Kulturkampf
2 users liked this post: HaughtyFrank, Nintex
Reply
3 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, benji, Alpacx
Reply
4 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, benji, Nintex, HaughtyFrank
Reply
   
Reply
"Aside from garbage being a rare bit of male coded housework..."

That's the point you idiots. They didn't even do the thing that's male housework.
3 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, benji, Uncle
Reply
(09-05-2026, 05:09 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote:

I was shocked or actually not. The AI person of the year in this country is some kind of DEI person. In fact there is a group of like 5 who work at the biggest universities mostly focused on making AI ethical, diverse and hitting the brakes on technological progress. All they do is make podcasts and post about how AI is bad but really they are the experts on this because they are trans or a fat black woman. It's the same arguments as always, climate, gaza and elon musk is a nazi and all the usual groups are on the same crack that they now call "philosophical" which is just woke rebranded. These people used ChatGPT for 5 minutes then concluded AI is racist. 

The woke scurge is not yet purged. The enemy is inside the gates. OFFICIAL TEAM TRUMP SEAL OF QUALITY™ 

They're not very smart though. The woman send me all their names and work to check out. So now I know exactly who they are. 

My argument is pretty simple. We were defenseless prior to World War 2 because of a left wing movement that prevented a military build-up. We had 1 tank against the dozens the Germans had. No fighter planes, despite building them for the Germans in WW1. If we don't invest in AI our AI experts will leave and we will be defenseless against what they see as the "fascists" like Trump and of course our real enemy Russia. This is the goal of the left. Weaken the country further by undermining the economy and hitting the brakes on AI. The data centers aren't bad for the climate, they are bad for their agenda. 

With AI we might actually solve these real issues and deal with shortages in healthcare and defense. They're all still living in lala land asking why efficiency is good and how AI is undermining the 'meaning of life' for many. Which you know, they are responsible for by destroying the Church. While at the same time they argue that AI does not deliver. If it doesn't deliver then why is it dangerous?

They have imported a theory called "Endtime fascism" from activists in Canada that they use to scare the masses. 



I was wondering this weekend. Why are vacancies for AI business development open for 6 - 12 months why have these companies only just set-up their campuses and don't dare to advertise it openly and instead talk nonsense about EU data sovereignty no one understands. Why is Mr. Rogers doing all this under the radar. Because having failed to stop Trump and being blindsided by Nvidia the left will call you a Nazi if you are pro AI. They made this thing political because that's the only argument they ever have.

Anyway I told the woman who makes the AI Nazi Bad podcasts the political class is eating up that I'm always happy to have an open debate.
1 user liked this post: Uncle
Reply
Europe will happily regulate AI because they're not even a player in it but I don't see it happening in the US or China while they are still so heavily competing. If one of them were to pause their development the other one would happily fill the gap.
4 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Nintex, Alpacx, Uncle
Reply
It's fucking stupid to regulate this early. Like regulating cars before they hit 20 mph.

History often rhymes.

Weak US support, falling behind in technology and low morale. That's exactly how the Allies lost the battle of Poland and France when WW2 broke out.
In those days England was still a formidable force, which it now isn't.

It is unlikely the US is going to stop Putin from moving the border back to East Germany if he attacks with backing from China.
1 user liked this post: Uncle
Reply
also, regulations already exist

anything bad you want to do with AI is already broadly illegal

it's like saying "wow photoshop is too powerful, we have to regulate it," what is there to regulate? if the program detects you drawing something naughty it shuts down?
1 user liked this post: Nintex
Reply

Hesright
Reply
Apparently there was another socialist con


4 users liked this post: Mask, Nintex, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, benji
Reply
Quote:Without a population ... there would be no BMI, no obesity epidemic, and no medical or scientific institutions

Hesright
3 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, DavidCroquet, HaughtyFrank
Reply
Woke 1 was crazy:


[Image: HRYDMSvbwAAK7q3?format=jpg&name=small]
Lawd
Reply
Tough cookie update:

Reply
The minivan post is my fave
1 user liked this post: nachobro
Reply
In China 128 000 short dramas have been made Q1 with AI.

Now state TV made the first AI TV series of 40 minute episodes called Beyond Wukong.
Reply
I feel kinda bad for this girl. She followed the social / cultural trend to get more attention and fit in with the woke crowd and then it reversed and backfired.
No it's over for her. In every way. 



Her previous archetype, shy nerd girl is now more popular than ever too. 

Spoiler:  (click to show)
Her role in the Odyssey is literally dying in the first act of the movie with ~5 minutes of screen time in total
Reply
All of the faces Ali is making in those preview thumbnails would make for great emoji.

(09-06-2026, 07:01 AM)Nintex wrote: In China 128 000 short dramas have been made Q1 with AI.

Now state TV made the first AI TV series of 40 minute episodes called Beyond Wukong.
AKA a place that exceeds the reach of Chinese gamedevs collective imagination
2 users liked this post: Potato, Nintex
Reply

Quote:Lewis tied this to her own refusal to define “woman”:

“Feminism has never needed to know what a woman is in order to proceed.”

Wut
4 users liked this post: Chumbawumbafan69, benji, DavidCroquet, Alpacx
Reply
(09-06-2026, 03:07 AM)benji wrote: Tough cookie update:

1 user liked this post: benji
Reply
Quote:At Socialism 2026, Georgetown professor Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò says that when he takes off his “commie hat” and puts on his “normie hat,” even he struggles to make police abolition sound convincing.

He recalls young people in Los Angeles who had been “on the wrong side of law enforcement” telling him that if police disappeared, "that's crazy" and “shit would go left immediately.”

Táíwò’s response is remarkable. Even if abolishing the police immediately proved disastrous, he says that still would not make abolition as the ultimate goal wrong.

“Even if that’s true, that doesn’t mean abolition as the horizon isn’t true.”

Táíwò admits the real problem is explaining what happens next week, rather than offering people “the long march towards dialectical materialism.”

As Táíwò struggles to explain what comes next, NYU professor Chenjerai Kumanyika jumps in with the ideological lifeline, “The answer is revolution.”
2 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, benji
Reply
"The revolution" serves the same purpose as the "Second Coming." Few Marxists will acknowledge that they've taken up a millenarianist prophecy from a German loser as proven scientific theory.
2 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, HaughtyFrank
Reply
2 users liked this post: Nintex, HaughtyFrank
Reply
lmao, now the socialists themselves are going after one of the speakers, however this seems to be about her being Jewish and expressing sadness over what happened at October 7 (while still saying Israel is committing genocide)




Her talking about rising anti semitism and how she feels about her jewishness are posted as if they were smoking guns
Reply

Social Justice Warrior
3 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, killamajig, HaughtyFrank
Reply
Stella is one of the good ones tbf
2 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Alpacx
Reply
On current evidence, she's a hypocritical cunt.
Reply
I disagree, Stella has gone to bat for the Jewish community plenty of times and she isn’t a crank so I see absolutely no hypocrisy here from her.

There’s obviously also a huge difference between a march and private members clubs. This is her being consistent and fair.
2 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Alpacx
Reply
The private members club has the right to pick and choose its membership. Women-only gyms do it all the time.  It's only ever men-only clubs that anyone has a problem with.

The huge difference is that apartheid the march was a gathering of people in a public space where black people women were told they had to stay in certain sections away from others.

She's a hypocrite. Of the highest order.
1 user liked this post: Straight Edge
Reply
Potato dateline='[url=tel:1788814106' wrote: 1788814106[/url]']
The private members club has the right to pick and choose its membership. Women-only gyms do it all the time.  It's only ever men-only clubs that anyone has a problem with.

The huge difference is that apartheid the march was a gathering of people in a public space where black people women were told they had to stay in certain sections away from others.

She's a hypocrite. Of the highest order.
They don’t have that right under the law and that’s the point. It may look like rules for thee and not for me based on the daily mail but Stella creasy is legit even handed with this and there are no complaints from me.
Reply


Forum Jump: