12-19-2025, 06:20 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-19-2025, 06:25 PM by HaughtyFrank.)
While they're correct that not everyone in a wheelchair needs to use it 100% of the time, if you skip the line to get wheeled on the plane but then walk off the plane I call absolute bullshit. Like how convenient that both times you happened to pick the option that's the fastest for you personally. And hilarious that none of blueskys anger is directed at anyone gaming the system
Is this Globalizing the Intifada?
I like the one worrying about how many people are going to get abused this week because of the article. Shame they didn't escalate to saying that people might die because of fear of asking for appropriate accommodations, etc.
This is generally the crux:
Except progressives aren't consistent about this anymore than most others, for people they like there's little they can do to be excluded, for people they don't a one-drop rule or even "you were at this guy's wedding" applies for exclusion from everything. I think one reason they seem so indifferent to authoritarian regimes (except for the Nazis) like China or older ones like the Soviets or socialism in general and how these are universally exclusionary by default for the entire population is the belief that they personally would run them in a more inclusionary manner for all. Even as you see how quickly they act to exclude people from even conversing with them on the slightest whim let alone for greater crimes like actively opposing them politically.
These are correct answers and get at why the typical "solutions" are always too broad and result in this:
It's like The Joker said, you can tell everybody that you're going to do something horrible and it's fine as long as it's "all part of the plan" but one little ol bpd woman can't get her wheelchair for her long COVID and everybody loses their minds!
(12-19-2025, 06:42 PM)Alpacx wrote: Is this Globalizing the Intifada? 
Anyone seen filler lately?
(12-18-2025, 07:31 PM)TylenolJones wrote: (12-17-2025, 10:38 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote: (12-17-2025, 10:04 PM)simiansmarts wrote: Doing this while the Brown University shooter is still at large is quite the social media flex.
Hey, they're trying very hard
Got em
(12-19-2025, 06:42 PM)Alpacx wrote: Is this Globalizing the Intifada? 
Quote:"We have arrested three individuals for offences targeting women and members of the Jewish community," said Toronto Police Chief Myron Demkiw.
On May 31, a woman was approached by three men, one of whom was armed with a handgun and another with a knife, in the Don Mills Road and Rochefort Drive area of Toronto, police said. The suspects attempted to force her into a vehicle but fled when interrupted by a passing motorist.
On June 24, two young women were targeted in Mississauga on Ellesboro Drive near Swanhurst Boulevard. Three masked men pulled up in an Audi SUV armed with a handgun, a rifle, and knife, and chased the women and tried to grab them, police said. The men again fled after being interrupted by a passerby.
When you're a rapist but got social anxiety
1 user liked this post: Potato
(12-19-2025, 07:44 PM)Great Rumbler wrote: he's just like me fr
1 user liked this post: Potato
12-19-2025, 08:58 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-19-2025, 09:00 PM by benji.)
Quote:That is CLEARLY a black hijab under the hoodie. But look at their build. It is extremely masculine for a woman. Is this a Muslim man disguising himself? Is the additional person of interest trans? One thing is certain, that is a black hijab and that means the person of interest is a Muslim.
12-19-2025, 08:59 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-19-2025, 09:00 PM by HaughtyFrank.)
It's funny that the one homeless guy from Reddit got it right. Meanwhile the large group of Internet sleuths was very convinced that it was some Muslim dude
It's an incredible kind of mind who can look at that, realize it's probably not a woman's body and to maintain the idea that it MUST BE A BLACK HIJAB decide it must be a trans woman rather than question the hijab theory.
(12-19-2025, 01:57 PM)Uncle wrote: (12-19-2025, 01:02 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote: [tw eet]https://x.com/HudaAmmori/status/2001305591424122892?s=20[/tweet]
"The rules around hunger strike"
brb hunger striking until I have a billion dollars, start working toward resolving that, government
It's fascist not to give me whatever the fuck I want.
1 user liked this post: Alpacx
"Is safe"
"Continuing hunger strike"
So is she dying of hunger striking or not?
12-20-2025, 04:57 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-20-2025, 06:25 PM by Alpacx.)
There is now a story going around that Kirk was going to be Vances VP and then Don Jr. was going to be Kirks VP.
Spoiler: (click to show)(click to hide)
12-21-2025, 08:18 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-21-2025, 08:25 AM by Alpacx.)
(12-21-2025, 07:18 AM)Uncle wrote:
Still can't believe that sorority story and the fact the actual women lost.
Don't believe your lying eyes (but there are too many PHDs produced in a lot of fields)
It isn't happening
But if it was happening jt would be a good thing
How are things going in conservative land?
Oh.
idk that sounds like some woke shit to me
woke is dead, everyone should allowed to say whatever they want without consequence
1 user liked this post: benji
|