Journal of Other Forum Analysis (Volume II, Issue 2)

[Jansen]

checking back on resetera, see a fatfall post, hover their profile and read 'female, she/her' is the funniest shit ever 



like leaving your pokemon on daycare and wondering what will happen when you come back

Honestly it shocked me even more to learn they chose “Agatha” as their cross dressing name… what is with these freaks and choosing the worst names you can imagine? 😂

Agatha all along

[Jansen]

Some groups of people are just upset sweeney looks good yet attainable.

The divas that put on too much make-up to hide their real looks, non-whites, the trans freaks like Agatha, women unable to control their eating habits and the women that hit the wall HARD. They all hate the average white natural hot girl(s) the most. They all fear that if this is 'normalized' you won't get away with looking like an orc and you're no longer a 10/10 by default. Especially when its tied to a jeans brand. If it was Porsche or a $5000 dress or whatever, they wouldn't care, it's no threat. Mainstream $20 - $50 jeans brand? The hive is in danger. It's an emotional response and thus makes no sense.

When you obtain a Sydney Sweeney level girl could you please post nudes of her

[Uncle]

How the fuck can you be in Euphoria and turns out to be Republican…

I know it's acting and yada yada but imagine playing alongside Hunter Schaffer for 2 seasons and ending up voting against your friend.

Gross.

These people are just fucking weird man

For all we know working with Hunter Schafer could have radicalized Sweeney into being a TERF.

Sunlight is the best disinfectant and exposure to trans people is the biggest factor in "transphobia"

they're both washing up in the ladies' room, hunter looks over at her, "ugh girl problems, am I right? I keep getting these period cramps"

sydney:

[Boredfrom]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/whats-your-most-disliked-type-of-threads-on-era.1260804/page-2#post-143431137

Low effort comic book threads by a moderator I can't mute

Meanwhile in the Constructive Community thread EchoesOfTheCreepyFetish writes:

Don't know where to post this, I just noticed the closed, "What's your most disliked type of threads on Era?" and I need to ask, are my threads considered a waste of space and annoying? Specifically my "So you're now..." Isekai-like threads since I noticed they got targeted by a couple of people in those threads. Do the mods just want me to stop doing those?

BS. 

He knows that people found his threads annoying, he has said this before. He just wants the mods to say to him “no, your threads aren’t annoying my little girl”.

[Disco55]

So C.Viper just got her teaser trailer. Wonder if the prude thread has something to say about it.

[simiansmarts]

So C.Viper just got her teaser trailer. Wonder if the prude thread has something to say about it.

I’m glad she’s finally back, it’s a shame Juri stole her thunder as the leading lady newcomer of SFIV and became a mainstay. Viper is way cooler

[Disco55]

Maybe so, but i guess it says how lame the SF4 newcomers were then. Juri is the only one with any semblance of personality.

[Jeff_at_the_laughfactory]

Maybe so, but i guess it says how lame the SF4 newcomers were then. Juri is the only one with any semblance of personality.

You leave Hakan out of this.

[Potato]

This site having people argue for payment processor censorship really shows you guys have zero opinion of anything except "the opposite of what resetera" says 

Upset you can't play your incest sim, are you? 

No one has argued for payment processor censorship anyway you fucking retard.

Hey man this is a free speech forum. If I were to post incest porn you'd have to just deal with it because this is not era. We can post what we want. Including incest porn.

You're from Resetera. You've likely got a password protected file full of it.

[HaughtyFrank]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/shouldnt-immigrants-from-developing-underdeveloped-countries-being-in-western-countries-be-seen-as-reperations-instead-of-as-being-illegal.1260987/

Always a good idea to frame immigration as an economic punishment for crimes of the past.

[Blueball]

Upset you can't play your incest sim, are you? 

No one has argued for payment processor censorship anyway you fucking retard.

Hey man this is a free speech forum. If I were to post incest porn you'd have to just deal with it because this is not era. We can post what we want. Including incest porn.

You're from Resetera. You've likely got a password protected file full of it.

Bruh, if you want to get a "gotcha" at least pic a rare fetish, not something people watch on HBO GoT lol.

[Potato]

Hey man this is a free speech forum. If I were to post incest porn you'd have to just deal with it because this is not era. We can post what we want. Including incest porn.

You're from Resetera. You've likely got a password protected file full of it.

Bruh, if you want to get a "gotcha" at least pic a rare fetish, not something people watch on HBO GoT lol.

Have you seen the Bluesky accounts of your fellow members like dear old melody shreds?

https://bsky.app/profile/melodyshreds.bsky.social

Post your Bluesky account you pussy bitch. Let's see what horrors await there...

[benji]

Hey man this is a free speech forum. If I were to post incest porn you'd have to just deal with it because this is not era. We can post what we want. Including incest porn.

[Straight Edge]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/american-eagle-sparks-backlash-for-touting-sydney-sweeneys-great-jeans.1255467/page-16#post-143386287

I'd love to have just one of these dudes explain what they expect to happen in detail. And how "people who believe they are on the left" raging more on video game forums would have stopped it.

Like I'm pretty "smart" (calm down, I'm kidding) but I can't get to even step two of how things are supposed to happen because of this.
1. People think it's okay to say something is the result of good genes. Which... has never not been the case?

They're still insisting this ad is eugenics when nobody in that thread has once explained it even when people objected that it's not. Instead of they just hand wave, well Sydney Sweeney has blue eyes and blond hair and the Nazis really loved blue eyes and blond hair. Which, okay? That doesn't make either eugenics, the Nazis didn't try to exterminate people with brunette hair and brown eyes or the Fuhrer would have some issues. The Aryan ideal was a mythological thing, they didn't exist, so were never a practical goal. They're essentially arguing that a jeans company doing an ad with a popular actress are taking a more extreme eugenics position than the Nazis and doing so entirely through not explicitly saying anything and relying on ignorant people to connect the dots from an endless series of secret signals.

And all of this is still based on the false idea that Nazis, really white supremacists in general, place dogwhistles everywhere to send secret messages to each other that nobody else picks up on. A lie they have to rely on because it's the only way they can accuse people who aren't these things of being these things.

If it's all dogwhistles then how does it normalize anything? Unless you're trying to say that saying Sydney Sweeney has great genes was abnormal before, which it wasn't, despite people in that thread trying to insist nobody has ever in human history said someone has great genes because they're attractive.

"Oh, people are now just going to think that saying white people have good genes is fine to say!" Nobody thought it wasn't before! Nobody's ever considered this a problem or the frontedge of a Nazi powergrab until you guys all convinced yourself that's what it must be. Something you all did in the last week when other people said this and then you all rushed to prove how intelligent you were by repeating with certainty something you haven't even thought about.

So really their objection is someone said something they don't like, and other people don't see a problem with it. So they have to accuse those people of being stupid and not seeing the obvious, which they themselves say is not obvious but requires vast knowledge to understand, which allows them to dismiss their concerns. Then to force anyone else to not downplay this issue they have to assert that it's also obvious that this is the beginning of Holocaust 3.0. They have absolutely no explanation of how this ad leads there so they fall back on "it normalizes" things which doesn't mean anything, especially because they never established what it means other than reference to the arcane knowledge they posses but can't point to for anyone else to learn it.

But don't worry if that's not enough to convince you they have another fall back, after spending pages dismissing intent they can inform you that NOTHING is done in advertising without everyone involved having a clear intent and that's how you know everyone involved in this is a Nazi because of their clear intent to promote eugenics. Which they then completely hid and only the great seers of the stones have the ability to uncover. But also ignorant stupid fucking chuds. And also every single person on Earth who will be influenced by this ad into thinking eugenics is based and needs to be done to the maximum extent possible right this instant.

All this does is just distract you from the fact that we're still sitting at step one. Even granting them all the premises, that this is a verbatim Nazi ad rewritten into English, we still have no explanation of how this is supposed to lead to anything else. But no matter how often they do this, like proclaiming that Stellar Blade is the front of a woman hating movement invading the West from Korea, and no matter how none of their predictions are ever correct are you ever allowed to dismiss their prognostication abilities. But don't worry, when the camps come they won't be mocking you for dismissing Sydney Sweeney's ad leading to exactly what they said because you already mocked the idea that Gamergate was leading to this. They already knew y'all weren't serious.

What’s wild is how no one pushing this narrative ever feels the need to explain how any of this is supposed to work. Not metaphorically, not through vague implications—step by step. How does an ad featuring a conventionally attractive actress lead to fascism 2.0? What exactly is the mechanism? And if the answer is just "normalization," okay—normalize what, exactly? Being hot?

You can't keep waving around “dogwhistles” and “aesthetics” like they're actual arguments. Just because Nazis once liked a certain look doesn’t mean everyone who finds it appealing is halfway to building a concentration camp. That’s not analysis, that’s paranoia with better vocabulary.

And let’s be honest: this has nothing to do with fascism or eugenics. The real problem is someone said something you don’t like—something you can’t disprove, but don’t want normalized. So instead of engaging honestly, you try to launder your discomfort through historical horror and cultural guilt. Because if you say "this ad is harmful" and nobody agrees, you’ve got nowhere to go—unless you scream "Nazi" and hope everyone shuts up out of fear of being labeled complicit.

Even worse, when people do push back and ask for clarification, the response isn’t more detail—it’s condescension. Suddenly we’re all too stupid or too ignorant to see the "obvious" connections. You can’t prove anything, but we’re the ones failing the intelligence check?

You can’t claim this is a crisis of mass influence while also insisting it’s all invisible and only you and your Twitter mutuals have the decoder ring. That’s not activism. That’s QAnon logic, just wearing a liberal arts hat.

But hey, maybe the reason nobody listens anymore isn’t because the masses are stupid or secretly fascist. Maybe it’s because you’ve been wrong every single time. Gamergate didn’t lead to a Fourth Reich. Stellar Blade isn’t a psyop. Saying someone has good genes because they’re beautiful isn’t eugenics. You’re just addicted to moral panic.

And until you can map out what’s actually supposed to happen—no metaphors, no vibes—maybe sit the next outrage out.
You can't keep waving around “dogwhistles” and “aesthetics” like they're actual arguments. Just because Nazis once liked a certain look doesn’t mean everyone who finds it appealing is halfway to building a concentration camp. That’s not analysis, that’s paranoia with better vocabulary.

And let’s be honest: this has nothing to do with fascism or eugenics. The real problem is someone said something you don’t like—something you can’t disprove, but don’t want normalized. So instead of engaging honestly, you try to launder your discomfort through historical horror and cultural guilt. Because if you say "this ad is harmful" and nobody agrees, you’ve got nowhere to go—unless you scream "Nazi" and hope everyone shuts up out of fear of being labeled complicit.

Even worse, when people do push back and ask for clarification, the response isn’t more detail—it’s condescension. Suddenly we’re all too stupid or too ignorant to see the "obvious" connections. You can’t prove anything, but we’re the ones failing the intelligence check?

You can’t claim this is a crisis of mass influence while also insisting it’s all invisible and only you and your Twitter mutuals have the decoder ring. That’s not activism. That’s QAnon logic, just wearing a liberal arts hat.

But hey, maybe the reason nobody listens anymore isn’t because the masses are stupid or secretly fascist. Maybe it’s because you’ve been wrong every single time. Gamergate didn’t lead to a Fourth Reich. Stellar Blade isn’t a psyop. Saying someone has good genes because they’re beautiful isn’t eugenics. You’re just addicted to moral panic.

And until you can map out what’s actually supposed to happen—no metaphors, no vibes—maybe sit the next outrage out.

Post this on resetera and see what happens.

[Alpacx]

TERF BiTCH thread proprietors asleep at the wheel. Blueballs please tell them to wake up to another step in genocide happening.

[benji]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/shouldnt-immigrants-from-developing-underdeveloped-countries-being-in-western-countries-be-seen-as-reperations-instead-of-as-being-illegal.1260987/

Always a good idea to frame immigration as an economic punishment for crimes of the past.

Also to lean into the framing that all immigrants are illegals, can they ever stop adopting right-wing views as correct? 

"You didn't develop the entire world to American standards so you owe them reparations." Who could object to such sound logic?

[Blueball]

You're from Resetera. You've likely got a password protected file full of it.

Bruh, if you want to get a "gotcha" at least pic a rare fetish, not something people watch on HBO GoT lol.

Have you seen the Bluesky accounts of your fellow members like dear old melody shreds?

No, why would I?

[Blueball]

Hey man this is a free speech forum. If I were to post incest porn you'd have to just deal with it because this is not era. We can post what we want. Including incest porn.

While it's true that the First Amendment only protects speech from government censorship, the comic oversimplifies a deeper cultural issue. Dismissing public backlash, deplatforming, and organized boycotts as “just consequences” ignores how powerful social and corporate forces can silence minority or unpopular views—even when those views are made in good faith.

Yes, private platforms have the right to set rules and communities can choose who they associate with. But when tech companies and social movements act in concert to silence dissenting voices, it raises concerns about how “free” the marketplace of ideas truly is. A society that claims to value free expression should be cautious about how quickly it punishes people for saying things others dislike.

Being labeled an “asshole” isn’t always the result of cruelty or stupidity—it’s sometimes just being contrarian in a highly conformist climate. We should be wary of a culture that mistakes discomfort for harm and seeks to exclude rather than engage.

Free speech may be a legal protection, but it’s also a cultural value—and that value suffers when the dominant response to disagreement is exile instead of dialogue.

[Besticus Maximus]

Bruh, if you want to get a "gotcha" at least pic a rare fetish, not something people watch on HBO GoT lol.

Have you seen the Bluesky accounts of your fellow members like dear old melody shreds?

No, why would I?

the vast expertise on the spectrum of fetishes was a hint tbf


What's your favourite fetish jeff? Being wrong on the internet? Or getting people banned maybe

[Blueball]

Have you seen the Bluesky accounts of your fellow members like dear old melody shreds?

No, why would I?

the vast expertise on the spectrum of fetishes was a hint tbf


What's your favourite fetish jeff? Being wrong on the internet? Or getting people banned maybe

who the fuck is jeff

[Potato]

TERF BiTCH thread proprietors asleep at the wheel. Blueballs please tell them to wake up to another step in genocide happening.

Joanne never misses...

[TylenolJones]

Hey man this is a free speech forum. If I were to post incest porn you'd have to just deal with it because this is not era. We can post what we want. Including incest porn.

While it's true that the First Amendment only protects speech from government censorship, the comic oversimplifies a deeper cultural issue. Dismissing public backlash, deplatforming, and organized boycotts as “just consequences” ignores how powerful social and corporate forces can silence minority or unpopular views—even when those views are made in good faith.

Yes, private platforms have the right to set rules and communities can choose who they associate with. But when tech companies and social movements act in concert to silence dissenting voices, it raises concerns about how “free” the marketplace of ideas truly is. A society that claims to value free expression should be cautious about how quickly it punishes people for saying things others dislike.

Being labeled an “asshole” isn’t always the result of cruelty or stupidity—it’s sometimes just being contrarian in a highly conformist climate. We should be wary of a culture that mistakes discomfort for harm and seeks to exclude rather than engage.

Free speech may be a legal protection, but it’s also a cultural value—and that value suffers when the dominant response to disagreement is exile instead of dialogue.

It isn’t worth wasting your ChatGPT tokens on replying to benji man.

[benji]

Let's just admit what underdevelopment, like not donating to #MutualAid on Bluesky, is: literal eugenics. When you say I'm laboring for myself and my loved ones instead of strangers, what you're really saying, in a system where white supremacy is the status quo, is that your genes are superior and should be prioritized over all others until those others are exterminated. That's not just selfish, that's literally Nazi shit. Did the Nazis desire to develop the Global South? Absolutely not, they only wanted what was good for Germany. If the rest die out from underdevelopment or not getting enough money on Ko-fi to eat? That's just natural selection at work. This is exactly what Sydney Sweeney and others are promoting, and that all y'all are making excuses for, that you should prioritize your "Master Race" at the expense of everyone else until they're dead.

Some of us aren't selfish Nazis though. Look at me, I selflessly work tirelessly for others non-stop. Every single day I get up, I read the theory and then I spread the Good Word about it while criticizing others for being selfish Nazis and not organizing to end capitalism, colonialism and white supremacy. When The Revolution comes, do you think I'll be left behind on Earth rather than ascending to the Golden Commune in the sky to take a carrot, leave a carrot? Of course not, because I put others first. I reject capitalism's orders to not care about other people and make their human well-being my constant priority.

That's the truth of the matter. And yet there is always a glut of folks ready at the to deny any given individual example as not being part of the pattern, somehow vacuously devoid of the social and historical forces that affect all things, with no actual reason to do so. We know beyond a shadow of a doubt that we live in a white supremacist world; anyone running cover for it is either too incompetent to understand the nature of how white supremacy works and thus is not worth engaging with because by definition they can't meaningfully contribute to the conversation, or they're too genuinely invested in its maintenance to understand that their plausible deniability is indeed going to waste the time of people who mean well but don't understand that their time is being wasted. Do better.

[Hap Shaughnessy]

I still think Blueballs is some nobody. That's why they're here, it's the only way they would get noticed by us.

[Jansen]

No, why would I?

the vast expertise on the spectrum of fetishes was a hint tbf


What's your favourite fetish jeff? Being wrong on the internet? Or getting people banned maybe

who the fuck is jeff

[benji]

who the fuck is jeff

Nazi who posts on Era:

In my no1curr post yesterday you didn't AI reply to I said I don't think you're as dumb as he is.

[nachobro]

when you have to do both tasks in order to boot the game on your console they are indeed the same, you factual retard

[Orange Juice Box]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/whats-your-most-disliked-type-of-threads-on-era.1260804/page-2#post-143431137

Low effort comic book threads by a moderator I can't mute

Meanwhile in the Constructive Community thread EchoesOfTheCreepyFetish writes:

Don't know where to post this, I just noticed the closed, "What's your most disliked type of threads on Era?" and I need to ask, are my threads considered a waste of space and annoying? Specifically my "So you're now..." Isekai-like threads since I noticed they got targeted by a couple of people in those threads. Do the mods just want me to stop doing those?

What a dry snitching prag.  "Officers, when they took my dessert should i be mad or something?"

These people would be murdered in a county lockup they are such squeelers.

[Blueball]

I still think Blueballs is some nobody. That's why they're here, it's the only way they would get noticed by us.

I'm actually

Spoiler:  (click to show)(click to hide)

benji

[nachobro]

id believe it