Kulturkampf
If she wants to show us how much of a man she is, she should show us the package.
Reply
(09-29-2026, 03:33 AM)Potato wrote: If she wants to show us how much of a man she is, she should show us the package.
He's not a toxic masculinity gross man like you chuds, he's one of the brave and stunning good ones. Social Justice Warrior 2
3 users liked this post: HaughtyFrank, killamajig, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth
Reply
The Cornell rape thing feels like  the Duke Lacrosse or Canada Hockey
1 user liked this post: HaughtyFrank
Reply
(09-28-2026, 07:59 PM)Alpacx wrote:

post hog
Reply
(09-29-2026, 07:37 PM)nachobro wrote:
(09-28-2026, 07:59 PM)Alpacx wrote:

post hog

pre hog

Ellen
6 users liked this post: BIONIC, filler, benji, who is ted danson?, nachobro, killamajig
Reply
Reply
"Looking for a man to lead..."

99.99999999999% of females of all species
Reply

Spoiler:  (click to show)
[Image: HTbQz3CW4AIL3Eh?format=png&name=small][Image: HTbQ6ZPWkAAJ3Nu?format=png&name=small][Image: HTbQ_gRXMAAbWe8?format=png&name=small][Image: HTbRD3xWQAAUoiW?format=png&name=small]
Reply

lmao
Reply


"Please accept my plan to crash a passenger plane as thoughtful protest"


5 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Alpacx, Polident, benji, killamajig
Reply
I'm afraid babyloon bee made another good joke

4 users liked this post: BIONIC, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Alpacx, benji
Reply
(09-30-2026, 08:24 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote: [Image: HTe72cAWIAAFk5W?format=jpg&name=small]
"When your police and immigration officials are trying to kill you, maybe you need to wake up to how the world sees the crimes facilitated by your society? And actually ... do something?"
Reply
(09-30-2026, 10:04 PM)benji wrote:
(09-30-2026, 08:24 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote: [Image: HTe72cAWIAAFk5W?format=jpg&name=small]
"When your police and immigration officials are trying to kill you, maybe you need to wake up to how the world sees the crimes facilitated by your society? And actually ... do something?"

you mean like protest, benji  ???
1 user liked this post: D3RANG3D
Reply
3 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, killamajig, HaughtyFrank
Reply
What were the consequences for men before?

Confused
4 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, simiansmarts, killamajig, benji
Reply
3 users liked this post: BIONIC, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, HaughtyFrank
Reply
What has happened to society that Todd Rundgren is allowed to say whatever he wants about whoever he wants!?!

...who's Todd Rundgren again?

Spoiler:  (click to show)
jk of course I know who Todd Rundgren is.


2 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, benji
Reply
1 user liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth
Reply
(09-30-2026, 12:36 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote:
Spoiler:  (click to show)
[Image: HTbQz3CW4AIL3Eh?format=png&name=small][Image: HTbQ6ZPWkAAJ3Nu?format=png&name=small][Image: HTbQ_gRXMAAbWe8?format=png&name=small][Image: HTbRD3xWQAAUoiW?format=png&name=small]

In a world where you can just declare yourself a woman and you are one, what's stopping the planetsmashers of this world from declaring themselves composers, designers, artists, programmers and anything else they fancy?
3 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, killamajig, simiansmarts
Reply
(10-01-2026, 12:37 AM)benji wrote:

Jennie Carragher is a cunt. Nothing he says should be taken seriously. That's all.
Reply
(10-01-2026, 12:37 AM)benji wrote:

This is actually true. City have definitely cheated but only on the basis of the rules that were deliberately created by the red clubs to stop them. The same clubs colluded to try and stop newcastle getting bought and when they did, they introduced brand new bullshit that meant that they can spend money and no one else can. Nobody can actually sit and explain to you why Chelsea are allowed to spend whatever they want whenever they want but City now must be deleted from football other than one ownership group has control over all the important clubs. The americans have arsenal, man united, liverpool and chelsea among others which is mental when you list it.

As for Carragher, he's a rat and was shite.
1 user liked this post: Potato
Reply
Nail update

5 users liked this post: benji, Alpacx, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, D3RANG3D, killamajig
Reply
https://theconversation.com/wolves-did-not-save-yellowstone-why-were-we-so-desperate-to-believe-they-did-292069

Quote:Wolves did not save Yellowstone – why were we so desperate to believe they did?

You might be among the 46 million people who’ve seen a video showing how wolves changed Yellowstone, or you may have heard some other version of this story. Yellowstone, which covers nearly 3,500 square miles of the western United States, was the world’s first national park. Its pioneering reintroduction of wolves, which began in 1995, set a worldwide precedent for conservation.

The first half of the story is well established. Wolves were eradicated from Yellowstone in the 1920s. With the wolves gone, populations of elk (a large species of deer) overgrew. Elk overgrazed the park’s riverbanks, turning groves of willow and aspen and beaver ponds into bare grasslands.

This process was swiftly reversed, or so the story goes, when wolves were reintroduced. Not only did wolves kill elk, keeping their numbers in check, but they also scared them away from the valleys, giving trees a chance to regrow.

A range of beneficial effects followed: beavers moved back and rebuilt their dams, and the regrown shrubs attracted more bears, who further helped keep elk in check.

It’s a neat and captivating story, widely cited as evidence that wolves can restore ecosystems and reforest the land. Unfortunately, reality is much more complicated.

SCIENCE!
3 users liked this post: benji, HaughtyFrank, D3RANG3D
Reply

Spoiler:  (click to show)
[Image: HTk73SbWgAEhwu3?format=jpg&name=900x900]
[Image: HTk74EVWUAAapmS?format=jpg&name=900x900]
[Image: HTk74tlWcAANua9?format=jpg&name=900x900][Image: HTk75C5XsAAMZtu?format=jpg&name=900x900]

2 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, benji
Reply
5 users liked this post: Uncle, Potato, Alpacx, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, benji
Reply
(10-02-2026, 12:16 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote: [Image: HTk74EVWUAAapmS?format=jpg&name=900x900]
Feel like I could easily come up with many exceptions. Just using famous people.

Especially if I looked up instances of gang-rap, like WuTang is a Zionist project?
3 users liked this post: Potato, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, HaughtyFrank
Reply
The replies on that tweet are saying the first guy pictured, Shaiel Ben-Ephraim, used to be a huge pro-Israel guy who has switched sides in recent years including calling October 7th a false flag.

I just searched for him to see if I could find anything to confirm that and found better from the top result:
https://dailybruin.com/2020/08/03/postdoctoral-fellow-left-ucla-following-tweeted-allegations-of-sexual-harassment wrote:A postdoctoral fellow left UCLA following multiple accusations of sexual harassment on Twitter.

Starting in early June, several Twitter users accused Shaiel Ben-Ephraim, a postdoctoral fellow at the UCLA Younes and Soraya Nazarian Center for Israel Studies, of sexual harassment, stating that he sent private messages harassing them, invited underage people for drinks and sent minors unsolicited inappropriate photos.

...

“I have recently engaged in several instances of inappropriate communications with individuals,” Ben-Ephraim said in an emailed statement to The Bruin.

Zaugg said in an interview with The Bruin that she and Ben-Ephraim met through Twitter and exchanged messages because they were both involved in the Jewish community on Twitter.

However, in May, Ben-Ephraim began to criticize her on Twitter and through email, Zaugg said. Ben-Ephraim threatened to hurt himself, criticized her political opinions and threatened to destroy her life, she added.

In an email obtained by The Bruin, Ben-Ephraim told Zaugg that “when you least expect it, you will get the payback you deserve.”

Once, when Zaugg tweeted about her friend being “her queen”, Ben-Ephraim criticized Zaugg over text message for being affiliated with anti-Zionists because of her friend’s rhetoric online, Zaugg said.
Quote:Khelgati first met Ben-Ephraim after she attended his lecture on Israeli settlement in the fall because she was interested in the topic, she said in an interview with The Bruin. Khelghati is an active member of J Street U at UCLA, a club dedicated to fostering discourse about the Israel-Palestine conflict.

After she attended his lecture, she became more interested in his work and invited him to speak about a similar topic to her club last December.

In February, Khelghati said Ben-Ephraim asked her through Twitter direct message if she would like to get a drink. Khelghati declined and told Ben-Ephraim that she was 20, but Ben-Ephraim asked her for dinner. Khelghati then told him she was uncomfortable.

Ben-Ephraim then told Khelghati he didn’t want to make her uncomfortable, but added he wished she was older.
Quote:Minor A, whose name has been redacted for confidentiality purposes, a 17-year-old girl, said Ben-Ephraim sent her flirtatious messages and photographs of himself on Twitter and Snapchat, even though he knew she was a minor. Minor A told Ben-Ephraim her age in their Twitter exchanges, according to screenshots she posted on Twitter of these exchanges. She also listed her age on her Twitter page.

“Once I had posted something about liking tattoos on white guys and he’d messaged me saying, ‘I’m white but I don’t have tattoos,’ which I found weird,” Minor A said in an interview with The Bruin.

edit:
2 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, HaughtyFrank
Reply
3 users liked this post: Nintex, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, benji
Reply
They're right, he hasn't annexed Gaza, hasn't even bothered bombing half of Palestine. Like this is the Zio imperialist you're going to stan. Girlslaff

edit: It's these guys: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yisrael_Beiteinu

Quote:Netanyahu has again agreed to the establishment of a Palestinian state. We must not let this happen.
3 users liked this post: Nintex, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, HaughtyFrank
Reply
(10-01-2026, 07:22 AM)Besticus Maximus wrote: This is actually true. City have definitely cheated but only on the basis of the rules that were deliberately created by the red clubs to stop them. The same clubs colluded to try and stop newcastle getting bought and when they did, they introduced brand new bullshit that meant that they can spend money and no one else can. Nobody can actually sit and explain to you why Chelsea are allowed to spend whatever they want whenever they want but City now must be deleted from football other than one ownership group has control over all the important clubs. The americans have arsenal, man united, liverpool and chelsea among others which is mental when you list it.

As for Carragher, he's a rat and was shite.


edit:

Not like this!
2 users liked this post: Alpacx, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth
Reply


Forum Jump: