Journal of Other Forum Analysis (Volume II, Issue 2)

[Hap Shaughnessy]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/in-south-korea-some-savour-last-season-of-legal-dog-meat.1611448/page-2#post-159505618

That's how my dog died in the Philippines. We're pretty sure our asshole neighbor used him for their pulutan a few days after he went missing. Dogmeat eaters are reprehensible to me forever.

[Uncle]

CANADIAN ZEO 

FACTUALLY INCORRECT, EH

[Ethan]

https://x.com/ChristianHeiens/status/2091688662782087404

Spoiler:  (click to show)(click to hide)

    

Quebec has deep water ports and can get that sweet middle eastern oil. It's more Ontario that'd be fucked. Then again, line 9 can be reversed. 

But sure, Canada should have built its energy infrastructures taking into account the possibility that the US might elect a retard who would be willing to destroy a century of mutually-beneficial trade between countries with similar standards of living and labour laws. Canadian companies should have put their products on a ship for a 3-week voyage to Japan or Australia instead of on a truck or a train for a 400km trip to Michigan or Oregon. Lessons learned all around.

Anyway, retarded debate. No one's cutting off power or shutting down pipelines.

[Gameboy Nostalgia]

cum pipeline

[benji]

Anyway, retarded debate. No one's cutting off power or shutting down pipelines.

FACT CHECK:

Newsflash dumbasses. Canadians know a Trade War is going to hurt. We're not idiots, we're an educated country that isn't attacking education. We know we'll be disproportionately affected.

We just don't fucking care because we know that you will hurt too and we will absolutely drag you down with us.

Canada existed when there was no free trade.

If Trump wants to play this game then we can play.

Canada would rather like not having to get burned for the fucking US population to get a clue, when they had literally no control over who got voted in that country. The world already hated the US, and now you got the country that was most aligned with it hating it too, and its not going to change back with just the midterms.

In other words, leave us the fuck alone, we are tired of your shit US, we are not your savior here to "show you the way"

canada doesn't have to win shit. they just have to make things bad enough for the US that they will suffer like iran currently is making the US suffer.

i hope Canada has the means to devastate America back, as much as possible. America needs to feel the hurt.

I think at this point Canadians are resolved to setting the economy on fire to spite America back in the face of this treatment.

Yep. Bring it on.

I know that he's an idiot, fascist, and rapist but what is his fucking deal with antagonizing Canada!?!

Same reason why he attacked Venezuela and Iran, oil.

Is there even anything Canada needs from the US that they can't get from another country? I mean sure logistics wise it might be easier to get things from the US but it doesn't seem worth the effort.

I think we should stop messing around and cut off power to the East Coast and stop shipping precious metals to the states and then lets see how long this trade war lasts

Also:

Just a complete fucking dipshit bully. It won't end the way your dumb lawsuits end for you, Donald.

So he'll win? Yikes.

Used to be a frozen pizza brand from Canada I could get (Hearth and Fire) that disappeared early last year after fuckface started all this

edit: Looks like not only is Hearth & Fire Pizza not Canadian, it's from Schwan's, but it's been discontinued unrelated to the tariffs. (Because it was American.) Apparently it was like $15.

[benji]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/in-south-korea-some-savour-last-season-of-legal-dog-meat.1611448/#post-159496315

Is silent panda a Reuters bot 🤔

Edit:

 User banned (3 days): inflammatory accusations against another user

[benji]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/game-freak-the-pok%C3%A9mon-battle-system-may-start-changing-as-the-series-moves-forward-made-pok%C3%A9mon-champions-to-preserve-classic-battle-system.1610584/page-3#post-159428398

Nah, we shouldnt be limited to compromises that come all the way from limitations of the Gameboy hardware, even in the story mode.

Again, the battling system has been developed every generation and is pretty much a different beast from the original games. Have you actually played any competitive Pokemon against another human being at all? Or do you just want to turn Pokemon into something that suits you versus playing something else?

I have used some of those systems, and have seen content of crazy builds and crazy runs at Worlds, the 4 moves and ancient JRPG layout of your side my side will never not feel ass at this day and age.

You didn't answer the question. Have you seriously played competitive Pokemon against human players?

Regardless, why is it such a bother that you only have four move slots? Because it's a limitation? That's literally the point. It's a strategy game; there is a cost-benefit analysis towards everything you do when training an individual Pokemon or putting together a team to work together, and your moxie as a trainer is working with these limitations.

Five+ move slots would eliminate break points that the system is fundamentally built around, such as move coverage on certain Pokemon potentially making them nigh-unkillable, or facilitating and defensive/stall based strategies that grind the game to a halt more than just over reliance on text (which some people are also unaware is really great for gaining information on things like the turn order of Pokemon on the field; I don't know how you overhaul the UI and allow for this to be kept.) It's unnecessary beyond "I don't like it."

But the thing is, you don't have to play games you don't like.

This is the problem. Some Pokemon fans just think the system is perfect and balk at any suggestions otherwise.

A lot of the suggestions in here are coming from people who don't actually engage with the battle system on any meaningful level though. Why should these opinions be taken seriously?

Because they might be the majority, and pay the same for the game? So is gatekeeping isnt it?

I don't doubt that you all are the majority because I don't think most Pokemon fans play competitive Pokemon, because it's hard and people don't want Pokemon to be hard. But that has nothing to do with whether or not your opinion on gameplay systems you admit you don't engage with are informed.

Were those who engage in those systems now so opposed to every change? One more move would be way more engaged by the casuals than any of those more obscure systems and combinations.

People who play competitive Pokemon are not "opposed to every change." Just opposed to uninformed changes by people who admittedly don't have much idea on how the systems work. There's a meaningful difference there. There is no honor or validation in being ignorant about something and yet insisting that your opinion on how to improve that thing be taken seriously.

Give me 5 moves in story mode and the invested competitors and informed strategist can limit themselves to 2 moves and gatekeep themselves for all I care, I want a palpable change in the story mode battle and I am not alone on it either, be it moves, potition matter stuff or whatever it still feels aged as fuck.

Or you can play a different game.

Nah I want to play withe pokemons, not the teemtems or pals or wharever.
Fuck this gatekeeping.

Gatekeeping is good sometimes.

I think people who are knowledgeable about things should have more say on relevant matters than people who aren't knowledgeable about said things. I think people should endeavor to learn more about stuff and think more critically than mindlessly reacting emotionally. I think it was a grave mistake for Western society to uphold the idea that the mere existence of an opinion or a particular taste is not to be questioned because everyone is a special individual and thus their opinions and tastes are special.

Anti-intellectualism is bad.

I am afraid of asking you for certain political opinions I must say, threadban me away, dear elite.

I'm pro-socialist/anti-capitalist with an affinity for dialectical materialism. I'm currently reading a Vietnamese college textbook about said philosophy. I still think people should stop being anti-intellectual.

You also haven't done anything to warrant being threadbanned. Don't try to martyr yourself. You're an adult; just leave the thread.

edit: I know the ones, it's a fucking meme:
https://archive.org/details/intro-basic-princ-marx-lenin-part-1-final
https://www.banyanhouse.org/product/the-worldview-and-philosophical-methodology-of-marxism-leninism-preorder/

Now, for the first time, the materials used to train Vietnamese students in the core ideological system of dialectical materialism and materialist dialectics is available to the English speaking world through Luna Nguyen’s groundbreaking translation of Curriculum of the Basic Principles of Marxism-Leninism, Part 1: The Worldview and Philosophical Methodology of Marxism-Leninism for University and College Students Not Specializing in Marxism-Leninism and Ho Chi Minh Thought. This text, originally produced by Vietnam’s Ministry of Education and Training for use in universities, provides a brief history of Marxism-Leninism as well as thorough explanations of the principles and laws of dialectical materialism, materialist dialectics, and the cognitive theory of dialectical materialism.

[Greatness Gone]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/concord-released-exactly-2-years-ago.1611637/page-5

A wonderful game made by an incredibly talented team, killed because Gamers were bored and saw chum in the water and an easy punching bag. All of y'all that participated in the communal flogging missed out on a great time, but I'm glad you got to mock a studio to death and then go right back to pretending you care about the wellbeing and mental health of developers.

how are they still so mad over this dogshit game??? 

[Daffy Duck]

Jeff really needs to stop this and start putting out good vibes, such a negative little arsehole, no wonder he’s so bitter and twisted he just rage baits himself on x

[benji]

edit: I know the ones, it's a fucking meme:
https://archive.org/details/intro-basic-princ-marx-lenin-part-1-final

[Cheers]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/game-freak-the-pok%C3%A9mon-battle-system-may-start-changing-as-the-series-moves-forward-made-pok%C3%A9mon-champions-to-preserve-classic-battle-system.1610584/page-3#post-159428398

Nah, we shouldnt be limited to compromises that come all the way from limitations of the Gameboy hardware, even in the story mode.

Again, the battling system has been developed every generation and is pretty much a different beast from the original games. Have you actually played any competitive Pokemon against another human being at all? Or do you just want to turn Pokemon into something that suits you versus playing something else?

I have used some of those systems, and have seen content of crazy builds and crazy runs at Worlds, the 4 moves and ancient JRPG layout of your side my side will never not feel ass at this day and age.

You didn't answer the question. Have you seriously played competitive Pokemon against human players?

Regardless, why is it such a bother that you only have four move slots? Because it's a limitation? That's literally the point. It's a strategy game; there is a cost-benefit analysis towards everything you do when training an individual Pokemon or putting together a team to work together, and your moxie as a trainer is working with these limitations.

Five+ move slots would eliminate break points that the system is fundamentally built around, such as move coverage on certain Pokemon potentially making them nigh-unkillable, or facilitating and defensive/stall based strategies that grind the game to a halt more than just over reliance on text (which some people are also unaware is really great for gaining information on things like the turn order of Pokemon on the field; I don't know how you overhaul the UI and allow for this to be kept.) It's unnecessary beyond "I don't like it."

But the thing is, you don't have to play games you don't like.

This is the problem. Some Pokemon fans just think the system is perfect and balk at any suggestions otherwise.

A lot of the suggestions in here are coming from people who don't actually engage with the battle system on any meaningful level though. Why should these opinions be taken seriously?

Because they might be the majority, and pay the same for the game? So is gatekeeping isnt it?

I don't doubt that you all are the majority because I don't think most Pokemon fans play competitive Pokemon, because it's hard and people don't want Pokemon to be hard. But that has nothing to do with whether or not your opinion on gameplay systems you admit you don't engage with are informed.

Were those who engage in those systems now so opposed to every change? One more move would be way more engaged by the casuals than any of those more obscure systems and combinations.

People who play competitive Pokemon are not "opposed to every change." Just opposed to uninformed changes by people who admittedly don't have much idea on how the systems work. There's a meaningful difference there. There is no honor or validation in being ignorant about something and yet insisting that your opinion on how to improve that thing be taken seriously.

Give me 5 moves in story mode and the invested competitors and informed strategist can limit themselves to 2 moves and gatekeep themselves for all I care, I want a palpable change in the story mode battle and I am not alone on it either, be it moves, potition matter stuff or whatever it still feels aged as fuck.

Or you can play a different game.

Nah I want to play withe pokemons, not the teemtems or pals or wharever.
Fuck this gatekeeping.

Gatekeeping is good sometimes.

I think people who are knowledgeable about things should have more say on relevant matters than people who aren't knowledgeable about said things. I think people should endeavor to learn more about stuff and think more critically than mindlessly reacting emotionally. I think it was a grave mistake for Western society to uphold the idea that the mere existence of an opinion or a particular taste is not to be questioned because everyone is a special individual and thus their opinions and tastes are special.

Anti-intellectualism is bad.

I am afraid of asking you for certain political opinions I must say, threadban me away, dear elite.

I'm pro-socialist/anti-capitalist with an affinity for dialectical materialism. I'm currently reading a Vietnamese college textbook about said philosophy. I still think people should stop being anti-intellectual.

You also haven't done anything to warrant being threadbanned. Don't try to martyr yourself. You're an adult; just leave the thread.

edit: I know the ones, it's a fucking meme:
https://archive.org/details/intro-basic-princ-marx-lenin-part-1-final
https://www.banyanhouse.org/product/the-worldview-and-philosophical-methodology-of-marxism-leninism-preorder/

Now, for the first time, the materials used to train Vietnamese students in the core ideological system of dialectical materialism and materialist dialectics is available to the English speaking world through Luna Nguyen’s groundbreaking translation of Curriculum of the Basic Principles of Marxism-Leninism, Part 1: The Worldview and Philosophical Methodology of Marxism-Leninism for University and College Students Not Specializing in Marxism-Leninism and Ho Chi Minh Thought. This text, originally produced by Vietnam’s Ministry of Education and Training for use in universities, provides a brief history of Marxism-Leninism as well as thorough explanations of the principles and laws of dialectical materialism, materialist dialectics, and the cognitive theory of dialectical materialism.

I love how everyone ignores her after that exchange. Nobody gives a fuck about what she has to say. 

[benji]

If it wasn't for all the Marxist gibberish and long quotations of Lenin's weird hangups about metaphysics you'd think this was a middle school textbook sometimes:







Here's some stupid charts:










This doesn't seem right about hurricanes:


Donut materialism:



👇

[Besticus Maximus]

Yeah im a fucking expert on everything because I read hoslop from the mid 80s

[Snoopy]

Reminder, Nep is a middle aged lady who dresses up as a dog and stacks shelves in a grocery store.

[benji]

Yeah im a fucking expert on everything because I read hoslop from the mid 80s

Reminder, Nep is a middle aged lady who dresses up as a dog and stacks shelves in a grocery store.

Sounds like a couple of white libs who metaphysically fry their eggs instead of materialist dialectically fry their eggs.

[benji]

@1May1312
11 months ago
I've been taking a couple hours a day to study, rather than just read, the historical materialism text. So far I'm getting a great deal out of it! Like Part 1, the annotations clearly explain what the original text says, and the illustrations are extra helpful for us visual learners. Thank you for all the work you put into translating and annotating the text!

@elephantman2112
11 months ago
Hey Luna, I’m still going through your first translation in detail. There’s so much to unpack. I can’t wait to read this one, too!

You’re a great teacher and your stuff is a brilliant entry point to teach English-speakers about materialism 😊

@achmeineye
11 months ago
I read the book on dialectical materialism and it literally changed my life. Easily one of the best books on the subject and it has clarified so much about the philosophy. I just ordered the book on historical materialism and I cant wait to read it

@slipknotboy555
11 months ago (edited)
One thing I will add (just an addition) - You can have a socialist society (i.e., actual socialism, but have not yet reached full communism) that is classless. Once there are no more capitalists, and only proletarians, you've effectively reached classless society because there is only one class.

Stalin era USSR (and for a while after that), for example, basically achieved this - or at least got so, so close it pretty much did.

Obligatory:

@Cirkux
11 months ago
Regarding ableist employers and valuing lives in terms of productivity that ties into the same thing as TERFdom. Solidarity is inclusive or it stops being solidarity. I hope your books will become accessible to us in the UK. Keep up the good work.

[benji]

I love that all these online Marxists waited for a Vietnamese YouTuber to translate a Vietnamese textbook into English rather than reading any of the millions of existing Marxist books on the subject including the ones that the Soviets and CCP have published in English.

Don't wait for YouTubers and streamers, go straight to the revolutionary source: http://www.korean-books.com.kp/index.php/Main/firstpage/en
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Languages_Publishing_House_(North_Korea)

Spoiler:  (click to show)(click to hide)

 

[Snoopy]

I told you people a long time ago but you decided to ignore my warnings and here we are



She will be your President

[Uncle]

edit: I know the ones, it's a fucking meme:
https://archive.org/details/intro-basic-princ-marx-lenin-part-1-final

    if true

[benji]

You see in that film, the quantity of Tom Hanks changed but the quality did not, creating a contradiction. Which expressed itself in his inability to continue operating within late stage capitalism at the toy company. The synthesis that resolves the contradiction is in his return to childhood to undergo proper materialist dialectic development much like how the proletariat needs to achieve revolutionary consciousness to advance to the next mode of production.

[Gameboy Nostalgia]

edit: I know the ones, it's a fucking meme:
https://archive.org/details/intro-basic-princ-marx-lenin-part-1-final
https://www.banyanhouse.org/product/the-worldview-and-philosophical-methodology-of-marxism-leninism-preorder/

Now, for the first time, the materials used to train Vietnamese students in the core ideological system of dialectical materialism and materialist dialectics is available to the English speaking world through Luna Nguyen’s groundbreaking translation of Curriculum of the Basic Principles of Marxism-Leninism, Part 1: The Worldview and Philosophical Methodology of Marxism-Leninism for University and College Students Not Specializing in Marxism-Leninism and Ho Chi Minh Thought. This text, originally produced by Vietnam’s Ministry of Education and Training for use in universities, provides a brief history of Marxism-Leninism as well as thorough explanations of the principles and laws of dialectical materialism, materialist dialectics, and the cognitive theory of dialectical materialism.

I love how everyone ignores her after that exchange. Nobody gives a fuck about what she has to say. 

YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWN

all you need is this

[benji]

[Gameboy Nostalgia]

Keep dreaming of your socialist utopia, era. I will be instead celebrating our future FEMALE great leader Kim Ju Ae.

[jimmys13]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/game-freak-the-pok%C3%A9mon-battle-system-may-start-changing-as-the-series-moves-forward-made-pok%C3%A9mon-champions-to-preserve-classic-battle-system.1610584/page-3#post-159428398

Nah, we shouldnt be limited to compromises that come all the way from limitations of the Gameboy hardware, even in the story mode.

Again, the battling system has been developed every generation and is pretty much a different beast from the original games. Have you actually played any competitive Pokemon against another human being at all? Or do you just want to turn Pokemon into something that suits you versus playing something else?

I have used some of those systems, and have seen content of crazy builds and crazy runs at Worlds, the 4 moves and ancient JRPG layout of your side my side will never not feel ass at this day and age.

You didn't answer the question. Have you seriously played competitive Pokemon against human players?

Regardless, why is it such a bother that you only have four move slots? Because it's a limitation? That's literally the point. It's a strategy game; there is a cost-benefit analysis towards everything you do when training an individual Pokemon or putting together a team to work together, and your moxie as a trainer is working with these limitations.

Five+ move slots would eliminate break points that the system is fundamentally built around, such as move coverage on certain Pokemon potentially making them nigh-unkillable, or facilitating and defensive/stall based strategies that grind the game to a halt more than just over reliance on text (which some people are also unaware is really great for gaining information on things like the turn order of Pokemon on the field; I don't know how you overhaul the UI and allow for this to be kept.) It's unnecessary beyond "I don't like it."

But the thing is, you don't have to play games you don't like.

This is the problem. Some Pokemon fans just think the system is perfect and balk at any suggestions otherwise.

A lot of the suggestions in here are coming from people who don't actually engage with the battle system on any meaningful level though. Why should these opinions be taken seriously?

Because they might be the majority, and pay the same for the game? So is gatekeeping isnt it?

I don't doubt that you all are the majority because I don't think most Pokemon fans play competitive Pokemon, because it's hard and people don't want Pokemon to be hard. But that has nothing to do with whether or not your opinion on gameplay systems you admit you don't engage with are informed.

Were those who engage in those systems now so opposed to every change? One more move would be way more engaged by the casuals than any of those more obscure systems and combinations.

People who play competitive Pokemon are not "opposed to every change." Just opposed to uninformed changes by people who admittedly don't have much idea on how the systems work. There's a meaningful difference there. There is no honor or validation in being ignorant about something and yet insisting that your opinion on how to improve that thing be taken seriously.

Give me 5 moves in story mode and the invested competitors and informed strategist can limit themselves to 2 moves and gatekeep themselves for all I care, I want a palpable change in the story mode battle and I am not alone on it either, be it moves, potition matter stuff or whatever it still feels aged as fuck.

Or you can play a different game.

Nah I want to play withe pokemons, not the teemtems or pals or wharever.
Fuck this gatekeeping.

Gatekeeping is good sometimes.

I think people who are knowledgeable about things should have more say on relevant matters than people who aren't knowledgeable about said things. I think people should endeavor to learn more about stuff and think more critically than mindlessly reacting emotionally. I think it was a grave mistake for Western society to uphold the idea that the mere existence of an opinion or a particular taste is not to be questioned because everyone is a special individual and thus their opinions and tastes are special.

Anti-intellectualism is bad.

I am afraid of asking you for certain political opinions I must say, threadban me away, dear elite.

I'm pro-socialist/anti-capitalist with an affinity for dialectical materialism. I'm currently reading a Vietnamese college textbook about said philosophy. I still think people should stop being anti-intellectual.

You also haven't done anything to warrant being threadbanned. Don't try to martyr yourself. You're an adult; just leave the thread.

edit: I know the ones, it's a fucking meme:
https://archive.org/details/intro-basic-princ-marx-lenin-part-1-final
https://www.banyanhouse.org/product/the-worldview-and-philosophical-methodology-of-marxism-leninism-preorder/

Now, for the first time, the materials used to train Vietnamese students in the core ideological system of dialectical materialism and materialist dialectics is available to the English speaking world through Luna Nguyen’s groundbreaking translation of Curriculum of the Basic Principles of Marxism-Leninism, Part 1: The Worldview and Philosophical Methodology of Marxism-Leninism for University and College Students Not Specializing in Marxism-Leninism and Ho Chi Minh Thought. This text, originally produced by Vietnam’s Ministry of Education and Training for use in universities, provides a brief history of Marxism-Leninism as well as thorough explanations of the principles and laws of dialectical materialism, materialist dialectics, and the cognitive theory of dialectical materialism.

Still not as defensive about pokemon as serebiijoemama

[DavidCroquet]

You cheated not only the game, but yourself.

You didn't grow.
You didn't improve.
You took a shortcut and gained nothing.

You experienced a hollow victory.
Nothing was risked and nothing was gained.

It's sad that you don't know the difference.

[Nintex]

Thank you

See South Korea this is how you should behave with respect instead of a bunch of freeloaders who copy iphones. In North Korea people are happier the birth rate is higher and the coal is cleaner. 
 

[Let's Cyber]

*Plays Pokemon Champions for several weeks*

WHILE YOU CAUSAL LOSERS ONLY PLAYED THE MAIN STORY, I STUDIED THE BLADE! 

[Nintex]

Lol 899 euro for the Xbox 25th edition

That's double what I paid December 2021

[Uncle]

benji, what say you

https://imgur.com/gallery/just-case-REcJQ4P

   

https://www.transvitae.com/what-rights-have-been-taken-from-transgender-people/

If you are a transgender person who has spent any amount of time online, or lately even offline, you have probably seen it. Maybe you have had it thrown at you in a heated discussion. Maybe it slipped into a comment thread you thought was safe. Maybe, like me, someone asked you directly to your face:

“What rights have you actually lost?”

For a long time, seeing that question used to make my stomach knot up. Not because I did not have an answer, but because I knew it was usually not asked in good faith. People often use it to trap us into sounding angry, defensive, or vague, all while pretending they are “just asking questions.”

But recently, when someone asked me this question in real life, calmly and curiously, I answered without hesitation. By the end of our conversation, they were nodding along. They understood.

That moment made me realize something important. Many trans people intuitively know the answer. We just have not always been given the words, the framing, or the support to say it clearly.

This article is for you. It is for your friends, your family, and the genuinely curious.

It is a guide to help you respond confidently, calmly, and truthfully when someone asks, “What rights have you lost?”

First, Let’s Be Honest About the Question

Before we dive into crafting good answers, it is important to understand the landscape around this question.

When TERFs (Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists) or GCs (Gender Criticals) ask it, it is often a trap. It is framed to paint trans people as irrational, emotional, or attention-seeking while pretending to be neutral and inquisitive. It is not neutrality. It is skepticism disguised as curiosity.

But not every person who asks this question is acting in bad faith. Some are genuinely unaware of the scope of what trans people are facing. Some have only heard distorted narratives. Some are asking because they truly want to understand.

Recognizing the difference can help you decide how to respond. Being prepared allows you to speak from a place of clarity and strength. Now, let’s talk about what those answers can actually sound like.

Here’s How I Answer It

When someone asks me, “What rights have you lost?” I start simply and plainly:

“The right to exist safely, to access healthcare, to participate in public life without discrimination, and to have the law protect me like it protects everyone else.”

It is short. It is direct. Jargon does not obscure its meaning. Most importantly, it is true.

Each part of that sentence points to a real area of life where rights have been stripped away or endangered for transgender people. In the next sections, we will break these areas down so you can see just how deep and wide these losses run.

   

   

anything that targets a specific group of people

like gun owners

or cocaine enthusiasts

or gamers

[Snoopy]

I said don’t worry baby, daddy loves you much. He’s on a work trip with Jesus so he can afford your blueberry budget.