ year old dying of cancer isn't much of a tragedy imo. Doubly so for a genocidal zionist war criminal freak like Biden.

Great place!

[Snoopy]

I honestly believe it would be easier to teach a dog carpentry than teach Marxism to Nep.

[Orange Juice Box]

User banned (3 months): inflammatory accusations against other members; if you have a problem with specific posts then report them

That was Kiyamet banned for three months for going after Solipsim of the Dogge
https://www.resetera.com/threads/joe-biden-diagnosed-with-an-aggressive-form-of-prostate-cancer.1192491/page-13#post-140155215

Dogge did good today

[benji]

Did we ever try to look this paper up? I don't remember.

I read a paper recently by a Harvard professor about the Medieval theological underpinnings of racism today, and how the rational and Enlightenment movements failed to graft a truly materialist view of the world, and instead only shifted the religious doctrine accordingly. Instead of God being on the top of the cosmological chain, white men were instead, and when you're on top of that chain, you have the authority to reshape and consume everything below you no matter the cost to anything lower on the hierarchy.

These quasi-theological beliefs and rationalizations, along with the astonishing inability to actually suss out and be eliminate problematic base assumptions and thought patterns, have formed a basis for capitalist thought for literally centuries, and it's an elegant way to explain why the fuck these ghouls think the way they do. They believe they are the closest thing to God that's ever walked the Earth. They believe that no respect is owed to the environment or to populations suffering under their hubris. They believe that technology only can not only solve everything, but elevate humanity to some undefined state of existence. The machine of technological development must run uninhibited. We must continue full speed ahead to the endgame of...something or other.

Yeah. These guys don't know what they're tangibly trying to accomplish because they're fucking idiots who thought the science fiction stories were roadmaps and not entertainment, entertainment that was and still is in some ways largely bigoted to various minorities. It's as cringe as folks marrying anime characters, except they have the money to force the rest of us in on the charade. Meanwhile, we fundamentally know what it will take to significantly alleviate if not outright solve issues with regards to things like climate, or hunger, or transportation, but the solutions to these things require actually democratic and egalitarian solutions and considerations that these freaks literally are unwilling to consider, because it messes with the chain, you see.

So the actual human cost to their pet projects is not to be thought about. If you bring up the human cost, well, it's to people who do not matter (because they're not white and rich). If you insist that these people do matter despite not being white and rich, well, okay that sucks for them, but think of all the good that will still come to the survivors later! You even see this shitty attitude on here from otherwise liberal people with regards to AI, without fail.

"You didn't think about the coal miners when they lost their jobs, did you?! Oh, you did advocate for a humane transition into a new career because you fundamentally think people should have a dignified existence? Well, uh, you're only delaying the inevitable regardless because we're all gonna get UBI! Wait, UBI might not be a long term solution either because there's no guarantee that money might not be garnished by housing and debt-related interests, or that your boss might lower your wage to compensate, because UBI doesn't solve the contradictions of capitalism.... Uhhh, look at this cool update to Stable Diffusion!'

We are not equipped to have meaningful conversations on what it means to determine what a better world looks like, much less how we get there, if we think Musk funding fucking hyperloops and cave submarines and shit is the solution. Literally, deluded and stupid rich white people are going to kill us. And they're getting express permission to do so because they're leaning on nerdy appeals to a fucking Star Trek future, without any of the anti-bigotry Star Trek stands for.

Spoiler:  (click to show)(click to hide)

Or probably more like

edit: Hap first posted the post in the first volume

edit2: Fuck, it happens so often I completely passed over her referencing something but not actually citing it so anyone else can read it.

[Jansen]

I like that neppy trotted out the dogge account to argue with themselves

[benji]

Meanwhile, we fundamentally know what it will take to significantly alleviate if not outright solve issues with regards to things like climate, or hunger, or transportation, but the solutions to these things require actually democratic and egalitarian solutions and considerations that these freaks literally are unwilling to consider, because it messes with the chain, you see.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chinese_Famine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1990s_North_Korean_famine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodian_humanitarian_crisis

Also "issues with regards to things like" is beyond redundant even for you.

edit: Ever so often I feel like signing up there with an account to sit and wait for Nepenthe to write an essay just so I can timely respond and completely dump it on and shred her sub-100 level student ignorance knowing she's completely unable to understand things like if I explained how the basic Misean/Hayekian theory proves that central planning is logically impossible (and nobody has ever refuted it) and will inevitably lead to famine and mass death so her saying stuff like this is just due to her never questioning her own premises or even reading the Wikipedia entries about any topics she claims to be expert in, but then I think they'd probably delete it. The ban is obvious I wouldn't care about that. The entire purpose would be to amuse any rational people who still read there which is why I have to imagine they'd delete it as a "troll post" for actually engaging in discussion with a staff member dismissing concerns about the guaranteed mass murder of beyond millions. (Something in that Superman post she said she'd deliberately do to billions personally if she had the power.)

[Jansen]

I've been driving around all day, man. Usually when I'm driving my car, I use Bluetooth and I play my own favorite music. But today, I was like: "Let's see what the radio got playing".



That was a mistake.



I turned to the hip-hop and rap station and bam! A Kendrick Lamar song was playing. It was 30 for 30 with SZA. Now, look. I actually do like this song so when I heard it, I was like okay bet. I'll keep listening.



But then it wouldn't stop. My local radio station played the same 3-4 Kendrick Lamar songs, one Drake song, and one Glorilla song over and over and over and over and over and over and over. It was nonstop the same cycle of songs on repeat with the occasional old song from like Lil Wayne or Chris Brown.



I started to lose it and fall into madness. I would go into a store and do some shopping. When I came back out to my car, it was usually a Kendrick Lamar or Drake song playing. When I was a kid, it wasn't this bad. No way. I try to think back when I was a kid and my local rap radio station actually played a wide variety of artists. I know radio stations are supposed to play the popular and super mainstream artists but dang. Isn't radio stations the entry point for most people discovering music still? Maybe not. Maybe radio has truly fallen off. Sad
 times.

I'd like to know how old they are. Definitely not old enough to remember the beginnings of MTV

[EaldNarche]

Meanwhile, we fundamentally know what it will take to significantly alleviate if not outright solve issues with regards to things like climate, or hunger, or transportation, but the solutions to these things require actually democratic and egalitarian solutions and considerations that these freaks literally are unwilling to consider, because it messes with the chain, you see.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chinese_Famine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1990s_North_Korean_famine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodian_humanitarian_crisis

Also "issues with regards to things like" is beyond redundant even for you.

We just have to get rid of all our pets!! That'll solve everything!

[Jansen]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/israel-palestine-the-ongoing-israeli-genocide-in-gaza-icj-orders-halt-to-israeli-offensive-on-rafah-see-staff-posts-for-posting-guidelines.772478/page-456#post-140154093

What a corny fucker

[benji]

We just have to get rid of all our pets!! That'll solve everything!

Finally, somebody who gets it.

[Orange Juice Box]

Nepenthe likes to argue that there is no one qualified to argue with her. Just like that guy who meets assholes all day she's clearly too intelligent to explain her ideas.

[benji]

Nepenthe likes to argue that there is no one qualified to argue with her. Just like that guy who meats assholes all day she's clearly too intelligent to explain her ideas.

In some respects it's not an incorrect view, you basically cannot argue with people who are not even wrong because you'd have to educate them up to the standard level first before discussion about a topic can begin. One of the problems with debating Creationists is/was that they fundamentally reject the premise that science is legitimate so have multiple reasons not to bother to learn it and so refuting them basically has no effect which is why they are unfazed by this and just continue to repeat the stuff in debates. Marxism and its derivatives essentially have the same problem because its underlying proof is that Marx said it was true. Nepenthe would be difficult if only because she incorrectly uses so many terms you'd never get her to agree to use them in a normal way. I didn't watch it but there was some trans debate with some famous YouTubers or something and they never agreed or even attempted to agree on definitions about things like sex, gender, etc. so the entire debate consisted of the two sides using all these terms in completely different ways then everybody involved wondering why it didn't accomplish anything. MAGA is totally like this too, just go look at Twitter.

My personal "debate tactic" if I were to be able to do it with Nepenthe would actually just be trolling. I'd take her whole utopian take a carrot thing as a granted, then ask her based on what she outlined it sounds like people can own property and trade between themselves possibly even for money, simply ask her if this is correct. When she says yes, inform her that's capitalism and declare victory that she agrees capitalism is superior to the alternatives.

[HardcoreRetro]

Disabled black mage?

Just get a white mage to cast esuna.

[Cheers]

1747616176[/url]']



Why don't you just tell them?  Why do they have to go looking for it.  Is it an easter egg hunt?

Because she doesn’t know. 

Somehow she’s absorbing theory through somewhere but she’s only getting bits and pieces. And the parts she regurgitates are all wrong. 

One that bothers me even today is her insistence that all African tribes were/are socialist.

[benji]

In all honesty, I don't think Lenin could tell you how "attempting to engage in dialectical materialism" could "materially fight fascism and the conditions of capitalism." He probably would have told you shutting the fuck up is free.

[Orange Juice Box]

1747616176[/url]']



Why don't you just tell them?  Why do they have to go looking for it.  Is it an easter egg hunt?

Because she doesn’t know. 

Somehow she’s absorbing theory through somewhere but she’s only getting bits and pieces. And the parts she regurgitates are all wrong. 

One that bothers me even today is her insistence that all African tribes were/are socialist.

Sigh, and that not even object permanence.  She uses the most academic terms possible and nobody wants to correct her for fear that she will say you are racist for correcting a black women even if she's wrong. 


This but she would declare your remarks racist and anyone who agrees a spy. 

[killamajig]

i saw your post in that thread that has been locked and i knew straight away that you'd be banned, it's a shame but the truth is not welcome in this place

For anyone wondering he was banned for this post. Still reading through but a number of other people from here also got banned.

Did I go and beat him to death? No, he's dying from a disease I had no hand in. Unlike the tens of thousands (more likely hundreds of thousands) who died by weapons he personally approved to an apartheid state. What a wonderful man!
Half of you would celebrate if it was Trump. So I don't need to get lectures. The difference is clear that too many on this forum still deny if not outright justify the genocide of Palestinians as evidenced by the posts that go "he dedicated his life to public service!" Or "he wasn't perfect but who is?!"
I dunno, SOMEONE WHO DIDN'T COMMIT A FUCKING GENOCIDE?!!

The fact is a significant portion of this forum do not view Palestinians as human. Where else would you see such a rush of sympathy for man who committed genocide? And where else would people be banned for calling that out?

[killamajig]

1747616176[/url]']



Why don't you just tell them?  Why do they have to go looking for it.  Is it an easter egg hunt?

Because she doesn’t know. 

Somehow she’s absorbing theory through somewhere but she’s only getting bits and pieces. And the parts she regurgitates are all wrong. 

One that bothers me even today is her insistence that all African tribes were/are socialist.

Sigh, and that not even object permanence.  She uses the most academic terms possible and nobody wants to correct her.

She's so Anti-AI I bet she uses it to write all that Gish gallop

[Potato]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/i-would-love-a-t-a-all-women-wlw-fighting-game-like-dead-or-alive-for-women.1192314/#post-140152299

Snip 

Jfc

Has that fucking idiot SEEN Wonder Woman? 

Plenty to keep the "male gaze™" interested in that one.

[Potato]

If Echos wasn't such a careless Buffon, he could've said the "TNA" actually stood for "Total Nonstop Action" instead. Like the wrestling federation.

Good thing he didn't though. 

Pretty insulting to compare probably the greatest goalkeeper of all time, Gianluigi Buffon, to that buffoon Echos, mate. 

[Gamegirl Nostalgia]

Benji is giving away mod likes like crazy today. 

Must be nice to be the mods FAVORITES

[Gamegirl Nostalgia]

and wow first post on page 1000 is the fucking admin?

rigged