Me, marathon watching explicit macromastia porn on max volume, my sore and battered cock openly hanging out of my cum-encrusted jeans, stinking like hell and visibly in a state of extreme exhaustion: "why can't women be seen as strong and powerful? Toxic masculinity sucks"
19 users liked this post: BananaBlast, Mediocre Lager, JoeBoy101, yetanotheraccountholyf, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, HardcoreRetro, FUME5, Orange Juice Box, Uncle, Averon, killamajig, Let's Cyber, Chumbawumbafan69, benji, Straight Edge, Taco Bell Tower, simiansmarts, BIONIC, D3RANG3D
11 users liked this post: BananaBlast, JoeBoy101, yetanotheraccountholyf, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Orange Juice Box, Potato, Averon, Alpacx, Hap Shaughnessy, simiansmarts, Taco Bell Tower
It’s a whole thread of absolute perves who think because they call themselves women it makes their obsession with big titty anime girls and thousand year old dragons wholesome versus men liking boobs which is a crime that must be called out at every moment.
The clue should probably be that in the actual real world, actual real lesbians are never like this.
You know who is like that? Weirdo incel shut ins that never stopped being teenagers.
15 users liked this post: BananaBlast, MJBarret, Cheers, yetanotheraccountholyf, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Daffy Duck, Orange Juice Box, Potato, Averon, killamajig, Alpacx, benji, Lonewulfeus, simiansmarts, Taco Bell Tower
(06-23-2026, 10:57 PM)Geoff Marvel wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/june-22-2026-cnn-upskirting-crimes-have-long-plagued-japan-now-children-are-becoming-offenders-of-upskirting.1559062/
What do you expect when they make games like Stellar Blade 2
 Stellar Blade is Korean actually (which is another country full of smelly incel nazis who women run away from)
(06-21-2026, 09:53 PM)Snoopy wrote: Except the English. Everybody hates them. Even the Amish
(06-23-2026, 10:58 PM)El Derpo wrote: It’s a whole thread of absolute perves who think because they call themselves women it makes their obsession with big titty anime girls and thousand year old dragons wholesome versus men liking boobs which is a crime that must be called out at every moment.
The clue should probably be that in the actual real world, actual real lesbians are never like this.
You know who is like that? Weirdo incel shut ins that never stopped being teenagers.
Tbh I just fundamentally do not understand what is sexually exciting about 2d and 3d doodles. But sadly I am not a woman so
(06-23-2026, 10:57 PM)Geoff Marvel wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/june-22-2026-cnn-upskirting-crimes-have-long-plagued-japan-now-children-are-becoming-offenders-of-upskirting.1559062/ In an awful thread topic like this, the loudest voices are the most suspect. Any normal person knows how horrible this is and doesn't need to virtue signal over it.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/june-22-2026-cnn-upskirting-crimes-have-long-plagued-japan-now-children-are-becoming-offenders-of-upskirting.1559062/#post-156893596
Mauricio_Magus wrote:This is fucking horrifying. I don't even know what else to say. Mauricio had to keep it brief because he had some googling to do.
13 users liked this post: BananaBlast, Shecky Fragbaum, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Averon, Alpacx, Hap Shaughnessy, Taco Bell Tower, DavidCroquet, Jansen, benji, BIONIC, Lonewulfeus, simiansmarts
(06-23-2026, 11:17 PM)Let's Cyber wrote: (06-23-2026, 10:57 PM)Geoff Marvel wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/june-22-2026-cnn-upskirting-crimes-have-long-plagued-japan-now-children-are-becoming-offenders-of-upskirting.1559062/ In an awful thread topic like this, the loudest voices are the most suspect. Any normal person knows how horrible this is and doesn't need to virtue signal over it.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/june-22-2026-cnn-upskirting-crimes-have-long-plagued-japan-now-children-are-becoming-offenders-of-upskirting.1559062/#post-156893596
Mauricio_Magus wrote:This is fucking horrifying. I don't even know what else to say. Mauricio had to keep it brief because he had some googling to do. Leave it to the Splatoon hentai and BNWO fetish guy to sound the alarm bells
12 users liked this post: BananaBlast, MJBarret, Cheers, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Averon, Let's Cyber, killamajig, Taco Bell Tower, benji, BIONIC, DavidCroquet, Lonewulfeus
06-23-2026, 11:35 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-23-2026, 11:37 PM by simiansmarts.)
(06-23-2026, 06:07 AM)simiansmarts wrote: love machine wrote:Speaking purely from a games and design perspective, I think before we can normalise women's breasts, we have to establish that they are not "for men". Or more broadly speaking, that women's bodies as a whole are women's property. The values and desires of men hold too much weight, both as the creator and the player/viewer. They assume everything is created in order to please/satisfy/benefit themselves, and currently very little exists that counteracts that worldview. That thinking not only goes uncontested, but is constantly bolstered by representation of women in popular games and franchises. I feel like trying to normalise in this climate (at least by way of making women's breasts less taboo) would only serve to make some men feel like they have more control, and are being catered to more. We first need to change that way of thinking, which to be honest sounds like a very difficult challenge because of how ingrained this distinction of women's and men's bodies are in society.
Maybe we could at least make a start by subverting expectations and breaking those holds where men's power over women's bodies is assumed and asserted. For example, with the portrayal of gay women who would otherwise be perceived as sexy or tantilising. And not just "Oh yeah, plus she's a lesbian" in her bio, but actually shown being gay with other women; only offering themselves to women, and rejecting the male gaze. Place a toxic male character and have his assertions confounded or even humiliated. Let men know explicitly that not everything is for them, and that women have agency over their own bodies and desires.
Similarly with male chests being seen as powerful, you could subvert this by having a big bare-chested man be portrayed as gay. Again, don't just hint at it in the lore, but show him in a cutscene or win pose actually being smitten with another man - both physically and vocally. I don't mean to imply that gay characters can't be powerful; I mean in the sense of the player seeing a burly chested man as a power fantasy - something they can use to uphold their worldview. Take that away from them. Show them men who they would idiolise as being able to have anything they want, and show them choosing to have other men.
...I'm sorry, I realise my suggestion in both cases literally boils down to "more gay characters!" lol - but this wouldn't be a bad thing in general. I understand this sort of approach would incur the wrath of alpha males, mysoginists and manbabies, but I'm imagining a big studio like Capcom doing something bold like this, and the positive voices overwhelming the negative ones. They would receive positive reception from both the gay community and ally players at large who are just here to play a fun game and appreciate cool designs. This would then be a form of "correction" whereby the vocal minority is drowned out, and those outdated, harmful ideologies would get exposed. We're seeing hints of this even now, and I think more extroverted moves in that direction would help to change the consensus.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-women-criticise-sexualised-character-designs-ot3-make-her-look-more-corpulent-more-stuffed-where-the-eyes-cant-escape.275780/page-542#post-156852100 I have to go back to this post because this psychotic rant is a perfect summation of that thread's entire worldview. It's straight up "saying the quiet part out loud".
No wonder ClickyCarl is drawn to that thread, the male humiliation/emasculation kink via homosexuality is built into their damn philosophy JUST LIKE THE BNWO FETISH!
THIS SHIT HAS LAYERS TO IT! IT'S ALL CONNECTED MAN!
11 users liked this post: BananaBlast, Cheers, jooseloose, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Orange Juice Box, killamajig, D3RANG3D, Alpacx, Taco Bell Tower, DavidCroquet, BIONIC
(06-23-2026, 11:35 PM)simiansmarts wrote: (06-23-2026, 06:07 AM)simiansmarts wrote: love machine wrote:Speaking purely from a games and design perspective, I think before we can normalise women's breasts, we have to establish that they are not "for men". Or more broadly speaking, that women's bodies as a whole are women's property. The values and desires of men hold too much weight, both as the creator and the player/viewer. They assume everything is created in order to please/satisfy/benefit themselves, and currently very little exists that counteracts that worldview. That thinking not only goes uncontested, but is constantly bolstered by representation of women in popular games and franchises. I feel like trying to normalise in this climate (at least by way of making women's breasts less taboo) would only serve to make some men feel like they have more control, and are being catered to more. We first need to change that way of thinking, which to be honest sounds like a very difficult challenge because of how ingrained this distinction of women's and men's bodies are in society.
Maybe we could at least make a start by subverting expectations and breaking those holds where men's power over women's bodies is assumed and asserted. For example, with the portrayal of gay women who would otherwise be perceived as sexy or tantilising. And not just "Oh yeah, plus she's a lesbian" in her bio, but actually shown being gay with other women; only offering themselves to women, and rejecting the male gaze. Place a toxic male character and have his assertions confounded or even humiliated. Let men know explicitly that not everything is for them, and that women have agency over their own bodies and desires.
Similarly with male chests being seen as powerful, you could subvert this by having a big bare-chested man be portrayed as gay. Again, don't just hint at it in the lore, but show him in a cutscene or win pose actually being smitten with another man - both physically and vocally. I don't mean to imply that gay characters can't be powerful; I mean in the sense of the player seeing a burly chested man as a power fantasy - something they can use to uphold their worldview. Take that away from them. Show them men who they would idiolise as being able to have anything they want, and show them choosing to have other men.
