Kulturkampf

[Alpacx]

EuGeNiCiSm :Spongebob
   
https://bsky.app/profile/danifroom.bsky.social/post/3mmwepzf7gc2x

[HaughtyFrank]

EuGeNiCiSm :Spongebob

https://bsky.app/profile/danifroom.bsky.social/post/3mmwepzf7gc2x

Legitimately don't understand what's supposed to be upsetting about the quoted text let alone eugenics

Edit: looking at the replies they're pinpointing on him calling chromosomal abnormalities abnormal...

How do these people ever want to be taken seriously when they can't understand language. Yes, something that differs from the norm is abnormal. When someone is born with only one hand that's an abnormality. We don't go around declaring that there's a new species of human that's only one handed

[benji]

Edit: looking at the replies they're pinpointing on him calling chromosomal abnormalities abnormal...

How do these people ever want to be taken seriously when they can't understand language. Yes, something that differs from the norm is abnormal. When someone is born with only one hand that's an abnormality. We don't go around declaring that there's a new species of human that's only one handed

They read moral criticism into it, that by saying it's abnormal you're saying it's bad and needs to be eliminated.

[benji]

Spoiler: "there goes any hope for Texas" (click to show)(click to hide)

[benji]

Dioecious (/daɪˈiːʃəs/) describes a species in which individual organisms are strictly either male or female. In biology, this means reproductive organs and gametes are separated into distinct "two houses" rather than combined within the same individual.

And since sex and gender being distinct and separate is a common piece of anti-trans misinformation (ignore Bernie at the top of the screenshot), I guess we just have to accept that there are only two genders in humans and it's entirely biologically based. I don't make the rules, Sobekhotep (who I've seen in the replies of Era people lol) does. 

[Potato]

potato, come get your girl. 

Absolutely valid questions. SBS is government funded and estimates is all about examining how they are spending their budget. If the jury selection was not transparent, balanced and featuring a broad cross-section of Australian society, then I want to know why. Taking a cursory look at the names, I'd say there was very little attempt to select anyone that stepped outside the usual lefty performing arts bubble.

[HaughtyFrank]

He calls intersex people abnormalities. Then uses the term "dignity and respect" which the entire UK has used to strip trans people of Healthcare and implement a bathroom ban.

Actually he calls their chromosomes an abnormality, not the person. These people care so much about dehumanizing language but then don't actually pay attention to the language

[benji]

Absolutely valid questions. SBS is government funded and estimates is all about examining how they are spending their budget. If the jury selection was not transparent, balanced and featuring a broad cross-section of Australian society, then I want to know why. Taking a cursory look at the names, I'd say there was very little attempt to select anyone that stepped outside the usual lefty performing arts bubble.

FACT CHECK: The only valid question is why is Australia allowed a ballot in Eurovision.

[Potato]

Also a fascinating facet of modern discourse. You can crawl on stage and flash your panties and then go on a talk show be all "Why are people sexualizing me??"

*Acts like a dirty whore*

"Why are you treating me like a dirty whore?"

[simiansmarts]

[HaughtyFrank]

EuGeNiCiSm :Spongebob

https://bsky.app/profile/danifroom.bsky.social/post/3mmwepzf7gc2x

Lmao, I didn't realize that the person they're disgusted with is this guy

You can try to virtue signal as hard as you want to trans people but take a minimal step out of line and you're declared a nazi eugenicist 

[Potato]

Absolutely valid questions. SBS is government funded and estimates is all about examining how they are spending their budget. If the jury selection was not transparent, balanced and featuring a broad cross-section of Australian society, then I want to know why. Taking a cursory look at the names, I'd say there was very little attempt to select anyone that stepped outside the usual lefty performing arts bubble.

FACT CHECK: The only valid question is why is Australia allowed a ballot in Eurovision.

FACT CHECK: Any broadcaster that is an associate member of the EBU is allowed to compete.



Participation since 1956:
Entered at least once
Never entered, although eligible to do so
Entry intended, but later withdrew
Competed as a part of another country, but never as a sovereign country

Spoiler:  (click to show)(click to hide)

The question is not whether we are allowed to enter, but whether we should.

[Alpacx]

[Potato]

Christopher Nolan chose a Mexican who said that "only Latinos should play Latinos" for the role of the old Greek Eumeu.

On the right: some random Greek.

No Greeks in the cast of "The Odyssey."

Nolan is an anti-Greek racist.

[HaughtyFrank]

They didn't even listen to her... 

[HaughtyFrank]

Christopher Nolan chose a Mexican who said that "only Latinos should play Latinos" for the role of the old Greek Eumeu.

On the right: some random Greek.

No Greeks in the cast of "The Odyssey."

Nolan is an anti-Greek racist.

Meanwhile 8 years ago people were upset a white girl wore a Chinese dress. 

This discourse never made sense beyond "it's bad when white people do it"

[Potato]

The discourse is retarded. The hypocrisy is 

[Alpacx]

[HaughtyFrank]

Sometimes I'm so certain it has to be a parody account and then they're completely sincere 

[DavidCroquet]

Also a fascinating facet of modern discourse. You can crawl on stage and flash your panties and then go on a talk show be all "Why are people sexualizing me??"

*Acts like a dirty whore*

"Why are you treating me like a dirty whore?"

[Rendle]

She looks like a clean whore if anything