Journal of Other Forum Analysis (Volume II, Issue 2)

[Lonewulfeus]

Got a new forum for you to comb through benji, find me some gold thanks

https://forum.looksmaxxing.com/

https://forum.looksmaxxing.com/threads/im-not-gay-but.159927/

i dont find pussy attractive, it kinda disgusts me. i dont really get it at all

[killamajig]

Hope all my fellow Bires have a great Ramadan starting tomorrow evening.

It's always important to never listen to Era kafir when it comes to our beloved religion.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/ramadan-all-month-all-day-and-night-2026.1438861/

[Uncle]

what about machines specifically designed to improve bone strength

[killamajig]

Shooter looking like a buffer..

oh and add some totenkopf SS tattoos

[filler]

hogg strength at an all time high 

[Potato]

Everybody's favorite sperg lord is back in constructive 

We really can't be having the Controversial opinions thread over and over again in different threads.



https://www.resetera.com/threads/times-when-a-games-success-or-praise-truly-bothered-you-and-why.1437727/



IMO like I said in the previous thread, these kind of threads are the ones that make Era's more and more and more and more negative each day.

And not to point at OP at all, far from it, but I feel the answer from mods to "we can't do anything, the Internet is negative on itself" is at least control these hot takes threads. I really don't think they add anything other than hate.

That's your own interpretation of my thread. Not my intent at all. I don't even consider it negative. The purpose is literally self reflection. I see this and I kind of want to break down the reasoning, and I used myself as an example so I wouldn't come off as just being critical of others. But now people want to pretend they're all above the thing I'm describing when it's regular ocurence.



I also disagree with your interpretation of the last thread you had a problem with, you just took it more seriously than that OP did and wrote intent they never even stated. Just like you're writing a brand new sentence I never said for me.



"Controversial Opinion - I don't like Pokemon SV" - Come on, be serious.

Yeah its really tiresome.

Why does this thread tire you?

So once again I clearly state my intent and purpose behind something and people interpret it as something else while ignoring my point even when I jump in to clarify.



I am what you say I am regardless of what I say otherwise. It's not a pattern or anything clearly.



And then the response when this gets pointed out is none.

You haven't read your own thread have you?



Well we can start with the title. As someone who is so astute on the mindset of the average era user you must realize that era doesn't read the op. You decided to name it "Times When a Game's Success or Praise Truly Bothered You and Why?" (I mean you could have gone with so many different thread titles like "Hey Era, we need to grow up and not hate on games that are successful" or "When are some times you felt stupid hating on something popular?" to name just a couple off the top of my head. So what (extremely) predictably happened was that you got about a third to half of the posts calling your immaturity out, and the other 2/3rds to 90% taking the opportunity of bashing their current game that they hate. So the tiresomely predicitble outcome was pretty inevedibitle.



Then yhour OP is pretty bad also. Your first paragraph is just a fig leaf of what you really feel, to be honest that you elaborate in your third paragraph, which is you just shitting all over Pokemon Scarlett/Violet. Your only responses where where you defended your flawd approach, discounting people who saw through what you tried to peddle, or strangly (for a thread to point out our flaws) adding fuel to a poster's hatred of the extreme love E33 got throughout the year with a glib response of "I mean, we weren't wrong." Nah, you just wanted to take this opportuinity to shit on Pokemon Scarlett/Violet.



Then when you are called out on it you say "that's your own interpretation of my thread" like that is some sort of shield from true criticism. I mean, you do realize that the listener/reader's comprehension of what you communicate is just as important as what you say?



So basically I don't buy your bullshit that your thread was some sort of "learning opportunity" for Era and this is just some convoluted excuse to be an ass.



EDIT: And good on the mods for not falling for this bullshit and shutting it down.

No, I didn't read how you rewrote my thread in your head.

Derbel, I know you and I have not exactly seen eye to eye in the past, and if you choose to disregard what I say based on that, I am not going to fault you. With that said, I am a huge fan of people engaging in self reflection and I am going to choose to trust you when you say that you sincerely are making that thread to self reflect This forum desperately needs a lot of its membership to be doing that, and I want to believe the best in those who say they are trying.



To that end, I will say that I can see why people may not take that intent away from your first post in that thread as is because it feels like the actual self reflection aspect is extremely limited versus the relitigating of your frustrations with ScarVi's many issues juxtaposed against the game's success, pointing at people for saying things like "talent won", and then accusing people of parasocial relationships for buying and generally liking a game. Self reflection doesn't mean you have to admit you were wrong (so you don't need to just accept that all the people celebrating the success of a set of flawed games), but it does require there to be more in regard to trying to understand the point of why those games ended up resonating for people despite the legitimate problems with it, and maybe also understanding where there are some "flaws" that may not be as flawed to others as they exist to you.



I do not think your general idea of the thread is completely unworkable, because people do immediately come in with good examples of successful games that bothered them (HogLeg is THE big one, but there are others).

I can't imagine me making that thread without calling myself out having gone over well. I used the one instance I'm guilty of.







Good job on assuming the worse of people and patting yourself on the back for it.



I get called a bullshitter and an ass because I stand by my attempt to contribute something here.



But I'm the one that gets call hostile because I'm not nice to people who insult me unprompted.



Just consider for a moment, maybe I'm not lying or trying to pull something and consider how frustrating this interaction is from that perspective and how you're coming off for no real reason.

Right. Like I said, I am going to believe you on it and that it just maybe wasn't the best worded because you aren't used to it. And that's okay! This forum is full of people who desperately need to learn how to engage in self reflection and people aren't going to get it perfect all the time because we just aren't that kind of creature that is able to just always get it right.

The other thing that's frustrating is that my own thread creation history can't be taken into account. Am I the guy that just makes negative threads for the sake of it. Do I do passive aggressive threads, am I known for that? Has this been a reoccurring issue? Since when am I the half assed thread maker? Or have I just made topics about anything serious, silly, or about nothing. And even with the sillier stuff I made sure to put in effort. So what are we doing here?

Unfortunately, I think you do have that reputation and it has been an issue, which is why people (including myself at first glance when I saw) might have originally seen your thread and thought the worst. Then I saw what you initially said here and I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt. I'm genuinely rooting for you when you say you are self reflecting.

For making negative troll threads?

we already have a controversial gaming opinions thread anyway



https://www.resetera.com/threads/your-controversial-gaming-opinions.938/page-537

1000th time. Not the intention or point of the thread. You can't just pretend that I didn't say that and explain what I was going for. Or maybe you can since that's what everyone else is doing.

But the kind of responses you should expect to get are basically things that belong in there. If it wasn't the intention or the point of the thread then it should have been elaborated on more or have a different thread title phrasing. Talk about your own opinion if that's really something to make a thread about. Why fish for more random opinions

Because why would anyone want to hear that? I don't even want to hear that so I didn't spent much time on mine.





I feel like there are issues with your suggestion you're overlooking, but somehow this is the most reasonable response I've gotten so far, so I'll just take it. So thank you for that.



There's misreading intent and just assuming the worse. This was definitely a case of the latter.



Going from what are times you were a hater about something successful and why to take petty snipes at popular things is straight up writing a brand new prompt. I like to think I've always been upfront about my thread intentions. I didn't think this needed the level of clarification and background as my thread about porn plots. And why, that's asking you to break down the reason. Why did you feel this way. That's the reflection. I felt. I resented. I felt like. I laid out an example.



By the logic applied here, could I not just assume this thread is also about being negative about games and have a go at them. Meanwhile they read my posts wondering where any of this is coming from. Which is how I feel now.



https://www.resetera.com/threads/iffy-games-with-great-box-art.1437838/#post-151432564



The initial responses to this in this thread are way more negative than anything in my thread. The people supposedly tired of negativity jumping on someone because they want to assume everything is an attack and clearly I pissed the second person off with some take last year considering how quickly they went to insults.

I think the thread was locked because the title was "Times When a Game's Success or Praise Truly Bothered You and Why?"



Despite you trying to expand in the OP, the majority of posts were only ever going to be responses to that question.



There's no agenda against you here, or post history not being taken into account it's just a poorly titled thread that was only going to invite negative potshots at things people like (and the people that like them). It's not even "what popular things do you not like", it's asking for when popularity actively bothered you which seems to invite a more specific type of negativity aimed at the fans of something.



I'm not saying any of this was your intent, but it was the inevitable result and has been fairly shut down.

To be fair to Derbs there is another thread that is from yesterday (UK time) that is ripe for negativity and negativity towards popular series. No one seems to be singling that out.

[USER=128269]Derbel McDillet[/USER] I get you're frustrated with the closure of your thread but coming in here to complain isn't productive. Open a ticket and plead your case.

