(05-25-2025, 03:39 AM)Boredfrom wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/the-game-post-report-marathon-delay-likely-as-sony-cancels-all-paid-marketing-plans.1198263/
So they closed the thread because they hate Colin Moriarty
Quote:Stop posting Colin Moriarty horseshit Jesus fuckin Christ Same Colin who interviewed Shuhei Yoshida and Neil Druckmann recently, those sad saps.
05-25-2025, 04:09 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-25-2025, 04:11 AM by killamajig.)
https://www.twitch.tv/hasanabi
Quote:This channel is temporarily unavailable due to a violation of Twitch's Community Guidelines or Terms of Service.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/hasan-piker-ot-oh-your-such-a-big-man-hasan.321886/page-43#post-140428002
Quote:24 hours according to Taylor Lorenz
https://www.resetera.com/threads/what-space-marine-chapter-would-like-to-get-focus-in-a-live-action-warhammer-40k-series.1197501/page-2#post-140419494
TheEchosOfTheCyborg wrote:I'll be honest, one of my biggest live action wishes is to see Perturabo, he's my fav of the Chaos Primarchs and it still surprises me we've never seen his Daemon Prince form.
Shouldn't he be sipping wine and posting about expensive face creams?
Like high femme Kunty
(05-25-2025, 04:09 AM)killamajig wrote: https://www.twitch.tv/hasanabi
Quote:This channel is temporarily unavailable due to a violation of Twitch's Community Guidelines or Terms of Service.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/hasan-piker-ot-oh-your-such-a-big-man-hasan.321886/page-43#post-140428002
Quote:24 hours according to Taylor Lorenz
sadly literally nothing. He got banned toward the end of his stream so he'll be back before his next one. No loss for him.
It's all a show. Twitch has no spine.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/crypto-investor-charged-in-nyc-for-kidnapping-torture-of-italian-tourist.1198305/
Quote:Two people were arrested in New York City on Friday for the kidnapping and torture of a tourist from Italy, according to police.
So now Bdubs is personally creating copy-and-paste threads of lurid news stories. What does he want discussed in this thread?
Quote:Do Not Create: Shock Threads
These are threads about news or content that is just disgusting and/or shocking, with little potential for discussion other than outrage. Nobody gains anything from these threads and you should not make them.
"Hypocrisy, thy name is ResetEra."
That’s just one of the “fun threads” he keeps asking for to be created, chud
05-25-2025, 05:32 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-25-2025, 05:34 AM by benji.)
(05-24-2025, 11:26 PM)BIONIC wrote: B-Dubs, post: 140398107, member: 143 wrote:I'll see if the image hosting is possible. You need to understand though, we're way bigger than all but two other xenforo forums. And for both of those, we definitely use more images as they're literally fanfiction repositories.
We're the biggest forum of our kind and that means stuff that works for smaller forums doesn't necessarily scale up to the point where it works for us and even if it does, it might be too expensive to make possible. I remember Ceri being annoyed at me over how much the vote tool cost. Thing took months to develop. The dude who said shit costs $15, that's for small forums that have a dozen or so active users. 1. Kiwi Farms not only is on Xenforo, they're on an unsupported version because Null gets deplatformed from everything. Yet they host all their own images and videos on their server. There's no way ResetERA.com would need more space than that. How many fucking images does he see in normal threads? It's like one or two. Most threads have zero images at all.
2. There's no really existing add-on for uploading to imgur or something?
3. They paid for the vote tool? Incredible ROI.
edit: lmao, MyBB has a plugin for uploading to imgur: https://community.mybb.com/mods.php?action=view&pid=386
(05-25-2025, 12:17 AM)ClothedMac wrote: (05-24-2025, 07:23 PM)Taco Bell Tower wrote: (05-24-2025, 06:47 PM)Besticus Maximus wrote: Kyuuji, it's this barefaced lying and hypocrisy that marks you out as one of the premier cunts of the entire internet. There is a vietnam style graveyard filled with all the digital accounts you have deleted from human history for liking cyberpunk 2077 and you yourself went and completed the game. Seething etc. You want to talk about social justice? Someone hold kyuuji to account, please, for once, I beg of thee
Someone tried and got a ban for it. Laughing Banana was the one.
Link?
Been trying to find it nearly all day
(05-25-2025, 05:32 AM)benji wrote: (05-24-2025, 11:26 PM)BIONIC wrote: B-Dubs, post: 140398107, member: 143 wrote:I'll see if the image hosting is possible. You need to understand though, we're way bigger than all but two other xenforo forums. And for both of those, we definitely use more images as they're literally fanfiction repositories.
We're the biggest forum of our kind and that means stuff that works for smaller forums doesn't necessarily scale up to the point where it works for us and even if it does, it might be too expensive to make possible. I remember Ceri being annoyed at me over how much the vote tool cost. Thing took months to develop. The dude who said shit costs $15, that's for small forums that have a dozen or so active users. 1. Kiwi Farms not only is on Xenforo, they're on an unsupported version because Null gets deplatformed from everything. Yet they host all their own images and videos on their server. There's no way ResetERA.com would need more space than that. How many fucking images does he see in normal threads? It's like one or two. Most threads have zero images at all.
2. There's no really existing add-on for uploading to imgur or something?
3. They paid for the vote tool? Incredible ROI. 
edit: lmao, MyBB has a plugin for uploading to imgur: https://community.mybb.com/mods.php?action=view&pid=386
best part of mati is when null resizes his users images.
(05-25-2025, 06:19 AM)Taco Bell Tower wrote: (05-25-2025, 12:17 AM)ClothedMac wrote: (05-24-2025, 07:23 PM)Taco Bell Tower wrote: Someone tried and got a ban for it. Laughing Banana was the one.
Link?
Been trying to find it nearly all day 
Deja Vu
www.thebore.com/forum/index.php?topic=48241.msg3103887;topicseen#msg3103887
Only this time I actually found it
https://www.resetera.com/threads/what-the-hell-was-everyone-smoking-with-cd-projekt-red.499113/page-5#post-75136011
"Nearly all day" took me 10 mins lol
How the hell lol. I tried googling it
05-25-2025, 07:17 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-25-2025, 07:18 AM by benji.)
Put it on the server to help make clear who runs Bartertown:
Snyder Cut:
(05-25-2025, 07:16 AM)Rendle wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/cdpr-is-a-transphobic-company-its-time-we-stop-making-excuses-for-them.307474/page-140#post-54858160 From a few posts down from there.
I love Kyuuji's response to Laughing Banana's call out
Quote:Someone offered me a key for the game so I could see the extent of transphobic elements, coming off the back of the thread I made last year.
Aside from randomly trying to call me out, was there something you actually disagreed with in what I said about them?
05-25-2025, 07:35 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-25-2025, 07:36 AM by Daffy Duck.)
SuperRiko wrote:So like you'd think its interesting lets say, if a lesbian were suddenly controlled to find a man attractive? still seems gross to me.
lol this bit got me good, because you know…
05-25-2025, 07:42 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-25-2025, 07:43 AM by Besticus Maximus.)
Bufbaf about to not get banned for moriarty posting on account of gender armour
https://www.resetera.com/threads/paul-tassi-it’s-just-over-for-‘marathon’.1192986/page-16
Quote:He is one, but he's still a credible source for PlayStation stuff. So let's stick to the news, not the postman.
Quote:I mean sure, feel free to spin me into some kind of Israel supporter supporter, if that makes you happy. I can assure you I'm not, and I'm reasonably sure you'll easily find other posts of me regarding Moriarty (or Israel) proving that.
Sony has and had always cuddled up to him though, both as a company and personally with Shu and others, so he does have input others do not. And no, this isn't some "art v artist" stuff, he's neither an artist not am I otherwise a fan of his. Jesus, I even posted the random website I saw reporting it.
05-25-2025, 07:46 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-25-2025, 08:00 AM by benji.)
(05-25-2025, 07:30 AM)Taco Bell Tower wrote: I love Kyuuji's response to Laughing Banana's call out
Quote:Someone offered me a key for the game so I could see the extent of transphobic elements, coming off the back of the thread I made last year.
Aside from randomly trying to call me out, was there something you actually disagreed with in what I said about them? The "extent of transphobic elements" then being confirmed to being that one ad they're cried about from the start that's not at all transphobic. Which then reduces Kyuuji's argument for CDPR's unprecedented crimes being that they fired someone who tweeted something he didn't like.
Additionally, it disproved Kyuuji's argument for why Cyberpunk topics needed to be limited. The purported reason, like with the Joanne ban, was that it was needed to protect TransEra from seeing threads about the sinful work. And like with the Joanne ban, TransEra's leaders did nothing to stop engaging with the criminalized content over and above probably anyone else on the forum.
And we should never forget that the entire reason they even got the ban, and its associated social power, was because the staff were exposed telling TransEra to "pound sand" regarding their demand for changing who would make the OT.
Oh lord, I remember the pound sand incident
Really, what is the case for not perma banning them?
I’m deferring to you guys who read era. The sense I get from here is they’ve ruined discussion. They actively harass other users. Whatever normal people who remain avoid acknowledging them. It’d be a Ken McElroy situation. Everybody would be okay with it. Nobody would judge.
(05-25-2025, 08:14 AM)Polident wrote: Really, what is the case for not perma banning them?
I’m deferring to you guys who read era. The sense I get from here is they’ve ruined discussion. They actively harass other users. Whatever normal people who remain avoid acknowledging them. It’d be a Ken McElroy situation. Everybody would be okay with it. Nobody would judge. You're confusing the public forum for the social cliques that actually matter on the forum. The staff believes empowering them is the correct path and solution to the forum's problems; that the unnamed masses of the forum are lurking chuds who refuse to become the New Women necessarily to populate the utopia. They'd rather ban 99% of the forum than admit the whole framework is misguided.
(05-25-2025, 07:42 AM)Besticus Maximus wrote: Bufbaf about to not get banned for moriarty posting on account of gender armour
https://www.resetera.com/threads/paul-tassi-it’s-just-over-for-‘marathon’.1192986/page-16
Quote:He is one, but he's still a credible source for PlayStation stuff. So let's stick to the news, not the postman.
Quote:I mean sure, feel free to spin me into some kind of Israel supporter supporter, if that makes you happy. I can assure you I'm not, and I'm reasonably sure you'll easily find other posts of me regarding Moriarty (or Israel) proving that.
Sony has and had always cuddled up to him though, both as a company and personally with Shu and others, so he does have input others do not. And no, this isn't some "art v artist" stuff, he's neither an artist not am I otherwise a fan of his. Jesus, I even posted the random website I saw reporting it.
I like that now the dirt on Colin Moriarty isn't any of the stuff they originally banned him for but that he expressed support for Israel in 2020
05-25-2025, 08:48 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-25-2025, 09:05 AM by benji.)
Yeah, Messofanego listing him as one of the prominent Zionists like Brianna Wu caused me to look that up and it's basically him in a number of tweets and a video taking the same position as most Americans ( especially conservatives) and saying that he supports Israel versus Hamas/Hezbollah/etc. and that Israel has the right to exist. I feel like that's really exaggerating to call that Zionism even if it's "technically correct" in a certain way.
It just being grifting aside I'd say the same about Wu despite tweeting twice a week about being the "biggest Zionist ever" and whatever other shit. I feel like Zionism as a concept marks out an important distinction between "Jews should have a homeland" versus "since Israel exists it should continue to/it's a good thing/it should be the Jewish homeland/it's the least bad option/etc." Someone like Blueball probably can't tell the distinction but I certainly wouldn't think most of us here are actually Zionists of the first sense even if we fall into one or more of the latter.
05-25-2025, 10:17 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-25-2025, 10:22 AM by benji.)
Concord won the new GOTY award at a major NON-POLITICAL NON-WOKE award show:
Timestamp (34:14) for seeing global fascism taking another L: https://youtu.be/H3B9xhE18K0?t=2051
Also watch this timestamp: https://youtu.be/H3B9xhE18K0?t=1146
Benji sharing his stand-up act… That’s more than Planetsmasher ever did.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/help-me-choose-my-dinner-pie.1198266/
angelgrievous wrote:Need help making a decision, please help!
It's pizza if you don't know. I'm leaning Some like it Hot and Could it be love.
The ones not in poll I'm not interested in. Yes this guy
https://www.resetera.com/threads/i%E2%80%99m-thru-hiking-the-appalachian-trail-ama.1162509/
This dude is just walking from pizza place to pizza place with other lazy "hikers" playing games evry night on his Switch. And staying in hotels when he needs recharge.
This is ResetEra "Outdoorsman" Even when they touch grass they'll only do it if they can call an Uber to a hotel and pizza if things get to rugged. Never seen a dude eat so much beer and fast food on a hike.
Ive hiked the Angeles National Forest near LA thats more isolated. If I had fucked up they would have to send a rescue chopper for my dumb-ass. I'm sorry if your surrounded by other hikers and a Uber call away from rescue are you really getting awayfrom it all. And Era fawning over him like he's on the Franklin Expedition
It wasn't until this thread that I found out how many man-made shelters and facilities there are for hikers on the Appalachian Trail. If I can get back in shape, I'll head out to the middle of nowhere to truly impress ResetEra. Or I'll just stay home and get high. I haven't decided yet, but it'll be one or the other.
More proof era is running out of topics......
Let's discuss the least interesting topic: the dream you had last night.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/so-the-ghost-of-dana-plato-night-trap-different-strokes-visited-me-in-a-dream-this-morning.1198290/
Soapbox wrote:So this was a mix of a "false awakening " and a "lucid dream."
So I'm dreaming And well aware that I'm dreaming as I was in what I thought was a shared dream where I was teaching other people how to fly. Long story not long, there was a moment in the dream where I could proceed any further down a hall and I thought that meant time to wake up.
So as I'm trying to pull myself from the dream world to the waking world….
Dana Plato came to me needing to be comforted from roaming through the spirit realm with regret. I could sense here remorse and her need for redemption and forgiveness. So we talked and hugged I gave her some comfort and then instead of waking up I'm back into the previous dream just another part of it.
I don't know what the hell that was but I would rather not be a dream medium for a wondering soul.
I picked a helluva day to stop sniffing my glue.
Soapbox, unless it's your shrink nobody cares about what your mentally challenged brain dreams up.
I should be happy that Echos isn't posting whatever his pedo brain cooks up
(05-25-2025, 01:33 PM)killamajig wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/help-me-choose-my-dinner-pie.1198266/
angelgrievous wrote:Need help making a decision, please help!
It's pizza if you don't know. I'm leaning Some like it Hot and Could it be love.
The ones not in poll I'm not interested in. Yes this guy
https://www.resetera.com/threads/i%E2%80%99m-thru-hiking-the-appalachian-trail-ama.1162509/
This dude is just walking from pizza place to pizza place with other lazy "hikers" playing games evry night on his Switch. And staying in hotels when he needs recharge.
This is ResetEra "Outdoorsman" Even when they touch grass they'll only do it if they can call an Uber to a hotel and pizza if things get to rugged. Never seen a dude eat so much beer and fast food on a hike.
Ive hiked the Angeles National Forest near LA thats more isolated. If I had fucked up they would have to send a rescue chopper for my dumb-ass. I'm sorry if your surrounded by other hikers and a Uber call away from rescue are you really getting awayfrom it all. And Era fawning over him like he's on the Franklin Expedition
It wasn't until this thread that I found out how many man-made shelters and facilities there are for hikers on the Appalachian Trail. If I can get back in shape, I'll head out to the middle of nowhere to truly impress ResetEra. Or I'll just stay home and get high. I haven't decided yet, but it'll be one or the other. 
All those amenities are mostly on that part of the trail. It’s also the easiest section as far as hiking goes. That’s why people are advised to start there. He’s done 200 miles which is ok for beginner. Not sure how long he’ll last when the trail starts to get harder and he’s unable to Uber out to the nearest hotel
If there was ever any doubt that ZeoVGM is an absolute fucking retard of the highest order (of course there isn't), then his Lilo and Stitch thread is the icing on the shit cake.
In this thread, Zeo argues with over half a dozen members, with every single one of them telling him his interpretation is flat out wrong, while Zeo desperately maintains that no, they are the ones who are wrong and he is perfect and correct as always.
Today is a slow day on TheBore, so here are the quotes for your full reading. Screencaps below.
There is just no way ZeoVGM is a human. Seriously. None.
It's hard to choosing a starting point because there is just so much, but this is as close to a good one as possible. ZeoVGM highlighted in bold for easier reading:
https://www.resetera.com/threads/spoilers-lilo-stitch-remake-has-a-new-ending-and-fans-are-very-divided.1197924/page-2#post-140389896
ZeoVGM wrote:The line "to the state" is taken directly from article that I linked in the OP. I didn't reframe anything "for clicks." I quoted a literal news article about the topic.
You also can't simply give a child to a neighbor for 4 years. It's not that simple. Temporary custody would only last a few months.
Scrooge McDuck wrote:I'm calling nonsense on this. Your entire post is just a collection of curated quotes, topped with the single line: "Nani gives Lilo up to the state." That line, and the quotes you chose, frames the entire situation the way you want your audience to see it.
"Nani gives Lilo up to the state" is a reductive, and arguably bad faith, interpretation of the ending. Either you haven't actually watched the movie and are just parroting an article, or you have seen the film and thus the bad faith is on you.
ZeoVGM wrote:Or, and I know this sounds crazy, but the reaction to this ending is actually quite negative elsewhere. The article has nothing but negative quotes, however, we can't embed Twitter anymore. So I went to Bluesky, typed in "lilo ending," and picked the first three that showed up at the time to make a more complete OP. And in scrolling past that, literally every single reaction was negative.
This isn't a conspiracy. I wasn't sitting here like, "Time to make a bad faith thread about Lilo & Stitch." That's weird to do and weird to assume someone would do. I genuinely think the change is terrible, saw the reaction on social media, which brought me to a Daily Beast article. And then I made a thread.
You disagree with those who hate the ending. That's cool, I respect that. But maybe chill out a bit because this kind of reaction is a bit much.
carlsojo wrote:Bro the first line in your OP is just blatantly false lol the article saying so isn't in bad faith so much as it is flat-out wrong.
Out of all the 100's of posts in that thread, carsojo's comment seems to have set ZeoVGM's hemorrhoids on fire.
It leads to this impassioned retort (Bonus Point: Jeff also says the magic words 'factually correct')
ZeoVGM wrote:No, it's not wrong. And it's weird being gaslit over a Lilo & Stitch movie.
In the original movie, which I just finished rewatching so I could have both versions crystal clear in my head, the social worker tells Nani that they're taking Lilo away after she almost drowns. Later on, after their house explodes and the social worker puts Lilo in his car to take her away, Nani starts yelling at him, saying Lilo needs her and that he can't take her away. She is fighting to keep custody.
In the remake, after Lilo almost drowns, the social worker convinces Nani to give Lilo up and she agrees to it. About 15 minutes later, the social worker goes to their house and Nani goes into Lilo's room to get her so that she can be taken away. The only reason this doesn't happen is because Lilo isn't in her room. She's out looking for Stitch.
Finally, at the very end of the film after everyone has learned about the aliens, Nani sees the social worker walking over so she starts telling Lilo that she's giving up guardianship. She looks up at the social worker and says, "I know, what happened doesn't change our agreement." (The agreement being her giving Lilo to the state.) It isn't until that very moment that the social worker says something like, "Actually, we might have an idea." And that is when she proposes that their neighbor becomes the foster parent.
It is factually correct to say that Nani choses to give Lilo up to the state. There are three separate scenes that tell the viewer she has made that decision and it's not until the third scene at the very end of the movie that the social worker comes in with an, "Actually, hold on!" moment.
The fact that the social worker comes in at the last moment with a save doesn't change the fact that Nani made the decision to give up Lilo, having no idea where she would end up going. It's a huge change from the original, in which she yells at the social worker and demands to let Lilo stay with her.
Finalgirl is the first of many people to call out Jeff's bullshit.
They have a several posts's long slapfight, with Jeff using his other favourite word 'disingenuous', like the cunt always does whenever he's losing an argument.
finalgirl wrote:No one is gaslighting you, dude. You started this thread in extreme bad faith with the literal line of text "Nani gives Lilo up to the state" an objective lie about the film & proceeded to back it up with equally bad faith Bluesky posts from random people. Don't be upset that people are rightfully calling you out and poking your "arguments" full of holes. Just own that this thread was, in a big way, a pretty poorly thought out and executed idea... As evidenced by the people going "this seems kind of posted in bad faith" in EVERY single one of the (9) pages of this thread.
ZeoVGM wrote:I just explained, in vivid detail, what happens in the film. In the post you quoted. But you took that part out when you quoted me because it completely destroys the "bad faith" and "objective lie" nonsense.
It is an indisputable fact that Nani chooses to give Lilo up to the state in the remake. And that her decision is shown in multiple scenes, before the social worker saves the day at the very last minute. (With an idea of her own making — not an idea that Nani comes up with.)
This isn't up for debate. It is literally what happens in the film, which makes it very funny how often you've accused people in this thread of not actually watching the movie.
finalgirl wrote:Mmm no. ZeoVGM, that's not true.
She decides to explore options with the social worker and the social worker helps her keep Lilo *out* of the system by making their family friend the guardian. She is never given up to the state, which AGAIN, is what you state in your post!
ZeoVGM wrote:This is so incredibly disingenuous.
Again, as I explained in the post (that you purposefully left out), the only reason Lilo isn't taken by the state is because she left the house to look for Stitch. Nani goes into her room to get her so that the social workers can take her away and there is no mention of the neighbor at that point. She would have just been put into the system like any other child.
finalgirl wrote:Now you're just getting upset and, as you did before, making up more stuff and being like "Well, in this fictional children's movie this would have happened if (main plot point) didn't happen" as if that's either relevant or the next "gotcha" you've failed to generate in this ten page thread.
ThrashPanda enters the ring and gives Jeff a kick in the nuts
ThrashPanda wrote:ZeoVGM wrote:No, it's not wrong. And it's weird being gaslit over a Lilo & Stitch movie. Ironic
Do you really think there was an active choice or decision? A teenager, in between jobs, with no real prospects, taking care of a little kid who she clearly has no idea how to take care of. Exhausted and facing massive hospital bills. Do you really think, if you're in that position, that there is a choice?
ZeoVGM wrote:This is a children's movie. It is not a documentary.
Not a single person is arguing that her giving up/losing custody isn't more realistic. We're saying it's a bad change to the story.
Nani chose to put Lilo in the foster system. At absolutely no point after that decision, does Nani push back. She is literally walking into Lilo's room to tell her that the social workers are going to take her away, but Lilo isn't there.
It is the social worker who, in the very last moments of the film, comes up with a different idea. And she tells Nani this idea by cutting off Nani when she's about to explain to Lilo that she's going into foster care.
It is disingenuous to be like, "ACTUALLY, Nani's choice to give Lilo up to the state that the film explains to us multiple times doesn't count because the social worker comes up with a different idea in the last 2 minutes of the film."
No, Nani still made the decision and didn't fight to keep Lilo like she did in the original. That is what happened. And if you're going to mince words to say that that doesn't count as her giving Lilo up to the state, sorry, I don't agree.
ThrashPanda wrote:You're the one who used the words "chose" and "decided". You're the one who's going hard on that, not me.
And yes, this is a children's movie, why are you getting this upset over a change in the story?
finalgirl wrote:If you see the movie (or the other 9 pages of this thread) the OP blatantly lied about the ending to generate responses like yours. If you have seen the movie and still feel that way.... Well, I have hit my allotted limit on people to make upset on a gaming message board about a Disney remake. I will connect you to the next available agent~
finalgirl, in particular, really gets under Jeff's skin:
ZeoVGM wrote:I did not lie. You are in fact lying to people when you make that clam. It is a fact that Nani chooses to give Lilo to the state. I explained what happens in the movie in pretty great detail.
Hollywood Duo wrote:The message of the ending is exactly the same. You should watch it.
ZeoVGM wrote:I watched it. The message is not the same.
Nani fights less to keep custody (and doesn't fight at all after the near-drowning incident, instead giving into the pressure to put Lilo in foster care). And the found family ending of the original is completely butchered because Jumba is not redeemed and Nani leaves Hawaii for California (which doesn't even make sense, as she could have gone to college in Hawaii).
Another new guy comes swinging at Zeo:
Noog wrote:You didn't technically lie but you certainly misrepresented what actually happens which is why people are frustrated with the premise/existence of this thread.
"Nani gives Lilo up to the state" implies that she threw Lilo into an orphanage while she runs off to California. In reality, she has Lilo live with a family they are close with while she goes to college, keeping a close connection with Lilo.
This change in itself is certainly controversial. It also reflects differences in 2000s Disney's more whimsical nature versus contemporary Disney's liberalized form of realism in their live action remakes.
The problem isn't that this thread exists to discuss and debate the differences, it's that the post paints the change in a very biased and myopic way, which is not unique to you - this narrative is all over social media - but it does lead to people who haven't seen the movie having a biased perception going into the conversation that they probably shouldn't be having anyways.
finalgirl gives Zeo another slap:
finalgirl wrote:Sure, bud. The other people calling you out on your bad faith arguments & misinformation are also lying, I am sure. We're all one big organized group trying to gaslight you over a Disney movie. You got us. Well done. Point is you misrepresented your initial argument almost 100% and that the foundation of this thread is disingenuous BS. No point in getting all sore because you got called out on said BS.
ZeoVGM, knowing finalgirl, aka FINALBOSS, can't be defeated, throws in the towel
ZeoVGM wrote:Edit: I'm actually done arguing with you, as it's clearly not going to change either of our opinions. However, I did update the OP to provide additional detail to spell out exactly what happened in the film. Hopefully, that fixes your issue with the wording.
And, finally, knowing finalgirl can't be beaten, ZeoVGM flames out
I got so many thoughts about Jeff's psychotic doubling-down of his dumbass misreading of a film.
But it basically comes down to just one.
You have to be an absolute fucking loser to argue this much over a KID'S CARTOON.
32 users liked this post: Tucker's Law, yetanotheraccountholyf, Chumbawumbafan69, benji, Cheers, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Straight Edge, Keetongu, JoeBoy101, MoonlightJazz, jooseloose, MJBarret, Switters, Hap Shaughnessy, Propagandhim, Greatness Gone, Orange Juice Box, malfoyking, clockwork5, Swiftest, Garfield, DJ Bedroom, Averon, Potato, Taco Bell Tower, DavidCroquet, Alpacx, HaughtyFrank, Polident, killamajig, simiansmarts, Besticus Maximus
05-25-2025, 04:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-25-2025, 04:29 PM by simiansmarts.)
You have to understand that Jeff is one of the most terminally online RE users there is. He can't handle simply being wrong or ignore it, he MUST always reply and constantly police everyone for takes that don't align with him. Be thankful he's not a mod or that Lilo & Stitch thread would be a graveyard of bans.
That forum is his LIFE.
21 users liked this post: Tucker's Law, Chudder Barbarity, nachobro, NekoFever, Chumbawumbafan69, benji, Cheers, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Keetongu, imsotired, MJBarret, BIONIC, Propagandhim, Greatness Gone, Orange Juice Box, Averon, Potato, Taco Bell Tower, killamajig, Venice, HaughtyFrank
05-25-2025, 04:36 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-25-2025, 04:36 PM by HaughtyFrank.)
(05-25-2025, 04:11 PM)Venice wrote: Quote:In the original movie, which I just finished rewatching so I could have both versions crystal clear in my head, the social worker tells Nani that they're taking Lilo away after she almost drowns. Later on, after their house explodes
Reading this as someone who isn't all that familiar with the movie, that's a pretty funny sequence of sentences.
11 users liked this post: Chudder Barbarity, benji, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Keetongu, DavidCroquet, MJBarret, BIONIC, Garfield, Taco Bell Tower, killamajig, Venice
|