10-06-2024, 05:26 AM
Journal of Other Forum Analysis
|
10-06-2024, 05:27 AM
He just responded benji and fuck me he is unhinged. Your stereotypical leftist, commie, antisemitic, racist and self absorbed piece of human waste.
Quote:China relies on cheap migrant labor just like moi but why ain't shit cheap here? It's not just that dawg or else a lot of people would be up, not just them. ESPECIALLY the states you know, the slavery capital. Slavery has been illegal for a long time, what in the FUCK is he talking about? Where is the same energy for slavery in Middle Eastern countries? Oh wait, it's not white people or east Asian so must be fine with him. Quote:The ACTU is FAR from perfect and it is limited in scope yes, this does not invalidate how state run unions work in tandem with nation industry goals like subsidizing in all sorts of sectors from housing, health or whatever. You don't see anywhere near the same hyper-precarity(fyi I'm african so… yeah, we suffer the most from this) as you do in the states. ![]() Still not realizing the dude is from China Quote:Your entire post was about individual cases of oppression, you barely stated any macroeconomic factors at all. If the reasons you named had any significant bearing on EV prices, the euro or euro adjacent imperials wouldn't be as far behind as they are today. Mother fucker you are American. You are African American yes, but you are not FROM Africa. But go on my dude, keep lecturing a guy who is from China about how he's wrong because he doesn't agree with your leftist horseshit. Dumb cunt. And other people have suffered over time. This isn't the oppression Olympics you fucking moron. Plus, Africa isn't the only place where resources are coming from if you had a BRAIN that functioned. ![]()
10-06-2024, 05:31 AM
![]()
10-06-2024, 05:33 AM
“I’m African so…”
![]() ![]() ![]()
10-06-2024, 05:39 AM
(10-06-2024, 05:31 AM)AnnoyedCanadian wrote: mugurumakensei Chief Idiot wrote:Neither are my people (African "Americans"), coming up on 5 centuries of nonstop slavery yet the states is getting dusted in so many key areas it's not even funny. If a war on terror, religion prosecution, cultural suppression etc is what was driving this, Uncle Sam would be up times a trillion. He isn't though, why is that ? ![]() ![]()
10-06-2024, 05:40 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-06-2024, 05:41 AM by AnnoyedCanadian.)
Chief Anti-Semite
Quote: mugurumakensei said: Booshka Quote:The only thing free under capitalism is capital. ![]()
Imagine being that fucking stupid and ignorant, and still feeling the need to get on your high horse
![]()
10-06-2024, 05:42 AM
Spoiler: (click to show) ![]()
10-06-2024, 05:43 AM
Holy shit, fucking Booshka, coming there to tell foreigners how they should feel about their countries again?
![]() ![]()
10-06-2024, 05:45 AM
![]() (10-06-2024, 05:18 AM)AnnoyedCanadian wrote: The fuck in God's name is going on here? I mean he was probably high on something after jumping like a retard but those eyes. (10-06-2024, 05:26 AM)Boredfrom wrote: He legit looks 10 years older. Is twitter more stressful to micromanage than Tesla?It's well known he's abusing drugs. His Twitter obsession is part of this because he can just sit and scroll and lol. Thankfully for most of his companies, Musk isn't business stupid enough to not listen to his experts. Remember the panic over the slash-and-burn the Telsa/SpaceX people Elon helicoptered in to do at Twitter over just a couple weeks? Yet, two years later the company is fine. This is not to praise everything they did, nor staffing choices since, merely to show they were right in estimating that 80% of the employees were expendable. Elon's people may have no better ways of monetizing Twitter and making it profitable but it didn't need that many employees to lose money. (Ironically, something both Jack and the last pre-Elon CEO also said. With the latter planning a long-term hiring freeze due to massive overstaffing.) (10-06-2024, 05:27 AM)AnnoyedCanadian wrote:Ignoring that China doesn't rely on migrant labor but cheap local labor, because the United States relies on cheap migrant labor for services not manufacturing.Quote:China relies on cheap migrant labor just like moi but why ain't shit cheap here? It's not just that dawg or else a lot of people would be up, not just them. ESPECIALLY the states you know, the slavery capital. (10-06-2024, 05:27 AM)AnnoyedCanadian wrote:Because there is no mobility at all. You should also realize that "working in tandem with nation industry goals" defeats the purpose of unionism.Quote:The ACTU is FAR from perfect and it is limited in scope yes, this does not invalidate how state run unions work in tandem with nation industry goals like subsidizing in all sorts of sectors from housing, health or whatever. You don't see anywhere near the same hyper-precarity(fyi I'm african so… yeah, we suffer the most from this) as you do in the states. (10-06-2024, 05:27 AM)AnnoyedCanadian wrote:Because the "macroeconomic" explanation is pretty obvious: China is losing money on EVs and because the workers don't get a choice the state can put the costs for this on them.Quote:Your entire post was about individual cases of oppression, you barely stated any macroeconomic factors at all. If the reasons you named had any significant bearing on EV prices, the euro or euro adjacent imperials wouldn't be as far behind as they are today. This is a well known economic thing and as a poster on a "video game" forum you should know about dumping: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dumping_(pricing_policy) Especially because the funniest interview in video game history was the CEO of Atari claiming he was going to block the release of the PlayStation and Saturn in the United States because Sony and Sega were supposedly doing this even as he claimed that the Jaguar had superior technology and was selling it for significantly under the price of either of those consoles. ![]()
10-06-2024, 05:46 AM
Look Chinaman, I'm American so naturally that means you should listen to me
I'm not sure if your puny yellow brain understands, so I'm going to ask you a retarded rhetorical question. Get it now ? ![]() ![]()
10-06-2024, 05:49 AM
![]()
10-06-2024, 05:50 AM
(10-06-2024, 05:39 AM)Boredfrom wrote:I mean, I'm going to ignore the rest of this nonsense to point out that you're assuming that Electrical Vehicles are in fact something you should want to be "up" on no matter the cost.Chief Idiot wrote:Neither are my people (African "Americans"), coming up on 5 centuries of nonstop slavery yet the states is getting dusted in so many key areas it's not even funny. If a war on terror, religion prosecution, cultural suppression etc is what was driving this, Uncle Sam would be up times a trillion. He isn't though, why is that ? (10-06-2024, 05:40 AM)AnnoyedCanadian wrote: BooshkaThis... doesn't make any sense? ![]()
Remember all those vacant cities China built? Or the giant movie studio? Or the Belt and Road Initiative? The burden should be on Chief Malik to show that EV's are not just another massive misallocation of capital by the monopoly capital corporation in China, the CCP.
![]()
10-06-2024, 05:52 AM
![]() Eileen Gu is so pretty This is what a woman is RetardEra, not one of you weirdo fucks. ![]() Quote:Thankfully for most of his companies, Musk isn't business stupid enough to not listen to his experts. Remember the panic over the slash-and-burn the Telsa/SpaceX people Elon helicoptered in to do at Twitter over just a couple weeks? Yet, two years later the company is fine. ![]() Edit: you mean Tesla? Or Twitter? ![]()
10-06-2024, 05:55 AM
(10-06-2024, 05:53 AM)Boredfrom wrote:All companies in which the owner has zero concerns about losing money because he is willing to subsidize it for personal pleasure are fine.Quote:Thankfully for most of his companies, Musk isn't business stupid enough to not listen to his experts. Remember the panic over the slash-and-burn the Telsa/SpaceX people Elon helicoptered in to do at Twitter over just a couple weeks? Yet, two years later the company is fine. ![]()
10-06-2024, 05:57 AM
(10-06-2024, 05:55 AM)benji wrote:(10-06-2024, 05:53 AM)Boredfrom wrote:All companies in which the owner has zero concerns about losing money because he is willing to subsidize it for personal pleasure are fine.Quote:Thankfully for most of his companies, Musk isn't business stupid enough to not listen to his experts. Remember the panic over the slash-and-burn the Telsa/SpaceX people Elon helicoptered in to do at Twitter over just a couple weeks? Yet, two years later the company is fine. ![]() ![]() ![]()
10-06-2024, 06:00 AM
Coincidentally, there's actually another video game example of this!
The chair of Sega, Isao Okawa, so loved Sega that he gave it $800 million of his own personal wealth to cover the losses during the 32X-Saturn-Dreamcast era. ![]()
10-06-2024, 06:02 AM
(10-06-2024, 05:57 AM)Boredfrom wrote:You're conflating personal approval with business soundness.(10-06-2024, 05:55 AM)benji wrote:(10-06-2024, 05:53 AM)Boredfrom wrote:All companies in which the owner has zero concerns about losing money because he is willing to subsidize it for personal pleasure are fine. ![]()
10-06-2024, 06:07 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-06-2024, 06:12 AM by Gameboy Nostalgia.)
![]() Nepenthe, https://www.resetera.com/threads/toxic-fandom-how-hollywood-is-battling-fans-who-are-%E2%80%98just-out-for-blood%E2%80%99-%E2%80%94-from-social-media-boot-camps-to-superfan-focus-groups.1000101/page-3#post-129688626 wrote:It's the same cringe as when gamers back in the day bragged about the medium being a billion dollar industry, like the economics finally validated them as people. ![]() Video games have been a multi-billion dollar industry since the 1970's. TheEchosOfTheCyborg, https://www.resetera.com/threads/toxic-fandom-how-hollywood-is-battling-fans-who-are-%E2%80%98just-out-for-blood%E2%80%99-%E2%80%94-from-social-media-boot-camps-to-superfan-focus-groups.1000101/page-3#post-129753408 wrote:It also feels like a good way for these toxic bigoted "fans" (because lets be real, many of the grifters leading this has proven time and again that their not actual fans of half the things they grift about) to get their wins because if these focus groups (which can be bad even in the best of cases) is telling them that including ANY LGBTQ+ content, POC etc will triggers these people, their not going to include them, presumably against the wishes of the creators in many cases. Their playing into what the chuds want. Even then, as pointed out in the article, even changes to the Status quo are considered worries for backlash which could mean these works becoming even more safer and risk averse which is not a good thing creatively.This lunatic wants corporations to spend their time policing irrelevant critics presumably using financial threats. Even as they recognize this could be a major threat to their community. TheEchosOfTheCyborg wrote:Quote:The problem is that being "just okay" or mediocre remains unacceptable for minority led projects but perfectly acceptable for white male leads.It's the same thing we've seen for decades with superhero films and media. Women led Superhero movies are not allowed to fail, otherwise the whole idea of women leading those films come into question but men can fail all the time and it's never been questioned in men leading superhero movies is the problem. TheChuggernaut wrote:Yeah I really was hoping we were moving past this, but we're still here. white dude led movie failing equals = oh i guess we just need to try harder next time. PoC, queer, and woman led movies failing = no one wants to see movies led by them actually. not even really just failing either tbh. a big issue that making an average movie will usually not generate much word of mouth so discussion won't really take off...except with the losers yelling about it being woke, so that's the lesson these dumbass c-suites take from it.Do these dudes have any examples at all? Especially in this incredibly niche slice within a specific form of entertainment? When has this ever occurred? ![]()
10-06-2024, 06:28 AM
![]()
10-06-2024, 06:29 AM
(10-06-2024, 06:02 AM)benji wrote:(10-06-2024, 05:57 AM)Boredfrom wrote:You're conflating personal approval with business soundness.(10-06-2024, 05:55 AM)benji wrote: All companies in which the owner has zero concerns about losing money because he is willing to subsidize it for personal pleasure are fine. Eh, not really, I didn’t tried to imply personal approval in this case. But honestly, I dunno If I could disagree with business soundness given that I’m not a great business man, so… ![]() So my impression is different but admittedly uninformed to debate it without sounding like a ERA user. So I’m going to admit my ignorance. ![]()
10-06-2024, 06:31 AM
![]()
10-06-2024, 06:33 AM
https://www.resetera.com/threads/four-teams-forfeit-against-sjsu-volleyball-over-alleged-transgender-redshirt-senior-after-playing-against-her-without-issue-her-entire-career.1001865/#post-129776250
Lady Dimitrescu wrote:Waiting for all the people online who defended Imane Kalif to defend us in sports.... Imane Kalif is an actual woman so I don't understand the point they're trying to make. ![]() ![]()
It's important to remember that Twitter has never made money, it's been an elite subsidized sinecure for its entire existence.
Presumably it could have had Musk merely fired all those employees while changing nothing else, but then that would defeat why he bought it. (To see more of his tweets trending and get more likes.) ![]()
10-06-2024, 06:46 AM
(10-06-2024, 06:33 AM)Gameboy Nostalgia wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/four-teams-forfeit-against-sjsu-volleyball-over-alleged-transgender-redshirt-senior-after-playing-against-her-without-issue-her-entire-career.1001865/#post-129776250 Ilame Kalif is as much of a woman as this volleyball player or lesbian-Era. Khalif, and the Taiwanese boxer, are almost certainly 5-ARD males. ![]() ![]()
10-06-2024, 06:47 AM
I enjoy the conspiracy theory that movie studios are willing, and even excited, to burn hundreds of millions of dollars to give second, third, fourth, fifth - hell, infinite - chances to actors whose projects fail miserably, solely because they are white.
![]() |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|