Which one?

https://www.resetera.com/threads/what-series-do-you-keep-giving-a-shot-to-no-avail.1437670/



I didn't want to single it out as I think negativity is a problem of the site, not that of thread creators really.

Part of this stems from other circumstances and previous instances. Some very recent. You suggest writing a ticket. But my last two mod inquiries were just straight up rejected, so I'm just not doing that anymore. Hence the "once again" because this has been a reoccurring thing in different ways. "You said this", "no I didn't", "yes you did", conversation locked.



People putting words in my mouth and straight up rewriting my intent is something I've always had an issue with and called it out at any moment.



You're being reasonable about it by going, hey you're thread could be taken this way. Yesterday, I was straight up accused of just trying to get one over and lying about it.



And one of the posters above that set the tone here clearly has a bone to pick.







I think reading that as an example of negativity is a straight up choice. "I'm trying to like this, but it's not clicking".



And that's just unfair to just put on people without even considering that wasn't the intent.

The point is, in any case, that people will come into a relatively benign topic that looks to have a wider discussion about something and without the OP "tending the garden" or whatever the same types of negativity keeps cropping up. If due care is not taken, threads like these get people crop dusting their "takes" about generally popular series that are negative and often only being negative. There is a controversial gaming takes thread that serves that purpose of a safer place to do that without spreading negativity throughout the site.



I think people can be critical of what they want to talk about without it automatically being negative, but people are lazy and prefer engagement so drop in one or two sentence posts that amount to "I don't like a thing". I just think thread creators can generally be better at minding threads, but I appreciate I say that as someone that doesn't create threads.



I highlighted that thread because no one is kicking up a fuss there, but instead decide to give you a hard time.

As someone that intentionally avoided engaging with Derbet's thread and posted in the one you shared, I don't think they're the same at all.

Then that's fair. I saw less of a difference in the framing.



I still think it's about the tending of a thread than the content of an OP, but I'll concede I may be wrong on the threads outlined.

[USER=128269]Derbel McDillet[/USER] - it's not unusual for you to come to these threads frustrated that your threads or wording is misinterpreted.

At a certain point, if it's happening again and again it's likely worth thinking about what you can do differently to make it less likely that happens.

When posting I often ask myself what the least charitable reading of what I'm saying might be and try to head that off, because many users on this site absolutely have an "oh you hate waffles?" issue.

To be blunt, you've made these Community Discussion threads about yourself multiple times now Derbel. In threads outside of this one, you seem to find yourself at the center of attention quite often, and not in a positive way. This doesn't seem to be a problem for anybody else on this website and yet it keeps happening with you.

I see what you're getting at, but looking back on those specific instances, I stand by what I said. There's misinterpreting and then there's flat out rewriting. There's getting the clarification and then outright ignoring it. If you do the above, that's your choice, not something for me to correct. You're telling me to be clearer when we're watching my clarification get ignored. This could've been a ticket, but it's not because of the way previous attempts as recent as two weeks ago played out. This isn't a misunderstanding. This is a choice.



We can watch people harp on the same game and troll threads for months and they'll literally tell you they're doing this, but asking what stems that feeling on is what we draw the line that at.



My personal favorite was - let's pretend a word doesn't have different connotations, insist you made it up and then laugh at you when you show examples of other people using that other connotation. But I need to be clearer.

I've read that OP multiple times. There is no clear call to discuss anything other than the title. And the title is that common "times XYZ" title we've all seen a hundred times such that you don't even need to read the OP to understand what they're asking for. And if you read that OP, there is nothing that contradicts that expectation.



There is nothing wrong with accepting that your thread didn't come out the way you wanted it to, and trying again with better phrasing for clarity. Although, don't quote me on that I'm obviously not a mod.

Not to pile on too much, but I feel that if the purpose of that thread was for self reflection and a bit of "hey don't we all act a bit silly sometimes", that doesn't come across at all in the OP.



I mean, it starts off with "this is not in response to what happened last year specifically", which I assume is a subtle wink wink nod nod to something, but I've no idea what. Then the bulk of the OP is taken up by the reasons why you hate a specific game. If you wanted the thread to be about self reflection, wouldn't it have been better to actually include some in the OP? "My example is Pokemon, I hated that it sold so well but now I've thought about it more, I realise how silly that stance was". Something along those lines? Instead it just sort of read like "here's my example of a game I hate, what games do you hate?", which I suppose is fine as a topic I 
suppose, but this forum already has a severe negativity problem so what does it add?



You've mentioned people taking your words the wrong way, but all we had to go off was what was in the OP. Maybe your intention was for something more lighthearted, positive or reflective, but even reading it over multiple times now, it just seems like an invitiation to be negative for no real reason.

And after all that back and forth we get this .........

https://www.resetera.com/threads/your-totally-reasonable-very-non-controversial-food-opinions.1438774/

Mint ice cream is just frozen toothpaste. Yuck.

Onions should be deleted from our dimension, plain and simple. No exception.

How food feels in your mouth is just as important as taste.

Cheese sucks

Nothing stops the "I hate ________" threads on Era. Where does that guy think he is?  

Oh and as a Wisconsinite

Cheese sucks

Cum

[FUME5]

Got a new forum for you to comb through benji, find me some gold thanks

https://forum.looksmaxxing.com/

https://forum.looksmaxxing.com/threads/im-not-gay-but.159927/

i dont find pussy attractive, it kinda disgusts me. i dont really get it at all

https://forum.looksmaxxing.com/threads/milkermaxxing-the-copes-the-basics.151059/

[Potato]

ITT: Nintentardian discovers the pitfalls of exceptionalism.

Inadvertently reveals to an ignorant audience the problem with so much progressive thought.

https://famiboards.com/threads/the-games-for-impact-award-category-betrays-a-fundamental-problem-in-mainstream-games-criticism.16589/#post-2186434

I don't know if Keighley started this stuff—I know it's spread to other video game award sets—but the "Games for Impact" category has bothered me for the better part of a decade.

The problem goes like this: the "Games for Impact" category acts as a kind of containment zone for a certain category of game. Described on the Game Awards website as, "For a thought-provoking game with a pro-social meaning or message," the framing serves to make us understand that the games described by the category are those with a strong artistic bent, with specific thematic messages or specific social aims. In other words: this is the category for games-as-art. Either that, or it is the Performatively Woke Part of the Game Awards™

Now, here's my thing. Here it is. I think that if an award show, or an entire school of criticism, need an entire category for games-as-art, because the definition of the "best games" in a given year wouldn't otherwise include them, then the standards for what makes a good game is vacuous in the extreme.

Now there's an argument to be made for games as toys: that games are fun first, and the primary marker of quality for games-as-toys is simply how fun they are to play and how satisfying they are in moment-to-moment gameplay. And I agree with that, broadly! Some of my favourite games are toys. Donkey Kong Bananza is one such game!

But if games are indeed art, then games have to be treated like art, and that means that the thematic underpinnings of games, the novelty of their formal elements, their uniqueness, and the refinement of their components that aren't upheld by tens of millions of dollars in development hours and playtesting, must be just as important as the things that do (or don't) make for a hype trailer.

The "Games for Impact" category must be abolished. Games that would have competed for it should simply be in the Game of the Year category

[FUME5]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-we-should-give-ozempic-to-everybody.1438372/

Fatties out in force.

[filler]

ozempic not curing ben franklin syndrome 

[Lonewulfeus]

Got a new forum for you to comb through benji, find me some gold thanks

https://forum.looksmaxxing.com/

https://forum.looksmaxxing.com/threads/im-not-gay-but.159927/

i dont find pussy attractive, it kinda disgusts me. i dont really get it at all

https://forum.looksmaxxing.com/threads/milkermaxxing-the-copes-the-basics.151059/

They don’t even have a jelqing subforum.  Pathetic.

[Orange Juice Box]

Like that entire films has a pretty obvious "Therapy doesn't work, killing people with mental health issues is the "right" salutation sometimes because we're too dangerous" message..

 

Stick with Scooby Doo cartoons, my dude.

Idiocy.  Nightmare on Elm Street was about community restorative justice.  They chase a chilly-mo into his hut and burn it down with him inside.  As a community.

[BIONIC]

Everybody's favorite sperg lord is back in constructive 

And after all that back and forth we get this .........

https://www.resetera.com/threads/your-totally-reasonable-very-non-controversial-food-opinions.1438774/

Mint ice cream is just frozen toothpaste. Yuck.

Onions should be deleted from our dimension, plain and simple. No exception.

How food feels in your mouth is just as important as taste.

Cheese sucks

Nothing stops the "I hate ________" threads on Era. Where does that guy think he is?  

Oh and as a Wisconsinite

Cheese sucks

Cum

Cum posting is back

[HaughtyFrank]

Generally with the trans stuff I imagine a lot less people would care to begin with if there wasn't such a strong push to change laws or go against common sense like participating in women's sports 

https://x.com/lxeagle17/status/2023746931118526964?s=20

It's my responsibility to inform you guys that polling people on trans rights is actually Anti-Trans

[benji]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/february-16th-2026-3-dead-3-injured-after-shooting-at-r-i-high-school-hockey-game.1437814/#post-151467538

This was just a quick drive away from where I live and I can say that this person had a history of acting unhinged in public.

And yeah, this is all obviously available through pictures and their social media at this point but they were a straight up Nazi. They had Nazi tattoos and Twitter posts referencing "1488" alongside their open love for MAGA.

So of course, all the most disgusting right-wing pieces of trash are focusing on the fact that they were trans but glossing over the fact that they were literally a Nazi.

It's so transparent and so gross. And I can tell you that no one around here is talking about their gender identity. They're talking about how a Nazi used a gun to murder their family members in a domestic violence incident.

And of course, the comments on my local news social media posts are now being flooded with out-of-state comments like, "The media is trying to hide the fact that they were trans!"

Motherfucker, you didn't say a god damn word when "cisgender" was left out of articles for the majority of the 420 mass shootings throughout 2025. You only care in the rare instance when a mass shooting is not perpetrated by a cis man.

It's fucking infuriating.

Hypothesis: their being trans and their being a Nazi are symptoms of the same problem that also led them to decide on mass murder. Discuss. 

[Alpacx]

Generally with the trans stuff I imagine a lot less people would care to begin with if there wasn't such a strong push to change laws or go against common sense like participating in women's sports 

https://x.com/lxeagle17/status/2023746931118526964?s=20

It's my responsibility to inform you guys that polling people on trans rights is actually Anti-Trans

   

[Boredfrom]

And of course, the comments on my local news social media posts are now being flooded with out-of-state comments like, "The media is trying to hide the fact that they were trans!"

Motherfucker, you didn't say a god damn word when "cisgender" was left out of articles for the majority of the 420 mass shootings throughout 2025. You only care in the rare instance when a mass shooting is not perpetrated by a cis man.

It's fucking infuriating.

No shit, Zeo.

Is like is something rare enough to be weird but consistent enough to be worrisome.

[HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth]

what about machines specifically designed to improve bone strength

All scams.

Only homogenised and pasteurised 100% full cream dairy MILK can improve bone strength.

[benji]

what about machines specifically designed to improve boner strength

[Boredfrom]

Hammerstein is a pretty stupid poster. 

Yeah, they're still just as bad at it for the most part. Obviously, misogny is not something that's exclusive to video games, but the kind of history that video games have had has left them profoundly shaped by it. How long have video games been around now, and the critical high points of the medium contain shit that you would've found amidst the top shelf of your local 1980s video rental dive. I remember a comment on reddit I saw, not long ago, a grown man saying he might buy Stellar Blade for himself, but he was worried what his wife would say if she caught him playing it... I mean, what has changed, really?

Can't help but look at those Policenauts screens and think back to the latest Epstein revelations, reading things like Carole Cadwalladr's article, the way those horrible men spoke to each other. Its absolutely crystal clear how this shit is raining down on us from the top and the people who make games and write about games, at the bare minimum they should be able to understand the truth of that, and understand the role they play in disseminating all of this rotten ideology into the wider culture.

 

I mean, David Ehrlich for example, a pretty harsh film critic reviewed Death Stranding 1 and 2 and said they were masterpieces: here that plus P.T. gives him a pretty good narrative for anyone not familiar with his more sexist games.

Thanks for that link. Wasn't familiar with that guy. If you look at Kojima's Criterion Closet video, he picks stuff like Ozu, and Women in the Dunes. Like, he obviously understands cinema and the language of it. Wouldn't it be cool if some interviewer just asked him sometime, like "Hey, whats with all this creepy stupid shit that you did here, here, here, here, and here. And wtf was this about?"

Never seen a Euro film in your life, don’t you? 

“Hey guys, it would be awesome if a reporter could try to intentionally change other’s opinions and perception of people he didn’t like by loaded questions? Wait, why would they advise against that in school?”

Like I said, if Kojima was as niche and broke as Suda51 they wouldn’t say shit.

[benji]

"Article leaves out that people argued for this position and successfully convinced others of it!!! We can't do that so it isn't fair, which means your job is to lie!!!"

[Boredfrom]

Hammerstein: “People hide that Policenauts was a pervy game  . Kojima is from the World elite like Epstein associates like Prince Andrew and the Clintons. Some actual journalist should ask him how he dare to like Ozu and tits at the same time.”

[PogiJones]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/february-16th-2026-3-dead-3-injured-after-shooting-at-r-i-high-school-hockey-game.1437814/#post-151467538

This was just a quick drive away from where I live and I can say that this person had a history of acting unhinged in public.

And yeah, this is all obviously available through pictures and their social media at this point but they were a straight up Nazi. They had Nazi tattoos and Twitter posts referencing "1488" alongside their open love for MAGA.

So of course, all the most disgusting right-wing pieces of trash are focusing on the fact that they were trans but glossing over the fact that they were literally a Nazi.

It's so transparent and so gross. And I can tell you that no one around here is talking about their gender identity. They're talking about how a Nazi used a gun to murder their family members in a domestic violence incident.

Notice how Zeo repeatedly refused to say "she" and instead went with "they", probably to try to make the shooter sound slightly less trans 

[benji]

Hammerstein is a pretty stupid poster. 

Yeah, they're still just as bad at it for the most part. Obviously, misogny is not something that's exclusive to video games, but the kind of history that video games have had has left them profoundly shaped by it. How long have video games been around now, and the critical high points of the medium contain shit that you would've found amidst the top shelf of your local 1980s video rental dive. I remember a comment on reddit I saw, not long ago, a grown man saying he might buy Stellar Blade for himself, but he was worried what his wife would say if she caught him playing it... I mean, what has changed, really?

Can't help but look at those Policenauts screens and think back to the latest Epstein revelations, reading things like Carole Cadwalladr's article, the way those horrible men spoke to each other. Its absolutely crystal clear how this shit is raining down on us from the top and the people who make games and write about games, at the bare minimum they should be able to understand the truth of that, and understand the role they play in disseminating all of this rotten ideology into the wider culture.

I mean, David Ehrlich for example, a pretty harsh film critic reviewed Death Stranding 1 and 2 and said they were masterpieces: here that plus P.T. gives him a pretty good narrative for anyone not familiar with his more sexist games.

Thanks for that link. Wasn't familiar with that guy. If you look at Kojima's Criterion Closet video, he picks stuff like Ozu, and Women in the Dunes. Like, he obviously understands cinema and the language of it. Wouldn't it be cool if some interviewer just asked him sometime, like "Hey, whats with all this creepy stupid shit that you did here, here, here, here, and here. And wtf was this about?"

Never seen a Euro film in your life, don’t you? 

I don't think it's just European films, but like any other form of art ever.  

It's like a guy who has only ever seen Disney films, childrens shows and video games watching his first cable TV show with a bra and panty shot: "Wow, I can't believe there's PORNOGRAPHY in this!"

[Boredfrom]

And I can tell you that no one around here is talking about their gender identity.

The police didn’t even bother to hide his identity like the Canucks.  

Dude was both Nazi enough to have tattoos and liking Nick Fuentes, but also a socially conscious TransWoman that shitted on Trump cronies.   A mentally ill person whose transition didn’t seem to help his mental health, just like the Canadian shooter last week that transitioned at 12

[benji]

That Policenauts shit is so tame, especially at 16-bit sprite resolution. Some dude probably did it one day and they thought it was funny, definitely not masturbating and salivating over it.

[benji]

"I clicked and her boobs jiggled, yadda yadda yadda, I'm on Epstein's Island with Bill Gates."

[Boredfrom]

"I clicked and her boobs jiggled, yadda yadda yadda, I'm on Epstein's Island with Bill Gates."

[Potato]

And after all that back and forth we get this .........

https://www.resetera.com/threads/your-totally-reasonable-very-non-controversial-food-opinions.1438774/

Nothing stops the "I hate ________" threads on Era. Where does that guy think he is?  

Oh and as a Wisconsinite

Cum

Cum posting is back

I'm hoping Gamegirl will resume his usual posting and liking if I put out the call...

[Boredfrom]

Leftists yearn for the Chinese model:

https://www.resetera.com/threads/chinese-food-deliverers-in-sydney-were-considering-protesting-chinese-police-called-and-threatened-their-families-in-china.1438957/

They think the west is a hellhole already.