United States Politics: ∆τ_i*ε*φ*m_i<0 where ε=4 and φ=0.25

[killamajig]

Here ya go, I was right in the thick of it when they started firing tear gas and rubber bullets about an hour ago














https://i.imgur.com/SBIN1yd.mp4
https://i.imgur.com/2iydJlS.mp4

[killamajig]

Any questions? Lol

I was at the federal building downtown LA. Until they fired  tear gas and rubber bullets at us

[Uncle]

how did you hide your secret chudliness

"yeah man, I'm all about these protests, it's bullshit man, bullshit. dude you know a really good site for organizing, a lot of like-minded people there? you should check out resetera.com"

[Uncle]

wait no here's the plan

you have to make a sign that says "NEPENTHE DOES NOT APPROVE" with a shitty drawing of a yellow dog, and under it "RESETERA.COM" next to the purple logo

you must do this

you must get captured on camera and get your sign on international news

[killamajig]

I was going to honestly do something like that but they legit started firing tear gas and rubber bullets. So I kind of missed my opportunity. I got home safe and sound to report back to you guys. Didn't want to end up like that journalist. 

When I arrived things were pretty calm. Just mostly people holding signs in the police. Just watching and holding the line. Didn't see any national guard that doesn't mean they weren't there and there was a lot of people around and I didn't want to get too nosy

[Ribosome]

That's the stuff that Stephen Miller and crew are currently having a meltdown on Twitter over?

[killamajig]

Now they've got streets blocked off near me and I saw a line of squad cars with their lights on that was 20 cars long. Crazy shit

[killamajig]

I'm not exaggerating when I say it's nonstop helicopters flying in circles over my building. I barely got any sleep last night. Tonight is worse. Guess I need to buy some of those noise cancelling headphones. This shit is brutal.

[Polident]

I'm not exaggerating when I say it's nonstop helicopters flying in circles over my building. I barely got any sleep last night. Tonight is worse. Guess I need to buy some of those noise cancelling headphones. This shit is brutal.

Get some ear plugs. Odd at first with the pressure but do wonders in those situations. Far better than noice cancelling headphones.

Recommend the Hearos brand. Standard beige colored ones are rated for 32 decibels. Personally, I can still hear an alarm clock or phone or anything important. They have purple ones rated for 33 or 34 that effectively make you deaf. 

I may or may not be in the pocket of big earplugs.

[Rendle]

I'm not exaggerating when I say it's nonstop helicopters flying in circles over my building. I barely got any sleep last night. Tonight is worse. Guess I need to buy some of those noise cancelling headphones. This shit is brutal.

You should be thankful this is the only time you can blast music in your house and your neighbours won't give a shit because it's so loud already. And if they don't like it what can they do, call the police?

[Nintex]

The troops will be everywhere

We just wanted lower egg prices

[benji]

Here ya go, I was right in the thick of it when they started firing tear gas and rubber bullets about an hour ago

ALL STATES ARE POLICE STATES

99.9% chance the person who wrote this supports communism.

[Uncle]

99.9% chance the person who wrote this supports communism.

https://thebire.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=336&pid=132662#pid132662 

[Himu]

I can't believe it but modern politics has got me to reconsider monarchism and I think it's winning out as the best overall political ideology for me.

Look at California. People are waving foreign flags while they burn cars and it's being okayed as "freedom of speech". Republics and Democracies are highly limited and do not consider human nature. For example, the Union - if they had a lick of sense - would have banned the Confederate Flag, and frankly, any flag that flies in America besides the stars and stripes. To do otherwise is to uplift other nations. Now, almost one and a half century after the effects of the Civil War, people hang Israel flags, and Palestine flags, and this flag, and that flag, every where a fucking flag flag, which naturally goes against the call of the nation that all Americans must hold fealty to America and America alone and drop their foreign ties.

But nope. Democrats are unable to contend with the fact they lost the election. Trump won partly due to his illegal immigration stance and the Democrats are in La La Land unable to accept it.

All this data and zero compromise. Democrats say they're the party of data, but if so why won't they relent?

Because Democracy and Republicans are about power. It's not about what's best for the nation. It's about the procurement of power against all else. if that wasn't the case things would get done.

Instead, we just go back and forth every 4 or 8 years in some political game of musical chairs. Every few years, things change in democracy. It's a constant back and forth. And if you were doing good you can't continue because....reasons. What if there were a third Obama term? You couldn't find out because democracy decided for you. Democracy is unstable. It also relies on placing hope in people that were not bred for power, but pursue it. It naturally raises up the vulture and the crow, who seek power at all costs even against the ruin of their own country.

Versus monarchism. Long reign so it's more stable, things happen quicker because less red tape, kings and queens are bred from a sense of duty to not only their family and class, but their people, as leaders. Humans naturally seek hierarchy and those above us. Just as humans have a natural tendency to seek God, we seek our betters in the flesh. Politicians are snakes and not our betters.

CS Lewis said this:

"Where men are forbidden to honour a king they honour millionaires, athletes, or film-stars instead: even famous prostitutes or gangsters. For spiritual nature, like bodily nature, will be served; deny it food and it will gobble poison."

And he's correct. Without an example of a monarchy or royalty society descends into no shape or reason because there's no good example to be made much less to follow. So boys admire people like Andrew Tate or Trump instead. Look at Prince William. He's someone that conjures respect. Who is a better example to our people? Riff raff or actual royalty?

Right now almost half of American children cannot read. We are graduating kids that cannot write much less read.

Yet our politicians don't give a shit and it's business as usual.

Nothing gets done and politics are in constant deadlock as they feast on our tax dollars.

It's time to consider that the Founding Fathers were wrong and the Loyalists were correct. America showed promise but the cracks have truly revealed themselves. At the end of the day, humans are animals and animals just want to be happy and led into the pen like a sheep barked at by a sheep dog. People want direction. People want an easy life for their families. People want community. Freedom gets in the way of all of these things and basing a society off of freedom alone was rather foolish in light of our human frailties. Social cohesion, stability, and leadership produce a better human society.

Fuck voting in a Constitutional Republic. Utterly pointless except at the local level.

[benji]

Nah, divine right is fucking stupid. Nobody sane respects royals.

[benji]

[Besticus Maximus]

Nah, divine right is fucking stupid. Nobody sane respects royals.

We've got a shit king you can have for nowt, if that's no good there's a ginger one already over there

[Polident]

I remember in 2016 people were calling Tom Hanks “America’s dad” and how Taylor Swift is seen as a princess. People yearn for American royalty. But our royalty is better because they star in movies about mermaid fornicarion.

[Gamegirl Nostalgia]

King Charles will fix this bros just wait

[Nintex]

The Musk rebellion has been CRUSHED

TRUMP  TRUMP  TRUMP

[Himu]

Nah, divine right is fucking stupid. Nobody sane respects royals.

Nothing about divine right was said and not all monarchy is about divine right.

The Democrats cannot say the Republicans are correct on the illegal immigration issue despite positive polling and being literally why Trump was re-elected out of obligation to their party. Therefore they betray what is right and focus solely on how they feel.

A King has no party. He is neutral. He does what is right and even when he is wrong you respect that he has to own up to it and learn through his life as king with many lessons. He gets better and better and has a whole store of knowledge handed to him by his ancestors and those in his charge to lead his nation to prosperity.

Monarchism wins out. Republics produce people that put party over people.

[benji]

Then what's the basis for their claim of ownership of everyone? Fucking lot?

[Nintex]

"Generations of Army heroes did not shed their blood on distant shores only to watch our country be destroyed by invasion and third world lawlessness here at home"

[benji]

Democracy is unstable. It also relies on placing hope in people that were not bred for power, but pursue it. It naturally raises up the vulture and the crow, who seek power at all costs even against the ruin of their own country.

Versus monarchism. Long reign so it's more stable, things happen quicker because less red tape, kings and queens are bred from a sense of duty to not only their family and class, but their people, as leaders. Humans naturally seek hierarchy and those above us. Just as humans have a natural tendency to seek God, we seek our betters in the flesh. Politicians are snakes and not our betters.

CS Lewis said this:

"Where men are forbidden to honour a king they honour millionaires, athletes, or film-stars instead: even famous prostitutes or gangsters. For spiritual nature, like bodily nature, will be served; deny it food and it will gobble poison."

And he's correct. Without an example of a monarchy or royalty society descends into no shape or reason because there's no good example to be made much less to follow. So boys admire people like Andrew Tate or Trump instead. Look at Prince William. He's someone that conjures respect. Who is a better example to our people? Riff raff or actual royalty?

Right now almost half of American children cannot read. We are graduating kids that cannot write much less read.

Yet our politicians don't give a shit and it's business as usual.

Nothing gets done and politics are in constant deadlock as they feast on our tax dollars.

It's time to consider that the Founding Fathers were wrong and the Loyalists were correct. America showed promise but the cracks have truly revealed themselves. At the end of the day, humans are animals and animals just want to be happy and led into the pen like a sheep barked at by a sheep dog. People want direction. People want an easy life for their families. People want community. Freedom gets in the way of all of these things and basing a society off of freedom alone was rather foolish in light of our human frailties. Social cohesion, stability, and leadership produce a better human society.

A King has no party. He is neutral. He does what is right and even when he is wrong you respect that he has to own up to it and learn through his life as king with many lessons. He gets better and better and has a whole store of knowledge handed to him by his ancestors and those in his charge to lead his nation to prosperity.

Monarchism wins out. Republics produce people that put party over people.

[Himu]

Democracy is unstable. It also relies on placing hope in people that were not bred for power, but pursue it. It naturally raises up the vulture and the crow, who seek power at all costs even against the ruin of their own country.

Versus monarchism. Long reign so it's more stable, things happen quicker because less red tape, kings and queens are bred from a sense of duty to not only their family and class, but their people, as leaders. Humans naturally seek hierarchy and those above us. Just as humans have a natural tendency to seek God, we seek our betters in the flesh. Politicians are snakes and not our betters.

CS Lewis said this:

"Where men are forbidden to honour a king they honour millionaires, athletes, or film-stars instead: even famous prostitutes or gangsters. For spiritual nature, like bodily nature, will be served; deny it food and it will gobble poison."

And he's correct. Without an example of a monarchy or royalty society descends into no shape or reason because there's no good example to be made much less to follow. So boys admire people like Andrew Tate or Trump instead. Look at Prince William. He's someone that conjures respect. Who is a better example to our people? Riff raff or actual royalty?

Right now almost half of American children cannot read. We are graduating kids that cannot write much less read.

Yet our politicians don't give a shit and it's business as usual.

Nothing gets done and politics are in constant deadlock as they feast on our tax dollars.

It's time to consider that the Founding Fathers were wrong and the Loyalists were correct. America showed promise but the cracks have truly revealed themselves. At the end of the day, humans are animals and animals just want to be happy and led into the pen like a sheep barked at by a sheep dog. People want direction. People want an easy life for their families. People want community. Freedom gets in the way of all of these things and basing a society off of freedom alone was rather foolish in light of our human frailties. Social cohesion, stability, and leadership produce a better human society.

A King has no party. He is neutral. He does what is right and even when he is wrong you respect that he has to own up to it and learn through his life as king with many lessons. He gets better and better and has a whole store of knowledge handed to him by his ancestors and those in his charge to lead his nation to prosperity.

Monarchism wins out. Republics produce people that put party over people.

Ah, so you'd prefer a politician bought by PAC money over a righteous leader who cares for his nations well being.

Got it.

Monarchies are also more flexible. Constitutional monarchy allows participation from the populace while having the Monarch as a check and balance against greedy politicians. The monarch stands more to benefit for the nations good prospects because it means good things for him and his children and his children's children. There's more incentive for success long-term. versus a politician who can only think of the short-term.

A monarch acts as a singular point of unity for a nation. Presidents naturally divide a nation because half the country is one party and the other half represents the other.

Monarchism is clearly superior.

[benji]

Got a list of those monarchies in the world better off than the United States? Or that historically even came close to your fantasies?

[Himu]

Got a list of those monarchies in the world better off than the United States? Or that historically even came close to your fantasies?

Better off in what way?

United States is a nation that has replaced the common good with a love for money. Money is our king.

Monarchism is the standard in human history. This isn't communism. It has been tried and replicated successfully around the world. You would deem to call it even the natural human form government since even now as was said by Polident people still label our celebrities our royalty in American society.

[Himu]

Then what's the basis for their claim of ownership of everyone? Fucking lot?

Loyalty to the Royalty is not out of pious obligation for only God is to be worshiped. Royals are not to be worshiped, they perform important functions for the State and can be a unifying figure. America is split along fault lines because of the lack of a unifying figure. It's my party or your party. 

If anything, a royal who is religious and does what is right by God is a good thing, for God allows them to rule why not honor our Creator?

Presidential elections are always in play. Elections are every four years but everyone knows elections start two years before the actual date due to campaigning. It's just constant campaigning. Constant posturing. Zero long-term planning. Imagine a corporation if the CEO was forced to fight for their seat every four years or they'd be voted out. It would be awful for the long-term health of the business because the CEO would have to be constantly campaigning.

America needs a king. The Yankee rebels were wrong and the Loyalists to the British Crown were in the right.

[benji]

Every CEO* has to fight for their seat every single day or the board could vote them out.

*who is not also the owner

edit: Okay, I won't string you along:

Got a list of those monarchies in the world better off than the United States? Or that historically even came close to your fantasies?

Better off in what way?

United States is a nation that has replaced the common good with a love for money. Money is our king.

Monarchism is the standard in human history. This isn't communism. It has been tried and replicated successfully around the world. You would deem to call it even the natural human form government since even now as was said by Polident people still label our celebrities our royalty in American society.

In other words, you have no examples. Most likely because none of your assertions have ever been true.

Most notably, historically, monarchs were almost always campaigning, almost never did what was right for the people and almost always thought in the short term.

[Potato]

What the fuck is going on in here? 

Arguing the merits of monarchs in 2025?

Oh, it's himu. Carry on then...