The thread where everyone in it hates streamers sponsored by DavidCroquet

arf please don't shock me..!
3 users liked this post: benji, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, HaughtyFrank
Reply
ZioJesse already got to the joke I was going to make:
4 users liked this post: BIONIC, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, killamajig, HaughtyFrank
Reply
Not even exaggeration lmao

5 users liked this post: BIONIC, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Alpacx, benji, DavidCroquet
Reply


Also learning this:
1 user liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth
Reply

Hesright Only Isreal would ever want to ship anything through the Strait of Gibraltar and the current situation is that it's closed by two Spanish enclaves, one of which is 200+ miles from the Strait.
2 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, HaughtyFrank
Reply
I originally read that as a zionist named Jew E Cellar.
2 users liked this post: benji, BIONIC
Reply
3 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, HaughtyFrank, benji
Reply
"Democrats failed you so hard you started voting Republican, but we'll make it so Republicans can never be elected ever again!" strikes me as a strange rallying cry.

edit: I suppose "We'll make Michigan and Wisconsin a single party state like California or New York!" wouldn't be quite as inspiring to them.
2 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Alpacx
Reply
4 users liked this post: Boredfrom, benji, Alpacx, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth
Reply

arf please don't shock me..!
4 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, benji, BIONIC, HaughtyFrank
Reply
Part 2

1 user liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth
Reply
Quote:@aced6990
3 hours ago
And there's a reason FOX news and the republican party is publicly smearing Hasan, it's not because they suddenly care to help the Democratic party. You should think about that, if your opinion about someone aligns with FOX news...you're probably doing more harm to the democratic party than good.
Quote:@bdeakes
1 hour ago
As the Democratic party has slid further to the right, to where it is literally adjacent to Fascism now, you want to criticize one of the people who is calling it out. Says a lot.
Quote:@Kieran-ALT24
2 hours ago
Ew, what tf was this centrist ass crap? I’m not a fan of Hasan even slightly but jfc man, pick a side, all I heard was faux outrage and grandstanding with zero coherent arguments made.
Quote:@Turboville100
1 hour ago
Damn bro you are obsessed
Quote:@Le_mane
1 hour ago
Nah, you are another non-melinated person who forces an opinion. I am not a fan of him, but you have a clear and weak agender here. Sorry this channel is no longer for me. Shame. I was hoping for something more substantial, and it just seems like bandwagoning, and I say reluctantly a strange form of jealousy. The infighting of the left is its biggest enemy. The comment section is also full of foul and bad-faith political miscreants.
Quote:@aced6990
3 hours ago
It's funny watching Libs choose now to try and make a platform by attacking the DSA, Hasan and its affiliates by arguing that those people should have supported Kamala more.
A lot of these people did in fact vote for Kamala, but they understood at the end of the say she was still a moderate who do nothing for the people and just let the republican majority inch our government towards facism.
And shes an Israel supporter and that is still the biggest dividing line in our voters today. So she would have been bad, but she's no Trump I'll give her that.

So back to how  the libs are upset about Hasan and others not pushing Kamala enough, interesting because its always been vote blue no matter who but now that real leftists and progressives are winning...all of a sudden you libs don't want to support those Dems.
It's almost like you pretend to be leftists when convenient.

Thne there's the fact that Hasan is at his most politically relevant TODAY. Not during Kamalas Campaign. And even today at his most relevant he just barely helped Abdul make the general for a state senate position...GENERAL, STATE, BARELY
HASAN CANNOT CHOOSE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.
He voted, he did not love her as a candidate but he voted for her. Unlike you fake leftists that dont like Hasans support in politics but instead of "Blue no matter who" we have dems ready to switch parties. Just hypocrites.

What more did you want a streamer to do for Kamala? Kamala who lost because she had half a campaign. Why not go show that support yourself, why not chellenge other streamers to back your candidates as hard as Hasan backs his.
I know, its because you guys don't do anything, you criticize other platforms effort while having no commitments yourself. Neither do your favorite streamers, they are here for the drama of hating Hasan, not to actually have a political movement.
Is Hasan perfect? Hell no, hes an ass to hit chat, he has bad quoutes though the worst ones are out of context. But at the end of the day his priority is the politics.
Hesright
2 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Alpacx
Reply
(08-07-2026, 09:58 PM)benji wrote:
Quote:@Le_mane
1 hour ago
Nah, you are another non-melinated person who forces an opinion. I am not a fan of him, but you have a clear and weak agender here. Sorry this channel is no longer for me. Shame. I was hoping for something more substantial, and it just seems like bandwagoning, and I say reluctantly a strange form of jealousy. The infighting of the left is its biggest enemy. The comment section is also full of foul and bad-faith political miscreants.

Lot of weak agender's in that comment section
1 user liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth
Reply
He has now accepted that he's Charlie Kirk

4 users liked this post: Besticus Maximus, benji, Alpacx, Boredfrom
Reply
Imagine thinking Charlie Kirk was an extremist like you...
1 user liked this post: D3RANG3D
Reply
The funny part is that while they maybe haven't done it for Charlie Kirk, this has been a regular part of their content for years. Not Fox obviously, but the other two have always tried to show the most extreme supporters of Republicans and bring them up. 

I can so easily think of an example because it was used against Republican candidates since the 1980s:
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/11/04/kkk-2016-election-donald-trump-david-duke-griffin-dnt-ac360.cnn

Just search for this one example and you'll see endless mainstream media stories about Duke endorsing Trump, Trump waffling on the endorsement, then Trump trying to reject it while keeping his supporters, etc. You can go all the way back to George H.W. Bush condemning David Duke but the media asking him about him over and over again.

Hasan probably thinks he's special rather than this being the norm when you say extreme things:
https://abcnews.com/Blotter/DemocraticDebate/story?id=4443788&page=1' wrote:The Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama's pastor for the last 20 years at the Trinity United Church of Christ on Chicago's south side, has a long history of what even Obama's campaign aides concede is "inflammatory rhetoric," including the assertion that the United States brought on the 9/11 attacks with its own "terrorism."

In a campaign appearance earlier this month, Sen. Obama said, "I don't think my church is actually particularly controversial." He said Rev. Wright "is like an old uncle who says things I don't always agree with," telling a Jewish group that everyone has someone like that in their family.
1 user liked this post: HaughtyFrank
Reply
Actually, Duke is a pretty good comparison for Hasan as they have a very similar grifter career of a guy with no accomplishments advocating an extreme position in hopes of power based purely around their personal advocacy of that. Duke even settled into the earlier version of political streamer: talk radio host.

Duke's probably smarter though, he did merchandising and publishing! Also he regularly got himself on mainstream television as a guest.
2 users liked this post: killamajig, Polident
Reply
Hasan wishes he was Charlie Kirk with a left-wing equivalent of Turning Points but he's too lazy and too extreme for that.

Duke's a good shout, so is Fuentes (if Fuentes had the backing of Establishment GOP-leaning media like Hasan does with the Dems)
Reply
New Hasan puff piece just dropped:
3 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, benji, HaughtyFrank
Reply
It's wild how these puff pieces keep getting made. Like isn't it so obvious how much he tones down the rhetoric for reporters?

"I'm just a little guy who wants people to listen and medicare for all" and then the he goes on stream spouting stuff like this



3 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, benji, Boredfrom
Reply
The Soviet's model was more direct intervention. That was more of a fall back when they couldn't invade themselves to impose a regime. It didn't really work anywhere. The US's batting average is so much higher because we preferred to back people who could win, so almost always the military rather than "groups", over only people who would be perfect submissives. Hence, the need for crushing the Czechs and Hungary. The Soviets became far less effective after Mao bucked them and their economy ceased to exist, culminating in Afghanistan where they invaded yet again to overthrow a communist.

This is a really nice clip for those who claim Hasan's overriding ideology, and thus benefit, is anti-imperialism. Which must mean it's out of context even though it's the same as everything he says.

Spoiler:  (click to show)
Uh, it's not imperialism when you're liberating people from capitalism. Social Justice Warrior 2 
2 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, HaughtyFrank
Reply
The soviets somehow managed to overthrow fewer neo-liberal foreign adversarial governments than Nepenthe has owned pitbulls
3 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, HaughtyFrank, benji
Reply
The US alienated everyone in the Americas and the Soviets still couldn't succeed in any of them. They hadn't backed Castro until after he came to power. And the "socialist" leaders had more success winning an election and simply making the rest fraudulent. Compare Ortega's success during and after the Soviets, for example. lol
2 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Alpacx
Reply
I can easily imagine a good version of the Hasan act where you make stubborn old fashioned lefty points from a defensible if sometimes tenuous position but he doesn't do any of that its just edgy 4chan gamer shit including the antisemitisms
4 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, HaughtyFrank, Alpacx, benji
Reply
I like the part where the fawning neoliberal Zionist media, and so his fans, typically used to fretting about unapproved money in politics ignores that the material value of Hasan's support is in his supporters providing millions of dollars in donations to candidates in other states who otherwise would have no base for fundraising. But that's none of my business...
2 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Besticus Maximus
Reply
2 users liked this post: BIONIC, HaughtyFrank
Reply


I know the typical response is "Oh so you have to be poor to be a socialist???" but there is a legitimate question to why he is focused on a high class life style. Like if the policies he advocates for actually happened he'd be taxed to shit for being a millionaire, it's very likely he wouldn't be able to afford the same quality of life so is the message just that he's living it up until the revolution?
3 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, benji, Alpacx
Reply
(08-13-2025, 03:58 PM)Ethan wrote: [Image: FINAL_HasanPiker__058_copy_2.jpg]

Quote:As Piker burns through his 70-minute workout, exhausting himself in the process, he strips his shirt off. An army of girls and gays—not to mention admiring looksmaxxers—would kill to be where I am now, next to Piker, as he pants in a pair of neon shorts with black Calvin Klein boxers poking out and sunlight glinting off the sweat beaded on his chest hairs.

https://www.gq.com/story/hasan-piker-thinks-america-might-be-cooked

omfg

(08-09-2026, 05:03 PM)Alpacx wrote: New Hasan puff piece just dropped:

The evolution over the last 12 months lol 
The PR team that told him to transition from himbo to depressed salary man really earned those big bucks.
5 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, benji, BIONIC, HaughtyFrank, Alpacx
Reply
(08-10-2026, 01:29 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote: I know the typical response is "Oh so you have to be poor to be a socialist???" but there is a legitimate question to why he is focused on a high class life style. Like if the policies he advocates for actually happened he'd be taxed to shit for being a millionaire, it's very likely he wouldn't be able to afford the same quality of life so is the message just that he's living it up until the revolution?

Right. It's not like he has to go to the extremes of Charles Feeney.
Quote:Mr. Feeney reversed his extravagant lifestyle, quitting wealthy social groups, flying economy class, buying his clothing off the rack and giving up fancy restaurants. He sold his limousines and took subways or cabs. He also resolved to give his money away anonymously, a course followed by only 1 percent of American givers, experts say.
Quote:In his last decades Mr. Feeney did not own a home or a car, wore a $10 wristwatch, preferred buses to taxis and, until he was 75, flew coach. He and his second wife lived in a two-bedroom rented apartment in San Francisco.

Hasan could rent a really nice apartment, own a nice Toyota, store brand clothes instead of his designer shit and lay off the Cartier and have a really comfortable life.
4 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, benji, killamajig, HaughtyFrank
Reply
They can't because they're obsessed with status. This is why they come up with excuses like "I have to live/dress like this so people will take me seriously."

They want the state to do it because then it will happen to others too. And they assume they'll rise to the top anyway.

What you're asking is that they voluntarily lower their status for no gain to themselves.
3 users liked this post: killamajig, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Alpacx
Reply


Forum Jump: