11-03-2025, 08:25 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-03-2025, 08:26 PM by simiansmarts.)
(11-03-2025, 08:08 PM)filler wrote: nick is a lot more intentionally entertaining than the rest of the right wing talking heads tbh
there's a lot of unintentional hilarity from most of politic tbh One of the funnier bits of this whole ordeal had to be when Fuentes made fun Officer Tatum (or as he's now known as "Officer Talmud") and made him mad enough to call Fuentes racist even though according to Talmud racism isn't real. I hope we're in for years of rightwing infighting because this shit is genuinely hilarious.
(11-03-2025, 08:23 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote: Tucker Carlson also manages to piss off right wingers by himself now by talking about how Sharia Law is actually awesome and how there are no rapes in Saudi Arabia
Not entirely sure what audience he's chasing now If Sharia Law means Laura Loomer will cover up her terrifying plastic mutant face then I’ll gladly take it.
Latest casualty of the trans genocide, Mazzy Starr.
11-04-2025, 05:23 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-04-2025, 05:25 PM by benji.)
Quote:On the Future
It is no coincidence this happened after Charlie’s martyring. I can testify firsthand he was keeping malignant forces like Fuentes at bay. In the final month of his life Charlie asked me to join him in a private, one-on-one Signal chat whose primary goal was to devise and deploy a strategy to make sure the likes Fuentes, Groypers, and other such knuckle draggers never gain a legit foothold in our movement. He was convinced they would extinct us both spiritually and politically, and God would never bless such darkness.
This chain of events is also no coincidence — our apostolic leader murdered, the demonic Democrats’ full throat embrace of Islamunist Mamdani, and the current division over Fuentes. This is the spiritual counter attack to the seeds of revival we saw at Charlie’s memorial.
Pat Buchanan was right about some things. Bill Buckley was wrong about some things. It's okay to say that. We don't always have to take on everyone's legacy whole hog. I started this way too wordy thread by inspirationally invoking Luther, without whom Western Civilization probably dies hundreds of years ago. But sadly antisemitic screeds at the end of his life are part of his legacy, too.
We have all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. What Trump has done, maybe without even realizing it, is that he has taken the positive aspects of Buchanan's views and discarded the bad. We can keep this coalition together if we follow that example.
Come now, let us reason together.
1 user liked this post: filler
11-04-2025, 06:58 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-04-2025, 07:03 PM by simiansmarts.)
I see Matt Walsh will still tapdance around the topic of Israel lest he wants a phone call from his boss, Mr. Shapiro. If Walsh said half the shit Buchanan did about Israeli lobbies his ass would be out of the daily wire so fucking fast.
Walsh is a massive pussy, he’ll vaguely gesture online without saying anything specific that could implicate him. I hope Fuentes goes after him next once he’s done with Shapiro.
1 user liked this post: filler
 Pence needs to challenge Mamdani for NYC Mayor from the left.
God now I know what it was like for others when I was obsessively Hasan posting. I can't tell wtf is happening in this thread anymore.
I'm not criticizing, just observing, and its fascinating. These dudes are suddently debating Pat Buchanan of all people?
11-04-2025, 08:09 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-04-2025, 08:10 PM by benji.)
Somebody said that it's okay for conservatives to question the jewnazis because Pat Buchanan did.
I'd go one better and go for Pat's old boss and say it's okay to drink heavily and then use anti-semitic slurs to spread jewnazi conspiracy theories because Nixon did.
1 user liked this post: filler
isn't it entirely obvious that NYT elevating fuentes is an attempt to give him enough rope to hang himself with
I mean, not that he even needs to do anything to hang himself, the more people who just find out about him and the things he's said, the worse it would be for republicans
pictured: an ominous portrait of man, apparently wearing all-black, eyes darting furtively toward the edge of the frame. Headline describes the subject as a "bitter opponent" of a victim of assassination.
Twitter guy: "wow, what a complimentary and deferential image! The NYT clearly love this dude!"
(11-04-2025, 08:37 PM)Uncle wrote: isn't it entirely obvious that NYT elevating fuentes is an attempt to give him enough rope to hang himself with
I mean, not that he even needs to do anything to hang himself, the more people who just find out about him and the things he's said, the worse it would be for republicans That's the jewnazis argument:
Find someone who looks at you the way George Bush looks at Willie Horton.
(11-04-2025, 07:44 PM)DavidCroquet wrote: God now I know what it was like for others when I was obsessively Hasan posting. I can't tell wtf is happening in this thread anymore.
I'm not criticizing, just observing, and its fascinating. These dudes are suddently debating Pat Buchanan of all people?
![[Image: 050401_buchanan_vmed_7a.jpg]](https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/t_fit-1000w,f_auto,q_auto:best/msnbc/Components/Photos/050401/050401_buchanan_vmed_7a.jpg)
cum
(11-04-2025, 08:42 PM)benji wrote: (11-04-2025, 08:37 PM)Uncle wrote: isn't it entirely obvious that NYT elevating fuentes is an attempt to give him enough rope to hang himself with
I mean, not that he even needs to do anything to hang himself, the more people who just find out about him and the things he's said, the worse it would be for republicans That's the jewnazis argument:
"the midget in the jackboots"
Yes, yes, keep attacking his height and calling him an incel. That's totally gonna work!
Right wingers hate this one anti immigration trick
Spoiler: (click to show)(click to hide)
Tons of posts like this from butthurt chuds on Twitter but I liked the wording on this one:
On the left there seems to be mostly an angry discussion about whether socialist or centrist politics were more popular
1 user liked this post: benji
(11-05-2025, 07:31 PM)Potato wrote:
Spoiler: (click to show)(click to hide)
This guy is the worst. Just a nonsensical, corrupt asshole. How can you be more corrupt that Sepp Blatter??
|