...I'm sorry, I realise my suggestion in both cases literally boils down to "more gay characters!" lol - but this wouldn't be a bad thing in general. I understand this sort of approach would incur the wrath of alpha males, mysoginists and manbabies, but I'm imagining a big studio like Capcom doing something bold like this, and the positive voices overwhelming the negative ones. They would receive positive reception from both the gay community and ally players at large who are just here to play a fun game and appreciate cool designs. This would then be a form of "correction" whereby the vocal minority is drowned out, and those outdated, harmful ideologies would get exposed. We're seeing hints of this even now, and I think more extroverted moves in that direction would help to change the consensus.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-women-criticise-sexualised-character-designs-ot3-make-her-look-more-corpulent-more-stuffed-where-the-eyes-cant-escape.275780/page-542#post-156852100 I have to go back to this post because this psychotic rant is a perfect summation of that thread's entire worldview. It's straight up "saying the quiet part out loud".
No wonder ClickyCarl is drawn to that thread, the male humiliation/emasculation kink via homosexuality is built into their damn philosophy JUST LIKE THE BNWO FETISH!
THIS SHIT HAS LAYERS TO IT! IT'S ALL CONNECTED MAN!

Cum
I did not expect you all to get trolled by an AI post. Do better.
(06-23-2026, 05:48 AM)Hap Shaughnessy wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/new-photos-show-first-look-at-kennedy-center-facade-without-trump%E2%80%99s-name.1557946/#post-156854719
daninthemix wrote:JFK was worthy of this building. He was instrumental in saving the world from nuclear annihilation. The guy who got elected by claiming there was a missile gap? And got lucky that the Soviets didn't want to escalate to nuclear war like Castro? And died rather than pass civil rights?
(06-23-2026, 06:07 AM)simiansmarts wrote: love machine wrote:Speaking purely from a games and design perspective, I think before we can normalise women's breasts, we have to establish that they are not "for men". Or more broadly speaking, that women's bodies as a whole are women's property. Why do they always want to police concepts and ideas? And create "property" of mass diverse groups of individuals?
Obviously men's bodies as a whole wouldn't be men's property, since something something power plus privilege yadda yadda.
love machine wrote:Maybe we could at least make a start by subverting expectations and breaking those holds where men's power over women's bodies is assumed and asserted. For example, with the portrayal of gay women who would otherwise be perceived as sexy or tantilising. And not just "Oh yeah, plus she's a lesbian" in her bio, but actually shown being gay with other women; only offering themselves to women, and rejecting the male gaze. Place a toxic male character and have his assertions confounded or even humiliated. Let men know explicitly that not everything is for them, and that women have agency over their own bodies and desires. If only there was a giant industry devoted to showing women only having sex with women with an audience almost entirely of men.
(06-23-2026, 06:43 PM)BIONIC wrote: TheEchosOfTheCyborg, post: 156842158, member: 40323 wrote:And I wonder if we push for the normalization of women's breasts, pushing back against the taboo, we end up pushing back against objectification of women's breast, take away men's power to control what women wear, positioned etc. Islamophobia.
(06-23-2026, 03:06 PM)Daffy Duck wrote: (06-22-2026, 10:41 AM)Jansen wrote: Cirrus, post: 156808165, member: 1661 wrote:I actually think the game looks fun but, they are right in that the thread title is hostile.
On a forum as large as this any thread title that implies everyone is doing something is hostile to the people not doing it. It makes people not interested in the game feel like they don't belong and excluded, and challenging anyone who dislikes it to stay out.
It makes more sense as a question between friends to confirm plans, rather than the title to a post that will garner thousands of views. https://www.resetera.com/threads/so-we%E2%80%99re-all-playing-meccha-chameleon-right.1556695/page-7#post-156808165
This might be the single most dumbest post I’ve ever read on that site, and that’s saying something!
Benji can you please ban for dismissing concerns
06-24-2026, 12:03 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-24-2026, 12:06 AM by Jansen.)
https://www.resetera.com/threads/6-22-2026-spacex-falls-for-third-day-erases-600-billion-in-market-value.1557781/page-3#post-156858280
Man they put a hit out on this guy. People were bitching back and forth about this user a few days ago in constructive.
SilentPanda banned
Quote:User banned (1 week): Posting article contents without proper sourcing. History of improper sourcing.
17 users liked this post: BananaBlast, nachobro, Bootsthecat, JoeBoy101, StandingOvation, yetanotheraccountholyf, jooseloose, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, NekoFever, Orange Juice Box, killamajig, Alpacx, BIONIC, Hap Shaughnessy, benji, Let's Cyber, Taco Bell Tower
06-24-2026, 12:12 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-24-2026, 12:12 AM by Hap Shaughnessy.)
https://www.resetera.com/threads/if-you-could-only-choose-1-game-this-holiday-ocarina-time-remake-or-gta-6.1550800/page-29#post-156730099
Quote: User banned (3 weeks): Antagonizing another user, history of similar behavior
Vic20 wrote:Krauub wrote:You cant fool me I'm familiar with your game 😂 Guy is literally on record saying he never played the series before.
but he has to tell everyone how it's not gonna be a success or how it's not gonna live up to the hype, or how it's gonna get delayed because they haven't put it up for pre order yet (lol)
werezompire wrote:But again, this is largely moot because 1) TGA doesn't matter, 2) GTA 6's current release date is outside the window for TGA GotY consideration this year, and 3) there's a good chance that it gets delayed again anyway. If by some chance, it doesn't get delayed again, it'll be coming in hot (which usually means buggy) & reviewers won't have had time to evaluate it yet and are more likely to put their votes behind something that they've already spent a lot of time with like Pokopia or Requiem or whatever other games get rave reviews in the next few months. werezompire wrote:Nah, GTA fans getting irrationally upset at my comments gives me life. The deification of this one game is insane to see. werezompire wrote:GTA won't be on the list because it'll get delayed again. Also, people will be disappointed that it doesn't live up to the insane hype. werezompire wrote:You're right in that I don't pay close attention to their marketing strategy or bugginess on release (have never played any of their games). I still don't think they're releasing this year and if they do, it'll be because something has gone horribly wrong at Take Two. I think it'll probably be the final delay though and will come out in the first half of 2027. werezompire wrote:You're right in that I don't pay close attention to their marketing strategy or bugginess on release (have never played any of their games). I still don't think they're releasing this year and if they do, it'll be because something has gone horribly wrong at Take Two. I think it'll probably be the final delay though and will come out in the first half of 2027. But it's the GTA Fans who are obnoxious actually.
I could give a flying shit about someone not liking my favorite series but Remember calling people who like the series casual fools who actually don't realize it's ass cause they don't know any better is completely fine and arguing against that means you are insane.
11 users liked this post: BananaBlast, nachobro, MJBarret, yetanotheraccountholyf, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, BIONIC, DavidCroquet, Let's Cyber, Taco Bell Tower, killamajig, benji
https://www.resetera.com/threads/6-22-2026-spacex-falls-for-third-day-erases-600-billion-in-market-value.1557781/page-3#post-156858280
Quote: User banned (1 week): Posting article contents without proper sourcing. History of improper sourcing.
SilentPanda wrote:Dan Thunder wrote:When out of direct sunlight space is near absolute zero. Would it be feasible to build a non-geostationary one that basically hides behind Earth? Promoters claim cooling will be easier in space, because space has an ambient temperature of -270 Celsius. That sounds intuitive, but it's more complicated than it seems.
In the vacuum of space, waste heat has no material to move into. There is no atmosphere, no water. The only escape route is infrared radiation: the spacecraft must literally glow its heat away, at wavelengths so weak it's invisible to our eyes.
The numbers are brutal. Starcloud's own white paper estimates that a two-sided radiator held around 20°C would emit only about 633 watts per square meter, over 1,000 times slower than water cooling of AI chips on Earth. So, a puny 1-megawatt orbital data centre, 1,000 times smaller than the gigawatt scale of hyperscale data centres on Earth, would need about 1,600 square meters of radiator, an area roughly the size of a hockey rink.
MOD EDIT: Article source added
https://www.weforum.org/stories/2026/06/space-data-centres-cooling/
(06-24-2026, 12:03 AM)Jansen wrote: https://www.resetera.com/threads/6-22-2026-spacex-falls-for-third-day-erases-600-billion-in-market-value.1557781/page-3#post-156858280 Quote:Theoretically, what happens to Musk if this gets below say, $50? I know if Tesla falls low, he will have creditors on his ass for Twitter and all the bills and loans he has out there.
If this fails, which it likely won't because of the current government, would this destroy him?
Quote:Quote:Afaik twitter/x is part of xAI, which is part of SpaceX, not Tesla.
He borrowed against Tesla to fund the Twitter buy.
I love when they're experts about easily favtually wrong things because they saw a tweet years ago and have repeated it ever since. Elon didn't borrow against Tesla to fund it, he had the funds, he didn't have the cash. Especially because there's limitations on his ability to cash out of his Tesla stock. The richest man on the planet with tons of collateral he could just hand over to get the cash to buy an asset is an easy loan for a bank. I wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't already paid for, assuming that Elon doesn't do his own finances.
HStallion wrote:Quote:How long can a company that loses money increase its stock value?
Considering Wall Street is just total bull shit maintained and upheld by the worst people on Earth, a VERY long time. HStallion wrote:Quote:Any insight into what China is doing with their data centers in the ocean? Why do American companies want fresh water sources, but China seems to be using salt water?
Because the whole AI push just comes off like what private equity companies do to companies they purchase but applied to all of civilization. Just extracting any and all the wealth possible before leaving a smouldering ruin in their wake. HStallion wrote:Quote:I get you want to rant, and I'm anti AI too, but that has nothing to do with what I asked the other user
My post was explaining the mindset that drives the often dubious backwards and counter intuitive moves being made by US AI companies. They're not trying to build long term reliable products and companies based on sound strategies. They're gutting everything they can under the guise of AI.
Quote:Quote:you can't use salt water in evaporative cooling systems like most US data centres because it'll corrode the electronics, and it's a lot more expensive to turn saltwater potable than freshwater.
those underwater data centres in china use a different, expensive sealed design but they're state-funded so i'm not really sure how practical they'd be in the US. you'd think more so than space, though...
AI in the US is basically stated funded. If it wasn't they wouldn't be getting tax breaks and all this land for basically nothing
Quote:The cost shouldn't be a problem for these grifters tho? They're spending money that doesn't exist on products that cost more to use and buying up physical locations and components without actual money changing hands.
Wait until this guy finds out how most things he loves are financed.
Quote:Quote:How long can a company that loses money increase its stock value?
Ask every "unicorn" start-up in the 2010s
Now list how many of those were public.
Quote:Some people in here don't seem to know how stocks and value work on the whole "erased $600 billion" thing. Which is fair, you're living a better life.
Anyway, it's not real value. Stock goes up and theoretically value is added to the economy but nothing is really made. Same when it goes down. Until someone sells and another person buys.
So Elon's networth is tied up in stuff he can't sell and if he did sell a ton of would decrease in value.
Money is pretty much a mass delusion anyway. I wave a dollar bill at you and that doesn't inherently have value beyond being a piece of paper unless we both assign it value. It's a symbol.
Speaking of people who don't know what they're talking about yet acting like experts, there's a lot of people in that thread incredibly confident that humanity can just operate orbiting data centers because every possible issue has been solved and they have a link to some random document or video that proves it.
06-24-2026, 12:28 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-24-2026, 12:31 AM by benji.)
These dudes will claim everything Elon does is some failing grift and nobody drives Teslas or uses Twitter anymore but he says some shit about putting AI in orbit and they're all like  and start ignoring that space is a vacuum and the backbone of every network is on Earth while thinking the sole problem is where to put the data centers heat. Just like they believe his nonsense about battery farms.
06-24-2026, 12:49 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-24-2026, 12:50 AM by Jansen.)
(06-23-2026, 11:13 PM)Besticus Maximus wrote: (06-21-2026, 09:53 PM)Snoopy wrote: Except the English. Everybody hates them. Even the Amish
(06-23-2026, 10:58 PM)El Derpo wrote: It’s a whole thread of absolute perves who think because they call themselves women it makes their obsession with big titty anime girls and thousand year old dragons wholesome versus men liking boobs which is a crime that must be called out at every moment.
The clue should probably be that in the actual real world, actual real lesbians are never like this.
You know who is like that? Weirdo incel shut ins that never stopped being teenagers.
Tbh I just fundamentally do not understand what is sexually exciting about 2d and 3d doodles. But sadly I am not a woman so
Ask boredfrock. He's into that shit.
06-24-2026, 01:11 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-24-2026, 01:13 AM by benji.)
Absolutely love that members of the zeitgeist of the video game industry, and the simmering anti-capitalist revolution, believe you can get out of a lawsuit by firing everyone who sued you. This one weird trick to eliminate standing and liability after the fact.
fuck you jeff, the transformer films are a masterpiece that MCU slop wishes they could be.
Might as well ask if Microsoft won't have the IDF take them out for them. No plaintiff, no case.
MCU slop has never made such kino music
06-24-2026, 01:22 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-24-2026, 01:23 AM by Gameboy Nostalgia.)
(06-24-2026, 01:20 AM)simiansmarts wrote:
![[Image: 7NNqJw0T3cb62PMzXR.webp]](https://i.giphy.com/7NNqJw0T3cb62PMzXR.webp)
Can't believe one fan music video has more heart than 18 years of MCU
Main reason Kevin Feige sucks: Not letting Michael Bay do Eternals 2.
|