03-13-2024, 09:58 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-13-2024, 09:59 PM by HaughtyFrank.)
"...but he had some pretty good one liners"
Did he though?
Edit: lol
[tweet]https://twitter.com/JHartley2/status/1767756664046858466?t=qWTW2N2BRvy4LNhQ2fSG-A&s=19[/tweet]
(03-13-2024, 09:58 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote: "...but he had some pretty good one liners"
Did he though?
Yes. Just ask NepNep
I’ve read Mein Kampf and Nepenthe rivals him for waffling on about absolute shite
thank you for my new avatar.
03-14-2024, 04:04 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-14-2024, 05:14 PM by HaughtyFrank.)
"Boycotting a company is harassment!"
*makes blacklist of individuals*
Edit:
(03-14-2024, 04:04 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote:
Kinda telling if you gloss over the perfomative flag in name "BETTER SPEAK OUT AGAINST THE MOB OR WE'LL GET YOU" could be attributed to either 'side' of this particularly retarded online battlefront
The gaming industry is on fire anyway. So I would tell the companies to CLEAN HOUSE and get rid of these STONE COLD CRAZY PEOPLE while they still can
Monolith Software, Hideo Kojima and Square Enix have done more for the alphabet people than any western developer ever did.
It's all
- written terribly
- designed ugly
- buggy as hell
- monetized to hell and back
Meanwhile Japanese games do it right and have done it right for decades:
"I don't care about your opinions and won't be going into discussions with you."
(03-14-2024, 07:03 PM)Eric Cartman wrote: Kinda telling if you gloss over the perfomative flag in name "BETTER SPEAK OUT AGAINST THE MOB OR WE'LL GET YOU" could be attributed to either 'side' of this particularly retarded online battlefront
More and more I see the idle threat of “ we’ll remember!”
You won’t and nobody cares.
They operate under the assumption strangers are their parents. Holding their breath and stomping on the ground to get what they want. Entitled to other peoples attention and effort. If they spent more time building allies and cooperating, maybe people would care. But people eventually recognized how empty they are exploiting the goodness of others to get their way.
Really, the cutesy avatar and be kind-isms. You know this dude is a piece of shit.
Spoiler: (click to show)(click to hide)
If you boycott a company you'll be blacklisted is certainly a take. What a Muppet.
We need to go back to the days when games were not art.
I'd like to make a subtle change to that which would actually change the meaning dramatically:
"We need to go back to the days when art was not games."
(03-15-2024, 01:40 AM)benji wrote:
GAMERCIDE NOW
Adam Neely is, at best, a dollar general Rick Beato. What a stupid bitch.
[tweet]https://twitter.com/TheLaurenChen/status/1768446004510982298?t=vXrC7fMlQjVOc99cHTkb5A&s=19[/tweet]
Good job gamers, keep fighting these conservatives and RINOs with common sense. Videogames are great.
03-15-2024, 03:08 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-15-2024, 03:13 PM by HaughtyFrank.)
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/03/14/fitzwilliam-museum-cambridge-university-not-woke-displays
no paywall
https://archive.ph/tzmvm
Quote:Luke Syson said last week: “I would love to think that there’s a way of telling these larger, more inclusive histories that doesn’t feel as if it requires a push-back from those who try to suggest that any interest at all in [this work is] what would now be called ‘woke’.”
The new signage states that pictures of “rolling English hills” can stir feelings of “pride towards a homeland
However, in a gallery displaying a bucolic work by Constable, visitors are informed that “there is a darker side” to the “nationalist feeling” evoked by images of the British countryside.
It states that this national sentiment comes with “the implication that only those with a historical tie to the land have a right to belong”.
Paintings at the Fitzwilliam have been reordered into themed categories, in a shake-up the museum’s director hopes will make the gallery’s displays “inclusive and representative”.
A sign for the Nature gallery states: “Landscape paintings were also always entangled with national identity.
“The countryside was seen as a direct link to the past, and therefore a true reflection of the essence of a nation.
“Paintings showing rolling English hills or lush French fields reinforced loyalty and pride towards a homeland.
“The darker side of evoking this nationalist feeling is the implication that only those with a historical tie to the land have a right to belong.”
The claims about the depiction of landscapes comes after the charity umbrella group Wildlife and Countryside Link submitted a report to MPs which claimed that the British countryside was seen as a “racist colonial” white space.
However, Mr Syson has insisted the shake-up of the museum is not “woke” or “radical chic”, saying: “Being inclusive and representative shouldn’t be controversial; it should be enriching.”
The most bonkers hard right wing guy couldn’t come up with something like that.
The countryside is racist thing has been brewing for a while now
C'mon guys, its clearly pretty problematic to display british cultural artefacts in the form of british paintings of british landscapes by a british artist in a british museum as though britain has a culture and isnt just earths bad guys from last season
They should just go and steal a bunch of landscape paintings from somewhere else to balance the feeling of national pride.
What I don't get about this stuff, why not just make the gallery more diverse and then shut the fuck up? Like did you know you can elevate other art without talking about how this old art of countrysides is actually racist and problematic?
(03-15-2024, 09:23 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote: What I don't get about this stuff, why not just make the gallery more diverse and then shut the fuck up? Like did you know you can elevate other art without talking about how this old art of countrysides is actually racist and problematic?
It's not enough to elevate diverse voices, you MUST denigrate the white people and declare them BAD.
(03-15-2024, 09:23 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote: What I don't get about this stuff, why not just make the gallery more diverse and then shut the fuck up? Like did you know you can elevate other art without talking about how this old art of countrysides is actually racist and problematic?
Because if given a choice, people would choose the old art of countrysides.
|