Journal of Other Forum Analysis (Volume II, Issue 2)

[simiansmarts]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-women-criticise-sexualised-character-designs-ot3-make-her-look-more-corpulent-more-stuffed-where-the-eyes-cant-escape.275780/page-541#post-156782638 
 

I saw that Stellar Blade tweet and the reference to DOA and istg I'm so tired with the sexualisation in fighting games and how much clickbait there is amongst content creators. A user posted a video in the street fighter thread (no hate to the user btw it was a combo video or guide or something but the thumbnail was of a shot from cammy's CA while in her classic thong leotard and it was soo in your your face. I mention this because someone last night on twitter pointed out that if you google Chun-Li one of the images that pops up right away is this (a thumbnail to one of max's video) 
 
And I've seen replies to that tweet from others basically confirming that they got the same thing when they searched Chun-Li (so I assume it's true and not a big meme). I don't think I really need to explain the problems with this here, but it just left me with an awful taste in my mouth and while everyones joking about it and finding it funny it is symbolic of so many issues in the fgc and potentially contributing to the rises of harassment that's been happening as I posted about a week or two ago

I also just decided to test it and that video pops up bigger and more centrally in the overview than a tutorial video on how to play her. I'm tired

  

I can't see your images but it's been a thing in fighting games forever. Tournaments are full of players that use the most revealing costumes 'to try and psyche out' their opponents. I hate that the industry gives lip service to equality but goes out of their way to make sure everyone knows it's really 'for the boys' at its core. By the industry I mean Capcom, Namco and SNK and it does show up in other smaller maker's work but to a lesser extent. Every version of SF I'm shocked by how revealing they make the swimsuit costumes. I get that fighting game characters are supposed to be peak humanity but woah, pump the brakes developers. Or try and make something interesting instead of just skimpy.

 

I've never had people reacting to characters in that way before when I search for a character and I often search characters up, I did it loads recently while trying to piece the timeline together and characters ages, so yeah this is a new thing for me. You're not wrong in anything you say about lip service, tournaments and the SF6 swimsuits but the fact reaction images like that appear in the AI overview that googles forced on us, it's just adding a layer of conditioning to anyone who looks up characters in how they should be acting/treating these characters.

 
 
they talk about fictional characters like they're being coerced into sexualization 

[Gameboy Nostalgia]

Max should be banned and canceled for that 

[HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth]

A new entry in Planetsmasher's Big Book Of Things That Definitely Happened

When I was a teenager I got dragged to the Boston Symphony Orchestra for a school trip to see some kind of opera, and they set me up in the front row of the top balcony, which was EXTREMELY close to the edge. At some point during the show I blacked out for a few seconds, and when I woke up I was leaning forward with the top part of my body dangling over the guardrail. I was extremely lucky I woke up when I did, because I don't think it would've taken much effort to send me sailing over that edge into the audience below me.

All that is to say that this has been a fear living in my brain ever since that day. I don't know what specific circumstances led that dude to fall off the balcony himself but it's something that's lived with me for a while. I get that upper-level balconies can't have super high guardrails in order to ensure the people sitting in them can actually SEE the stage, but I wish there was a more elegant (and safe) solution.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/concertgoer-51-falls-to-his-death-during-goose-show-at-madison-square-garden-police.1556539/

The most believable part of the story is that something bad could happen to him and none of his fellow students would do anything to help him.

[Boredfrom]

Is clear to me that the woke squad read sites like KotakuInAction and follow Chuds, because otherwise they sound insane with some of the accusations about drama.

[benji]

I'm not understanding, should we not be trying to stop the pedophile game that's part of a conspiracy to push acceptance of pedophilia as part of a global conspiracy to subjugate women and spread fascism? Or should we just not publicize efforts at stopping it, keep that anti-fascist work on the down low?

"Troll account" or maybe brave and stunning activist inspired to call others to action?

[benji]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/ryo-mizuno-record-of-lodoss-war-is-retweeting-chud-posts-including-about%E2%80%A6resetera.1556872/#post-156798991

 why are these assholes taking this seriously. is era a fucking cult to them 

He should share some of those other times.

[benji]

Imagine believing something so favtually wrong.

[Besticus Maximus]

I think ive found the worst, and probably most stupidest actually of all time

Like the original Luddites who were actually in reality the predecessors of the modern era's progressives that fought for workers' rights, labor & environmental laws, and an egalitarian society that largely materialized in the Post-WWII era, the Neo-Luddite movement focuses on fighting for these same sorts of things in addition to the excision of the big tech middleman surveillance state from our lives. And like the original Luddites, many of them are technologists themselves with intimate knowledge of the state of the art and are not anti-technology. Rather, they are against weaponization of technology by powerful forces within society (i.e., oligarchs, the investment class, governments, etc.) and consolidation of wealth and power via technology. They are very pro privacy, pro expansion of true public 3rd spaces, pro in-person socializing/interactions, and pro workers sharing in the value created from technologically-driven productivity gains. They want life to shift its focus back on to us...real physical human beings...and away from the metaphorical chains of digital connected platforms harvesting our data via forced adoption in every facet of our lives and addiction.

[benji]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/anyone-else-heard-of-the-neo-luddite-movement-and-how-awesome-they-sound.1556965/

It seems the cultural rebellion against big tech I've been hoping for is starting to happen, and I want in on it. Anyone ever been to any of these events? They all seem to be in public spaces in NYC and are completely offline.

Like the original Luddites who were actually in reality the predecessors of the modern era's progressives that fought for workers' rights, labor & environmental laws, and an egalitarian society that largely materialized in the Post-WWII era, the Neo-Luddite movement focuses on fighting for these same sorts of things in addition to the excision of the big tech middleman surveillance state from our lives. And like the original Luddites, many of them are technologists themselves with intimate knowledge of the state of the art and are not anti-technology. Rather, they are against weaponization of technology by powerful forces within society (i.e., oligarchs, the investment class, governments, etc.) and consolidation of wealth and power via technology. They are very pro privacy, pro expansion of true public 3rd spaces, pro in-person socializing/interactions, and pro workers sharing in the value created from technologically-driven productivity gains. They want life to shift its focus back on to us...real physical human beings...and away from the metaphorical chains of digital connected platforms harvesting our data via forced adoption in every facet of our lives and addiction.

As mentioned in the video, you can find out more info about the happenings of the movement at the following website:

NYC Off Tech
nycofftech.com

Maybe the kids will be alright after all...

While I get the idea, I can't help but side-eye most who fall into this group a bit because a lot of them in my experience inevitably end up past Huxley and more somewhere around Unibomber the more you talk to them, sometimes with a bit of incel sprinkled in.

I don't begrudge the young their ideology most times tho. I was young and a firebrand once, so I generally just listen with open ears and try to have empathy if they're not exactly the most sound. Believing in something that heavy generally takes a passion I feel gets lost in a lost of people around 30 or so, so let the young feel their big feels, experience them, and shape them a bit I say.

After watching the interview, I don't think I'd necessarily categorize what's going on here that way. These people (the ones heading it anyway) actually sound very educated. This is not at all an anti-intellectual, anti-technology movement.

Again, please take a bit of time to watch the interview. This seems to be a very thoughtful and intentful movement with intentions of impacting real political and infrastructural change.

The Unabomber was also very well educated...

Touche. But still, if you know a bit of history, you'll know that the original Luddite movement was not what they were made out to be in popular culture. That is of course because the victors write history, and the Luddite uprising had to be crushed by more military force than was deployed by England during the Napoleonic wars. Literally, there had to be more troops deployed to quell them than in actual large scale wars of that era.

These were worker rebellions that were popular with the general public at that time for good reason: they weren't against technology but rather being cut out of the equation altogether or being subjugated/exploited by it.

Lastly, I'm in my 40s and have a family. What they are saying does not sound the least bit crazy to me at all. It sounds like what needs to happen to right the ship.

Im in my late 30s, work on the internet, and 100% agree with these people. I don't think it's "youthful passion" to hate the tech that is blatantly stealing your future and has poisoned your entire childhood and teenage years. Dismissing it with a head pat and a "you passionate youths" is an unc take (derogatory).

This is the same guy who posted that hilarious thing in the latest Iran thread:

Whats the reason for that though?

The only logical reason I can think of is that billionaires run this country and while they might fund both parties, in reality they own everything and wholeheartedly are Republicans at heart.

Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner.

They know Democrats are more likely to turn against them or at least regulate them / limit their power, as Biden started doing with Lina Khan.

That's why they went all in on conspiring to get Trump reelected, buying media platforms and essentially deploying full on information warfare against the Democrats.

It's why Elon Musk said he would have been in jail: he's a treasonous criminal who went behind the Biden administration's back on multiple times conspiring with Putin and the Kremlin against Ukraine. That stupid fuck deserves to be beneath the jail, as do Bezos, Zuckerberg, Thiel, Ellison, the shithead who runs Palantir, the top execs at Microsoft, the CEOs of all the major AI companies, etc. etc.

Clicking on his posts to get to that, I found this other incredible post:

These stupid motherfuckers. These companies are run by a bunch of moronic lemmings marching their way off a cliff...

If we had built out sustainable energy production infrastructure at the rate we should have been building it out for the last 15 plus years, this potentially would have been less of an issue. But the U.S. isn't interested in the political cooperation necessary to achieve a significant long term goal like sustainable energy production at future-proof scale.

The most important issue of our lifetime to invest in solving IS sustainable energy production, storage, and distribution. It's much more important than "A.I.", as cheap, abundant, sustainable energy is the cornerstone of all sustainable economic growth and increases in standard of living.

Like, he realizes that the people he's praising in this other thread are against all that and rherotically willing to kill people to stop it, right?

[Besticus Maximus]

Actually the original luddite movement was a lot more about posting than it was violent action and smashing up property

[HaughtyFrank]

This Mastercard thing is a great troll. I hope someone does it every single time they try to ban a game for stupid reasons. It’s literally just doing what they do.

It's so funny how they take offense for being pointed out as the site that bans games.  They are acting shocked like they've never done that before. ClickyCal is apparently a false-flag persona. Or it's "anti-wokes" who made up Era's bans.

Part of why their defense sounds so hollow is that we all know they'd be celebrating if MasterCard were to ban Stellar Blade

[benji]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/anyone-else-heard-of-the-neo-luddite-movement-and-how-awesome-they-sound.1556965/

It seems the cultural rebellion against big tech I've been hoping for is starting to happen, and I want in on it.
...
Maybe the kids will be alright after all...

Do I have a U.S. Senator for him:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/magazine/wp/2019/08/28/feature/a-conservative-senators-crusade-against-big-tech/
https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-senator-wants-ban-big-tech-buying-anything-ever-again-2021-04-12/
https://www.hawley.senate.gov/issues/big-tech/

edit:

U.S. Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) delivered a speech at the National Conservatism Conference addressing the threat posed by transhumanism. Rather than using advanced technologies like artificial intelligence to ‘transcend’ the human condition, subvert traditional values, and concentrate power among a small elite—as the transhumanist ideology seeks to do—Senator Hawley laid out a vision that centers on the interests of working Americans.

Senator Hawley stated, “America is a nation founded on the idea of the common man. The American republic is premised on his worth and his liberty. But the transhumanist ideal rejects the common man’s worth. And artificial intelligence threatens the common man’s liberty. To state it in the clearest terms, then: Americanism and the transhumanist revolution cannot coexist. And it is our job to see that Americanism wins.”

He continued, “And the problem with the AI ‘revolution’ as it’s currently going is that it only entrenches the power of the people … who are already the most powerful in the world. Imagine a future—a not too-distant future—where AI is deployed across the economy, across the country. We are well on the way to this future now. And we are told by AI boosters of the remarkable efficiencies it will bring. The papers written in seconds. The contracts drafted instantly. The algorithms that write themselves. Productivity like we’ve never seen. But here’s the flip side: millions of Americans out of work. That’s not any conspiracy theory, by the way. That’s what the tech titans openly tell us. One CEO recently predicted half of entry-level, white-collar jobs could be gone in the next five years. Half.”

...

Senator Hawley concluded, “We are, when all is said and done, creatures—not gods. And that is a good thing. Our frailties teach us humility. Our shortcomings instruct us in perseverance. Our suffering gives us compassion for those who suffer. Our limits make us something better than powerful. They make us good. And they keep us free. Because there is only one God, we allow no man or class of men to rule over us. We rule ourselves, together, as equals. That is—and always has been—the American way.”

Or to put it in the resonant language of the Bible that has formed so much of our tradition, we are creatures, not deities—and that is no failing. “We have these treasures in jars of clay,” the Apostle Paul said. The glory of the creature is to display, in all his frailty, the wonder of the Creator. It is not to be a god.

That lesson has not been learned, apparently, by some of America’s leading citizens. There is nothing new under the sun, as the Bible also says, and the quest of Gilgamesh to cheat death may be the hottest thing going among the most powerful people in America today: the tech barons of Silicon Valley.

Not content with addicting our kids to their gizmos or amassing fortunes the size of lesser European states, our tech elite has turned with rabid enthusiasm to artificial intelligence. They hail it as the greatest breakthrough for humanity since the Industrial Revolution, maybe the printing press. They predict it will centuple American economic output. They insist it will defeat China. They claim it “will save the world”—that is an actual quote.

Of course, it will also make them additional, ungodly sums of money. But that does not seem to explain the religious fervor of AI’s loudest advocates. There is something else going on, something more ideological. No, only the less cautious articulate the real reason, what many quietly believe: that AI will reinvent human existence.

The eugenicist Julian Huxley predicted this as far back as 1957. He wrote then that “a thousand million years of evolution” would lead to a moment when man, harnessing his “modern control of physical nature” would “transcend himself”—would achieve a new state of being. Today’s technologists believe that moment is now.

For Huxley, this was a religion all its own. “I believe in transhumanism,” he liked to say. And so do untold numbers of today’s tech class.

That is the vision—the religion and ideology—that animates so much of the breathless race for artificial intelligence … and for artificial general intelligence … and super-intelligence, and beyond: for the day when humans are no longer embodied beings at all but live infinitely in the cloud.

The technologists have discovered Gilgamesh’s plant, they believe. The question is, can America survive their quest for immortality? Can the republic?

I suggest to you the answer is no, and for one simple reason. America is a nation founded on the idea of the common man. The American republic is premised on his worth and his liberty. But the transhumanist ideal rejects the common man’s worth. And artificial intelligence threatens the common man’s liberty.

To state it in the clearest terms, then: Americanism and the transhumanist revolution cannot coexist. And it is our job to see that Americanism wins.

When it comes to transhumanist ideology, it does seem easy to dismiss at one level. All those ultra-billionaires sleeping in pressure-controlled chambers and applying their youth serums, taking a hundred supplement pills a day and monitoring their every bodily function—the picture is fairly absurd.

And anyway, if the friendly neighborhood billionaire wants to spend his fortune trying to live forever, why should I care? Do as you please.

But there is a more sinister aspect to the transhumanist ideal, one that Julian Huxley, the eugenicist, inadvertently captured. When he wrote, back in 1957, about the new kind of human existence science would make possible, he was all too clear about just who would be leading humanity to this exalted state.

“The universe is becoming conscious of itself,” he said, “in a few of us human beings.”

In a few of us. There is the clue. Huxley could wax eloquent about the universe appointing man “director of the biggest business of all, the business of evolution”—much as today’s transhumanists rhapsodize about living to the twenty-fifth century and curing every known disease for the sake of mankind. But Huxley didn’t mean it and neither do his successors.

When Huxley said Nature or the Universe or whatever had given “man” the opportunity to redirect human evolution, he did not mean all men, anymore than today’s transhumanists believe their billion-dollar health regimens will be accessible to all people. Huxley meant some men. He meant “a few of us.” The better sort. The anointed. The elite.

And transhumanism is, when you think about it, an elite project by definition. It is all about overcoming the common and ordinary experiences of mankind: common limits, common weaknesses, common lives … even common loves. The goal is to replace “the common” with something else. Which means replacing common people.

 

[Boredfrom]

I must say, the Palantir CEO is such a cartoon character that it makes you think about how the conspiracies may not be that far off… then you read a Elon druggie post and  .

[Taco Bell Tower]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-women-criticise-sexualised-character-designs-ot3-make-her-look-more-corpulent-more-stuffed-where-the-eyes-cant-escape.275780/page-541#post-156782638 
 

I saw that Stellar Blade tweet and the reference to DOA and istg I'm so tired with the sexualisation in fighting games and how much clickbait there is amongst content creators. A user posted a video in the street fighter thread (no hate to the user btw it was a combo video or guide or something but the thumbnail was of a shot from cammy's CA while in her classic thong leotard and it was soo in your your face. I mention this because someone last night on twitter pointed out that if you google Chun-Li one of the images that pops up right away is this (a thumbnail to one of max's video) 
 
And I've seen replies to that tweet from others basically confirming that they got the same thing when they searched Chun-Li (so I assume it's true and not a big meme). I don't think I really need to explain the problems with this here, but it just left me with an awful taste in my mouth and while everyones joking about it and finding it funny it is symbolic of so many issues in the fgc and potentially contributing to the rises of harassment that's been happening as I posted about a week or two ago

I also just decided to test it and that video pops up bigger and more centrally in the overview than a tutorial video on how to play her. I'm tired

  

I can't see your images but it's been a thing in fighting games forever. Tournaments are full of players that use the most revealing costumes 'to try and psyche out' their opponents. I hate that the industry gives lip service to equality but goes out of their way to make sure everyone knows it's really 'for the boys' at its core. By the industry I mean Capcom, Namco and SNK and it does show up in other smaller maker's work but to a lesser extent. Every version of SF I'm shocked by how revealing they make the swimsuit costumes. I get that fighting game characters are supposed to be peak humanity but woah, pump the brakes developers. Or try and make something interesting instead of just skimpy.

 

I've never had people reacting to characters in that way before when I search for a character and I often search characters up, I did it loads recently while trying to piece the timeline together and characters ages, so yeah this is a new thing for me. You're not wrong in anything you say about lip service, tournaments and the SF6 swimsuits but the fact reaction images like that appear in the AI overview that googles forced on us, it's just adding a layer of conditioning to anyone who looks up characters in how they should be acting/treating these characters.

 
 
they talk about fictional characters like they're being coerced into sexualization 

Max being scared of getting cancelled again 

[Gameboy Nostalgia]

read between the lines my dear taco

Whatever you guys do, don’t google “Chun li”   and click on the video thumbnail with me  in it.

Please . By any means necessary . This cannot be my legacy .

lil bro is happy he's getting clicks on an old video.

[jooseloose]

This fucking thread  https://www.resetera.com/threads/so-we%E2%80%99re-all-playing-meccha-chameleon-right.1556695/

So many miserable cunts when someone recommends a new game that isn't the latest prestige-bait single player Sonyslop.

[Jansen]

I actually think the game looks fun but, they are right in that the thread title is hostile.



On a forum as large as this any thread title that implies everyone is doing something is hostile to the people not doing it. It makes people not interested in the game feel like they don't belong and excluded, and challenging anyone who dislikes it to stay out.



It makes more sense as a question between friends to confirm plans, rather than the title to a post that will garner thousands of views.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/so-we%E2%80%99re-all-playing-meccha-chameleon-right.1556695/page-7#post-156808165

[Uncle]

I think ive found the worst, and probably most stupidest actually of all time

Like the original Luddites who were actually in reality the predecessors of the modern era's progressives that fought for workers' rights, labor & environmental laws, and an egalitarian society that largely materialized in the Post-WWII era, the Neo-Luddite movement focuses on fighting for these same sorts of things in addition to the excision of the big tech middleman surveillance state from our lives. And like the original Luddites, many of them are technologists themselves with intimate knowledge of the state of the art and are not anti-technology. Rather, they are against weaponization of technology by powerful forces within society (i.e., oligarchs, the investment class, governments, etc.) and consolidation of wealth and power via technology. They are very pro privacy, pro expansion of true public 3rd spaces, pro in-person socializing/interactions, and pro workers sharing in the value created from technologically-driven productivity gains. They want life to shift its focus back on to us...real physical human beings...and away from the metaphorical chains of digital connected platforms harvesting our data via forced adoption in every facet of our lives and addiction.

from what I remember, even marx himself criticized and dismissed the luddites as being not truly class conscious, misdirected, and confused

and to quote home alone, if a complete retard like uncle karl says no...then it must be really bad

[Uncle]

The Unabomber was also very well educated...

Touche. But still, if you know a bit of history, you'll know that the original Luddite movement was not what they were made out to be in popular culture. That is of course because the victors write history, and the Luddite uprising had to be crushed by more military force than was deployed by England during the Napoleonic wars.

oh, fuck all the way off

the idea that the luddites were actually very smart   and their movement was unfairly maligned is revisionist history

it's so tantalizing to these people to be taught that they've been taught wrong and wowee zowee did you know the tongue actually doesn't have individual taste centers on it and the brontosaurus was actually the apatosaurus

you weren't taught wrong about the luddites

they were actual retards who thought by smashing enough machines they could make society go back to the way it was

quashing their dumb rebellion meant moving full speed ahead on producing cheaper clothing and blankets for everyone which saved countless lives, now that a simple set of clothes didn't cost 3 months of savings, and set the stage for further advancements now that this was one basic aspect of living that was greatly improved-upon

[Besticus Maximus]

Not only that, they were all white 

[HaughtyFrank]

I actually think the game looks fun but, they are right in that the thread title is hostile.



On a forum as large as this any thread title that implies everyone is doing something is hostile to the people not doing it. It makes people not interested in the game feel like they don't belong and excluded, and challenging anyone who dislikes it to stay out.



It makes more sense as a question between friends to confirm plans, rather than the title to a post that will garner thousands of views.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/so-we%E2%80%99re-all-playing-meccha-chameleon-right.1556695/page-7#post-156808165

"Everything is violence except actual violence which is fine." Meme stays winning

[Potato]

I actually think the game looks fun but, they are right in that the thread title is hostile.

On a forum as large as this any thread title that implies everyone is doing something is hostile to the people not doing it. It makes people not interested in the game feel like they don't belong and excluded, and challenging anyone who dislikes it to stay out.

It makes more sense as a question between friends to confirm plans, rather than the title to a post that will garner thousands of views.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/so-we%E2%80%99re-all-playing-meccha-chameleon-right.1556695/page-7#post-156808165

Can these cunts ever just ignore something that's not for them?

[DavidCroquet]

I'm not understanding, should we not be trying to stop the pedophile game that's part of a conspiracy to push acceptance of pedophilia as part of a global conspiracy to subjugate women and spread fascism? Or should we just not publicize efforts at stopping it, keep that anti-fascist work on the down low?

"Troll account" or maybe brave and stunning activist inspired to call others to action?

“I disapprove of your pedophile game made by pedophiles, but I will defend to the death your right to sell it on Steam!” - Voltaire

[killamajig]

AI-bot-boy still getting roasted.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/so-im-a-housemarque-fan-but-i-completely-missed-saros-what-the-heck.1556602/page-6#post-156809968

I don't believe OP. They make numerous threads and I'm going to assume they wanted to make another thread and saw this as an opportunity to do so.

That's not how I make threads. You can even look up my thread history. It's public. You're just flat out wrong.

Also, engagement bait? Why? There's no money to me made lol.

At least on YouTube or TikTok you can money. On a small forum? Please.

Some of you guys have internet brain to the max.

You're saying I'm flat out wrong for believing you made this thread for engagement bait? It's not just me.

Yes. I'm saying that to everyone with that assertion. I can defend myself, can I not? You don't have to believe me. That's fine. But I'm not going to sit idly by.

My tthreadmaking philsophy is not "engagement bait". Again, this is not TikTok. It's niche forum about video games. There's no need to do engagement bait here.

He's getting so over heated his spellcheck programing is malfunctioning. 

[HaughtyFrank]

Do they really have any grounds to stand on when a bunch of them have gotten game developers fired for retweeting a post saying "Nazis have no place in modern society"?

I wanna be straight up, under no circumstances should anyone do what that troll was talking about. It's beyond the pale.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/ryo-mizuno-record-of-lodoss-war-is-retweeting-chud-posts-including-about%E2%80%A6resetera.1556872/post-156815314


But why? Your community already wants to ban the game on the forum. Your community already calls the developers pedophiles. Your community will endlessly talk about the harm of sexualization and how those games shouldn't exist and you ban anyone who disagrees with them. Why is it suddenly beyond the pale to complain to payment processors? Actually seems perfectly in line with your community

[Taco Bell Tower]

read between the lines my dear taco

Whatever you guys do, don’t google “Chun li”   and click on the video thumbnail with me  in it.

Please . By any means necessary . This cannot be my legacy .

lil bro is happy he's getting clicks on an old video.

Pretty clever 

[Let's Cyber]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-is-american-patriotism-so-weird.1557064/

America is so novel, and its nationalism is so unique; no one else could possibly understand how much more patriotic we are than other countries nor understand the depths of our deeply ingrained propoganda. 

Also, jingoism doesn't exist anywhere else, and no other country has a history of slavery, bigotry, or racism. Not like America. Because we are the best and no one else is as evil as we are. 

[Jansen]

When do we get the official art of Ryu and Terry shoving their dicks into eachother?

https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-women-criticise-sexualised-character-designs-ot3-make-her-look-more-corpulent-more-stuffed-where-the-eyes-cant-escape.275780/page-541#post-156810007

Hopefully soon 

[NekoFever]

I actually think the game looks fun but, they are right in that the thread title is hostile.

On a forum as large as this any thread title that implies everyone is doing something is hostile to the people not doing it. It makes people not interested in the game feel like they don't belong and excluded, and challenging anyone who dislikes it to stay out.

It makes more sense as a question between friends to confirm plans, rather than the title to a post that will garner thousands of views.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/so-we%E2%80%99re-all-playing-meccha-chameleon-right.1556695/page-7#post-156808165

Can these cunts ever just ignore something that's not for them?

I feel like it’s the natural next step of their “everything must be completely inclusive at all times” philosophy.

[jooseloose]

I do love that Maximillian Dood gets a pass from Era's usual blind hatred for streamers because he posts there.