Kulturkampf

[Alpacx]

Edit:
https://j-source.ca/resources-for-covering-tumbler-ridge/

For quick reference, here are some top tips:

    Gender and sex are different concepts. Do not use the sex categories male or female to denote gender.
        NO: “Biological male who identifies as female” (no reason ever…in this instance, similar language was used by the RCMP. If it appeared in publication ever, should be enclosed in quotation marks.
        YES: A girl or woman…

The TJA expands here on the phrase “biological sex.”

    People do not identify as men or women — they are men or women.
    If gender is explicitly relevant to the story, people can be described using their gender identity. If sex is explicitly the category relevant to a story, it should be clear why.
        i.e. do NOT refer to a stat about “female photographers” unless you’re both certain this data exclude trans women and that there’s a contextual reason why sex is more relevant to the story than gender, much more commonly relevant in social categorization.
        YES: Women photographers…

[Nintex]

It's a big city. Sadly that happens sometimes

[HaughtyFrank]

Amazing, we reached the point where "identifies as woman" is now transphobic. The bar just keeps constantly getting moved, the thing they told you 5 years ago to say is now bigotted. 

Bet your ass though that if someone trans gets murdered they'll shout the victims gender identity to the heavens

[DavidCroquet]

Releasing the Epstein files was a massive mistake.

Rather than clarify anything, it drove everyone on the planet fucking insane.

[Alpacx]

[Nintex]

Releasing the Epstein files was a massive mistake.

Rather than clarify anything, it drove everyone on the planet fucking insane.

It's almost as if put some land mines into the files for the Democrats to step on

But you’re right this is boring stuff. Better leave it

[Uncle]

I get that somebody being named somewhere in the epstein files is very suspicious and if there's even a 1% chance that someone is a pedophile we have to take it as an absolute certainty

but isn't there a possibility that epstein surrounded himself with all sorts of people from all walks of life, even including totally innocuous visits to the island where nothing untoward occurred, just to further make sure he'd be well-insulated and defended should anything happen, because all those innocent people would be motivated to convince others that they're not pedos just because they happened to be in proximity to the guy once

[benji]

Edit:
https://j-source.ca/resources-for-covering-tumbler-ridge/

The TJA expands here on the phrase “biological sex.”

    People do not identify as men or women — they are men or women.

Oh, well, then it's up to me to decide what they are isn't it. 

[benji]

[benji]

why is the government lying to us such a stretch at this point?

Why would the world's dumbest, most ignorant and least skeptical people who are the poorest researchers be the ones to figure it out? (Especially off of single and/or planted clues.)

It's Creationist methods like the trans stuff. "Oh, you can't explain this random thing (that I might have made up and definitely are referencing wrong) in five seconds, then the entire theory and connected set of theories is debunked and you're now required to accept whatever I assert no matter how stupid."

[boreform]

all of western intelligence knew about the attacks before they happened. the israelis sent a team to film it in person. european agencies tried to report  it ahead of time and were ignored. 

the official narrative is that the fbi and cia weren't sharing info(lol if you believe that), or that no one would have ever thought they would fly the planes into buildings. reason being that in the past hijackers would only take hostages. this falls apart when we found out there were mossad bois sent to film the towers going down. if the israelis knew, then the U.S. intel agencies also knew. there isn't much of anything one side knows that the other doesn't. israeli and U.S. intel go hand in hand. 

at the very least the people who's entire job is to stop terrorists attacks like 9/11 knew ahead of time and stood down. 


when the october 7th attack happened. it was the exact same playbook. there are idf officers who say they were told to stand down and not do their jobs guarding the border. the sophistication of the israeli defense along their borders and the goofyness of the attack, it's ridiculous to believe hamas was just so brilliant and unstoppable.

[DavidCroquet]

My favorite ex girlfriend was a dead serious 9/11 truther. She also had phenomenal tits.

Filler, show them. I need to check something.

[boreform]

we were lied into war with iraq. 

"saddam 1000% has weapons of mass destruction, bros" -source trust me, bro lol


but somehow it's impossible we were lied to about what exactly went down both leading up to and on the day of september 11th 2001

[HaughtyFrank]

[benji]

all of western intelligence knew about the attacks before they happened. the israelis sent a team to film it in person. european agencies tried to report  it ahead of time and were ignored. 

the official narrative is that the fbi and cia weren't sharing info(lol if you believe that), or that no one would have ever thought they would fly the planes into buildings. reason being that in the past hijackers would only take hostages. this falls apart when we found out there were mossad bois sent to film the towers going down. if the israelis knew, then the U.S. intel agencies also knew. there isn't much of anything one side knows that the other doesn't. israeli and U.S. intel go hand in hand. 

at the very least the people who's entire job is to stop terrorists attacks like 9/11 knew ahead of time and stood down. 


when the october 7th attack happened. it was the exact same playbook. there are idf officers who say they were told to stand down and not do their jobs guarding the border. the sophistication of the israeli defense along their borders and the goofyness of the attack, it's ridiculous to believe hamas was just so brilliant and unstoppable.

we were lied into war with iraq. 

"saddam 1000% has weapons of mass destruction, bros" -source trust me, bro lol


but somehow it's impossible we were lied to about what exactly went down both leading up to and on the day of september 11th 2001

See, you're doing other Creationist methods too. You're not even arguing the point you're supposed to be arguing, you've backed off the bailey to the motte that was never argued against in the first place. Then gish-galloping.

People like Cenk, or Alex Jones, or the bulk of 9/11 accusations including in your own post above tries to make a strong claim, an assertion, not merely a negative distrust of any official story or any collectively accepted story. It doesn't simply try to say "the government isn't telling the full story" instead it attempts to construct an alternative story for which there typically is absolutely no evidence, let alone good evidence (let alone extraordinary evidence for the extraordinary claims) and is even harder to believe than either the government's story or the collectively accepted one.

These assertions often, almost always I would say, ignore inconvenient facts. You know what's part of the official/collective narrative? That the government knew. The federal government admitting this is in the 9/11 Commission Report aka the official story. They knew al Qaeda members on multiple watchlists were trying to learn to fly planes without learning to land them. One reason they knew instantly who did it was because they knew all the names and connected the dots from all the information they already had. That's why they scooped up the "19th hijacker" immediately. Also al Qaeda had been targeting and attempting to use planes for mass attacks since 1995.

Instead of keeping to this acknowledged by the official story fact, you (and Cenk and Alex) feel the need to construct a story you can believe that affirms your priors. That the government is hyper competent and evil but also so incompetent that any idiot can figure this out from a handful of random trivia and also nobody ever betrays it even as its evil plans are constantly exposed by random idiots. In your theory the government can't even be incompetent, it has to be hyper competent and instead they have to "let it happen" even though there's no reason for this and you don't have an explanation for why other than your priors.

Again, same as Creationists. They can't accept a world that's not planned billions thousands of years ago by the perfect being. Everything has to be explained by this or else there's no point at all. Even a more defensible version of this premise, that God spun things up for fun and stopped paying attention before humans even appeared violates the prior: that humans are created in God's image. That the person matters by cosmic direction. The person needs this to be true and so all theories must confirm it or else the version feels a loss of self. Same with conspiracy theories who also believe they are privileged to not just exclusive information but the secret cosmic meaning of everything that happens in the world. Anyone who doesn't see God's Mossad's plan in everything just strays from the light.

Same crutch: someone must be in control. The world must be ordered by someone's design (and only makes sense if you force it to) and anything else literally does not make sense.

It's a self-justification like with religions, a demonstration of one's fealty to the greater faith. It's not about convincing others or even anything actionable about the powers that actually move reality, it's about a demonstration of piety to other believers. Those who speak in the language of the faith. The non-believer is the foil for strengthening group solidarity by producing an outsider unspoken in the ways of the faith whose mere existence is hostile by threatening the believers way of life. You can dismiss them because they don't engage in the rituals of the community.

[boreform]

I'm not reading any of that, because you started off making a claim that has nothing to do with me. I don't get this from cenk or alex jones. I've never been a "truther". so you can take all that and start over. I'm not a "creationist" or a trans right advocate. start over and just read what I posted. it has nothing to do with whatever bullshit you're bringing up.

[benji]

[Potato]

Some Berk doesn't understand rhyming slang...

[HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth]

"The term exists to suggest Americans are shit."

Yeah? What seems to be the problem?

[HaughtyFrank]

[Nintex]

It seems to me that someone was making a joke. Jeff was a real joker it's boring stuff fellas jeez who the hell cares 

[Ribosome]

lol. They still try to ratfuck you even after all the pandering.

[Kazuma_Kiryu]

The Bluesky left is trying to stochastic terrorism Will Stancil now.

[benji]

If women were in power, men would have no rights or privileges.

To begin with, women do not regard poor or unattractive men as fully human. They tend to view men primarily in terms of usefulness, and those who offer no benefit are dismissed as useless. That's how ruthless women are.

This is why often laugh when feminist men say they want to destroy the patriarchy. Do they really think that under a matriarchy, women would consider doing anything for men?

Women, by nature, are consumers rather than givers. If they were in power, all they would do is continue awarding more rights and privileges to themselves at expense of men. Basically, the men do all the dangerous work, they ask for rights and privileges. Any  man who demanded the same would be viewed as a threat.

Look around: despite having more rights and privileges than men in many areas, women still claim to be oppressed and continue to demand more. Patriarchy is the only system that attempts to care for both genders. Women tend to prioritize themselves alone.

They do not even care about the boy child. Have you ever seen the United Nations speak about education for boys? No. Why? Because it is run by women.

They do not even care about little boys, and yet you think they would care about you as an adult?

[HaughtyFrank]

[HaughtyFrank]

[benji]

It's all happening on X, the everything app:

[HaughtyFrank]

Did all the global south talk bite her in the butt here? I assume that's why she thought it's below the equator

[Rendle]

"Third world"? "Global South"? Maybe Trump was right, it may be offensive but when someone says "shithole countries" at least you know which ones they're talking about.

[HaughtyFrank]

This guy is truly amazing