United States Politics: ∆τ_i*ε*φ*m_i<0 where ε=4 and φ=0.25
(07-24-2026, 06:37 AM)who is ted danson? wrote: What about the Epstein files, Donald??



He congratulated the journalists that wrote about his involvement with King Jeff Applause 

Trumps

(07-25-2026, 02:14 AM)benji wrote:
Spoiler:  (click to show)
 
tbh it's kind of like how Saddam held iraqi parliament hostage on live TV. Trump is doing it with an entire country. how does he do it
Reply
1 user liked this post: Nintex
Reply
3 users liked this post: Polident, Nintex, benji
Reply


Thank you sir what an incredible  Cry
1 user liked this post: who is ted danson?
Reply

Hesright 
Spoiler:  (click to show)
Reply
1 user liked this post: Alpacx
Reply
Reply
The fucking deep state at it again:


Why can't Trump stop listening to these dumb advisers he's hired and drain the swamp? Not like this!

Spoiler:  (click to show)
2 users liked this post: DavidCroquet, who is ted danson?
Reply
Reply
Nintex, your time has come. 

2 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, benji
Reply
(08-01-2026, 01:22 AM)benji wrote: Why can't Trump stop listening to these dumb advisers he's hired and drain the swamp? Not like this!
Reply
(Yesterday, 02:54 PM)TylenolJones wrote: Nintex, your time has come. 


why didn't they just ask AI

"punish Iran creatively and make no mistakes"
Reply
(Yesterday, 05:27 PM)Uncle wrote:
(Yesterday, 02:54 PM)TylenolJones wrote: Nintex, your time has come. 


why didn't they just ask AI

"punish Iran creatively and make no mistakes"
[Image: jurassic-park.gif]

Quote:I can't help generate new military strategies or operational ideas intended to make a war more effective or increase pressure on a specific adversary.
2 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, benji
Reply
Here's my idea, tunnel under Iran. The entire country.
2 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Besticus Maximus
Reply
Mamdani Mart:


A thread, could be BSbecause he doesn't link to the document but: https://x.com/i/status/2084312689682108669
Text of the thread: 
Quote:I downloaded and reviewed NYC's grocery store RFP... as someone who has built biz's and bought a lot of food... wow.

Forget for a moment whether or not the govt should own a grocery store. Let's review the doc instead.

Here you go

NYC strongly prefers bidders

who commit to all 5 stores. But 3 of the 5 sites haven't been identified. Bidders are supposed to price unknown stores in unknown neighborhoods by assuming they're "about 15,000 sq ft." Absurd.

Bidders get preference for operating all 5 stores, presumably b/c scale lowers costs. But NYC awards each store separately, so an all-5 bidder may win only 1. They want scale pricing while refusing to award scale

 The stores must use a "limited SKU" model. They must also carry full grocery departments, household goods, culturally specific products, plus kosher, halal, vegan, gluten-free, dairy-free and diabetic options. Pick one.

The RFP says stores won't have deli counters or on-site food prep. Then its Core Basket includes chicken salad, egg salad, potato salad, fruit salad and other deli-prepared foods. So, a deli w/o a deli.

Oh... you're going to ship them in every day prepared.

Gotcha...

NYC chooses and pays for the design, equipment, refrigeration and fitout. The operator pays utilities, maintenance, cleaning and security. So NYC makes the capital decisions while someone else pays for the consequences.

That's how they control the goalposts.

The "best" bid promises 30% discounts, best-in-class wages/benefits, local sourcing, sustainability, community programs and full-time jobs. Then 20% of the score goes to whoever claims they need the least subsidy. Lowballing is the strategy... and then cost overruns are guar.

Core Basket discounts must be universal “sticker prices,” not promotions. Then the operator must create a membership card to “implement the discount program.” Which is it? Universal shelf price or an ID card system -- btw, also says it's available to all people...

and it doesn't even properly target their goals b/c the subsidy isn’t targeted. No means test. Anyone can shop there. So taxpayers will subsidize groceries for affluent shoppers who happen to live nearby, while needy families elsewhere get zero.

I always *thought* that this was a terrible idea. They could much better help people with $$ and hey, there are already programs that they could expand.

But after reading -- now I *know* it's a ridiculous idea.

We have an efficient system... just change the outcomes

so naturally one asks -- why would they *want* to build crappy grocery stores that have conflicting goals and will be mismanaged? Because either that's the goal... or else they have no idea how to actually craft an RFP or run a business.
4 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Uncle, killamajig, benji
Reply

But that's none of my business...
2 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Alpacx
Reply
Quote:The "best" bid promises 30% discounts, best-in-class wages/benefits, local sourcing, sustainability, community programs and full-time jobs.

Wut

Quote:Then 20% of the score goes to whoever claims they need the least subsidy. Lowballing is the strategy... and then cost overruns are guar.

Ohhh
2 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, saltygeneraltso
Reply
   
3 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, saltygeneraltso, Alpacx
Reply


Forum Jump: