Yesterday, 12:28 PM
|
Kulturkampf
|
8 users liked this post: DavidCroquet, BIONIC, benji, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Alpacx, who is ted danson?, Nintex, simiansmarts
Yesterday, 12:58 PM
5 users liked this post: benji, HaughtyFrank, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, who is ted danson?, D3RANG3D
Owen's "basic point" is stupid. Everywhere on Earth had already been claimed well before then so Zionism in "practice" meant at the expense of someone's claim. And people like Owen recognize dominion over lands not even settled, for example the Americas were mostly empty and settled areas were contested between many peoples, but people like Owen still make any colonialism in it verboten on behalf of a collective imagined people who didn't possess the land.
And this is beside that the Ottoman's allowed Jewish immigration because nobody else wanted to live there. If the recognized sovereigns (the Ottoman's and then the British) claims and permissions are to be ignored then by what standard do the Palestinians have any claim to any land? The Palestinian claim is based on the same thing as Israel's, the UN's partition. The whole thing could have just been Jordan. 3 users liked this post: saltygeneraltso, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, HaughtyFrank
Yesterday, 07:43 PM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 07:45 PM by HaughtyFrank.)
(Yesterday, 07:12 PM)benji wrote: Owen's "basic point" is stupid. Everywhere on Earth had already been claimed well before then so Zionism in "practice" meant at the expense of someone's claim. And people like Owen recognize dominion over lands not even settled, for example the Americas were mostly empty and settled areas were contested between many peoples, but people like Owen still make any colonialism in it verboten on behalf of a collective imagined people who didn't possess the land. I'd really like to hear an example from him of what exact ethnic or religious group is allowed their own homeland and how that doesn't come at the expanse of other people. "I support ethnostates but I'd never ever support an ethnostate that enforces being an ethnostate" makes no sense. And all of that doesn't even address how it's pretty arguable whether Israel even qualifies as ethnostate. 3 users liked this post: saltygeneraltso, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, killamajig
Yesterday, 09:24 PM
(Yesterday, 07:43 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote: I'd really like to hear an example from him of what exact ethnic or religious group is allowed their own homeland and how that doesn't come at the expanse of other people.These people have a sense that knows when a people "belong" where they are that's basically just based around vibes and if it feels like it to them. The idea of "land back" is fundamentally nonsense because it supposes that any people somehow came into legitimate ownership of the land previously based on no evidence. Even the "pristine" claims of the Americas are based on ignorance, for all we know the tribes in America came across the land bridge and slaughtered everyone who was here. Humans genocided the Neanderthals everywhere. They need this kind of logic because they can't construct another method in which colonialism or settler colonialism or even just dispossession is illegitimate since that threatens the underlying premises of a bunch of their other beliefs. I think it's fine to call Israel an ethnostate, it legally prioritizes Jewish people. This is largely benign historically for ethnostates and also currently in the world. None of these people object to China even though it does the same thing with the Han supermajority. And China doesn't allow the same level of rights to the minorities or even the majority citizens as Israel does. There are all kinds of supposed non-ethnostates in the world that are ethnostates in practice, especially in Africa, but nobody gives a shit. Israel is somehow beyond the pale despite being better and more democratic than those. It's really just that they don't think "those people" can be any better whereas Israel is Western enough that it's fair game to criticize. 3 users liked this post: saltygeneraltso, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, HaughtyFrank
Yesterday, 10:21 PM
4 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, HaughtyFrank, TylenolJones, Nintex
Yesterday, 10:34 PM
7 users liked this post: BIONIC, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, Potato, HaughtyFrank, simiansmarts, Nintex, benji
Yesterday, 11:22 PM
8 users liked this post: BIONIC, NekoFever, saltygeneraltso, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, nachobro, HaughtyFrank, simiansmarts, benji
Today, 12:13 AM
Quote:The German Greens have officially distanced themselves from the Green Party of England and Wales over its "Zionism is Racism" resolution. translated: 1 user liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth
Today, 02:47 AM
5 users liked this post: BIONIC, Nintex, Alpacx, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, HaughtyFrank
2 users liked this post: HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth, HaughtyFrank
Today, 03:08 AM
"This model has worked for centuries bringing in huge advances in standards of living and human freedom across all relevant indicators, but only now, when I am alive and don't want to have to work hard for a living, is it failing!"
3 users liked this post: killamajig, DavidCroquet, HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth
There is something tothat in left policy. They have a Trump zero-sum view to all transactions and trade so their economic policy eschews any type of growth for redistribution.
Que en: Quote:Men shouldn't be in women's and girls' changing rooms, period. There is no test in existence to determine whether a man is or is not a threat to women before he's committed an assault. Innumerable men who claim to be women have sexually assaulted women. A simple Google search will give you the names and histories. 1 user liked this post: simiansmarts
(Today, 04:54 AM)Alpacx wrote: There is something tothat in left policy. They have a Trump zero-sum view to all transactions and trade so their economic policy eschews any type of growth for redistribution. re: "He defied @PlanetFitness policy by entering a woman’s change room as a man. Thee are NOT a trans woman nor biological woman, and does not identify as either. So he was illegal in there point blank" ok so what officially qualifies you as officially having identified as a woman? do you just have to say it out loud once, think it once? what if you do so in an obviously mocking or disingenuous way, who are we to judge another's intent based on our interpretations of their emotional state? maybe "sounding disingenuous" is just how they communicate due to autism and lacking proper social cues, how bigoted to assume someone "doesn't really mean it" 1 user liked this post: Alpacx
10 hours ago
(This post was last modified: 10 hours ago by Besticus Maximus.)
(Yesterday, 09:24 PM)benji wrote:(Yesterday, 07:43 PM)HaughtyFrank wrote: I'd really like to hear an example from him of what exact ethnic or religious group is allowed their own homeland and how that doesn't come at the expanse of other people.These people have a sense that knows when a people "belong" where they are that's basically just based around vibes and if it feels like it to them. The idea of "land back" is fundamentally nonsense because it supposes that any people somehow came into legitimate ownership of the land previously based on no evidence. Even the "pristine" claims of the Americas are based on ignorance, for all we know the tribes in America came across the land bridge and slaughtered everyone who was here. Humans genocided the Neanderthals everywhere. They need this kind of logic because they can't construct another method in which colonialism or settler colonialism or even just dispossession is illegitimate since that threatens the underlying premises of a bunch of their other beliefs. this chud doesn't even know that neanderthals only lived from europe to central asiaYou're thinking of the lillim, who jesus put here to test our loins 1 user liked this post: D3RANG3D
4 hours ago
2 hours ago
2 hours ago
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
8 users liked this post:

this chud doesn't even know that neanderthals only lived from europe to central asia