this video generated a ton of discussion on twitter the past few days, if you dive into the replies and retweets it's a warzone of seethe, honestly could've posted this in kulturkampf but the video itself is fun
(it's because the coffee is a blonde roast rather than black)
(05-10-2026, 05:28 PM)killamajig wrote: (05-10-2026, 08:14 AM)Uncle wrote:
https://www.resetera.com/threads/mixtape-ot-sounds-like-teen-spirit.1512631/page-11#post-154792318
Messofanego wrote:I love the interactivity in this game, it's so inventive. The French kiss, the chases, the forest flying, the photo booth, the headbanging in the car, and many more. Quantic Dream (Fahrenheit, Heavy Rain) walked, so this game could run with it. I imagine this was first written as a traditional script, then the songs were figured out to match the storytelling as they don't feel like random needle drops, and then all the funny or quirky interactive moments came in. I'd love to see the behind-the-scenes of this. 
Of course that soyboy loves it
![[Image: yx3QKYcl.png]](https://i.imgur.com/yx3QKYcl.png)
05-13-2026, 06:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-13-2026, 06:54 PM by Orange Juice Box.)
Spoiler: (click to show)(click to hide)
05-14-2026, 04:17 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-14-2026, 04:19 PM by Propagandhim.)
Funny thread bc it's a real Monet painting
stupid ass Monet didn't know bout the amalgams
(05-10-2026, 06:27 AM)benji wrote:
 1 user liked this post: Potato
(05-14-2026, 04:17 PM)Propagandhim wrote: stupid ass Monet didn't know bout the amalgams Egregiously.
who else is this smart 
Incredible slop account:
![[Image: image.png]](https://i.ibb.co/Qvm9P74q/image.png)
![[Image: image.png]](https://i.ibb.co/KctDmdKx/image.png)
I have no idea why YouTube recommended this to me but it was short so I clicked on it to see how dumb it was:
And in the comments, jdmorin9327 being the video creatoer:
Quote:@InductiveSchmuck242
11 hours ago
your first points are immediately a bunch of strawmen. Its not the case that all or even most atheists believe that everything came from nothing. That statement is nonsense if you belive time is interlinked with space, and therefore space has existed for all of time/ space didnt come from some prior state of nothingness. This feels especially weak for someone who is a b or c theorist for time.
Also, you absolutely strawman the abiogenisis position. Its not like life popped into being from nothing. They make the claim that the foundational chemical building blocks for life begin to develop in these conditions ( things like amino acids make themselves in the miller urey experiment for example), and form together in such a way that is conducive to VERY basic life. You go on to ask why life doesnt pop into existence all the time now that we have life. I can think of a few reasons for this: firstly, considering that the life that was formed by non living matter was microscopic, you would hardly be able to tell if it did or didnt newly pop into being. We dont have a map of all microscopic organisms. For all you know, maybe there are microscopic organisms popping into existence and you just cant see. Secondly, there is now lots of competition from highly adapted organisms for the resources necessary for continued living. If something was to try to pop up now, its gonna have to win some insane lottery ticket such that it doesnt get outcompeted by some other bacteria or ameoba that is far more adapted to its environemntal niche.
Abiogenisis is unintuitive, sure, but lets not act like either you or I have the barest clue of the current evidence for it. But its simply ridiculous to reject it out of hand when you clearly dont have a clue about it. Also, i doubt anyone who actually understands abiogenesis would respond to your terrible criticism of it with the problem of evil.
Your assesment on the problem of evil is also bad. When an atheist proposes it, they arent superimposing their atheistic morality on to you. Its an internal consistency test. They are asking you to reconcile the immense suffering in the world with a loving god. If you read a piece of paper that said " how would a loving god give children cancer", your response shouldnt be " clearly the person writing this has some unjustified moral standard system", thats asinine. A reasonable response would be an explenation that tries to reconcile this suffering with gods good nature. An atheist is perfactly capable of arguing if your reconciliation of this suffering with gods goodness seems sound or not.
Sorry for making the comment long but shit, I had something to say about each of your claims because all of them were unnuanced when they deserved some
Quote:@jdmorin9327
11 hours ago (edited)
Too long didn’t read. Go enjoy your life. You could die to today and you it wasted talking to a random person online who doesn’t care what you have to say. 😊
(05-14-2026, 10:00 PM)Nintex wrote:
who else is this smart
If you watch an 8:46 YouTube video about how smart you are, you might just be clinically retarded.
a good bit, I think it could stand to have slightly more variation...I liked when he introduced himself, I think that was important to keep it going
like one of those times he could've said "I cut somebody off...complete accident really...you guys ever done anything like this? And the guy rolled his window down..."
|
