Journal of Other Forum Analysis (Volume II, Issue 1)
(02-18-2025, 11:56 PM)Straight Edge wrote: I’m gonna say it. The Dark Knight is overrated as fuck.

It's a great film ruined by being waaaaaaaaaay too long.

EDIT: It's funny, because if you asked me how long TDK was I would say 3 hours. It's actually "only" 152 minutes. That last 30 minutes really drags and the story feels like it's done.
3 users liked this post: Chumbawumbafan69, Jonsey, Taco Bell Tower
Dark Knight was great. The other two in the trilogy were mid with meh villians.
Sickos (Batman edition)
2 users liked this post: cRumB, Taco Bell Tower
All 3 were great with tdkr being the best
4 users liked this post: Keetongu, Nintex, D3RANG3D, Taco Bell Tower
https://www.resetera.com/threads/john-carmack-doge-fan.1112796/

In this thread, Entremet tries to call John Carmack dumb.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/marvel-rivals-support-studio-director-shares-that-he-and-his-team-were-just-laid-off.1112481/page-13#post-135977220

Please shutter quantic dream 🙏
4 users liked this post: Hap Shaughnessy, Taco Bell Tower, Jonsey, D3RANG3D
(02-19-2025, 12:45 AM)Jonsey wrote: All 3 were great with tdkr being the best

Hesright
4 users liked this post: Keetongu, Taco Bell Tower, Jonsey, D3RANG3D
Spoiler:  (click to show)
[Image: UhHli8V.jpg]

3 users liked this post: Keetongu, Taco Bell Tower, DocWager
(02-19-2025, 01:11 AM)D3RANG3D wrote:
Spoiler:  (click to show)
[Image: UhHli8V.jpg]


How embarrassing.
4 users liked this post: nachobro, Keetongu, NekoFever, Taco Bell Tower
(02-19-2025, 01:13 AM)Boredfrom wrote:
(02-19-2025, 01:11 AM)D3RANG3D wrote:
Spoiler:  (click to show)
[Image: UhHli8V.jpg]


How embarrassing.

For you!


Spoiler:  (click to show)
Porque eres tan maricon mano?
The Dark Knight is one of the best movie trilogies perhaps ever.

Each film covers a different theme of Batman, the adventure in Batman begins, the detective in The Dark Knight and finally the action in The Dark Knight Rises.

absolute kino
6 users liked this post: nampad, Daffy Duck, Garfield, Jonsey, Taco Bell Tower, D3RANG3D
(02-19-2025, 01:15 AM)D3RANG3D wrote:
Spoiler:  (click to show)
Porque eres tan maricon mano?

Por que no soy un Trumpista de mierda. 

“Mira mamá, puse un meme del Trump con máscara de Bane en la calle en el año 2025.”

“Estás bien pendejo, mijo.” 

Es más maricon irle al Trump.
1 user liked this post: Taco Bell Tower
https://www.resetera.com/threads/trump-says-ukraine-should-have-never-started-it-in-comments-about-war-with-russia.1112799/#post-135975483
Quote:Trump deep throating Putin's cock, what a surprise.
Boys rhetorical club?
is this?
https://www.resetera.com/threads/forum-aggregation-and-you-ignoring-threads-that-are-damaging-to-your-mental-health-or-you-might-not-want-to-see.1087431/page-2#post-134846538
Quote:Is it possible to add a category for "Phil Spencer" ?
3 users liked this post: Hap Shaughnessy, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, benji
https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/40512-resetera-hide-forum-threads
This was posted on Ree  lol
1 user liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth
Look how manly Trump is. Sucking Putin dick.
(02-19-2025, 12:02 AM)Potato wrote:
(02-18-2025, 11:56 PM)Straight Edge wrote: I’m gonna say it. The Dark Knight is overrated as fuck.

It's a great film ruined by being waaaaaaaaaay too long.

EDIT: It's funny, because if you asked me how long TDK was I would say 3 hours. It's actually "only" 152 minutes. That last 30 minutes really drags and the story feels like it's done.

Have to channel my name sake and state that you are unfortunately, factually wrong.
I don't think you can remove any part of TDK without losing something from the story, it might be just over 2 and a half hours but the narrative is tight enough that it justifies that run time.

Spoiler:  (click to show)
I haven't seen it in half a decade so I might be pulling all this out my ass
2 users liked this post: D3RANG3D, Taco Bell Tower
AliceAmber, post: 135978051, member: 42858 wrote:I apologize for the wait on this. Here is the official C-word policy update.

[STAFF][SIZE=18px]Revisions to the moderation of the ban on the word "cunt"[/SIZE]
2.18.2025

The word will be banned with no differences based on target or user's gender.
First time will be given a much lighter moderation before proceeding back to more severe ban durations.
Adjustments to the banners. (Durations are guideline starting points).
  • User Banned (3 Days): Perpetuating Misogynistic slur; Don't Do It Again.
  • User Banned (1 Month): Perpetuating Misogynistic Slur; Prior Ban for the Same
Additional Considerations & Details
  • The primary concern is and always has been the word creating a less comfortable if not hostile environment for some women.
  • Context in other cultures and countries.
    • Some places have a more normalised usage. However there are still women who feel otherwise from these countries and places.
    • It remains our hope that each community is welcoming to members and takes consideration of things that make the community less welcoming.
    • Unlike in speech where it is one and done a forum persists longer. Whether users are browsing later, going back to reply to a quote or following a conversation the slur will remain present again and again on the forum.
    • In consideration of the above, we felt it fair to give others a less harsh first time offense while reinforcing the desire to curb the word from the forum. We also recognise that it is unlikely their intention to cause discomfort to women reading and have focused the banner to reflect perpetuation of harmful language rather than a banner than felt like being labelled a misogynist.
  • Recognising usage & patterns on Resetera
    • The primary usage across the site is as a derogatory. Even ignoring the misogynistic lens the word remains one of the harshest in most cultures.
    • The usage is primarily towards figures who have done or are planning to/doing something that is of significant harm to others. Eg. Politicians in the UK with policies that directly harm trans people.
    • The immediate contention is when users are banned when using this word to express criticism towards bigotry and similar instances. It is evident that there is no intention in these post to harass or otherwise provoke readers using the word and moderating these often feel like tone policing or restricting criticism. However it remains part of what drives the word usage and it doesn't serve to benefit anybody to allow usage that causes unintended friction between different groups on the site.
    • One issue we did not foresee is that when users gather to express disagreement on the bans in such instances it further cause friction as it can feel like the concerns of the slur is being dismissed. Seeing many users pushback on it and calling for conditional allowances can feel very much like boys club behaviour further driving some women away from the site. It is however evident that driving women away from the site is ultimately not what any of the users or staff involved want.
    • We have dramatically reduced the duration of the first ban to ease the pressure on members venting frustrations at critical issues. We are however serious about the ban otherwise.
    • We will also be stricter on this type of meta-commentary in threads where bans take place, if you have constructive feedback you can post in the constructive criticism and discussion thread.
    • The best moderation remains as self moderation. We understand your frustrations but blasting someone who will unlikely ever read your comment here is not a reason to make the place unwelcoming to others. If you see a friend post it, tell them to edit it. If its gone by the time a moderator reviews the report we're all good.
  • Reclamation, affirmation, affection & empowerment
    • We recognise these aspects in different communities and parts of the world. Usage where it is not an insult is incredibly uncommon and has honestly not been an issue for us.
    • We won't be banning usage such as "serving cunt" or "cunty" which have their own usage and meanings in the queer communities. Concerns of dog whistling or using these to try and circumvent the ban should still be reported for moderators consideration.
[/STAFF]

These embarrassing cunts omfg
(02-19-2025, 01:17 AM)Nintex wrote: The Dark Knight is one of the best movie trilogies perhaps ever.

Each film covers a different theme of Batman, the adventure in Batman begins, the detective in The Dark Knight and finally the action in The Dark Knight Rises.

absolute kino

the nice thing about "one of" is that people can name lotr and man with no name and bttf you're still not wrong, but

I mean how many movie trilogies worth talking about are there, even

doesn't seem hard to be "one of"

the best, though?
3 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Taco Bell Tower, Nintex
(02-19-2025, 01:46 AM)BIONIC wrote:
AliceAmber, post: 135978051, member: 42858 wrote:I apologize for the wait on this. Here is the official C-word policy update.

[STAFF]Revisions to the moderation of the ban on the word "cunt"
2.18.2025

[/STAFF]

These embarrassing cunts omfg

Absolutely wild that they don't like Trump over there, if you're not from America then era administration doesn't give a fuck what you think
4 users liked this post: Keetongu, DavidCroquet, Taco Bell Tower, Potato
(02-19-2025, 01:28 AM)Boredfrom wrote:
(02-19-2025, 01:15 AM)D3RANG3D wrote:
Spoiler:  (click to show)
Porque eres tan maricon mano?

Por que no soy un Trumpista de mierda. 

“Mira mamá, puse un meme del Trump con máscara de Bane en la calle en el año 2025.”

“Estás bien pendejo, mijo.” 

Es más maricon irle al Trump.

