Journal of Other Forum Analysis (Volume II, Issue 2)

[simiansmarts]

I also really liked weapons, it’s nice to see an original story succeed as well as this did.  
 
The next big avengers movie is probably going to take a huge hit to its box office total with how overseas audience have been dodging capeshit lately. We’re not far from the big ITS OVER moment of the MCU .

[Taco Bell Tower]

MCU stans are in total disarray right now. F4 getting the shit kicked out of it by a horror movie.

Weapons is great by the way.

It was released after Trevor Moore passed away 

[Boredfrom]

Capt marvel is blonde tho

*Someone post Monica Rambeu*

TELL them...and Monica didn't need the artificial push to be a badass

https://www.resetera.com/threads/if-you-are-black-you-should-get-a-priority-pass-to-play-as-blade-in-marvel-rivals.1265922/page-3#post-143694354

[HaughtyFrank]

MCU stans are in total disarray right now. F4 getting the shit kicked out of it by a horror movie.

Weapons is great by the way.

It was released after Trevor Moore passed away 

He even specifically made it to work through his grief. Or with the the intent I guess

[clockwork5]

Again, Kordova?!

https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-women-criticise-sexualised-character-designs-ot3-make-her-look-more-corpulent-more-stuffed-where-the-eyes-cant-escape.275780/page-479#post-143641044

This is literally a camera mod for the versus screen, nobody’s forcing him to look at Chun’s buns. 
 
Potato was right about these people being self-loathing porn addicted men.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/women-who-stray/201808/science-stopped-believing-in-porn-addiction-you-should-too

People who fear sex and porn are those taught to feel shame about sex.  Nearly all people who self report porn addiction were raised as religious.  Era's sex hangups are based on self shame and not systemic cultural issues.

They should just put Ken in a speedo with one testicle hanging out. 

“We heard you and we listened!”

[Boredfrom]

Well the apology clears it up. Hopefully the money can go to the indigenous people.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHA

If anyone does buy that ugly shoe, the money should go to these people then.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

What's unfortunate is a mostly white forum jumping to dismiss the very real issues that face marginalised people every day.

Also we could've easily surmised the designer wasn't Zapotec because there wouldn't have been a controversy to begin with.

Like, glad we finally figured out being "Mexican-American" doesn't actually mean you are Indigenous or have direct ties to all of Mexican culture after the apology.

 

Remind us about the universality of Blackness, Nep. You cunt.

[Potato]

What's his Resetera username?

South Shields soiled nappy dumper caught in wheelie bin with trousers down while on bail

Abbi Taylor, of South Shields, formerly known as Martin Tarling, appeared in court after climbing into clinical waste bins for comfort which left residents alarmed.

A defendant on bail for dumping soiled adult nappies at nurseries was caught inside a bin bag in a wheelie bin with her trousers down by an alarmed resident.

[Boredfrom]

My mother just mentioned that you can go to any supermarket in Mexico and buy footwear designed like what they were bitching about. And none of that money goes to the Zapotecas.

[davepoobond]

If a white person had Black familial ties somewhere back in their ancestry or they married a Black person, does that morally entitle them to profit off of a corporate design taken directly from Black culture?

This is so rich coming from Nepenthe who sees herself as honorary Brazilian just because she's black  

i only use AIs made by indigenous AIs

[Boredfrom]

Everyone knows that black culture is singular and unchanging. 

But just because you are a dirty mestizo a Mexican-American doesn’t give you the right to use Zapoteca culture… now let’s talk about Capoiera. 

Nepenthe is such an ignorant piece of shit that doesn’t even understand she is working against her own interests.

[DavidCroquet]

My mother just mentioned that you can go to any supermarket in Mexico and buy footwear designed like what they were bitching about. And none of that money goes to the Zapotecas.

The irony for me is when i saw this shoe I was like…oh, that sandal i see middle-aged black club chicks wearing all the time.

[Boredfrom]

My mother just mentioned that you can go to any supermarket in Mexico and buy footwear designed like what they were bitching about. And none of that money goes to the Zapotecas.

The irony for me is when i saw this shoe I was like…oh, that sandal i see middle-aged black club chicks wearing all the time.

Adidas and that shoe designer are stupid for apologizing… but then again, they were the ones that emphasized the Mexican connection and probably thought their audience are stupid idiots like Nepenthe.

[HaughtyFrank]

My mother just mentioned that you can go to any supermarket in Mexico and buy footwear designed like what they were bitching about. And none of that money goes to the Zapotecas.

The irony for me is when i saw this shoe I was like…oh, that sandal i see middle-aged black club chicks wearing all the time.

Adidas and that shoe designer are stupid for apologizing… but then again, they were the ones that emphasized the Mexican connection and probably thought their audience are stupid idiots like Nepenthe.

Yeah I don't think they really had a choice considering the whole line is meant to be one big cultural celebration.
The designer seems to be quite the activist so if he didn't apologize he'd probably be ostracized from his own circles too.

[davepoobond]

Shouldn’t everyone saying the shoes are ugly be banned for being anti-Mexican heritage anyway?

[benji]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/episodes-of-shows-that-really-pissed-you-off.1266027/#post-143680137

so many posts about childrens cartoons     

The Young Justice season 1 episode where they pull the "Science vs Magic" (aka a stand-in for Science vs Religion) nonsense where they completely botch it, completely misunderstand what science actually is (nor would it actually be in conflict with magic because they aren't separate things, Science isn't a belief (why is that so hard for Hollywood to understand), "Magic" is science we don't understand scientists would simply re-evaluate their understanding and explore it), make Artemis come across as an anti-science and seem to weirdly side with her.

If I had to place money on which side fundamentally doesn't understand science, I'm [icking the person who seems to think making videogame characters come to life through hobgoblin farts is a thing that plausibly could happen if the underpinning rationale was discovered

I don't even like his take on magic. Magic is boring if it would just translate to "oh so the wizard showers the rock in antigraviton particles so that's how you can make it float, let me build my own antigraviton particle machine", no magic is fun because it's inexplicable with science and inhabits it's completely own realm of logic that's incompatible with physics. I'm pretty sure that's also the idea in the DC universe which is why one of Superman's weaknesses is just labelled "magic"

Spoiler:  (click to show)(click to hide)

I'd like to point out that, magic aside, the DU universe has literal gods in it. Not "super advanced aliens indistinguishable from gods" but literal bound by nothing but their will gods who exist outside the mortal plane. Including the Christian one.

[Potato]

Racists: "Races should be segregated. Cultures should be kept pure."

Resetera: "Races should be segregated. Cultures should be kept pure...but not like that."

[Hap Shaughnessy]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/american-eagle-sparks-backlash-for-touting-sydney-sweeneys-great-jeans.1255467/#post-143197212

 User Banned (1 Week): Dismissive drive by in a sensitive thread

This is dumb internet controversy. It's a pun.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/american-eagle-sparks-backlash-for-touting-sydney-sweeneys-great-jeans.1255467/page-21#post-143456481

 User Banned (2 Weeks): Dismissing Concerns of Racism

I can't wait until her career goes to shit and she does an apology tour. Or she just ends up on Fox's Outnumber with Scott Baio or Dean Cain. Celebs can do the conservative lean but it's usually like how Chris Pratt does it and even then it still hurts you. There ain't enough roles in Yellowstone. Her just going right into the white supremacy is going to follow her forever. I think her career is fucked.

I'm glad there are videos of Sweeney just hanging out and having fun with the Europhia cast to contrast people posting comments like the one above.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/american-eagle-sparks-backlash-for-touting-sydney-sweeneys-great-jeans.1255467/page-21#post-143486181

 User Banned (2 Weeks): Concern Trolling; Account in Junior Phase

I don't really blame people who are born into conservative families and who live in conservative areas vote Republican. It's almost like they're indoctrinated to think what they believe from a young age - not unlike religion - which many people find hard to break away from.

It also doesn't help when the alternative is voting for Biden - who many people on here despise despite supporting the Democrats.

Many people think anyone who votes Republican is a piece of shit but that kind of attitude doesn't help. We live in a democracy, people are entitled to have different political opinions. We should try to win over hearts and minds by educating and informing not insulting and chastising.

[Boredfrom]

Informed consent, collaboration, equitable compensation, need authorisation contracts.

There has been a number of incidents like this, which inspired the new law, and now the second time the law has been used.

This is BS from the government. Most Mexican companies do whatever they want with this shit, is just performative shit from a shit government.

Apologies are cheap.

You thinking this money is going to the Zapotecas.

[Hap Shaughnessy]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/how-the-israel-lobby-is-getting-keir-starmer-to-ban-palestine-action.1233321/#post-142325739

Zionism is a cancer that runs roughshod through the pillars of your institutions and democracy. I hope one day the world sees it for what it is.

Zionists understand very well what the horrible libels against jews were before and during WWII. One of them was that 'Jews controlled the world', which is obviously an antisemitic propaganda to exterminate Jews.

Zionists now are actually embedding themselves in many western democracies to assert control though heinous lobbying and when you bring that up, you will be called an antisemite for propagating a holocaust libel. Zionists exploit the terrible history to move forward their agenda and to completely kill debate about it.

Seriously, I tried to bring it up once on a local Dutch message board. One of the representatives for a conservative political party was asked a question whether his allegiance was more to the Netherlands or to Israel, he said Israel. Which is an odd thing to say if running to represent the Netherlands...
Similarly, the party that won the last election (far right..) wanted to appoint a secretary/minister that didn't pass the national security screening because he was found to have ties with the Mossad and Israël. I guess we can't have him become a minister but hey go ahead you can still be in Parliament and have access to confidential files! Almost every politician let this slide. It's madness to think that we have an active member of parliament that didn't pass security screening and no one made a fuss about it. But when you try to raise the question of concern about Zionists influence... It's blood libel and antisemitism. Productive and fair discussion is completely shut down.

"(((Zionists))) actually do control the world."

[Boredfrom]

The marginalized speaks within ERA users, like the affluent PakistaniBritish and the furry AfroAmerican. Don’t forget the Canadian Incelsior and whatever Aerith is from.

Stupid shitty slackstivism.

[Boredfrom]

Just got out of the movie, and my wife had a wild read that I think makes me want to immediately see it again to see if there's evidence or it holds up.

She really fixated on the young narrator, and said this has a quality of a version of events people would've told a young, young child. This casts every moment of the film into doubt.

Her theory is...

SPOILER

She wants to do a re-view to see if it could all be allegory told through the lens of a very young kid.

Somebody at ERA is married to Peggy Hill.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/weapons-reviews-are-dropping-dir-zach-cregger.1262556/page-8#post-143713206

Spoiler:  (click to show)(click to hide)

is modern take on fairy tales and witch stories, you asshole. How the fuck a child will know about police brutality and crackheads if they hide school shootings?  

Don’t take the title literally, you idiots.

[Shecky Fragbaum]

spineduke? PSH more like David Duke.

[JoeBoy101]

Informed consent, collaboration, equitable compensation, need authorisation contracts.

There has been a number of incidents like this, which inspired the new law, and now the second time the law has been used.

This is BS from the government. Most Mexican companies do whatever they want with this shit, is just performative shit from a shit government.

Apologies are cheap.

You thinking this money is going to the Zapotecas.

But remember, like the Sydney Sweeny kerfuffle, this isn't the left getting worked up or offended at all. If anything, its the right using it to distract from the Epstei-

What? ... The right doesn't care about this? Well that's because they're racist and don't care about Mexicans!

[BIONIC]

OP made a retarded post, comes back after the weekend to continue bitching about it. Still developing  

https://www.resetera.com/threads/as-much-flak-as-people-give-english-dubs-they-really-didnt-have-to-be-so-literal-with-some-translations-tsunades-nickname-in-naruto.1248261/page-5#post-142908980

He’s all over constructive defending his honor

Spoiler:  (click to show)(click to hide)

I get that most of us don't know each other, and we're reading each other through text and maybe aren't going to always pick up what someone is saying the way they're saying it, misunderstandings happen that way, but I don't care for the way it gets a pass when the misreadings feel a bit more deliberate.

I don't like when I say something, and then people then feel the need to tell me what I'm actually saying and then argue against that adjacent or entirely new point.

I say X, they tell you you said Y and then call you an asshole for saying Y. And it feels like I'm taking crazy pills because the post where you said X is blatantly visible and just being ignored. And you can quote yourself saying X to those people and some just disappear from the conversation. And then I'm sitting there like, why did this person I never interacted with before say I said all these things. Which then ties into the whole Discord of it all in which some names are clearly on a list.

Or sometimes it can be a misunderstanding that you can clarify, but then people just double down so aggressively and it never gets through.

But then you have the people who know exactly what they're doing. I'm now gonna call you angry or a troll or insinuate a grudge against something I like. And you can point out that none of that's true, but they can just choose to ignore all that and continue their gotcha.

That's beyond arguing in bad faith, but there has to be a phrase for it.

And this also stems into why I don't take people's words for things. Someone describes something or someone one way, I look it up for myself instead of parroting what they said, and I see they're sometimes off base. Contextualizing my posts for the Skill Up discussion.

I feel like there's this category of "Era tactics" of how to win an argument we don't really acknowledge. But the thing is, I'm not trying to win anything, but will get dogpiled twice by people who think I am. The point was made, agree with it, or don't. I can follow up on some things but once it gets dragged to such a nasty place where we're just insulting people, it's like, what's the point.

Can't keep up with everything flung at me, just saying my peace.

It's like I don't get to be who I am, Era tells me who and what I am. Criticize A, you're an A hater. Praise B, you're now a B lover which means you hate all the other letter as well. But then when you ask "when did I hate all the other letters, A included?" that gets ignored and people double down on the B thing. And it's not like it's subtle. People do this openly to each other.


This is in response to me critiquing localization dialogue. We went from "those writers could've phrased that differently" to that. And then I get blamed for the escalation.

I get when it's 1 vs 100, it's easier to go well obviously you're the problem, but if given the opportunity to break it down post by post, I guarantee my side of it holds up. But then why would anyone want to take the time for that, understandably.

I can literally quote myself trying to come to an understanding with you despite you repeatedly calling me a troll. And then all it takes is for me to lose it once and then it's like "we got em boys", at least that part we can call baiting.

But isn't the general rule, don't be assholes.

If it's any consolation I agree that there's been some bullshit mudslinging aimed at you Derbel. I disagree with your thread premise, but only in a friendly banter way. I'd say try to not let it bother you, but people seem to go at you quite frequently like this, so I can only imagine how frustrating it can be.

Edit - oh I thought i was responding to a post in that very thread, got my notifications mixed up.

you went straight to calling people obtuse because they don’t agree with your premise

Sorry, you went immediately on the defensive, come across aggressive even if you don't mean to and within 3 posts, everyone else was obtuse. I can't get on board with this.

except i specifically went out my way to track down the episode and scene in japanese and had my partner translate/explain if "duck" has alternate meanings in japanese and it turns out, it means someone gullible, someone who can be taken advantage of, a sucker. i added it to the thread and there was quite a few posts in there trying to having a conversation about the translation but the OP never interacted with any of it except having a fit.

My first thought reading this, oh maybe I was rude initially in a way that I missed. Then I read it for myself, a bunch of people assume I don't know what a word means, I clarify for them. They do it again, I clarify again that this isn't necessary. And my response to it still going was ...

"I feel like we're being obtuse here". You see how that's not like the way you described it. You make it sound like I insulted everyone right out of the gate.

It's all in the framing isn't it.

This is exactly what I'm talking about.


Sorry, I didn't respond to the 20+ notifications I got at once. It was sort of a lot.

it's exactly how i described it. i don't agree it's a purposeful double entendres and i'm not being obtuse about it. it’s rude.

i won't be responding about this here any more, this thread has bigger issues

Appreciated. If a thread disagrees with me it's fine, but it's like I distinguish between people disagreeing and then people straight up insulting me for thinking my way.

My problem is when it's clearly the latter and people try to frame it as the former.

"Wow look at this idiot that doesn't understand this kid's series."
"Oh he's mad that we disagree with him."
"No, it's the insults. Its always the insults."

And that's just referring back to a Ratchet and Clank thread I made about a cover system.


That is literally not true. I even explained what the disconnect was. The thread is right there for everyone to see so why lie?

But no need to drag it out. I made my point. My posts stand for themselves. I'm just saying read the whole thing to see how we got there, don't just cherrypick.

I tend to try and read people extremely generously, but when I read that thread, it really comes across as someone posting a thread and getting needlessly aggressive when people disagree.

Also, as a woman, I do not in any way agree with your premise and have never heard the term "sucker" used in a sexual context unless its preceded by a naughty word.

Seems like you quite often attribute people interpreting things differently to you as being deliberately untruthful.

Someone said you insulted people by calling them "obtuse", you respond saying you didn't do that and quote yourself, they say the quote you provided is insulting, you call them a liar.

I don't track your posts, but I feel like I've read at least one or two other lengthy posts ITT from you more or less on this topic and I'm not sure what you're hoping to achieve with them. It's likely true you do get unfairly dogpiled at times, but it's also likely true you are sometimes comporting yourself in a way that others are finding abrasive, then when that's called out you respond poorly and claim they are misrepresnting you by telling you how you're making them feeli.

That you didn't intend to insult someone doesn't mean that you didn't, and doesn't make someone saying you insulted them a liar. You put a lot of this down to malice, that people are deliberately misrepresnting you and it seems paranoid to me.

In general, as someone above said, if you find posts where you think someone has crossed a line or broken a rule report them.

Have you ever thought that these things (where "the people double down on you in bad faith") happen to you so much it might not be because of "the people"?

Explain to me how

"I feel like we're being obtuse here". is an insult.

Explain to me how

"I feel like we're being obtuse here".

said in response to multiple people telling you what a word means even though you clarified multiple times you know what the word means and are now ignoring you to repeat the same thing.

That's what happened.

Their description is that I just came out insulting people for disagreeing with me.

You see how that paints two different pictures right? Ones a passive response. The other is just aggressive and petty.

So when I quote what happened more specifically and you still stick with that second painting, yeah, it kind of feels like lying.



If I say blue and 100 people tell me I said red, if I remember blue and can clearly see my post that says blue, and am literally going "hey look at where I said blue" and people still claim I said red, I'm betting on myself.



Your experience is your experience, but the responses made it seem like I just misunderstood a word and made up a definition. If I can cite comment sections or threads in other places making the same observation or just the joke "woah, that sounds wild out of context", does that not prove my point, which is just an acknowledgement of awkward phrasing. That's all.

I even cited another cartoon that regularly uses the word "sucker", and noted the difference.

The framing of the scene itself and the word legendary just gave it a different connotation to me. That's all.

A handful of people in the thread even acknowledged this, so I'm wondering why I'm being told that I'm making shit up. And how I NEED to admit that I'm wrong or I'm trolling, to what purpose.

No one considered it just to just be slang they're not aware, it just went straight to me making shit up.

Since looking into it, I can now cite those Reddit threads and YouTube comment sections and sucker by itself even has that definition mentioned buried in urban dictionary. But I'm the lying troll that needs to admit that he's wrong (you didn't say this, I'm quoting the thread).

And saying any of this doesn't matter because it'll get ignored and someone will just repeat something someone else already said that I disproved.

Zero introspection.

Calling people "obtuse", generally meaning stupid or slow, a few posts into your thread could very well be considered insulting. Saying "we're being obtuse" doesn't do much to offset that.

So people saying you insulted people, or that they felt insulted, aren't lying. Your insistence that they are speaks to why you seem to keep coming up against these issues.

I would seriously consider why you keep finding similar situations like this, and what your part in it might be.

Sigh ...

"I feel like we're being obtuse here".

Being obtuse.

Choosing to misunderstand what I'm saying.

But yes, ZERO introspection. I can't tell you why you just put me in that situation.

So you say "obtuse" and mean "deliberatly not understanding", while others are reading it to mean "stupid" or "slow" both of which are understood definitions of the word.

But you call the people who say they found it insulting liars. Not that it could be a different interpretaton of something.

"Sorry, I didn't mean to insult anyone, I meant X"
or
"These people saying I insulted them are lying and deliberately misrepresenting me"

Seriously, worth taking a minute to consider why you feel this keeps happening to you.

Sources cited and shared and watch it change nothing because my words don't matter, only what you say I said and we gotta keep the joke going, right?

But they're not choosing to "misunderstand". They understand exactly what you're saying but fundamentally disagree with the statement. Implying they're choosing to misrepresent you is insulting.

Like you're quoting urban dictionary now to prove your point, and its not even the top definition.

Because there are MULTIPLE DEFINITIONS!!!

They chose to ignore my post saying I know what the word means by telling me the definition over and over. That's not disagreeing, that's ignoring.

Just because there are multiple doesn't mean they're all used regularly, and Urban Dictionary doesn't show where the definitions origin is, also anyone can add any definition to a word/phrase they want to there, there's very little regulation outside of voting thumbs up or thumbs down on what means what. Everything on sucker has 0 votes either way because it's universally known as someone who is gullible(A sucker born every minute), and less so as someone who has a weakness for something(I'm a sucker for word etymology). As for the definition you're using as the basis for the thread, yeah I can see how that could be a term used for that, but I've literally never heard it used in that way that in my nearly 40 years here.

A more reputable source than Urban Dictionary, Miriam Webster does not list anything related to your thread premise for sucker as a definition, maybe suckling if you're looking at it generously, but even then it's not a common use. I can't even quickly find examples of it on the internet being used in that way.

[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sucker[/URL]

You're latching on to a definition you found on Urban Dictionary, or that in your circle of friends/area you live in it is used as a phrase but it ultimately isn't common outside of that.

The initial implication was that I made up the connotation. Urban Dictionary is the OTHER source (we're not acknowledging the reddit thread for some reason). And I'm using it to back what I already know, I'm not getting the definition from them.

Who goes to Miriam Webster for slang? Honestly. Maybe don't try to be an expert on this one. Hey, Mariam Webster, what does "throat GOAT" mean? Weird, I'm not getting any suitable results from the "more reputable source", it's like I should use a site specifically made for slang on this subject.

So apparently, it's just me and my friends in New York, then my Florida friends in one city, and then my Florida friends in another city, a handful of Era members and then randoms online from over a decade ago who are all in on this. Just this select few of us.

It seems like you misunderstood a word because you have, because sucker is not used as a euphemism for blow jobs. At least not widely in the United States.

You seem hostile because you continue to aggressively defend this position at anyone who disagrees or says you are wrong, to the point of saying you've disproved their stance or claiming people are lying or being obtuse. And you frame your defense in a patronizing way as you are the smartest person in the thread.

You don't need to admit you are wrong. I think you need to take a breath and remember that not everyone has it out for you even if they disagree with you.

You don't need to cite comment sections elsewhere because you feel like the work sucker in this context is sexual. Sometimes its best to just have the thread closed or stop posting.

Edit: Telling people who disagree with you "Maybe don't try to be an expert on this one" is EXTREMELY insulting and patronizing.

User warned: cross-thread drama

I am what you say I am, since I clearly don't get a say. Silly of me to point it out and expect people to stop doing it because obviously it's working.

People tell me I made up a definition, sure, I have absolutely no reason to cite it being used in different places.

I think I'm the smartest person here, I don't know what that's based on, sure, let's say I think that.

I'm not feeling kind to be insulting me, sure, I'm hostile.

I did not in fact state the difference between people disagreeing with me and those insulting me, I'm aggressive towards everyone. You did not literally quote me directly talking to someone who disagreed with me respectfully.

People are not doing the exact things I described in my initial post.

I'm begging you not to have some introspection because I find your threads very entertaining as a result

Was wondering what happened to this weirdo:

https://www.resetera.com/threads/wwe-discussion-thread-ot-doomed-by-the-booking.1075830/page-615#post-143048004

I'm gonna call it a day with this account. It's been fun. I'm gonna miss the live posting Raw and PLEs with y'all.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/wwe-containment-thread-ot.1075830/page-652#post-143529609

You're right.

Lil addict bitch is already back to ree in a Clair Obscur thread

[Jonsey]

Weapons is great by the way.

It was released after Trevor Moore passed away 

He even specifically made it to work through his grief. Or with the the intent I guess

I miss Trevor as well

[Taco Bell Tower]

He’s all over constructive defending his honor

Spoiler:  (click to show)(click to hide)

Was wondering what happened to this weirdo:

https://www.resetera.com/threads/wwe-discussion-thread-ot-doomed-by-the-booking.1075830/page-615#post-143048004

I'm gonna call it a day with this account. It's been fun. I'm gonna miss the live posting Raw and PLEs with y'all.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/wwe-containment-thread-ot.1075830/page-652#post-143529609

You're right.

Lil addict bitch is already back to ree in a Clair Obscur thread

Last time I got in here to see 5 notifications, it was not a very good time. Glad this went over better, minus the one.

[Hap Shaughnessy]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/welcome-new-members-introduce-yourself-here.119184/page-45#post-143720340

Hope all is well

Inbox Strategies

Unlimited SMTP Server - It is guranteed that your mail will reach to recipient's inbox

Valid Smtp or Webmail that deliver into office365 inbox

SMTP Setup, Cracking & Scanner IP Smtp

Methods for building your own SMTP

Cracking Smtps available Hosts ( biglobe, kagoya, nifty, sakura, heteml, gmoserver, xserver...)

Cracking Webmails ( Zimbra, Rackspace, Spectrum, Owa , Edu, Gov, Japan server...)

Complete setup Send 100K emails/day hitting Inbox to all domain ( Smtp With RDP and Email Sender )

Send DM for test to you email on Telegram:

Website: https://365logz.com/
Channel: t.me/shadecrack
Admin: t.me/shadecr4ck
Whatsapp: 13398376648

Kind regards,

[Snoopy]

Actual footage of Dubs in the BCT discord

[Cauliflower Of Love]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/the-naked-gun-review-thread-certified-fresh-beaver.1256964/page-9

Honestly surprised they aren't pearl clutching

[benji]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/how-the-israel-lobby-is-getting-keir-starmer-to-ban-palestine-action.1233321/#post-142325739

Zionism is a cancer that runs roughshod through the pillars of your institutions and democracy. I hope one day the world sees it for what it is.

Zionists understand very well what the horrible libels against jews were before and during WWII. One of them was that 'Jews controlled the world', which is obviously an antisemitic propaganda to exterminate Jews.

Zionists now are actually embedding themselves in many western democracies to assert control though heinous lobbying and when you bring that up, you will be called an antisemite for propagating a holocaust libel. Zionists exploit the terrible history to move forward their agenda and to completely kill debate about it.

Seriously, I tried to bring it up once on a local Dutch message board. One of the representatives for a conservative political party was asked a question whether his allegiance was more to the Netherlands or to Israel, he said Israel. Which is an odd thing to say if running to represent the Netherlands...
Similarly, the party that won the last election (far right..) wanted to appoint a secretary/minister that didn't pass the national security screening because he was found to have ties with the Mossad and Israël. I guess we can't have him become a minister but hey go ahead you can still be in Parliament and have access to confidential files! Almost every politician let this slide. It's madness to think that we have an active member of parliament that didn't pass security screening and no one made a fuss about it. But when you try to raise the question of concern about Zionists influence... It's blood libel and antisemitism. Productive and fair discussion is completely shut down.

If they were horrible libels and anti-semitic before why aren't they now?

Also great to see progressives, who always know history, to be advocating for loyalty tests. Plus how fast that sentiment would switch if someone was saying they should have loyalty to the Netherlands over the EU or UN. (Even though both institutions are filled with Zionist cancer.)

Just got out of the movie, and my wife had a wild read that I think makes me want to immediately see it again to see if there's evidence or it holds up.

She really fixated on the young narrator, and said this has a quality of a version of events people would've told a young, young child. This casts every moment of the film into doubt.

Her theory is...

SPOILER

She wants to do a re-view to see if it could all be allegory told through the lens of a very young kid.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/weapons-reviews-are-dropping-dir-zach-cregger.1262556/page-8#post-143713206

Continuing on my theme of their superior media literacy over there, if you go into something with a theory where you're looking for evidence to confirm it, you will find it. Which is why media interpretation rarely bothers with actual weighing of evidence. For example, how the bank used for shooting in the one Harry Potter movie has a star on the floor which proves Joanne's books are anti-semitic and she's a far-right Nazi who hates Zionists all minorities. Or how a jeans ad is proof of a Nazi plot to manipulate people into wanting to exterminate minorities.

In that lens I would say that since this movie was written to process his grief about losing a friend we should look at that friend:


Yep, Weapons is about pushing Nazi ideology.