Yesterday, 11:52 PM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 11:53 PM by HaughtyFrank.)
(Yesterday, 05:21 PM)filler wrote: (Yesterday, 04:42 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/flotilla-activists-report-multiple-accounts-of-rape-and-torture-by-israeli-forces-at-sea.1527946/
Will someone wonder that this sounds a bit convenient that this happens right after the other rape accusations against Israel? For some reason the previous activists didn't claim they were raped.
I think it's very telling when you see the way israeli officials are reacting towards ben gvir. they were not condemning his behavior towards the previous activists. something went wrong enough that countries normally allied with israel are complaining to the extent israel is condemning the treatment of the activists instead of just pretending like nothing happened 
I'll say one thing, if Israel didn't film those activists 24/7 to disprove allegations then they're either idiots or really did some shit.
Probably because the one that did the stunt is an asshole politician, is difficult to ignore when the act is share on video and people are mad that Israel has outright admitted is more political convenient for them that Hormuz is still closed.
I doubt it has to do with the rape stuff.
(Yesterday, 05:17 PM)Hap Shaughnessy wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/flotilla-activists-report-multiple-accounts-of-rape-and-torture-by-israeli-forces-at-sea.1527946/#post-155292631
Boondocks wrote:Israel has become the new face of a holocaust. The orthodox and conservative Jews are evil
Quote: User banned (1 month): antisemitism
(Yesterday, 05:03 PM)Hap Shaughnessy wrote: (Yesterday, 05:00 PM)Greatness Gone wrote: One of the fastest locks I've ever seen!!!! 
https://www.resetera.com/threads/m-o-b-a-network-resetera-owner-to-use-ai-powered-development.1527976/
From B-Chubs:
Quote:Oh my god, can we stop with the concert trolling? We don't use AI for shit.

Quote: User banned (permanent): making a thread to engage in concern trolling around AI, prior severe bans
(Yesterday, 05:06 PM)cRumB wrote: Another perm
https://www.resetera.com/threads/wsj-mind-blowing-growth-is-about-to-propel-anthropic-into-its-first-profitable-quarter.1526530/page-10#post-155292823
(Today, 12:52 AM)Hap Shaughnessy wrote: (Yesterday, 05:17 PM)Hap Shaughnessy wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/flotilla-activists-report-multiple-accounts-of-rape-and-torture-by-israeli-forces-at-sea.1527946/#post-155292631
Boondocks wrote:Israel has become the new face of a holocaust. The orthodox and conservative Jews are evil
Quote: User banned (1 month): antisemitism
11 users liked this post: Averon, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, benji, killamajig, Taco Bell Tower, Alpacx, BIONIC, Let's Cyber, Lonewulfeus, MJBarret, HaughtyFrank
Transistor, post: 155297881, member: 1099 wrote:At the end of the day, yes, ResetEra is owned by MOBA, but they don't interfere with or influence anything that goes on here. They let staff handle the site in the way we've been handling it for years. What MOBA does with AI is their own business and it doesn't affect us and we aren't being forced to use it in any way
never, post: 155306830, member: 23444 wrote:So could someone else post that topic without being banned? Or is that topic banned?
Transistor, post: 155307409, member: 1099 wrote:What topic?
never, post: 155307769, member: 23444 wrote:This thread topic
[url unfurl=true]https://www.resetera.com/threads/m-o-b-a-network-resetera-owner-to-use-ai-powered-development.1527976/[/url]
Transistor, post: 155307826, member: 1099 wrote:Without being banned? Of course. Without it being locked? Probably not. There's nothing to discuss. MOBA doesn't really dictate anything we do here. They like the way we run it and they leave us to do just that. We're not going to host a thread that's nothing but fear-mongering, what-ifs, and bad faith nonsense.
Plus, y'all know me well enough to know I'd hang up my hat the day any generative garbage gets forced on me.
never, post: 155308255, mem
ber: 23444 wrote:Ok makes sense. Thanks.
Idiots thanking them for a total bullshit response
14 users liked this post: Hap Shaughnessy, Green Jupiter, BIONIC, JoeBoy101, MJBarret, Gameboy Nostalgia, Vertigo, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, benji, kaleidoscopium, killamajig, Taco Bell Tower, simiansmarts, HaughtyFrank
Today, 01:52 AM
(This post was last modified: Today, 02:09 AM by Boredfrom.)
Sirap wrote:What is it with Israel and rape?
Really infuriating how they pretend this shit is exclusive of Israel.
“And October 7?”
“SHUT THE FUCK UP!  ”
Kiyamet wrote:Media orgs who do not report on this are compromised.
Probably most of them want a confirmation, because it would be a diplomatic suicide to do this to European activists.
rsfour wrote:They don't view it as anything bad, there isn't anything they'd find reprehensible when it comes to people they see as subhuman.
Not saying they don’t rape, but the argument that “they rape because they seem them as animals”  is always weird ass hell. The enemy not only need to be amoral, but comically depraved.
(Yesterday, 10:10 PM)cRumB wrote: (Yesterday, 09:41 PM)DavidCroquet wrote: (Yesterday, 04:42 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/flotilla-activists-report-multiple-accounts-of-rape-and-torture-by-israeli-forces-at-sea.1527946/
Will someone wonder that this sounds a bit convenient that this happens right after the other rape accusations against Israel? For some reason the previous activists didn't claim they were raped.
Did they train the dogs to swim?
if anyone else like me wanted a refresher on exactly what joke triggered super dave so hard here
https://youtu.be/cKdbntTZXdY?t=885
wake up birettes, another gen Z men thread got posted
https://www.resetera.com/threads/single-gen-z-women-are-outpacing-their-male-counterparts-when-it-comes-to-buying-their-first-house-in-the-u-s-fortune.1527871/
cyress8 wrote:Something is wrong with men. I understand living is harder today but there is something else going wrong when women are still pushing through the headaches with even more issues on their backs with pay inequality, misogyny, etc.
The older black men in my life pressed me to buy a home to build generational wealth because no one sure as shit going to give it to you. Took that to heart in my 20s, bought my home and will give to my daughter once I'm buried. I'm really thinking that actual grown men just have lost proper role models along with their ambition being killed off when they constantly hear whining from influencers.
Ernest wrote:(this may be anecdotal), but compared to other generations of men I've observed, Gen-Z men seem to have "given up", and have little drive/ambition.
I'm sure a lot of it is how much more difficult shit is now than 20, 30+ years ago, but seems like that whatever "drive" men had to do things is dying off.
Kyrios wrote:I wonder how much of that has to do with all those manosphere influencers (or just influencers in general) where they are successful for doing stupid shit or complaining about society and raking in the money.
r/slutoon and r/whiteboydiscussion user wrote:Definitely a significant effect. The manosphere has done so much damage.
gen z men are trooning out
11 users liked this post: Cheers, JoeBoy101, Vertigo, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, benji, Lonewulfeus, Taco Bell Tower, killamajig, Alpacx, Potato, HaughtyFrank
(Yesterday, 08:25 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote: Someone made a game about owning slaves and then after all the idiots bought the game in support he patched the game to make all the slaves white. Like... that's funny right?
That's fucking hilarious
Today, 03:34 AM
(This post was last modified: Today, 03:49 AM by simiansmarts.)
(Today, 02:20 AM)Uncle wrote: gen z men are trooning out They’re simply women in their extended rest period, bigot
I notice that the previous journal of other forum analysis apparently became unstable around 1200 pages?
unless 1200 was arbitrarily chosen as a point well before the main issues that happened in the 2300 page thread
(Today, 02:08 AM)simiansmarts wrote: wake up birettes, another gen Z men thread got posted
https://www.resetera.com/threads/single-gen-z-women-are-outpacing-their-male-counterparts-when-it-comes-to-buying-their-first-house-in-the-u-s-fortune.1527871/
cyress8 wrote:Something is wrong with men. I understand living is harder today but there is something else going wrong when women are still pushing through the headaches with even more issues on their backs with pay inequality, misogyny, etc.
The older black men in my life pressed me to buy a home to build generational wealth because no one sure as shit going to give it to you. Took that to heart in my 20s, bought my home and will give to my daughter once I'm buried. I'm really thinking that actual grown men just have lost proper role models along with their ambition being killed off when they constantly hear whining from influencers.
Ernest wrote:(this may be anecdotal), but compared to other generations of men I've observed, Gen-Z men seem to have "given up", and have little drive/ambition.
I'm sure a lot of it is how much more difficult shit is now than 20, 30+ years ago, but seems like that whatever "drive" men had to do things is dying off.
Kyrios wrote:I wonder how much of that has to do with all those manosphere influencers (or just influencers in general) where they are successful for doing stupid shit or complaining about society and raking in the money.
r/slutoon and r/whiteboydiscussion user wrote:Definitely a significant effect. The manosphere has done so much damage.
Nobody is willing to have an honest conversation about this.
The fact is gen z didn’t have Halo.
What, exactly, was easier 20-30 years ago?
(Yesterday, 09:50 AM)Besticus Maximus wrote: Does Jeff Power Rangers even play videogames? At least Planet smasher has some taste and clears the year's bangers. I wonder if he's got fat, our jeff. Fat and lustless. He seems to play Destiny 2 and Fortnite as he sometimes posts screenshots on Twitter before deleting them later. It's a shame he built a whole streamer studio and has never streamed so we can't know for sure.
(Yesterday, 06:24 PM)Hap Shaughnessy wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/uk-government-publishes-guidance-on-trans-people-excluding-them-from-sports-changing-rooms-toilets-womens-groups.1526719/page-3#post-155287741
nanhacott wrote:Ah, I see why you're confused.
Once more, for the bigots in the back:
You
can
change
your
biological
sex
That had never been part of the debate, until far-right idiots started trying to just redefine stuff. Of course you can change your sex. But terfs managed to swindle a bunch of people into believing you can't. Hence, nothing ever makes a reference to a person's current sex, only the marker on their birth certificate, because sex can change, so you need to start making up other rules in order to get away with discrimination. Like, "biological sex" no longer refers to a person's current biological sex, it refers to their oldest observed sex, even if that was wrong.
Which is itself a bit of a trap, because then we end up back at "oh then that's cut and dry, we'll just divide everything based on actual current biological sex", but does that mean a person magically goes from cis to trans only at the moment of medical intervention? That's silly. Obviously they were already trans, otherwise they wouldn't be changing sexes in the first place. And trans people who don't undergo any medical intervention are just as valid, that's why we started using the term transGENDER. Not because you can't change sex, but because biological sex is a myopic and exclusionary way of looking at things. Any examples of this?
Spoiler: (click to show)(click to hide)
(Today, 04:05 AM)Uncle wrote: I notice that the previous journal of other forum analysis apparently became unstable around 1200 pages?
unless 1200 was arbitrarily chosen as a point well before the main issues that happened in the 2300 page thread Yeah, it was arbitrary as about the halfway point as the slow downs I'm pretty sure didn't start happening until past 2000+ pages. I think I may start splitting them based on dates so it's easier to figure out which thread to go into if you're looking for something and you know the year at least. Unless we really start producing pages, maybe two threads a year will work. I had thought of this earlier but didn't do it at the year because the pages were nowhere near enough, but looking for that PoliEra Dossier I saw how much faster and easier it was knowing what thread had the posts around the date.
(Yesterday, 06:44 PM)Greatness Gone wrote: Ree forum culture is so insane that you'd catch a perma for saying you can't alter your chromosomes. Actually, they deny that chromosomes have anything to do with sex based on a slight technicality because X and Y chromosomes only match sex in 99.9% of cases. The layman's understanding is wrong, X chromosomes don't really have anything to do with sex, you can have a defective Y chromosome that never triggered the SRY in the womb and thus be an XY woman. (The problem with this argument? If you developed as a male, SRY triggered.) XX is "easier" because it's most people and with no Y you can't be a male. They want to use an infinitely small possibility to throw out the entire thing because it's not accurate 100% of the time. (Even though we can identify every case where it's not accurate. Just read the SRY gene on the Y chromosome. And we know it is accurate for any trans women.)
The main thing they (not Era, but the people they repeat) argue is that primary sex characteristics (gametes, uterus, prostate etc.) have nothing to do with sex because nobody actually looks at that, instead we "determine" sex based off of secondary sexual characteristics (boobs, dicks, etc.) and therefore if you change these you're changing your sex. This is, of course, a massive logical error and beyond that is actually nearly reifying gender. Something they more typically do when they're explaining that women have emotions or whatever misogyny they typically post.
So you notice that we're already two blatant fallacies in and we still haven't demonstrated that you actually can change your sex, which the burden is on in the first place since nobody has any examples of it being done. Our first fallacy equivocates and then uses this equivocation to basically appeal to a possibility that doesn't ever apply to anyone arguing for it. Then we work entirely backwards and use another equivocation to claim that the characteristics are not defined by the sex but are instead our culture imposing the sex on the characteristics. So really, we're four claims in without any demonstration of anything, simply a claim that there's some vagueness (really some minor nuance) and therefore anything is possible. Which itself is an even more massive claim that requires incredible demonstration before we should accept it.
The secondary sexual characteristics claim is arguably the worst because it denies that humans are animals, specifically mammals. Animals know the sex of their partners, so humans must have before "culture" established gender especially late stage capitalist conceptions of gender. Of course, as we know, they like to appeal to the animal kingdom when they can say that some species can change their sex therefore humans can, which is another equivocation on "animal" ignoring that humans are specifically mammals aside from the fact that humans have never changed their sex ever.
There's really two ways to refer to what this is and they're basically the same logical construction. Conclusions first, "science" second. It looks like the Creationists gish gallop and "God of the gaps" argument because it is that. Where it departs from Creationism is that the "God" is themselves, or humanity typically envisioned purely through themselves, and so humanity then has the capacity to change biological reality because it creates reality in the first place. (A claim that itself is never demonstrated.) Which makes it more like Lysenkoism, we have the theory and so we can dictate how science and reality should work. And if we just conform to the theory enough, science and reality will match the theory. (If you notice, more demonstration required that never is.)
The fact that it's "progressive" and claims "science" and it's "bigoted" to not conform hides that it's really a pernicious, quite-religious (and obviously political too), assault on science and even reasoning itself. One reason they react so fast to asking about trans racial or even "I identify as an attack helicopter" is because they don't have any response at all to this argument in either form. Literally everything they claim about sex and gender is far more true about race. And their actual premises and claims would stand just as well for attack helicopters. If biology is entirely within the domain of our belief and will to alter it, then why can't we be attack helicopters? "ONE JOKE" is to make sure you don't actually consider the argument honestly, you want to be a good person, right? Well, dishonesty is required to be good. Maybe try some basic human decency and reject the possibility of truth outside what we collectively decide is true.
Today, 06:04 AM
(This post was last modified: Today, 08:47 AM by Averon.)
(Yesterday, 09:42 PM)Jansen wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/nascar-legend-kyle-busch-dead-at-41-from-a-severe-illness.1527292/page-2#post-155302732

MasterYoshi, post: 155302732, member: 12088 wrote:I gotta disagree with y'all on this one, an extremely public facing couple who often speak about their struggles with infertility and IVF thanking the PotUS for lowering costs isn't some full throated endorsement. Same with Kyle giving a generic statement about the PotUS attending the Daytona 500. To my knowledge the couple has never been political in any way, publicly.
If you're expecting NASCAR drivers to come out in opposition of the PotUS, I'm just not so sure you're ever going to see that happen. 99% of them carefully curate pretty much any public statements they give.
NOT ON MY REEE 
Reee death threads is always hilraious.
Normal, well-adjusted Person: "Oh, a youngish, uncontroversial person suddenly died? Too bad. So sad. RIP.
Reeee: "Oh, a youngish, uncontroversial person suddenly died?
*Spends the next hour searching through the deceased's social media for anything chuddy*
"This chud 'thanked' Trump back in 2019. Fuck them, and I'm glad there's one less chud to chuddify the world. Into the  they go."
18 users liked this post: Boredfrom, Cheers, Lonewulfeus, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, killamajig, DavidCroquet, Let's Cyber, BIONIC, Green Jupiter, JoeBoy101, MJBarret, Greatness Gone, HaughtyFrank, Gameboy Nostalgia, Taco Bell Tower, simiansmarts, Alpacx, benji
Today, 06:06 AM
(This post was last modified: Today, 06:14 AM by benji.)
Oof. Yikes. You didn't always know he was a chud? Not a good look. I never liked him.
(Today, 02:20 AM)Uncle wrote: gen z men are trooning out
it's mens turn to be stay at home mothers.
(Today, 05:59 AM)benji wrote: The fact that it's "progressive" and claims "science" and it's "bigoted" to not conform hides that it's really a pernicious, quite-religious (and obviously political too), assault on science and even reasoning itself.
since malicious means you're full of malice, then I guess these beliefs are full of pernice
Men are hopeless. They order Coke zero, leave early "tired" and let the girls pay for their drinks.
So they all left and I had to chat with a 19 year old at the bar about her self-diagnosed ADHD. Guide her jealous friend in her attempt to "split the G" of a guiness that she had seen on TikTok. Sit through a massage of my bald head. Finish the cheap left over wine bottle after closing they smuggled in. Hug and kiss
I bet today is one of those days when all the young women from the cities visit the beach with their friends and want to know where the food or ice cream is best. Meanwhile the chuds just sit at home playing videogames, gambling and trade in crypto
sigh
14 users liked this post: benji, Switters, Taco Bell Tower, simiansmarts, Boredfrom, Lonewulfeus, Mask, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, DavidCroquet, BIONIC, filler, Potato, Nintex, NekoFever
(Today, 06:06 AM)benji wrote: Oof. Yikes. You didn't always know he was a chud? Not a good look. I never liked him.
There was always just something off about him.
Is the part of the Nintex dating arc where he realizes that no woman with an actually developed frontal cortex wants anything to do with him?
(Today, 06:06 AM)benji wrote: Oof. Yikes. You didn't always know he was a chud? Not a good look. I never liked him. (11 hours ago)Potato wrote: There was always just something off about him. My magical 6th sense for detecting secret chuds and future milkshake ducks has never been wrong.
(10 hours ago)BIONIC wrote: Is the part of the Nintex dating arc where he realizes that no woman with an actually developed frontal cortex wants anything to do with him?
This is not dating it's arguably even better.
The girl from the ice cream shop says hi. She wanted a puppy to cuddle but with 2 cats life already got too expensive so instead her sister got a puppy so the cuddle crisis has been solved.
Is this the Nintex becomes a puppy girl arc?
year of nintex is officially over
|