[Image: QhgAlNp.png]

boredfrom please don't say faggot, that's very homophobic
1 user liked this post: Taco Bell Tower
(02-19-2025, 01:49 AM)Uncle wrote:
(02-19-2025, 01:17 AM)Nintex wrote: The Dark Knight is one of the best movie trilogies perhaps ever.

Each film covers a different theme of Batman, the adventure in Batman begins, the detective in The Dark Knight and finally the action in The Dark Knight Rises.

absolute kino

the nice thing about "one of" is that people can name lotr and man with no name and bttf you're still not wrong, but

I mean how many movie trilogies worth talking about are there, even

doesn't seem hard to be "one of"

the best, though?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Colours_trilogy

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Vengeance_Trilogy

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonic_the_Hedgehog_(film_series)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars_original_trilogy

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Back_to_the_Future

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Flavours_Cornetto

Etc…
2 users liked this post: StandingOvation, Taco Bell Tower
(02-19-2025, 01:51 AM)Uncle wrote:
(02-19-2025, 01:28 AM)Boredfrom wrote:
(02-19-2025, 01:15 AM)D3RANG3D wrote:
Spoiler:  (click to show)
Porque eres tan maricon mano?

Por que no soy un Trumpista de mierda. 

“Mira mamá, puse un meme del Trump con máscara de Bane en la calle en el año 2025.”

“Estás bien pendejo, mijo.” 

Es más maricon irle al Trump.

[Image: QhgAlNp.png]

boredfrom please don't say faggot, that's very homophobic

A better translation for that second line:

“You really are a stupid asshole, my son.”
2 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Taco Bell Tower
https://www.resetera.com/threads/are-you-an-ambitious-person.1112637/

entremetGPT, post: 135967296, member: 9388 wrote:I would say I am, but my ambition isn't just the regular crap--house, kids, career, money. But I'm also an idealist. Change the world type of guy, lol.

I have a list of social causes I focus on: volunteering, building relationships, doing advocacy work, etc. I don't think ambition is just the typical American Dream garbage--no hate if that's your thing.

But I want to expand on what I mean to be ambitious. MLK Jr. was ambitious but had nothing to do with money.

omfg NINTENDER
(02-19-2025, 01:38 AM)Jeff_at_the_laughfactory wrote:
(02-19-2025, 12:02 AM)Potato wrote:
(02-18-2025, 11:56 PM)Straight Edge wrote: I’m gonna say it. The Dark Knight is overrated as fuck.

It's a great film ruined by being waaaaaaaaaay too long.

EDIT: It's funny, because if you asked me how long TDK was I would say 3 hours. It's actually "only" 152 minutes. That last 30 minutes really drags and the story feels like it's done.

Have to channel my name sake and state that you are unfortunately, factually wrong.
I don't think you can remove any part of TDK without losing something from the story, it might be just over 2 and a half hours but the narrative is tight enough that it justifies that run time.

Spoiler:  (click to show)
I haven't seen it in half a decade so I might be pulling all this out my ass

Uno reverse card. This is factually incorrect.
2 users liked this post: benji, Taco Bell Tower
Quote:At first glance I might prefer the costume design from Troy, and Matt Damon and his non-existent Greek features doesn't really fit.

These people are retarded
(02-19-2025, 01:49 AM)Uncle wrote:
(02-19-2025, 01:17 AM)Nintex wrote: The Dark Knight is one of the best movie trilogies perhaps ever.

Each film covers a different theme of Batman, the adventure in Batman begins, the detective in The Dark Knight and finally the action in The Dark Knight Rises.

absolute kino

the nice thing about "one of" is that people can name lotr and man with no name and bttf you're still not wrong, but

I mean how many movie trilogies worth talking about are there, even

doesn't seem hard to be "one of"

the best, though?

There are many like The Godfather and of course movies with more than 3 parts. Although I consider the first 3 Bourne films another trilogy for example as well as Indy 1 - 3.
The consistency of quality of the TDK trilogy is key though.
(02-19-2025, 02:12 AM)BIONIC wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/are-you-an-ambitious-person.1112637/

entremetGPT, post: 135967296, member: 9388 wrote:I would say I am, but my ambition isn't just the regular crap--house, kids, career, money.  But I'm also an idealist. Change the world type of guy, lol. 

I have a list of social causes I focus on: volunteering, building relationships, doing advocacy work, etc. I don't think ambition is just the typical American Dream garbage--no hate if that's your thing.

But I want to expand on what I mean to be ambitious.  MLK Jr. was ambitious but had nothing to do with money.

omfg NINTENDER

"I have a list of social causes I focus on: volunteering, building relationships, doing advocacy work, etc."

Bullshit.
(02-19-2025, 02:25 AM)Nintex wrote:
(02-19-2025, 01:49 AM)Uncle wrote:
(02-19-2025, 01:17 AM)Nintex wrote: The Dark Knight is one of the best movie trilogies perhaps ever.

Each film covers a different theme of Batman, the adventure in Batman begins, the detective in The Dark Knight and finally the action in The Dark Knight Rises.

absolute kino

the nice thing about "one of" is that people can name lotr and man with no name and bttf you're still not wrong, but

I mean how many movie trilogies worth talking about are there, even

doesn't seem hard to be "one of"

the best, though?

There are many like The Godfather and of course movies with more than 3 parts. Although I consider the first 3 Bourne films another trilogy for example as well as Indy 1 - 3.
The consistency of quality of the TDK trilogy is key though.


But Begins and Returns are ass
2 users liked this post: JoeBoy101, Taco Bell Tower
(02-19-2025, 01:46 AM)BIONIC wrote:
AliceAmber, post: 135978051, member: 42858 wrote:I apologize for the wait on this. Here is the official C-word policy update.

[STAFF]Revisions to the moderation of the ban on the word "cunt"
2.18.2025

The word will be banned with no differences based on target or user's gender.
First time will be given a much lighter moderation before proceeding back to more severe ban durations.
Adjustments to the banners. (Durations are guideline starting points).
  • User Banned (3 Days): Perpetuating Misogynistic slur; Don't Do It Again.
  • User Banned (1 Month): Perpetuating Misogynistic Slur; Prior Ban for the Same
Additional Considerations & Details
  • The primary concern is and always has been the word creating a less comfortable if not hostile environment for some women.
  • Context in other cultures and countries.
    • Some places have a more normalised usage. However there are still women who feel otherwise from these countries and places.
    • It remains our hope that each community is welcoming to members and takes consideration of things that make the community less welcoming.
    • Unlike in speech where it is one and done a forum persists longer. Whether users are browsing later, going back to reply to a quote or following a conversation the slur will remain present again and again on the forum.
    • In consideration of the above, we felt it fair to give others a less harsh first time offense while reinforcing the desire to curb the word from the forum. We also recognise that it is unlikely their intention to cause discomfort to women reading and have focused the banner to reflect perpetuation of harmful language rather than a banner than felt like being labelled a misogynist.
  • Recognising usage & patterns on Resetera
    • The primary usage across the site is as a derogatory. Even ignoring the misogynistic lens the word remains one of the harshest in most cultures.
    • The usage is primarily towards figures who have done or are planning to/doing something that is of significant harm to others. Eg. Politicians in the UK with policies that directly harm trans people.
    • The immediate contention is when users are banned when using this word to express criticism towards bigotry and similar instances. It is evident that there is no intention in these post to harass or otherwise provoke readers using the word and moderating these often feel like tone policing or restricting criticism. However it remains part of what drives the word usage and it doesn't serve to benefit anybody to allow usage that causes unintended friction between different groups on the site.
    • One issue we did not foresee is that when users gather to express disagreement on the bans in such instances it further cause friction as it can feel like the concerns of the slur is being dismissed. Seeing many users pushback on it and calling for conditional allowances can feel very much like boys club behaviour further driving some women away from the site. It is however evident that driving women away from the site is ultimately not what any of the users or staff involved want.
    • We have dramatically reduced the duration of the first ban to ease the pressure on members venting frustrations at critical issues. We are however serious about the ban otherwise.
    • We will also be stricter on this type of meta-commentary in threads where bans take place, if you have constructive feedback you can post in the constructive criticism and discussion thread.
    • The best moderation remains as self moderation. We understand your frustrations but blasting someone who will unlikely ever read your comment here is not a reason to make the place unwelcoming to others. If you see a friend post it, tell them to edit it. If its gone by the time a moderator reviews the report we're all good.
  • Reclamation, affirmation, affection & empowerment
    • We recognise these aspects in different communities and parts of the world. Usage where it is not an insult is incredibly uncommon and has honestly not been an issue for us.
    • We won't be banning usage such as "serving cunt" or "cunty" which have their own usage and meanings in the queer communities. Concerns of dog whistling or using these to try and circumvent the ban should still be reported for moderators consideration.
[/STAFF]

These embarrassing cunts omfg

3 users liked this post: Keetongu, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Taco Bell Tower
It appears there are no actual revisions to using the word "cunt", despite the title.

And that it also appears that AliceAmber is likely the source for most of the insane bans we see here, if that writing style is any indication.


Forum Jump: