Journal of Other Forum Analysis (Volume II, Issue 2)
(11-10-2025, 06:05 PM)Uncle wrote:
Duffking wrote:So from the last olympics that'll ban a total of 0 participants from the last checks notes 100% of olympic games.

Wow, glad they're spending all the time and effort on this transphobic garbage. Not a waste of time at all.
Women having their own places free from men is a waste of time? It takes too much time and effort to tell men "this is for women" so we should just drop it? Interesting perspective, go on. Society 

(11-10-2025, 09:38 PM)Boredfrom wrote:
(11-10-2025, 08:34 PM)Taco Bell Tower wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/tucker-carlson-and-nick-fuentes-declare-civil-war-on-the-gop-ben-shapiro-in-shambles.1348315/

BWoog wrote:Bonus video of the GOP's number one Zionist losing his mind about Tucker, realizing that the hate beast he helped create is beginning to lick its lips while staring at Shapiro:
Ben Shapiro helped create a man who hosted multiple cable news television programs and wrote for countless media publications before Shapiro was even out of college?

Also, there's no way he's the "number one Zionist" in the GOP especially since he holds no position in the party, but he is Jewish. So that's fun.
Reply

[Image: image.png]

Spoiler:  (click to show)

Does he think that's a literal quote? lol 

[Image: image.png]
Wut He doesn't even do every episode? And never made a video about the movie itself?
Reply
With all the Ree hatred of AI, there's never been a thread that I've seen (tbf i dont search very hard) that criticizes Audible which uses lame AI to voice many an author (artist)'s books, proving that Ree doesnt read. 

Or it proves that books are part of a capitalist structure to keep brown, black, and white trans folkx down.

Edit- Sweeney is that chick with the tits. In a year, there will be a new girl that's known for her tits. Ree is a lamer version of the old Perez Hilton website.
Reply
I can't believe box office draw Sydney Sweeney was in a movie that bombed
Reply
(11-11-2025, 02:25 AM)Jansen wrote: I can't believe box office draw Sydney Sweeney was in a movie that bombed
Next you'll tell me you don't expect the first release of an indie studio that's also an obscure biopic to make MCU money.
Reply
Mutual Aid Alert:
Reply
(11-11-2025, 12:59 AM)Propagandhim wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/eurogamer-gives-arc-raiders-2-5-dinged-for-use-of-ai-generated-voices.1349200/page-10

[Image: image.png]


They are distinctly NOT like this  lol

for whatever reason my mind went immediately to Metroid Prime 2 which had a weird multiplayer mode that literally no one ever played and didn't necessarily make the game any worse for its existence

"it's a masterpiece of a game, but because they jumped on the worrying trend of adding shitty tacked on multiplayer, we must with heavy hearts dock its score in protest to 2 out of 5" Hmph
Reply
(11-11-2025, 02:15 AM)books wrote: With all the Ree hatred of AI, there's never been a thread that I've seen (tbf i dont search very hard) that criticizes Audible which uses lame AI to voice many an author (artist)'s books, proving that Ree doesnt read. 

don't you mean it proves that if they experience literature at all, they must be reading it themselves, and what they don't do is LISTEN

 ufup
Reply
(11-11-2025, 12:28 AM)Hap Shaughnessy wrote:
(10-26-2025, 11:50 PM)Taco Bell Tower wrote:
(10-26-2025, 11:08 PM)Hap Shaughnessy wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/bernie-sanders-defends-graham-platner-calls-him-an-%E2%80%9Cexcellent-candidate-and-the-next-senator-of-maine%E2%80%9D.1330780/page-20#post-146886832

Sickos

NepNep
Quote:I have found and worked with plenty of people who understand the fundamental problems of exploitation, oppression, and environmental destruction inherent to capitalism and want to work together to get rid of it. We may have different ideas on how to get there at which point we can have adult discussions over those ideas, the opposite of the bad faith drivel you wrote in this post, but we at least see it as a goal to mutually work towards.

You still see capitalism as something that's salvageable. If what you say is true and 99% of people agree with you on that front, stop bitching about the 1% of people who disagree with you and go work with the 99% to pretty please beg the billionaires capitalists to give you a $17 minimum wage or whatever it is you want.
Lynnetto
Quote:I'm not bitching about anything, I asked you about your approach in good faith and you attacked me. I apologize if it makes you uncomfortable to question your extremely militant and exclusionary stance.
NepNep
Quote:No you didn't.
Lynnetto
Quote:I understand why you would want to frame any kind of questioning of your ideology as bad faith since it's difficult to internalize and reflect on criticism, but it wasn't. I am genuinely curious what you think you can accomplish when you intentionally reject such an extremely broad scope of allies.
NepNep
Quote:You can continue acting like this-

- is good faith, and I can simply be specific and direct and call you an asshole.

Do you want to apologize for being bad faith and actually have an adult discussion, or continue wasting my time? Makes me no difference.

Benny W is kissing NepNep's ass
Quote:I didn't read Nepenthe's comment as militant (please be careful) or exclusionary. It's direct speak. "Real talk". Straight to the point.

I believe they're saying don't waste their time by pretending you're in alignment when you're just going to pull back later on down the line. It's an absolutely frustrating process to go through.

Also they said collaborators may have "different ideas on how to get there." That's open, inclusive, and not militant.
Sickos (furry edition)

https://www.resetera.com/threads/target-employees-will-now-be-required-to-smile-and-look-customers-in-the-eye-if-they-are-within-10-feet-of-them.1347817/page-8#post-147481330
Quote: Cop User Banned (Permanent): Troll Account
Lynnetto wrote:
pioneer wrote:Most people won't just blindly follow whatever their boss asks them to do regardless of anything else. It's perfectly normal and acceptable for employees who aren't being paid a living wage to skirt some of their responsibilities. In this specific example, putting on a friendly face to those who are often openly hostile towards you when you're working full time but still living paycheck to paycheck is not a reasonable expectation for everyone
That is most certainly any workers prerogative, to determine what they are comfortable with, but if the basic premise of the job is "be friendly and helpful to customers" I don't really know what wiggle room is expected in skirting those responsibilities.
Shocked Pikachu

Spoiler:  (click to show)
A lot of people are saying...

The fact that retards like bchuds and Hecht see this shit and don't think there's anything wrong with it speaks volumes about how fucking stupid they are. Cunts like Blueballs just fellating them constantly makes matters worse. What a fucking joke of a website. Anyone still active on that site is a complete retard.
Reply
Finally, Propagandhim is being held accountable:
Reply
(11-11-2025, 12:47 AM)HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth wrote:
(11-10-2025, 10:30 PM)Uncle wrote: men are even better at being women than women

Whoa, Uncle coming out as a trans activist.  

Or should I say... Aunt?

Did you mean cunt? I'm confused.
Reply
(11-11-2025, 02:55 AM)benji wrote: Finally, Propagandhim is being held accountable:

[Image: R81FSua.png]
Reply
(11-11-2025, 02:46 AM)Uncle wrote:
(11-11-2025, 12:59 AM)Propagandhim wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/eurogamer-gives-arc-raiders-2-5-dinged-for-use-of-ai-generated-voices.1349200/page-10

[Image: image.png]


They are distinctly NOT like this  lol

for whatever reason my mind went immediately to Metroid Prime 2 which had a weird multiplayer mode that literally no one ever played and didn't necessarily make the game any worse for its existence

"it's a masterpiece of a game, but because they jumped on the worrying trend of adding shitty tacked on multiplayer, we must with heavy hearts dock its score in protest to 2 out of 5" Hmph
Super Mario Bros. 2 might be the greatest game of all time but it doesn't have camera controls: 1/5.
Reply
From reading that thread I get the impression that we should also dock games if they:
1. Use voice actors that aren't SAG-AFTRA.
2. Don't use voice acting at all to avoid paying for it.
3. Use repeating gibberish noises like Banjo-Kazooie or whatever unless voiced by SAG-AFTRA members.

Spoiler:  (click to show)
Miyamoto
Reply
"As you can see here we used tessellation to increase the detail of all our rocks and dirt in the game."

Oh, rather than hire an artist to draw that detail at the moment the player comes to it? Fuck off. ERAsure of the marginalized!

"Also, we're using DLSS to generate fr-"

Oh, rather than hire an artist to draw the entire frame? FUUUCCKKK OOOOFFFFOOOFFFF ERAsure of the marginalized!
Reply
https://www.reddit.com/r/LivestreamFail/comments/1otyr2i/chinese_security_police_harassed_hasan_piker/
Can someone check up on Jeff Marvel?
Reply
https://www.resetera.com/threads/can-anything-good-come-from-the-united-states-at-this-point.1349473/
Reply
(11-11-2025, 05:09 AM)BIONIC wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/can-anything-good-come-from-the-united-states-at-this-point.1349473/

[Image: bIy7irY.png]

Insane
Reply
Spoiler:  (click to show)
The fact that you don't need a loicense for having an opinion...means America>everywhere else...checkmate fedora atheists Smug
2 users liked this post: Gamegirl Nostalgia, Taco Bell Tower
Reply
(11-11-2025, 02:55 AM)benji wrote: Finally, Propagandhim is being held accountable:

[Image: OUHeY3z.png]

Feels bad, man
Reply
(11-10-2025, 05:28 PM)kaleidoscopium wrote:
TheEchosOfTheCyborg wrote:Something about the no trans women have won a medal bothers me because even if we did, that still shouldn't be an issue but it 100% would be turned into one and used as proof we shouldn't be allowed to participate.

It's frustrating because us just participating is an issue but even if we're allowed to, we're never allowed to exceed because that's also an issue. Anything we do including just existing is an issue :(

https://www.resetera.com/threads/ioc-set-to-ban-trans-women-athletes-from-the-olympics.1348621/page-2#post-147482893

hmm

Kiyamet wrote:ngl I thought this was about Israel Occupying force

but yeah fuck this trash ass tradition burn it down

"Death to the Jews! And...oh yeah down with sports too I guess,  I'm not entirely sure what is being discussed."
Reply
(11-11-2025, 05:28 AM)Uncle wrote:
(11-11-2025, 05:09 AM)BIONIC wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/can-anything-good-come-from-the-united-states-at-this-point.1349473/

[Image: bIy7irY.png]

Insane

BRING ON THE THUNDERDOME

[Image: Review_365_Photo_3_-_Mad_Max_Beyond_Thun...985%29.jpg]
3 users liked this post: Gamegirl Nostalgia, Taco Bell Tower, Propagandhim
Reply
(11-11-2025, 05:53 AM)Jansen wrote:
(11-11-2025, 02:55 AM)benji wrote: Finally, Propagandhim is being held accountable:

[Image: OUHeY3z.png]

Feels bad, man

Eat a box of dicks.

ufup
4 users liked this post: Gamegirl Nostalgia, Taco Bell Tower, nachobro, Jansen
Reply
(11-11-2025, 05:09 AM)BIONIC wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/can-anything-good-come-from-the-united-states-at-this-point.1349473/
(11-11-2025, 05:28 AM)Uncle wrote: [Image: bIy7irY.png]
Reply
(11-10-2025, 04:21 PM)JoeBoy101 wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/supreme-court-denies-request-to-revisit-same-sex-marriage-decision.1348735/

So obviously, the ERA response will be “at least they can do something right for once”?
Let's check back:
(08-12-2025, 12:46 AM)benji wrote: Seeing the Caraballo tweet got me to look for the thread, unfortunately too many people bothered to find out if it was likely true before posting, thankfully not everyone did:
https://www.resetera.com/threads/supreme-court-formally-asked-to-overturn-landmark-same-sex-marriage-ruling.1267365/#post-143766849
Quote:Where are all the dumb fucks that said they wouldn't do this after they said they wouldn't over turn roe v wade?
AniHawk wrote:yyyyyyyyep. after so many people were so damn sure that the supreme court wouldn't do the 'an official presidential act can't be illegal, actually', or overturn roe v wade, there's nothing these craven fucks won't do.
Quote:What I find myself speculating on is when and how they'll move on interracial marriage.
AniHawk wrote:someone will bring up states rights or something and it'll be 6-3 based on not even the flimsiest excuse.
Quote:Soon after guessing this will be the next subset of the population that will start to be "disappeared" off the streets.
Quote:here we go!

[statement that would get me banned]
Sign My Guestbook! wrote:They will take it up.
They will overturn.
Maybe not today but it's coming.
Quote:Once the road to fascism starts, it picks up speed as more and more institutions and guardrails are dismantled, and norms are shifted.
Quote:Next interracial marriage
Quote:Why do people keep saying this? The Roberts court has shown time and time again that nothing is off the table.
plagiarize, Moderator wrote:
Quote:After Roe being overturned I can't trust this supreme court.
No one should. Not every attempt to enshrine Protestant beliefs into law is going to succeed, but many will. Until we're dealing with a different court, it's going to progress in one direction.
Quote:After this, Interracial marriage is next.
DrForester wrote:I mean, the question isn't if they're going to overturn it, it's gone.

The question is the can of worms they might open for already existing marriages. Do they nullify all of them, or just stop any new ones.
Quote:After the immunity ruling and Roe, people really are saying No way THIS will happen !

Come back in a few years and see.
Quote:Next Up: Loving v Virginia
Quote:How many times have I heard this in the past 10 years

They are going to take up the case. Try not to be surprised. And I suspect that they will overturn Obergefell on the same grounds as Roe, like they've been saying they would do since Roe was overturned.

Literally, this is exactly why I left Texas, because I refuse to live in a state where I will wake up one day to the news that gay marriage is once again illegal in my state. I think it has a greater than 50% chance of being overturned
Quote:Don't people underestimate this. This is exactly how the right eventually got Roe v Wade overturned. Just continually hitting the courts with cases designed to get Roe v Wade challenged until eventually they struck. This is the same tactic they will do with same sex marriage. Just continually pepper the courts for years, decades with cases designed to get Obergefell v Hodges overturned.
Quote:Wait, we are talking about the same Supreme Court that bends over backwards to give Trump what he wants? That Supreme Court? ???

They always find a way. States rights will happen at minimum. 6:3 They are a kangaroo ct.
Quote:But seriously, this shit is coming. The religious crazy folks have full control, and they will destroy everything they hate. Their "God loves everyone" shit is pure theatrics to appease the masses and conceal the daggers in the shadows. They don't care and will never care for anyone.
Soliloquy of a Dogge wrote:But yeah, it was inevitable. They won't stop until they've rolled back every measure of progress. Loving v. Virginia and Brown v. Board are next.
Reply
(11-10-2025, 02:54 PM)killamajig wrote:
Groomerize wrote:Yep. Even the ones like archery where there is no evident difference in ability between men and women.

So there is evidence in other sports? lol Groomer and company need to get on the same page if want people to buy their bullshit lies.

Reee "Men can't beat up women now!'  Cry

me
[Image: dnfozw3.gif]

I get the arguments for integrating, say, firearms shooting sports, but archery? No upper body strength involved there.
Reply
(11-11-2025, 12:28 AM)Hap Shaughnessy wrote:
(10-26-2025, 11:50 PM)Taco Bell Tower wrote:
(10-26-2025, 11:08 PM)Hap Shaughnessy wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/bernie-sanders-defends-graham-platner-calls-him-an-%E2%80%9Cexcellent-candidate-and-the-next-senator-of-maine%E2%80%9D.1330780/page-20#post-146886832

Sickos

NepNep
Quote:I have found and worked with plenty of people who understand the fundamental problems of exploitation, oppression, and environmental destruction inherent to capitalism and want to work together to get rid of it. We may have different ideas on how to get there at which point we can have adult discussions over those ideas, the opposite of the bad faith drivel you wrote in this post, but we at least see it as a goal to mutually work towards.

You still see capitalism as something that's salvageable. If what you say is true and 99% of people agree with you on that front, stop bitching about the 1% of people who disagree with you and go work with the 99% to pretty please beg the billionaires capitalists to give you a $17 minimum wage or whatever it is you want.
Lynnetto
Quote:I'm not bitching about anything, I asked you about your approach in good faith and you attacked me. I apologize if it makes you uncomfortable to question your extremely militant and exclusionary stance.
NepNep
Quote:No you didn't.
Lynnetto
Quote:I understand why you would want to frame any kind of questioning of your ideology as bad faith since it's difficult to internalize and reflect on criticism, but it wasn't. I am genuinely curious what you think you can accomplish when you intentionally reject such an extremely broad scope of allies.
NepNep
Quote:You can continue acting like this-

- is good faith, and I can simply be specific and direct and call you an asshole.

Do you want to apologize for being bad faith and actually have an adult discussion, or continue wasting my time? Makes me no difference.

Benny W is kissing NepNep's ass
Quote:I didn't read Nepenthe's comment as militant (please be careful) or exclusionary. It's direct speak. "Real talk". Straight to the point.

I believe they're saying don't waste their time by pretending you're in alignment when you're just going to pull back later on down the line. It's an absolutely frustrating process to go through.

Also they said collaborators may have "different ideas on how to get there." That's open, inclusive, and not militant.
Sickos (furry edition)

https://www.resetera.com/threads/target-employees-will-now-be-required-to-smile-and-look-customers-in-the-eye-if-they-are-within-10-feet-of-them.1347817/page-8#post-147481330
Quote: Cop User Banned (Permanent): Troll Account
Lynnetto wrote:
pioneer wrote:Most people won't just blindly follow whatever their boss asks them to do regardless of anything else. It's perfectly normal and acceptable for employees who aren't being paid a living wage to skirt some of their responsibilities. In this specific example, putting on a friendly face to those who are often openly hostile towards you when you're working full time but still living paycheck to paycheck is not a reasonable expectation for everyone
That is most certainly any workers prerogative, to determine what they are comfortable with, but if the basic premise of the job is "be friendly and helpful to customers" I don't really know what wiggle room is expected in skirting those responsibilities.
Shocked Pikachu

Spoiler:  (click to show)
A lot of people are saying...
Saw that ban in the Target thread and thought it was absolutely bizarre, but it makes so much sense now. How does Nep keep getting away with this? lol

EDIT: they're discussing it in the Community thread now https://www.resetera.com/threads/constructive-community-discussion-2025.1193208/page-59#post-147499882

Quote:This is the weirdest discussion on Era ever: https://www.resetera.com/threads/ta...e-if-they-are-within-10-feet-of-them.1347817/

Show this to 99.99% of the people outside this forum and they think you're on a weird place.

But it's fine to have strange takes, what I do find bizarre is that Lynnetto has been perma banned. She didn't wrote anything strange. Wasn't hostile and basically wrote what most people will think. Maybe I'm missing some posts but I can't see a reason for a warning. Let alone a perm ban

I think it's unfair if moderators become part of a discussion and when you don't share their views you end up being banned. There was one moderator part of this discussion who was unnecessarily hostile.
Reply
Because she's a cop.
Reply
nepnep the loser being thin skinned again 🤣🤣🤣
She is such a loser pretending to be the big revolutionary on a forum full of losers.
Reply
That arc raiders review thread is just a who’s who of Era cunts with their hate boner for anything AI
Reply


Forum Jump: